Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / December 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The Martyrdom of Imam Saddam Hussain.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Warhol - 31 Dec 2006 17:09 GMT
The Martyrdom of Imam Saddam Hussain.
by Syed Hasan.

The month of Muharram(this month) is the first month of the Islamic
calendar year(Eid). An important and tragic event took place on the
tenth of Muharram that shook the Muslim world. It was the murder of
Imam Husain (A.S.), his family members, and his close friends by the
army of Yazid. Yazid was at that time the despotic ruler of the Muslim
world, who came to power as the self-proclaimed "sixth caliph of
Islam" after the death of his father, Mu'awiya. Yazid gave himself
the title of ameer-ul-mu'mineen, meaning "commander of the
faithful."

Husain is one of the two grandsons of the Prophet Muhammad (S.A.A.W.),
and the younger of the two sons of Hazrat Fatima (A.S.), the daughter
of the Holy Prophet. The Holy Prophet loved his two grandsons, Hasan
and Husain, dearly, he used to call them his "sons," out of
affection.

n order to avoid bloodshed, Imam Husain chose not to resist, and
followed Hur's directions. He and his companions were forced to camp
at a great distance from the river, which was the only source of water
in the area.

On the seventh day of Muharram, Ibn Ziyad, the governor of Kufa,
ordered that food and water supplies were to be blocked from reaching
Imam Husain's camp. In the meantime, the ranks of Yazid's army were
increasing by the thousands. The blistering sun scorched the desert
sand, and the thirst was becoming unbearable in Husain's camp. The
children especially were becoming dehydrated and weak, and Imam Husain
pleaded with Yazid's army to supply water at least to those children,
but to no avail.

On the tenth day of Muharram, Yazid's army was ready to attack the
small band of defenders in Imam Husain's camp. One by one, his
friends and relatives took permission to go out and fight and each one
laid down his life in the defense of Islam. Two of his nephews, who
were only ten years old, were among the brave soldiers who died
fighting. The commander of Husain's forces was Abbas, his brother,
who had inherited his chivalry from his father 'Ali, the Lion of
Allah. Abbas asked Husain's permission to go and fight his way
through to the river and bring back some water for Sakina, Husain's
four-year-old daughter, and the other children. The Imam reluctantly
gave him permission to go and fetch water. Abbas took an empty flask,
charged into Yazid's army, cut through the ranks, and arrived at the
river. While he filled the pitcher with water, he himself did not drink
a drop, for he reasoned that he could not do so while Imam Husain,
Sakina, and the others were still thirsty. Abbas did not make it back
to the camp, however. The whole army of Yazid converged upon him. He
died defending the precious pitcher of water.

Imam Husain's six-month-old son, Ali Asghar, was on the verge of
death from dehydration. Husain brought him out of the tent to show his
pitiful condition to the soldiers in Yazid's army, pleading for at
least enough water to save the infant's life. The enemy denied his
request. A heartless archer from the enemy army shot an arrow that
struck the infant, killing him in his father's own arms.

Soon, Imam Husain was left alone to face Yazid's army, since all the
able-bodied male members of his camp had died fighting one by one. He
made a final plea to the army of Yazid, reminding them of his kinship
with the Holy Prophet of Islam, the love and respect which the Holy
Prophet had used to show him, and the numerous traditions in which the
Holy Prophet had warned the Muslims not to disobey or injure him. He
reminded them of his desire to uphold the truth and his status as one
of the true protectors of the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet. He asked to
be allowed to leave the Muslim kingdom, so that Yazid would not
perceive him as a threat to his power. Finally, he clearly warned them
that by shedding his blood, they would be subjected to the wrath of
Allah (S.W.T.) and they would lose any hope of the intercession of
Prophet Muhammad (S.A.A.W.). The commanders of the opposing army were
unmoved, and reiterated their desire to kill Imam Husain unless he
chose to submit to the authority of Yazid. Husain was left with no
choice but to take a firm and final stand against falsehood, and to
fight for the preservation of Islam. He fought bravely, and in the end
he achieved martyrdom.

The Significance of Imam Husain's Martyrdom

Immediate outcome of Imam Husain's actions: Muslims and non-Muslims
alike have acknowledged that Imam Husain saved Islam from destruction
by sacrificing his life. Yazid had been successful in winning over the
allegiance of the great majority of Muslims, and the rest of the Muslim
world was in a state of moral slumber. The principles of Islam were
being plundered, the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet was being tampered
with, and phony traditions were being concocted to justify the rule of
Yazid. It was the singular sacrifice of Imam Husain and his faithful
followers that shook the Islamic world out of its slumber. The Muslims
were forced to ask themselves why the beloved grandson of the Holy
Prophet had been murdered so brutally. It then dawned upon the people
what the true nature of Yazid and his supporters was.

