Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / July 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cosmic Evolution of Nebulae

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 28 Jul 2006 14:46 GMT
My hypothesis is there was a spacetime after the big gamma bust had died
down and the spacetime of hydrogen(mostly) and helium gas was
distributed evenly(homogenized) through out space. We see this as the
way gases work today. What caused these gases to become clumpy and form
galaxies millions of light years apart.  My answer is great space shock
waves.    Bert
Double-A - 28 Jul 2006 15:13 GMT
> My hypothesis is there was a spacetime after the big gamma bust had died
> down and the spacetime of hydrogen(mostly) and helium gas was
> distributed evenly(homogenized) through out space. We see this as the
> way gases work today. What caused these gases to become clumpy and form
> galaxies millions of light years apart.  My answer is great space shock
> waves.    Bert

How about those ripples in the neutrinos I posted about?

Double-A
Hagar - 28 Jul 2006 15:53 GMT
> My hypothesis is there was a spacetime after the big gamma bust had died
> down and the spacetime of hydrogen(mostly) and helium gas was
> distributed evenly(homogenized) through out space. We see this as the
> way gases work today. What caused these gases to become clumpy and form
> galaxies millions of light years apart.  My answer is great space shock
> waves.    Bert

Beeert, there is a more logical explanation for this phenomena.  In any
explosion, be it the Big Bang or a cherry bomb, there are outwardly
radiating forces.  However, they propagate at ever so slightly different
speeds. Any time that happens, vortexes are created. The best example I can
think of is the water spiraling down a drain in your sink.  It is caused by
the speed differential in the Earth's totation between ay two points, in the
case of the drain spiral it is only inches, but nonetheless, the
differential exists.  The only two areas on Earth where there is no speed
differential is on the true north pole and the true south pole, with the
equator having the greatest momentum; but you know all that.  Each atom has
a mass and therefore gravitational properties.  In a vortex, if you have
several atoms clumped together, their combined mass increases their
gravitational properties, thus attracting other single atoms to join the
club, so to speak. As the mass grows and its gravitational pull attracts
more and more loose atoms, its internal pressures also increase
dramatically.  Since the original universe consisted of about 75% hydrogen
and 25% helium, which respectively are the lightest and the second lightest
elements known, it took a huge amount of them to create a ball huge enough
to ignite the nuclear furnace and create a star. Since the first stars in
the universe were totally un-contaminated by other elements (they hadn't
been created yet), the hydrogen and then the helium fusion process completed
in a relative short time, measured in millions of years, before the star
went super nova and seeded the universe with all of the heavier elements.
That super nova explosion also created new vortexes, which created new
stars.  The newly created stars, however, also contained all the heavier
elements created by the original progenitor stars and thus the fusion
process was slowed down by that contamination.  Our sun is thought to be a
third generation star, with a life cycle of appr. 10 billion years. Most
second and third generation stars do not go supernova.  They are limited in
physical size, because the heavier elements contained in them require less
mass to start the fusion process, at which point stars cease growing.  The
area surrounding them has been "vacuumed" clean either by the star or by
planets accreting in orbits around the star.
That's my story and I'm sticking with it, Beeert.
Saul Levy - 29 Jul 2006 02:10 GMT
The coriolis force does not operate over such small dimensions as sink
drains, Hagar!

Saul Levy

>> My hypothesis is there was a spacetime after the big gamma bust had died
>> down and the spacetime of hydrogen(mostly) and helium gas was
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>planets accreting in orbits around the star.
>That's my story and I'm sticking with it, Beeert.
Double-A - 29 Jul 2006 02:26 GMT
> The coriolis force does not operate over such small dimensions as sink
> drains, Hagar!
>
> Saul Levy

Yet a persistent myth.  When I was a student, I tried to demonstrate
this "scientific" principle.  However, I could find no consistency in
the directions of the vortices formed.  Little did I know that this was
just the tip of the iceberg of all the bullshit I was being taught in
our fine educational system.  That is why even today, I question
everything!

Double-A
Saul Levy - 29 Jul 2006 07:33 GMT
There was no consistency because it isn't caused by a coriolis force,
DA.  The direction depends on local factors of the drain only.

Saul Levy

>> The coriolis force does not operate over such small dimensions as sink
>> drains, Hagar!
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Double-A
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 29 Jul 2006 14:34 GMT
Double-A  Good for you. Question every thing makes us think of other
possibilities. Read a chapter in a science book and try to add to
it.That makes you think. Alway think in every direction. Never become a
parrot only repeating the thoughts of others. Be your own mental boss.
Teachers should teach their students to think. It is new ideas that move
humankind into the future.   Bert
Double-A - 29 Jul 2006 17:22 GMT
> Double-A  Good for you. Question every thing makes us think of other
> possibilities. Read a chapter in a science book and try to add to
> it.That makes you think. Alway think in every direction. Never become a
> parrot only repeating the thoughts of others. Be your own mental boss.
> Teachers should teach their students to think. It is new ideas that move
> humankind into the future.   Bert

There was no formal teaching during my education of logic, valid and
invalid arguments, or how to think straight.  I had to read some books
on my own during high shcool that showed me how I was being mislead by
politicions, etc, using invalid and dishonest argument tactics in their
harangues.  All the facts they make you memorize in school are mostly
forgotten years later.  But learning the habit of logical thinking
might stay with you the rest of your life.

Well, what would you expect of a school that brought out a local water
witch to tell them where their pipes were buried!

