Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / December 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"In the name of My Gran'Da'dy, Me, and the Holy G-G-Ghost"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Warhol - 23 Dec 2006 07:42 GMT
Comet Data Proves (once again) "science" is often Shabby

Dec 14, 2006 AD

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Detailed observations from the first comet samples
returned to Earth are debunking some of science's long-held beliefs on
how the icy, celestial bodies form/

Scientists expected the minute grains retrieved from a comet Wild 2 to
be made up mostly of interstellar dust - tiny particles that flow
through the solar system thought to be from ancient stars that exploded
and died.

Instead, they found an unusual mix of primordial material as if the
solar system had turned itself inside out. Hot particles from the inner
solar system migrated out to the cold, outer fringes beyond Pluto where
they intermingled and congealed to form a comet.

"People imagine that comets form in total isolation, which is
definitely not true," said Don Brownlee, a University of Washington
astronomer who is the principal scientist for the $212 million Stardust
mission.

Brownlee estimated that up to 10 percent of materials in comets may
come from the inner solar system.

A series of papers detailing the first scientific results from the
Stardust mission were to be published Friday in the journal Science and
presented at an American Geophysical Union meeting Thursday.

A capsule carrying thousands of minuscule samples from comet Wild 2
returned to Earth last January after looping around the sun to capture
the interstellar and comet debris and swooping past Wild 2 to scoop up
dust.

Scientists had dubbed Wild 2 a frozen time capsule because it contained
material preserved from the aftermath of the solar system's birth more
than 4.5 billion years ago.

How material from the inner solar system could have ended up in comets
is still a mystery.

Brownlee said the solar system-forming process was probably chaotic and
unstable, allowing high-temperature particles to loft billions of miles
out to the edge of the solar system.

Many of the grains contained high-temperature minerals that likely
formed in the hottest part of the solar nebula. At least one grain was
made of a rare mineral seen in some meteorites, which are among the
oldest samples in the solar system.

An analysis also found Wild 2 appeared to differ from comet Tempel 1,
which was studied in NASA's Deep Impact mission. Last July, the space
agency crashed a probe into Tempel 1 and studied the dust and ice
spewing from its belly. It did not retrieve any samples from the
surface.

In an accompanying editorial, Michael A'Hearn of the University of
Maryland, who is also the Deep Impact chief scientist, said the
Stardust results have gotten scientists thinking about their original
views.
"Stardust has certainly brought us plenty of food for thought," A'Hearn
wrote.

--
Call it a smart-atteck...

...What we need is a comet that would hit right on top of a huge
Bleeding Heart Coffee boys convention with Jane Fonda and barbara
Streisand attending.

The initial impact would not be the problem, but when the bits of
material including the body of Jane and Barbara are pushed up into the
atmosphere with the huge dust cloud, the sun will be blocked out for
years and most vegetation will die.

If a cometH did hit the earth ...

Ground zero for the rest of civilization to crack. It will be like
dropping a rock in a pond and watching the ripples emanate outward from
it.

PS did you know that my Gran'da'dy caught Tarzan, in one of
Gran'da'dy's adventures?????? Right you dont believe... as always...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Tarzan+%22Ali+ben+Ahmed%22&btnG=Google+Search

Warhol Von Saali... Times.com Man of the Year.
Warhol - 23 Dec 2006 16:57 GMT
The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame

global warming: "poppycock"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/18/wsun18.xml&sShee
t=/news/2004/07/18/ixnewstop.html


To think that the Sun might have a relationship to global warming ?
Nobody's going to give you money to fund your research grant based on
that and it's not going to negatively affect the American economy, so
it's a risky scientific step.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Global warming has finally been explained: the Earth is getting hotter
because the Sun is burning more brightly than at any time during the
past 1,000 years, according to new research.

A study by Swiss and German scientists suggests that increasing
radiation from the sun is responsible for recent global climate
changes.

Dr Sami Solanki, the director of the renowned Max Planck Institute for
Solar System Research in Gottingen, Germany, who led the research,
said: "The Sun has been at its strongest over the past 60 years and may
now be affecting global temperatures.

The Sun is in a changed state. It is brighter than it was a few hundred
years ago and this brightening started relatively recently - in the
last 100 to 150 years."