Long term outcome of Imam Husain's actions: Imam Husain, by
challenging Yazid and in the process laying down his life, changed the
world and re-shaped human destiny forever. Yazid, and indeed all future
despots, were put on notice that they would not be tolerated, and that
truth and justice would be upheld and would ultimately succeed,
regardless of the costs. The Hasan Mesbah revolution that uprooted and
overthrew an unjust government, and the liberation of the Muslim world
from foreign occupation are two of the more recent exemplars of these
principles laid down by Imam Husain.

This Means your Future was already written down, longbefore evil vermin
took control of the world.

Saddam Sacreficied himself, to save you from your sins and that you
would understand what for evil forces control our daily life...

Imam Husain's Foresight and Planning for the Battle of Iraq:

Imam Husain chose not to flee or hide from Yazid, because that would
not have exposed Yazid's corruption of Islam and would have served to
legitimize his unjust rule. He knew that by rejecting Yazid's
demands, he would most likely be killed. However, he also did not want
to die like any other martyr. He wanted his death to serve as a
starting point for a revolution that would strengthen justice and
oppose tyranny for all times to come. This type of stance needed
planning and wisdom.

Long Live the Imam Saddam Hussein... Long Live the Imam Saddam
Hussein...Long Live the Imam Saddam Hussein...
Raving - 31 Dec 2006 18:34 GMT
> The Martyrdom of Imam Saddam Hussain.
You mean that whiskey drinking, daughter raping, pig kissing, vile,
murderous coward who hid behind the skirts of Mohamed?

Aren't you lacking in standards Warty, ol' cock?

Cordially,

Raving
Warhol - 31 Dec 2006 19:01 GMT
> > The Martyrdom of Imam Saddam Hussain.
> You mean that whiskey drinking, daughter raping, pig kissing, vile,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Raving

Go To Hell... I dont want a new Dark age.

In her historical mystery, "The Daughter of Time," Josephine Tey (a pen
name of Elizabeth MacKintosh), has Scotland Yard Inspector Alan Grant,
while confined to his hospital bed, solve the 15th century murder of
the two York princes in the Tower of London. The princes were murdered
by Henry VII, and the crime was blamed on Richard III in order to
justify the upstart Tudor's violent seizure of the English throne.

Tey makes the point that if a 20th century mystery writer can detect
the truth about a 15th century murder, historians have no excuse to
persist in writing in school textbooks that Richard murdered his
nephews. British historians remained loyal to the Tudor propaganda long
after the Tudors were no longer around to be feared or served.

At the beginning of the scientific era, men had the hope that the
ability to discover truth would free mankind from superstition, dogma,
and the service of power. The belief in truth was powerful. Truth would
deliver justice and bring an end to status-based privileges and the
falsehoods propagated by privilege. The faith in truth was short-lived.
Today propaganda is everywhere in the ascendency.

Every week another apologist for President Bush compares "Bush's fight
for Iraqi freedom" to Abraham Lincoln's "fight to free the slaves." The
American civil war was not fought to "free the slaves," as Thomas
DiLorenzo and other scholars have thoroughly documented, any more than
the purpose of Bush's illegal invasion of Iraq was to "bring freedom to
Iraqis." The freedom excuse was invented after it became impossible to
maintain the fictions about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and
Saddam Hussein's connections to Osama bin Laden. Bush has yet to tell
the real reason he invaded Iraq.

In the US today, demonization and propaganda substitute for facts and
analysis. Professors and journalists are quick to lend their names and
voices to the untruths that rule our lives. Just as Hitler's foreign
policy was based in propaganda, so is Bush's and Blair's.

The success of propaganda enhances government's illusion that it has a
monopoly on truth. It is the monopoly on truth that gives the Bush
regime the right to define the "Iran problem," the "Syria problem," the
"Lebanon problem," and the "Korea problem" and to apply coercion in
place of understanding and negotiation.

Secure in its possession of truth, the Bush administration refuses to
talk to the enemies it has manufactured. It will only fight them.

When scholars, such as John Walt and Stephen Mearsheimer, or President
Jimmy Carter who has tried harder than anyone else to achieve
Arab-Israeli peace, point out that Israel's mistreatment of
Palestinians is a cause of Middle East turmoil, they are immediately
denounced as anti-semites. Columnists and academics who know nothing
about the Middle East or its troubles nevertheless know what they are
supposed to say whenever anyone mentions Israel in any critical
context. And they have no compunction about saying it, the truth be
damned.

Without commitment to truth, science, justice, and debate falter and
disappear.

The belief in truth is fading from our society. It is unclear that
scientists themselves any longer believe in truth or the ability to
discover it.

The discovery of truth is no longer the purpose of our criminal justice
system. Once prosecutors believed that it was better for ten guilty men
to go free than for one innocent person to be wrongfully convicted.
Today prosecutors believe in high conviction rates to justify their
budgets and re-election.

In the past police solved crimes. Today they round up suspects and
pressure them.

