> > How many stars could an astronaut floating in deep space see? Assume
> > he's in our stellar neighborhood.
>
> None if you were a apollo astronaught. In an interview, three said they
> saw zero stars. Seriously.
That was because of glare from the Sun. When they are in darkness,
they reported seeing a fabulous sky. I'm just wondering how
(numerically) fabulous. In the very best viewing conditions from the
Earth's surface we see about 8000 stars, but that number must be
significantly greater with no air in the way.
Steve - 29 Jun 2006 14:07 GMT
Llanzlan Klazmon wrote:
>While they were on the moon the surface was sunlit.
That may be true, but according to footage and stills, the lunar sky,
at least through the lenses, was as black as coal. The aperture
settings could have been manually adjusted to lighten the background,
yet every picture/film shows a black sky. I seen footage where indeed
the aperature settings were adjusted to allow in more light, and the
background was still pretty dark.
Furthermore, there is no light diffusion in an absolute vacuum.
Daylight on the moon (having no atmosphere) appears roughly the same as
in space. It is much much darker than daylight on earth due to
diffusion (light spreading out due to an atmosphere). The technical
term for this phenomenon is Heiligenschein, and is the result of light
refraction, reflection, and diffraction by air molecules and other
things in the air (as on earth).
"Steve" <philhendrie@aol.com> wrote in news:1151467092.126586.326110
@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
>> How many stars could an astronaut floating in deep space see? Assume
>> he's in our stellar neighborhood.
>
> None if you were a apollo astronaught. In an interview, three said they
> saw zero stars. Seriously.
That just means that their eyes were not dark adapted. While they were on
the moon the surface was sunlit.
Klazmon.
Steve - 29 Jun 2006 13:51 GMT
>While they were on the moon the surface was sunlit.
That may be true, but according to footage and stills, the sky at least
through the lendses, was as black as coal. The aperture settings could
have been manually
adjusted yet every picture/film revealed a black sky.
Llanzlan Klazmon - 29 Jun 2006 23:56 GMT
"Steve" <philhendrie@aol.com> wrote in news:1151585470.183093.69780
@d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:
>>While they were on the moon the surface was sunlit.
>
> That may be true, but according to footage and stills, the sky at least
> through the lendses, was as black as coal. The aperture settings could
> have been manually
> adjusted yet every picture/film revealed a black sky.
The discussion was human vision not cameras.
Klazmon.