"In the name of My Gran'Da'dy, Me, and the Holy G-G-Ghost"
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Warhol - 23 Dec 2006 07:42 GMT Comet Data Proves (once again) "science" is often Shabby
Dec 14, 2006 AD
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Detailed observations from the first comet samples returned to Earth are debunking some of science's long-held beliefs on how the icy, celestial bodies form/
Scientists expected the minute grains retrieved from a comet Wild 2 to be made up mostly of interstellar dust - tiny particles that flow through the solar system thought to be from ancient stars that exploded and died.
Instead, they found an unusual mix of primordial material as if the solar system had turned itself inside out. Hot particles from the inner solar system migrated out to the cold, outer fringes beyond Pluto where they intermingled and congealed to form a comet.
"People imagine that comets form in total isolation, which is definitely not true," said Don Brownlee, a University of Washington astronomer who is the principal scientist for the $212 million Stardust mission.
Brownlee estimated that up to 10 percent of materials in comets may come from the inner solar system.
A series of papers detailing the first scientific results from the Stardust mission were to be published Friday in the journal Science and presented at an American Geophysical Union meeting Thursday.
A capsule carrying thousands of minuscule samples from comet Wild 2 returned to Earth last January after looping around the sun to capture the interstellar and comet debris and swooping past Wild 2 to scoop up dust.
Scientists had dubbed Wild 2 a frozen time capsule because it contained material preserved from the aftermath of the solar system's birth more than 4.5 billion years ago.
How material from the inner solar system could have ended up in comets is still a mystery.
Brownlee said the solar system-forming process was probably chaotic and unstable, allowing high-temperature particles to loft billions of miles out to the edge of the solar system.
Many of the grains contained high-temperature minerals that likely formed in the hottest part of the solar nebula. At least one grain was made of a rare mineral seen in some meteorites, which are among the oldest samples in the solar system.
An analysis also found Wild 2 appeared to differ from comet Tempel 1, which was studied in NASA's Deep Impact mission. Last July, the space agency crashed a probe into Tempel 1 and studied the dust and ice spewing from its belly. It did not retrieve any samples from the surface.
In an accompanying editorial, Michael A'Hearn of the University of Maryland, who is also the Deep Impact chief scientist, said the Stardust results have gotten scientists thinking about their original views. "Stardust has certainly brought us plenty of food for thought," A'Hearn wrote.
-- Call it a smart-atteck...
...What we need is a comet that would hit right on top of a huge Bleeding Heart Coffee boys convention with Jane Fonda and barbara Streisand attending.
The initial impact would not be the problem, but when the bits of material including the body of Jane and Barbara are pushed up into the atmosphere with the huge dust cloud, the sun will be blocked out for years and most vegetation will die.
If a cometH did hit the earth ...
Ground zero for the rest of civilization to crack. It will be like dropping a rock in a pond and watching the ripples emanate outward from it.
PS did you know that my Gran'da'dy caught Tarzan, in one of Gran'da'dy's adventures?????? Right you dont believe... as always... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Tarzan+%22Ali+ben+Ahmed%22&btnG=Google+Search
Warhol Von Saali... Times.com Man of the Year.
Warhol - 23 Dec 2006 16:57 GMT The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame
global warming: "poppycock" http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/18/wsun18.xml&sShee t=/news/2004/07/18/ixnewstop.html
To think that the Sun might have a relationship to global warming ? Nobody's going to give you money to fund your research grant based on that and it's not going to negatively affect the American economy, so it's a risky scientific step.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Global warming has finally been explained: the Earth is getting hotter because the Sun is burning more brightly than at any time during the past 1,000 years, according to new research.
A study by Swiss and German scientists suggests that increasing radiation from the sun is responsible for recent global climate changes.
Dr Sami Solanki, the director of the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Gottingen, Germany, who led the research, said: "The Sun has been at its strongest over the past 60 years and may now be affecting global temperatures.
The Sun is in a changed state. It is brighter than it was a few hundred years ago and this brightening started relatively recently - in the last 100 to 150 years."