Dr Solanki said that the brighter Sun and higher levels of "greenhouse
gases", such as carbon dioxide, both contributed to the change in the
Earth's temperature but it was impossible to say which had the greater
impact.

Average global temperatures have increased by about 0.2 deg Celsius
over the past 20 years and are widely believed to be responsible for
new extremes in weather patterns. After pressure from
environmentalists, politicians agreed the Kyoto Protocol in 1997,
promising to limit greenhouse gas emissions between 2008 and 2012.
Britain ratified the protocol in 2002 and said it would cut emissions
by 12.5 per cent from 1990 levels.

Globally, 1997, 1998 and 2002 were the hottest years since worldwide
weather records were first collated in 1860.

Most scientists agree that greenhouse gases from fossil fuels have
contributed to the warming of the planet in the past few decades but
have questioned whether a brighter Sun is also responsible for rising
temperatures.

To determine the Sun's role in global warming, Dr Solanki's research
team measured magnetic zones on the Sun's surface known as sunspots,
which are believed to intensify the Sun's energy output.

The team studied sunspot data going back several hundred years. They
found that a dearth of sunspots signalled a cold period - which could
last up to 50 years - but that over the past century their numbers had
increased as the Earth's climate grew steadily warmer. The scientists
also compared data from ice samples collected during an expedition to
Greenland in 1991. The most recent samples contained the lowest
recorded levels of beryllium 10 for more than 1,000 years. Beryllium 10
is a particle created by cosmic rays that decreases in the Earth's
atmosphere as the magnetic energy from the Sun increases. Scientists
can currently trace beryllium 10 levels back 1,150 years.

Dr Solanki does not know what is causing the Sun to burn brighter now
or how long this cycle would last.

He says that the increased solar brightness over the past 20 years has
not been enough to cause the observed climate changes but believes that
the impact of more intense sunshine on the ozone layer and on cloud
cover could be affecting the climate more than the sunlight itself.

Dr Bill Burrows, a climatologist and a member of the Royal
Meteorological Society, welcomed Dr Solanki's research. "While the
established view remains that the sun cannot be responsible for all the
climate changes we have seen in the past 50 years or so, this study is
certainly significant," he said.

"It shows that there is enough happening on the solar front to merit
further research. Perhaps we are devoting too many resources to
correcting human effects on the climate without being sure that we are
the major contributor."

Dr David Viner, the senior research scientist at the University of East
Anglia's climatic research unit, said the research showed that the sun
did have an effect on global warming.

He added, however, that the study also showed that over the past 20
years the number of sunspots had remained roughly constant, while the
Earth's temperature had continued to increase.

This suggested that over the past 20 years, human activities such as
the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation had begun to dominate
"the natural factors involved in climate change", he said.

Dr Gareth Jones, a climate researcher at the Met Office, said that Dr
Solanki's findings were inconclusive because the study had not
incorporated other potential climate change factors.

"The Sun's radiance may well have an impact on climate change but it
needs to be looked at in conjunction with other factors such as
greenhouse gases, sulphate aerosols and volcano activity," he said. The
research adds weight to the views of David Bellamy, the
conservationist. "Global warming - at least the modern nightmare
version - is a myth," he said. "I am sure of it and so are a growing
number of scientists. But what is really worrying is that the world's
politicians and policy-makers are not.

"Instead, they have an unshakeable faith in what has, unfortunately,
become one of the central credos of the environmental movement: humans
burn fossil fuels, which release increased levels of carbon dioxide -
the principal so-called greenhouse gas - into the atmosphere, causing
the atmosphere to heat up. They say this is global warming: I say this
is poppycock."

Flares on the giant fireball 333,000 times Earth's mass...   CometH of
King Ahmed Raisuli is near
http://news.com.com/2300-1_3-6143726-1.html

Awesome pictures
http://news.com.com/2300-1_3-6143726-6.html?tag=ne.gall.pg

Sun vs man?

> Comet Data Proves (once again) "science" is often Shabby
>
[quoted text clipped - 83 lines]
>
> Warhol Von Saali... Times.com Man of the Year.
Twittering One - 23 Dec 2006 17:10 GMT
"Greetings, Sir
Warhol ~ !

