Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / January 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

progressive precession

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
wahid - 30 Jan 2006 21:17 GMT
My question started with astrology but the answer concerns astronomy. I
wanted to know the exact hour when the sun transits the degree and
minute of my birth. I didn't expect it to be the same time. I
understand the concept of precession, of the earth's axis and orbit.
What I didn't expect was to find that the return hour-and-minute is
later some years and earlier others. These are my data:
4/14/06-14:28hours
4/14/07-20:37hours
4/14/08-02:38hours
4/14/09-08:56hours
4/14/10-15:06hours
-and so on. The net precession over 4 years is about 1/2 hour. What I
don't understand is the irregular progression from year-to-year. Is it
a problem with my astrology program or a law of nature? The other
bodies also have a similar uneven progression. If it is too complicated
to answer in a newsgroup reply, how to articulate an Internet search
query would be a great help.
Greg Neill - 30 Jan 2006 21:35 GMT
> My question started with astrology but the answer concerns astronomy. I
> wanted to know the exact hour when the sun transits the degree and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> to answer in a newsgroup reply, how to articulate an Internet search
> query would be a great help.

Can you define your terms more precisely?  What exactly
do you mean by the degree and minute of your birth?
The position of the Sun (presumably in equatorial
coordinates) at that time?

The sidereal year is 365.256363 days in length.
The Julian year is 365.25 days.

After four years the difference in the two amounts
to 4*(0.006363day) = 36.6 minutes.  Perhaps this is
what is turning up in your calculations.
wahid - 31 Jan 2006 00:12 GMT
Respectfully, check dates yourself; that would tell me if I have a
problem with my program. You know the y/m/d/h/m of your natal sun. What
is the y/m/d/h/m of the sun at the same degree/minute the following
year, the next, and so on. It's not a regular progression, according to
my data.
Greg Neill - 31 Jan 2006 00:51 GMT
> Respectfully, check dates yourself; that would tell me if I have a
> problem with my program. You know the y/m/d/h/m of your natal sun. What
> is the y/m/d/h/m of the sun at the same degree/minute the following
> year, the next, and so on. It's not a regular progression, according to
> my data.

Sorry, I haven't time to lay out the calculations
(I would do them manually, not with a program).

But the difference between the sidereal year and
Julian year may be a clue to the reason for the
progression you've noticed, keeping in mind that
there will be period corrections every leap year.
Odysseus - 31 Jan 2006 09:45 GMT
> My question started with astrology but the answer concerns astronomy. I
> wanted to know the exact hour when the sun transits the degree and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> to answer in a newsgroup reply, how to articulate an Internet search
> query would be a great help.

The effect you're seeing has very little to do with precession, but
is mostly due to the mismatch between the 365-day calendar year and
the 365.2422-day tropical year--most of which gets corrected for each
leap-year. Specifically, any four calendar years (that don't include
a century-year indivisible by 400) contain a total of 1461 days,
while there are about 1460.97 days in four tropical years: the
discrepancy is therefore about three-quarters of an hour every four
years. (Most of this error is corrected for by omitting a leap-year
in three of every four centuries, which was introduced with the
Gregorian reform to the Julian calendar.)

Over the short term, however, in three of every four years the time
the Sun reaches a given longitude advances by about 6 hours, falling
back by about 18 hours in those yearly intervals that contain a
February 29th. Note that the same is true of e.g. the vernal equinox,
which by definition is unaffected by precession. (That is, while of
course its position moves WRT the stars, its ecliptic longitude is
fixed at 0°, when the Sun appears to reach the point where the
ecliptic crosses the equator from south to north.)

Signature

Odysseus

wahid - 31 Jan 2006 16:26 GMT
Then it is the calendar. Thanks. I don't care what they say about
astrology. It's the best damn watch I ever owned.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.