Dr Solanki said that the brighter Sun and higher levels of "greenhouse gases", such as carbon dioxide, both contributed to the change in the Earth's temperature but it was impossible to say which had the greater impact.
Average global temperatures have increased by about 0.2 deg Celsius over the past 20 years and are widely believed to be responsible for new extremes in weather patterns. After pressure from environmentalists, politicians agreed the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, promising to limit greenhouse gas emissions between 2008 and 2012. Britain ratified the protocol in 2002 and said it would cut emissions by 12.5 per cent from 1990 levels.
Globally, 1997, 1998 and 2002 were the hottest years since worldwide weather records were first collated in 1860.
Most scientists agree that greenhouse gases from fossil fuels have contributed to the warming of the planet in the past few decades but have questioned whether a brighter Sun is also responsible for rising temperatures.
To determine the Sun's role in global warming, Dr Solanki's research team measured magnetic zones on the Sun's surface known as sunspots, which are believed to intensify the Sun's energy output.
The team studied sunspot data going back several hundred years. They found that a dearth of sunspots signalled a cold period - which could last up to 50 years - but that over the past century their numbers had increased as the Earth's climate grew steadily warmer. The scientists also compared data from ice samples collected during an expedition to Greenland in 1991. The most recent samples contained the lowest recorded levels of beryllium 10 for more than 1,000 years. Beryllium 10 is a particle created by cosmic rays that decreases in the Earth's atmosphere as the magnetic energy from the Sun increases. Scientists can currently trace beryllium 10 levels back 1,150 years.
Dr Solanki does not know what is causing the Sun to burn brighter now or how long this cycle would last.
He says that the increased solar brightness over the past 20 years has not been enough to cause the observed climate changes but believes that the impact of more intense sunshine on the ozone layer and on cloud cover could be affecting the climate more than the sunlight itself.
Dr Bill Burrows, a climatologist and a member of the Royal Meteorological Society, welcomed Dr Solanki's research. "While the established view remains that the sun cannot be responsible for all the climate changes we have seen in the past 50 years or so, this study is certainly significant," he said.
"It shows that there is enough happening on the solar front to merit further research. Perhaps we are devoting too many resources to correcting human effects on the climate without being sure that we are the major contributor."
Dr David Viner, the senior research scientist at the University of East Anglia's climatic research unit, said the research showed that the sun did have an effect on global warming.
He added, however, that the study also showed that over the past 20 years the number of sunspots had remained roughly constant, while the Earth's temperature had continued to increase.
This suggested that over the past 20 years, human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation had begun to dominate "the natural factors involved in climate change", he said.
Dr Gareth Jones, a climate researcher at the Met Office, said that Dr Solanki's findings were inconclusive because the study had not incorporated other potential climate change factors.
"The Sun's radiance may well have an impact on climate change but it needs to be looked at in conjunction with other factors such as greenhouse gases, sulphate aerosols and volcano activity," he said. The research adds weight to the views of David Bellamy, the conservationist. "Global warming - at least the modern nightmare version - is a myth," he said. "I am sure of it and so are a growing number of scientists. But what is really worrying is that the world's politicians and policy-makers are not.
"Instead, they have an unshakeable faith in what has, unfortunately, become one of the central credos of the environmental movement: humans burn fossil fuels, which release increased levels of carbon dioxide - the principal so-called greenhouse gas - into the atmosphere, causing the atmosphere to heat up. They say this is global warming: I say this is poppycock."
Flares on the giant fireball 333,000 times Earth's mass... CometH of King Ahmed Raisuli is near http://news.com.com/2300-1_3-6143726-1.html
Awesome pictures http://news.com.com/2300-1_3-6143726-6.html?tag=ne.gall.pg
Sun vs man?
> Comet Data Proves (once again) "science" is often Shabby > [quoted text clipped - 83 lines] > > Warhol Von Saali... Times.com Man of the Year. Twittering One - 23 Dec 2006 17:10 GMT "Greetings, Sir Warhol ~ !
