> Earth's closest astronomical neighbor, the Moon, is still not fully
> understood. The side facing us is covered with large round features,
> currently explained as the remnants of an early period of massive
> bombardment which later filled up with wide-ranging lakes of magma.
> Yet, it is a proven fact that such large scale lava infilling is a
> physical impossibility.
Oh yes? Proven by whom? Cites please.
> Also intriguing is the presence of
> magnetospheres, located on the exact opposite side of several round
> features. How can magnetic poles possibly be created by impacts? It
> makes as much sense as the probability of such a massive bombardment
> period in the first place -- that is, none.
And your sources for this analysis are?
> There is no sense in the current explanation for our nearest, and most
> memorable, astronomical feature -- the Man in the Moon...
Methinks you've been reading from the wrong
(i.e. crackpot) sources.