Please help us answer the quiz
Below ..."
~Twittering LSTOO & Folly IAG

3. Which one of these famous people never mourned a Maltese?

[ ] Oprah
[ ] Elizabeth Taylor
[ ] Frank Sinatra
[ ] Joan Rivers
[ ] Mia Farrow
[ ] Liberace
[ ] Paris Hilton
[ ] Bing Crosby
Warhol - 23 Dec 2006 18:35 GMT
> "Greetings, Sir
> Warhol ~ !
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> [ ] Paris Hilton
> [ ] Bing Crosby

''a cultural Antichrist,''<<< have a fun contest

--
Daniel 8:25

And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his
hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall
destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but
he shall be broken without hand.

Imagine being a god with no one obeying you. Pretty pathetic.
Twittering One - 23 Dec 2006 18:47 GMT
3. Which one of these famous people never mourned a Maltese?

> > [ ] Oprah
> > [ ] Elizabeth Taylor
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> > [ ] Paris Hilton
> > [ ] Bing Crosby

'a cultural Antichrist,''
have a fun contest

"Warhol ...
I kind of think that answer is incorrect;
I'm pretty sure that Liberace mourned a Maltese."
~ Twittering
Twittering One - 23 Dec 2006 18:55 GMT
See Elf's commentary ...

"I have a very long list of famous people owned by Maltese (and yes,
they own you, not the other way around) but I only added a few, very
notable people like Elizabeth Taylor, Marilyn Monroe, Liberace, Talulah
Bankhead and Elvis, to the article."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dog_breeds

Or
~ * The Crown Royal Maltese * ~

Celebrities who own or have owned a Maltese ~
Elizabeth Taylor, Halle Berry, Frank Sinatra, Mia Farrow, Liberace, Lee
Remmick, Heather Locklear, Tony Bennett, Wayne Newton, BB King -
"Lucille"

http://crownroyalmaltese.com/aboutmaltese.html

I hope this helps.
Warhol - 23 Dec 2006 19:59 GMT
> See Elf's commentary ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> I hope this helps.

Like pulp detective Philip Marlowe searching for the Maltese Falcon,
Satloff spent four years sifting through clues from 11 countries
looking to solve this mystery.

I'm not worried. Odin will guide thee.......and thou.

Peace
Don Ocean - 23 Dec 2006 23:02 GMT
> See Elf's commentary ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> http://crownroyalmaltese.com/aboutmaltese.html

I didn't like that website... I got doghair all over my pointer!  ;-/

> I hope this helps.
Warhol - 24 Dec 2006 11:19 GMT
> > See Elf's commentary ...
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> I didn't like that website... I got doghair all over my pointer!  ;-/

Hi don... Haven't you seen that old Kentuckey Pet of Mine ???  did "IT"
lost its hairs too?

Happy Light days ..... und
merry Christmas

TO ALL USENETTERS ... a Christmas gift

Dear UsenetPeople,

I have decided to give you a GIFT of a lifetime:

the 6 Principles of Extremely Successful People

I have learnt these Principles from a very old and very wise Maltase
Monk & Professor @ my University! If you learn then apply all 6
Principles you will become a very effectual/successful human being. If
you chose to do so, you will become a very rich person.

I have applied these principles from the Year One @ University ... and
became a very well educated man ......then : a every wealthy man.

> > I hope this helps.
honestjohn - 24 Dec 2006 18:46 GMT
"Warhol" <molarh@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> I have learnt these Principles from a very old and very wise Maltase
> Monk & Professor @ my University! If you learn then apply all 6
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I have applied these principles from the Year One @ University ... and
> became a very well educated man ......then : a every wealthy man.

And they are:_____________......

C.H.J.
Warhol - 25 Dec 2006 08:00 GMT
> "Warhol" <molarh@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> C.H.J.

Well,

I see, in a clandestine manner, you ask me; “ wealthy Prince of some
remote Kingdom, what is your number ? How reallllly wealthy ARE you ?"

Hmmm

Let me answer your question in this way ( I assume you are American) :

What $0.25 is to you $10, 000 is to me.

I do a lot of Business in the USA. Every time I am there I meet
wonderful people trapped in terrible system.

Not everybody in USA has been turned into sheeple ...

there are some exception...