Double-A
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 29 Jul 2006 19:10 GMT
Double-A your post shows teaches only want their students to have the
knowledge of others. (be knowledgeable) that is good up to a point.
Maybe I lived in the best of peacetimes(great depression) I was an only
child,and until my mother died she worked very hard to keep a roof over
my head. I skipped school more than I went. You can not live without
bread and money is bread. Not having a teacher to explain the thoughts
of others was good and bad for me.Like Einstein that had bad teachers I
really had none. Good because when reading a page out of a science book
I would not turn to the next page unless I could think out and make
sense out of what I just read.  No use reading if what you read is over
your head. No use reading a word without knowing its definition.       I
miss my genius late friend Joe. He like oc friend Wolton was so nice to
relate too. We argued a lot,and I miss him so very much. Bert
honestjohn - 29 Jul 2006 22:13 GMT
> > Double-A  Good for you. Question every thing makes us think of other
> > possibilities. Read a chapter in a science book and try to add to
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Double-A

Water-witching works!  I can even do it.

OHJ
Double-A - 30 Jul 2006 01:08 GMT
> > > Double-A  Good for you. Question every thing makes us think of other
> > > possibilities. Read a chapter in a science book and try to add to
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> OHJ

I just knew somebody would jump to its defense!

But I'm a skeptic because it didn't work for me.

Double-A
honestjohn - 30 Jul 2006 01:21 GMT
> > > > Double-A  Good for you. Question every thing makes us think of other
> > > > possibilities. Read a chapter in a science book and try to add to
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Double-A

Not everyone has the "touch of the Fonz".  I do.

OHJ
Double-A - 30 Jul 2006 08:33 GMT
> > > > > Double-A  Good for you. Question every thing makes us think of other
> > > > > possibilities. Read a chapter in a science book and try to add to
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> OHJ

I'm surprised that a good Christian like you would have anything to do
with a practice that had the word "witch" in it.

Don't you suspect that it might be the Devil who's tugging on the end
of that dowsing rod?

Double-A
honestjohn - 31 Jul 2006 02:17 GMT
> > > > > > Double-A  Good for you. Question every thing makes us think of other
> > > > > > possibilities. Read a chapter in a science book and try to add to
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>
> Double-A

You are correct, and that's why I don't do it anymore, including finding
things and answering questions with  a crystal swinging on the end of a gold
chain.  But never doubt that those things work in the "right" hands.

O.H.J.
Hagar - 29 Jul 2006 04:05 GMT
Sorry to disappoint you there, Saul, but it is exactly the Coriolis effect
that causes it.  Do a Google search. The cannot be any other explanation.
If you have one, please enlighten me.

> The coriolis force does not operate over such small dimensions as sink
> drains, Hagar!
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> >planets accreting in orbits around the star.
> >That's my story and I'm sticking with it, Beeert.
Saul Levy - 29 Jul 2006 07:33 GMT
Local factors of the drain only.

Saul Levy

>Sorry to disappoint you there, Saul, but it is exactly the Coriolis effect
>that causes it.  Do a Google search. The cannot be any other explanation.
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>> >planets accreting in orbits around the star.
>> >That's my story and I'm sticking with it, Beeert.
Starman - 29 Jul 2006 09:27 GMT
I remember seeing a childrens science program with my son in tv not so long
ago, where they did a experiment here i my native country Denmark
with 10 different sinks filled with water, and they also had a reporter in
Australia doing the same test to see if the vortex would go the other way
when they let out the water, the result was very clear:  it was the local
factor of the drain only since the vortex did go both ways or in some cases
straight out
no matter where they did the test

> Local factors of the drain only.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >>
> >> Saul Levy

-snip

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere.
Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 9445 spam-mails
Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails.
Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her.
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 29 Jul 2006 14:49 GMT
Starman  Letterman had a toilet flush in NYC and one in Sidney Australia
to prove the water spun in the same direction.  Bert
Double-A - 29 Jul 2006 17:29 GMT
> Starman  Letterman had a toilet flush in NYC and one in Sidney Australia
> to prove the water spun in the same direction.  Bert

Toilets are designed to force the water to swirl in one direction only.
Jets under the rim shoot out the water in the direction that it should
go.  So the water would swirl in the same direction wherever on Earth
you flushed it.

Double-A
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 29 Jul 2006 19:14 GMT
Double-A  Thank you thank you. Right you are. How did I miss that. Good
observation and thinking on your part. You are now my ideal thinker.
However not when it comes to BH  Bert
Double-A - 30 Jul 2006 00:19 GMT
> Double-A  Thank you thank you. Right you are. How did I miss that. Good
> observation and thinking on your part. You are now my ideal thinker.
> However not when it comes to BH  Bert

Ah shucks, Bert it was nothing.

Maybe I've just had my head in the toilet more than you.

(Beer guzzling went against me when I was starting out.)

Double-A
nightbat - 29 Jul 2006 05:33 GMT
nightbat wrote

> My hypothesis is there was a spacetime after the big gamma bust had died
> down and the spacetime of hydrogen(mostly) and helium gas was
> distributed evenly(homogenized) through out space. We see this as the
> way gases work today. What caused these gases to become clumpy and form
> galaxies millions of light years apart.  My answer is great space shock
> waves.    Bert    

nightbat

        Correct Officer Bert and those sub quantum shock waves are
still going on even today. The field is very conserving onto itself yet
permits non uniform impulse to take place. Quantum energy is all around
us hence the ability to send wireless transmission for great distances
via frequency directed generated impulses. The deduced field memory
pointing great initial impulse which theoretically disturbed the pure
quantum uniform energy field is the question.

         ponder on,
         the nightbat
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 29 Jul 2006 14:44 GMT
nightbat  We are told how stars formed out of gas and dust. The dust
coming from a supernova explosion creating a space shock wave to disrupt
this homogenized hydrogen helium cloud,so that it would be easier for
gravity to compress. This begs the question. How was this very dense
supernova star created when there was no dust,or shock waves??
Naturally I have an answer.  Bert
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.