Please help us answer the quiz Below ..." ~Twittering LSTOO & Folly IAG
3. Which one of these famous people never mourned a Maltese?
[ ] Oprah [ ] Elizabeth Taylor [ ] Frank Sinatra [ ] Joan Rivers [ ] Mia Farrow [ ] Liberace [ ] Paris Hilton [ ] Bing Crosby
Warhol - 23 Dec 2006 18:35 GMT > "Greetings, Sir > Warhol ~ ! [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > [ ] Paris Hilton > [ ] Bing Crosby ''a cultural Antichrist,''<<< have a fun contest
-- Daniel 8:25
And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.
Imagine being a god with no one obeying you. Pretty pathetic.
Twittering One - 23 Dec 2006 18:47 GMT 3. Which one of these famous people never mourned a Maltese?
> > [ ] Oprah > > [ ] Elizabeth Taylor [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > [ ] Paris Hilton > > [ ] Bing Crosby 'a cultural Antichrist,'' have a fun contest
"Warhol ... I kind of think that answer is incorrect; I'm pretty sure that Liberace mourned a Maltese." ~ Twittering
Twittering One - 23 Dec 2006 18:55 GMT See Elf's commentary ...
"I have a very long list of famous people owned by Maltese (and yes, they own you, not the other way around) but I only added a few, very notable people like Elizabeth Taylor, Marilyn Monroe, Liberace, Talulah Bankhead and Elvis, to the article."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dog_breeds
Or ~ * The Crown Royal Maltese * ~
Celebrities who own or have owned a Maltese ~ Elizabeth Taylor, Halle Berry, Frank Sinatra, Mia Farrow, Liberace, Lee Remmick, Heather Locklear, Tony Bennett, Wayne Newton, BB King - "Lucille"
http://crownroyalmaltese.com/aboutmaltese.html
I hope this helps.
Warhol - 23 Dec 2006 19:59 GMT > See Elf's commentary ... > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > I hope this helps. Like pulp detective Philip Marlowe searching for the Maltese Falcon, Satloff spent four years sifting through clues from 11 countries looking to solve this mystery.
I'm not worried. Odin will guide thee.......and thou.
Peace
Don Ocean - 23 Dec 2006 23:02 GMT > See Elf's commentary ... > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > http://crownroyalmaltese.com/aboutmaltese.html I didn't like that website... I got doghair all over my pointer! ;-/
> I hope this helps. Warhol - 24 Dec 2006 11:19 GMT > > See Elf's commentary ... > > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > I didn't like that website... I got doghair all over my pointer! ;-/ Hi don... Haven't you seen that old Kentuckey Pet of Mine ??? did "IT" lost its hairs too?
Happy Light days ..... und merry Christmas
TO ALL USENETTERS ... a Christmas gift
Dear UsenetPeople,
I have decided to give you a GIFT of a lifetime:
the 6 Principles of Extremely Successful People
I have learnt these Principles from a very old and very wise Maltase Monk & Professor @ my University! If you learn then apply all 6 Principles you will become a very effectual/successful human being. If you chose to do so, you will become a very rich person.
I have applied these principles from the Year One @ University ... and became a very well educated man ......then : a every wealthy man.
> > I hope this helps. honestjohn - 24 Dec 2006 18:46 GMT "Warhol" <molarh@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> I have learnt these Principles from a very old and very wise Maltase > Monk & Professor @ my University! If you learn then apply all 6 [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I have applied these principles from the Year One @ University ... and > became a very well educated man ......then : a every wealthy man. And they are:_____________......
C.H.J.
Warhol - 25 Dec 2006 08:00 GMT > "Warhol" <molarh@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > C.H.J. Well,
I see, in a clandestine manner, you ask me; “ wealthy Prince of some remote Kingdom, what is your number ? How reallllly wealthy ARE you ?"
Hmmm
Let me answer your question in this way ( I assume you are American) :
What $0.25 is to you $10, 000 is to me.
I do a lot of Business in the USA. Every time I am there I meet wonderful people trapped in terrible system.
Not everybody in USA has been turned into sheeple ...
there are some exception...
