Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / June 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How many stars can be seen from space?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
tom.yamartino@gmail.com - 28 Jun 2006 02:42 GMT
How many stars could an astronaut floating in deep space see?  Assume
he's in our stellar neighborhood.

I guess you can figure this out if you know what fraction of visible
starlight energy is lost as it travels through the atmosphere, and then
imagine that our night sky is "brightened up" by that amount.

Any takers?
Starlord - 28 Jun 2006 04:04 GMT
if he is in deep space, he'll see far more than we on the ground could ever
see, he had no miles of air to look threw and he has to keep from looking
sunward too.

Signature

The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond

Telescope Buyers FAQ
http://home.inreach.com/starlord
Sidewalk Astronomy
www.sidewalkastronomy.info
Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net
In Garden Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/ingarden
Blast Off Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/starlords
Astro Blog
http://starlord.bloggerteam.com/

> How many stars could an astronaut floating in deep space see?  Assume
> he's in our stellar neighborhood.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Any takers?
Steve - 28 Jun 2006 04:58 GMT
> How many stars could an astronaut floating in deep space see?  Assume
> he's in our stellar neighborhood.

None if you were a apollo astronaught. In an interview, three said they
saw zero stars. Seriously.
tom.yamartino@gmail.com - 28 Jun 2006 06:01 GMT
> > How many stars could an astronaut floating in deep space see?  Assume
> > he's in our stellar neighborhood.
>
> None if you were a apollo astronaught. In an interview, three said they
> saw zero stars. Seriously.

That was because of glare from the Sun.  When they are in darkness,
they reported seeing a fabulous sky.  I'm just wondering how
(numerically) fabulous.  In the very best viewing conditions from the
Earth's surface we see about 8000 stars, but that number must be
significantly greater with no air in the way.
Steve - 29 Jun 2006 14:07 GMT
Llanzlan Klazmon wrote:
>While they were on the moon the surface was sunlit.

That may be true, but according to footage and stills, the lunar sky,
at least through the lenses, was as black as coal. The aperture
settings could have been manually adjusted to lighten the background,
yet every picture/film shows a black sky. I seen footage where indeed
the aperature settings were adjusted to allow in more light, and the
background was still pretty dark.

Furthermore, there is no light diffusion in an absolute vacuum.
Daylight on the moon (having no atmosphere) appears roughly the same as
in space. It is much much darker than daylight on earth due to
diffusion (light spreading out due to an atmosphere). The technical
term for this phenomenon is Heiligenschein, and is the result of light
refraction, reflection, and diffraction by air molecules and other
things in the air (as on earth).
Llanzlan Klazmon - 28 Jun 2006 06:17 GMT
"Steve" <philhendrie@aol.com> wrote in news:1151467092.126586.326110
@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

>> How many stars could an astronaut floating in deep space see?  Assume
>> he's in our stellar neighborhood.
>
> None if you were a apollo astronaught. In an interview, three said they
> saw zero stars. Seriously.

That just means that their eyes were not dark adapted. While they were on
the moon the surface was sunlit.

Klazmon.
Steve - 29 Jun 2006 13:51 GMT
>While they were on the moon the surface was sunlit.

That may be true, but according to footage and stills, the sky at least
through the lendses, was as black as coal. The aperture settings could
have been manually
adjusted yet every picture/film revealed a black sky.
Llanzlan Klazmon - 29 Jun 2006 23:56 GMT
"Steve" <philhendrie@aol.com> wrote in news:1151585470.183093.69780
@d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:

>>While they were on the moon the surface was sunlit.
>
> That may be true, but according to footage and stills, the sky at least
> through the lendses, was as black as coal. The aperture settings could
> have been manually
> adjusted yet every picture/film revealed a black sky.

The discussion was human vision not cameras.

Klazmon.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.