 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI SpaceKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Space Forum / Astronomy / July 2006The Dandelions of Universes.
Dandelions are seeds from their mother flower. Universes come out of their parent universe. The seeds of new universes come from the parent that seeded space with black holes. Here you can see how our universe was created,and that does away with that stupid thought that universes can be created out of nothing. To think our universe is the only one is very naive thinking. I remember reading about this philosopher named Bruno and he was burned at the stake for what I just typed. I'll get some flaming too,but best to keep in mind we live in a universe that seems as being improbable. Reality is the reason our universe has the character it has is that if not there would be no one here to see it. Bert Makes for better thinking that black holes make universes continual. Universes could be "stop,and "go" but the time lapse is only 10-^43 of a second. Bert > Makes for better thinking that black holes make universes continual. > Universes could be "stop,and "go" but the time lapse is only 10-^43 of a > second. Bert http://www.npl.washington.edu/av/altvw100.html Double-A Double-A Even Einstein was looking to tie EM with his GR for over 45 years(failed). They are not two sides to the same coin.I always knew that(Am I better that Einstein?) GR does not fit with Quantum gravity. That's probably why Einstein did not like QM. oc has gravity as an in push,and I see gravity as attraction. Go figure Bert > Double-A Even Einstein was looking to tie EM with his GR for over 45 > years(failed). They are not two sides to the same coin.I always knew > that(Am I better that Einstein?) GR does not fit with Quantum gravity. > That's probably why Einstein did not like QM. oc has gravity as an in > push,and I see gravity as attraction. Go figure Bert My point was that black holes do not exist. Double-A Double-A GR predicted black holes. Black holes answer the disks of active galaxies,giving off superfast jets of charged subatomic particles. They give the answer to the quasars great energy. Best to keep in mind there is a quasar out there that sends out more energy in one second than the Sun does in three million years. See what the Hubble has found to show reality of black holes. Bert > Double-A GR predicted black holes. Black holes answer the disks of > active galaxies,giving off superfast jets of charged subatomic > particles. They give the answer to the quasars great energy. Best to > keep in mind there is a quasar out there that sends out more energy in > one second than the Sun does in three million years. See what the Hubble > has found to show reality of black holes. Bert Bert, I am confident I will be proven right, though maybe not in my lifetime. Giant stars do not collapse into pinpoint sized objects that still have the same gravity as before. Of this I am sure. Double-A Double-A Einstein did not like BH even though his GR predicted them. I know you like Hawking and his life's work is just about BH Than Schwarzchild gave them reality using GR math. I'[m afraid Double-A that there is enough strong evidence that BH are real;,and this evidence is building up in time. BH will be just as real as neutron stars. Bert The late Carl Sagan was my ideal for astronomy. Feynman my ideal in QM,and Greene my ideal in Planck lengths; ,and other dimensions. Sagan's "dandelion" and my vision of a singularity are relative. Both are blue prints of creating what will be Bert When Sagan released the dandelion seed he was showing life is part of the universe. Also that the seed floated and had no weight. It was weightless,and the universe is also weightless Bert > When Sagan released the dandelion seed he was showing life is part of > the universe. Also that the seed floated and had no weight. It was > weightless,and the universe is also weightless Bert Yeah, the estimated density of thre universe is 1 × 10-27 kg/m3, while that of air is 1.48 kg/m3, so I guess you could say the universe is virtually weightless. It would float on air! Double-A |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.