A "Theory of Everything" That WORKS
(Book Review):
"THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION", by Dewey B. Larson, 1984,
North Pacific Publishers, Portland, Oregon, 456 pages,
indexed, hardcover.
"THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION" contains FINAL SOLUTIONS
to most ALL astrophysical mysteries.
This book is Volume III of a revised and enlarged
edition of "THE STRUCTURE OF THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE",
1959. Volume I is "NOTHING BUT MOTION" (1979), and
Volume II is "THE BASIC PROPERTIES OF MATTER" (1988).
Most books and journal articles on the subject of
astrophysics are bristling with integrals, partial
differentials, and other FANCY MATHEMATICS. In this
book, by contrast, mathematics is conspicuous by its
absence, except for some relatively simple formulas
imbedded in the text. Larson emphasizes CONCEPTS and
declares that mathematical agreement with a theory does
NOT guarantee its conceptual validity.
Dewey B. Larson was a retired engineer with a
Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering Science from
Oregon State University. He developed the Theory
described in his books while trying to find a way to
MATHEMATICALLY CALCULATE the properties of chemical
compounds based ONLY on the elements they contain.
"THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION" describes the
astrophysical portions of Larson's CONSISTENT,
INTEGRATED, COMPREHENSIVE, GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the
Physical Universe, a kind of "grand unified field
theory" or "theory of everything" that orthodox
physicists and astro-physicists CLAIM to be looking for.
It is built on two postulates about the physical and
mathematical nature of space and time:
(1) The Physical Universe is composed ENTIRELY of
ONE component, MOTION, existing in THREE dimensions, in
DISCRETE units, and with two RECIPROCAL aspects, SPACE
and TIME.
(2) The Physical Universe conforms to the relations
of ORDINARY COMMUTATIVE mathematics, its primary
magnitudes are ABSOLUTE, and its geometry is EUCLIDEAN.
From these two postulates, Larson was able to build
a COMPLETE theoretical universe, from photons and
subatomic particles to the giant elliptical galaxies, by
combining the concept of INWARD and OUTWARD SCALAR
MOTIONS with translational, vibrational, rotational, and
rotational-vibrational motions. At each step in the
development, he was able to match parts of his
theoretical universe with corresponding parts in the
real Physical Universe, including EVEN THINGS NOT YET
DISCOVERED. For example, in his 1959 book, he first
predicted the existence of EXPLODING GALAXIES, several
years BEFORE astronomers started finding them. They are
a NECESSARY CONSEQUENCE of his comprehensive Theory.
And when quasars were discovered, he had a related
explanation ready for those also.
As a result of his theory, which he called "THE
RECIPROCAL SYSTEM", Larson TOTALLY REJECTED many of the
sacred doctrines of orthodox physicists and
astrophysicists, including black holes, neutron stars,
degenerate matter, "nuclear" physics, general
relativity, relativistic mass increases, relativistic
Doppler shifts, nuclear fusion in stars, and the big
bang, all of which he considered to be nothing more than
MATHEMATICAL FANTASIES. He was very critical of the AD
HOC assumptions, uncertainty principles, solutions in
principle, "no other way" declarations, etc., used to
maintain them.
"THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION" is divided into 31
chapters. It begins with a description of how galaxies
are built from the gravitational attraction between
globular star clusters, which are formed from
intergalactic gas and dust clouds that accumulate from
the decay products of cosmic rays coming in from the
ANTI-MATTER HALF of the physical universe. (Galaxy
formation from the MYTHICAL "big bang" is a big mystery
to orthodox astronomers.) He then goes on to describe
the life cycles of stars and how binary and multiple
star systems and solar systems result from Type I
supernova explosions of SINGLE stars.
Several chapters are devoted to quasars which,
according to Larson, are densely-packed clusters of
stars that have been ejected from the central bulges of
exploding galaxies and are actually traveling FASTER
THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT (although most of that speed is
AWAY FROM US IN TIME).
Astronomers and astrophysicists who run up against
observations that contradict their theories would find
Larson's explanations quite valuable if considered with
an OPEN MIND. For example, they used to believe that
GAMMA RAY BURSTS originated from pulsars, which exist
primarily in the plane or central bulge of our galaxy.
But the new Gamma Ray Telescope in earth orbit observed
that the bursts come from ALL DIRECTIONS UNIFORMLY and
do NOT correspond with any visible objects, (except for
a few cases of directional coincidence). Larson's
explanation is that the gamma ray bursts originate from
SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS in the ANTI-MATTER HALF of the
Physical Universe, which Larson calls the "cosmic
sector". Because the anti-matter universe exists in a
RECIPROCAL RELATION to our material universe, with the
SPEED OF LIGHT as the BOUNDARY between them, and has
THREE dimensions of TIME, and ONLY ONE dimension of
space, the bursts can pop into our material universe
ANYWHERE seemingly at random.
