I've just finished reading "the big splat" by Dana Macenzie. In it she says,
that Theia's impact site is impossible to determine given that the Earth
would have contained a magma ocean straight afterwards. Ok, fair enough, but
I think it was the Rev Usher who first suggested that the the Moon was
thrown out of the Pacifitc Ocean. Well, why could the site of Theia's impact
have been the Pacific? It would explain the absence of continents there
quite neatly by removing much of the lighter material that would elsewhere
form continents. Also the East Pacific ridge could be a relic of the fierce
convection that would have existed. Yes I know that the other oceans have
constructive marging too, but only the Pacific's is ancient. The other
oceans open and close periodically.
Alan
> I've just finished reading "the big splat" by Dana Macenzie. In it she says,
> that Theia's impact site is impossible to determine given that the Earth
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> constructive marging too, but only the Pacific's is ancient. The other
> oceans open and close periodically.
Alan, fire-up your browser and goto google. Typ in "Alfred Wegener" and
hit enter. It will broaden your world!!
Another link which you might find usefull:
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/geology/tectonics.html
Now try and start to find the "Pacific Ocean"-area approx 4.5 billion
years ago.
Richard - 19 Apr 2005 14:26 GMT
> Now try and start to find the "Pacific Ocean"-area approx 4.5 billion
> years ago.
aww .. d*mn .. should've read the other posting previously. You already
know that stuff. However, regarding the "Panthalassa" remark, I don't
agree with you. Approx 750mln years ago the area that is occupied by the
presently Pacific Ocean was then occupied by a landmass.