P.S.
without knowhow your money is taken away from you (every day) by people with the “secret”. Hmm ... people like I?
sorry
..... und merry Christmas
my Dear all
..The KNOWLEDGE made me WEALTHY … not the money. Actually, I do not think of the money as you people do. I do not think of the money as money.
how many of you graduated from an old Jesuit University?
Saul Levy - 28 Dec 2006 05:15 GMT Save the crap, WartPlug! Send me your head!
Saul Levy
>> "Warhol" <molarh@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > >how many of you graduated from an old Jesuit University? Warhol - 28 Dec 2006 08:08 GMT http://www.ummah.net/history/scholars/ibn_battuta/
Happy Now??????? That's Me.
> Save the crap, WartPlug! Send me your head! > [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > > > >how many of you graduated from an old Jesuit University? Saul Levy - 30 Dec 2006 19:21 GMT You're a delusional moron, WartPlug!
Saul Levy
>http://www.ummah.net/history/scholars/ibn_battuta/ > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> Saul Levy Don Ocean - 24 Dec 2006 23:43 GMT > Hi don... Haven't you seen that old Kentuckey Pet of Mine ??? did "IT" > lost its hairs too? > > Happy Light days ..... und > merry Christmas Your pet rat Giorgio still haunts these NG's.. And Merry Christmas to you and your family. The best of the New year to you.
Also Merry Christmas to all in these NG's and a prosperous and happy *Peaceful* New Year to you all.. Even Fat Alpert and Eddie the fink! ;-p
Warhol - 25 Dec 2006 08:18 GMT > > Hi don... Haven't you seen that old Kentuckey Pet of Mine ??? did "IT" > > lost its hairs too? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Also Merry Christmas to all in these NG's and a prosperous and happy > *Peaceful* New Year to you all.. Even Fat Alpert and Eddie the fink! ;-p ha ha ha ha ha...
I have that worthless idiot ratdung aka d'Giorgio baby on ignore, Well, he may be a bit ignorant but I will wish him and his family a merry Christmas.
Happy hanukaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Joes
The Good, the bad and the ugly
Double-A - 23 Dec 2006 17:12 GMT > The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame > [quoted text clipped - 208 lines] > > > > Warhol Von Saali... Times.com Man of the Year. And here I just read a study concluding that the Sun's increased intensity was NOT enough to be a significant part of the cause of global warming!
Who to believe?
Double-A
Warhol - 23 Dec 2006 18:47 GMT > > The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame > > [quoted text clipped - 216 lines] > > Double-A We simply cannot afford to gamble. We cannot risk inaction. The scientists who disagree are acting irresponsibly. The indications that our climate can soon change for the worse are too strong to be reasonably ignored.
It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it. Upton Sinclair
I love that quote from the film.
www.climatecrisis.net
here is another very inconvenient truth; The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals. Scientific truth is rarely mentioned. Why? Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage.
Saul Levy - 27 Dec 2006 23:42 GMT Yep, you sure are a noted expert on global warming, WartPlug!
Saul Levy
>here is another very inconvenient truth; The vested interests in the >global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, >and huge media coverage. Saul Levy - 27 Dec 2006 19:25 GMT You must believe Hoax to Hoax, DA! One of their idiot guests stated outright that the Sun wasn't the cause. This statement was NOT on a recent show...
Saul Levy
>> The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> that and it's not going to negatively affect the American economy, so >> it's a risky scientific step.
>And here I just read a study concluding that the Sun's increased >intensity was NOT enough to be a significant part of the cause of [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Double-A Saul Levy - 27 Dec 2006 19:22 GMT Really, WartPlug, I think it has more to do with your a.s, than the Sun. We have to be fair here...
Saul Levy
>The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame > [quoted text clipped - 120 lines] > >Sun vs man? Saul Levy - 27 Dec 2006 19:12 GMT Same old idiotic blah, blah, blah, WartPlug!
Saul Levy
>Comet Data Proves (once again) "science" is often Shabby > [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] >"Stardust has certainly brought us plenty of food for thought," A'Hearn >wrote.
|
|
|