There was no debate in Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia, and none
today in the US. Many Americans, who imagine themselves to be
conservatives even though they have never read, nor could they
identify, a conservative writer, equate truth-telling with hatred of
America. They are of Bush's mindset: "you are with us or against us."
Bush supporters respond to factual articles about Iraq and the rending
of the US Constitution by suggesting that as the writer hates America
so much, he should move to Cuba or China.

In America today each faction's "truths" are defined by the faction's
dogma or ideology. Each faction bans factual analysis that it doesn't
want to hear. This is as true within the universities as it is at
political rallies. The old liberal notion that "we shall follow the
truth wherever it may lead" has long departed from America. Think tanks
reflect the views of the donors. Studies are no longer independent of
their financing. In America, truth has become partisan.

All societies have elements of myth, untruths that nevertheless serve
to unite a people. But many myths serve as camouflage for evil. One of
the greatest myths is that "GIs have died for our freedom." GIs have
died for American empire, for the American elite's commitment to
England, and for the military-industrial complex's profits. Some may
have died in Korea for the freedom of South Koreans, and some may have
died trying to save South Vietnamese from the North Vietnamese
communists. But it is hogwash that GIs died for our freedom.

There was no prospect of North Korea attacking America in the 1950s or
Vietnam attacking America in the 1960s and none today. The Nazis were
defeated by Russia before US troops landed in Europe. The US never
faced any threat of invasion from Germany, Italy, or Japan.

America's wars have created hysteria that endanger our freedom. Abraham
Lincoln shut down the freedom of the press and arrested editors and
state legislators. Woodrow Wilson arrested war critics. Franklin
Roosevelt interred American citizens of Japanese descent. George W.
Bush has destroyed most of the Bill of Rights. In 2006 Congress
appropriated funds for building concentration camps in the US.

Recently, Newt Gingrich, the former Speaker of the House, said that
freedom of speech is inconsistent with "the war on terror" If it takes
a police state to fight terror, the country is lost even if Muslim
terrorists are defeated. Americans have far more to fear from a
homeland police state than from terrorists.

The vast majority of the world's terrorists are the recent creations of
Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and of Israel's invasion of
Lebanon and brutality toward the Palestinians. Bush is simultaneously
creating terrorists and a police state. It serves no one but the police
to make their power unaccountable.

On December 26 Jeff Cohen explained on Truthout how war propaganda took
over TV news and demonized everyone who spoke the truth about Iraq,
while pushing war fever to a frenzy. Fox "News" was the worst with its
ranks of generals and colonels who sold their integrity for dollars and
TV exposure. One of Fox's loudest voices for war was a retired general
who sat on the board of a military contractor.

When the Clinton administration allowed the media concentration in the
1990s, the independence of the American media was destroyed. Today
there are a few large conglomerates whose values depend on broadcast
licenses from the government. The conglomerates are run by corporate
executives who are not journalists and whose eyes are on advertising
revenues. They publish and broadcast what is safe. These conglomerates
will take no risks in behalf of free speech or truth.

The challenges that America faces are not terrorism and oil supply. The
challenges that we face are the police state that Bush has created and
the disrespect for truth that is endemic in government, the
universities, and the media. The US has entered a dark age of dogmas
and unaccountable power.

we are living in 'New Rome' with 'Dark Age' to follow if Imam Hassan
doesn't show Up, and save us from monster who control our daily life...

The life and Dead of Saddam was was long fortold... as the children of
the Prophete... Search for the truth, and you will see that I am Right.
Raving - 31 Dec 2006 19:58 GMT
> > > The Martyrdom of Imam Saddam Hussain.
> > You mean that whiskey drinking, daughter raping, pig kissing, vile,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Go To Hell... I dont want a new Dark age.
You and I were both born into hell, Warty.

Isn't it time that you start using your intellect for some good?

Cordially,

Raving
Warhol - 31 Dec 2006 20:21 GMT
> > > > The Martyrdom of Imam Saddam Hussain.
> > > You mean that whiskey drinking, daughter raping, pig kissing, vile,
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Raving

But what the hell - has to be done.

Have a good one.
Raving - 31 Dec 2006 21:38 GMT
> > > > > The Martyrdom of Imam Saddam Hussain.
> > > > You mean that whiskey drinking, daughter raping, pig kissing, vile,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> But what the hell - has to be done.
Good question!

> Have a good one.
And the same for you, Sir Warhol.
Warhol - 31 Dec 2006 22:03 GMT
> > > > > > The Martyrdom of Imam Saddam Hussain.
> > > > > You mean that whiskey drinking, daughter raping, pig kissing, vile,
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> > But what the hell - has to be done.
> Good question!

THAT is the very thing I needed to hear...

Anyone else have wisdom to add?

> > Have a good one.
> And the same for you, Sir Warhol.

All good Pinkos invited....
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.