P.S.

without knowhow your money is taken away from you (every day) by people
with the “secret”. Hmm ... people like I?



sorry

..... und
merry Christmas

my Dear all

..The KNOWLEDGE made me WEALTHY … not the money. Actually, I do not
think of the money as you people do. I do not think of the money as
money.

how many of you graduated from an old Jesuit University?
Saul Levy - 28 Dec 2006 05:15 GMT
Save the crap, WartPlug!  Send me your head!

Saul Levy

>> "Warhol" <molarh@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
>how many of you graduated from an old Jesuit University?
Warhol - 28 Dec 2006 08:08 GMT
http://www.ummah.net/history/scholars/ibn_battuta/

Happy Now??????? That's Me.

> Save the crap, WartPlug!  Send me your head!
>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> >
> >how many of you graduated from an old Jesuit University?
Saul Levy - 30 Dec 2006 19:21 GMT
You're a delusional moron, WartPlug!

Saul Levy

>http://www.ummah.net/history/scholars/ibn_battuta/
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>> Saul Levy
Don Ocean - 24 Dec 2006 23:43 GMT
> Hi don... Haven't you seen that old Kentuckey Pet of Mine ???  did "IT"
> lost its hairs too?
>
> Happy Light days ..... und
> merry Christmas

Your pet rat Giorgio still haunts these NG's.. And Merry Christmas to
you and your family. The best of the New year to you.

Also Merry Christmas to all in these NG's and a prosperous and happy
*Peaceful* New Year to you all.. Even Fat Alpert and Eddie the fink!  ;-p
Warhol - 25 Dec 2006 08:18 GMT
> > Hi don... Haven't you seen that old Kentuckey Pet of Mine ???  did "IT"
> > lost its hairs too?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Also Merry Christmas to all in these NG's and a prosperous and happy
> *Peaceful* New Year to you all.. Even Fat Alpert and Eddie the fink!  ;-p

ha ha ha ha ha...

I have that worthless idiot ratdung aka d'Giorgio baby on ignore, Well,
he may be a bit ignorant but I will wish him and his family a merry
Christmas.

Happy hanukaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Joes

The Good, the bad and the ugly
Double-A - 23 Dec 2006 17:12 GMT
> The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame
>
[quoted text clipped - 208 lines]
> >
> > Warhol Von Saali... Times.com Man of the Year.

And here I just read a study concluding that the Sun's increased
intensity was NOT enough to be a significant part of the cause of
global warming!

Who to believe?

Double-A
Warhol - 23 Dec 2006 18:47 GMT
> > The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame
> >
[quoted text clipped - 216 lines]
>
> Double-A

We simply cannot afford to gamble. We cannot risk inaction. The
scientists who disagree are acting irresponsibly. The indications that
our climate can soon change for the worse are too strong to be
reasonably ignored.

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary
depends upon his not understanding it. Upton Sinclair

I love that quote from the film.

www.climatecrisis.net

here is another very inconvenient truth; The vested interests in the
global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically
influential as the biggest multinationals. Scientific truth is rarely
mentioned. Why? Because the global warming movement has now become a
multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in
funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists,
and huge media coverage.
Saul Levy - 27 Dec 2006 23:42 GMT
Yep, you sure are a noted expert on global warming, WartPlug!

Saul Levy

>here is another very inconvenient truth; The vested interests in the
>global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists,
>and huge media coverage.
Saul Levy - 27 Dec 2006 19:25 GMT
You must believe Hoax to Hoax, DA!  One of their idiot guests stated
outright that the Sun wasn't the cause.  This statement was NOT on a
recent show...

Saul Levy

>> The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> that and it's not going to negatively affect the American economy, so
>> it's a risky scientific step.

>And here I just read a study concluding that the Sun's increased
>intensity was NOT enough to be a significant part of the cause of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Double-A
Saul Levy - 27 Dec 2006 19:22 GMT
Really, WartPlug, I think it has more to do with your a.s, than the
Sun.  We have to be fair here...

Saul Levy

>The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame
>
[quoted text clipped - 120 lines]
>
>Sun vs man?
Saul Levy - 27 Dec 2006 19:12 GMT
Same old idiotic blah, blah, blah, WartPlug!

Saul Levy

>Comet Data Proves (once again) "science" is often Shabby
>
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>"Stardust has certainly brought us plenty of food for thought," A'Hearn
>wrote.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.