Larson heavily quotes or paraphrases statements
from books, journal articles, and leading physicists and
astronomers. In this book, 351 of them are
superscripted with numbers identifying entries in the
reference list at the end of the book. For example, a
quote from the book "Astronomy: The Cosmic Journey", by
William K. Hartmann, says, "Our hopes of understanding
all stars would brighten if we could explain exactly how
binary and multiple stars form.... Unfortunately we
cannot." Larson's book contains LOGICAL CONSISTENT
EXPLANATIONS of such mysteries that are WORTHY OF
SERIOUS CONSIDERATION by ALL physicists, astronomers,
and astrophysicists.
[See http://members.aol.com/rem547/bisolar.htm or
http://www.geocities.com/remspiral7/bisolar.html .]
A WEALTH of Information about the GENERAL UNIFIED
Theory of the Physical Universe developed by the late
Physicist Dewey B. Larson can be found at the web site
http://www.rsystem.org/isus/index.htm or /dbl/index.htm
MOST of the TEXT of the book "THE UNIVERSE OF
MOTION" can be found at the web site
http://www.rsystem.org/um/index.htm .
Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS
http://members.aol.com/rem460
Preserve BOTH on CD-R and PRINT-OUTS
P.S.: PASS IT ON !
"EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
"The Truth IS stranger than fiction."
"The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
"OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
"The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."
Painius - 29 Sep 2005 05:33 GMT
> A "Theory of Everything" That WORKS
Yup... we're still looking for it, too.
happy days and...
starry starry nights!

Signature
Ask the stars
along the way,
what good is Love?
and the stars will say...
On this world
so full of Hate,
a little Love
must always wait.
So a little Love
go a long . . . long way.
Indelibly yours,
Paine http://www.savethechildren.org/
http://www.painellsworth.net
Henry Haapalainen - 30 Sep 2005 00:06 GMT
Theory of everything is possible, but not with methods used today. If it is
accepted that different theories can be used to explain different phenomena,
we are in the wrong way. For example, we ought to know that a proper atomic
model must explain the interaction between an atom and gravity. But we don't
care!
Henry Haapalainen
> > A "Theory of Everything" That WORKS
>
> Yup... we're still looking for it, too.
>
> happy days and...
> starry starry nights!
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 30 Sep 2005 20:47 GMT
Henry There can never be a Grand Ultimate Theory. It might take an
infinite amount of theories to give answers to Natures great amount of
mysteries. Best to keep in mind the more theories we have now means the
more questions they make. reality is we don't have a complete theory on
any subject. Relativity is not complete QM is far from complete,EM
theory has many mysteries. String theory that's been around for 50
years is poorly under stood even by Witten. Hawking's said we will have
TOE 25 years ago at the end of the century. That century is gone. I say
man will never have TOE. Reason is Tiny is to small,and big is to
big,and humankinds spacetime is much to short. Beert
For example, - 29 Sep 2005 10:17 GMT
> A "Theory of Everything" That WORKS
>
[quoted text clipped - 152 lines]
> "OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
> "The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."
Post your proof.

Signature
http://www.log-book.org.uk
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 29 Sep 2005 10:50 GMT
Good mornin to all Gravity creates accelerating motion. Accelerating
motion and gravity are equivalent. Spin is equivalent to inertia.
Gravity and inertia are two sides to the same coin. Curved space is
related to motion. There is no way of proving absolute motion. Motion
is based on relativity. It is motion all the way down
Spacetime is created by motion I left out a lot but its still early.
Bert
Double-A - 29 Sep 2005 13:48 GMT
> Good mornin to all Gravity creates accelerating motion.
Not according to GR devotees. They contend that objects in free fall
do not accelerate. The ground rushes up at them!
Double-A
> Accelerating
> motion and gravity are equivalent. Spin is equivalent to inertia.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Spacetime is created by motion I left out a lot but its still early.
> Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 29 Sep 2005 18:34 GMT
Hi double-A Einstien only said (tongue in cheek) that if the Earth came
up to the apple it would answer a hard question. It is true the apple
does have the same force trying to pull the Earth up.(tug of war) but we
know which one has the most inertia or as you can see Double-A I could
have said the most gravity. How well inertia and gravity fit as
the same comes into my thoughts day and night. I always look for
sameness(yes) Beert
brian a m stuckless - 29 Sep 2005 22:37 GMT
> A "Theory of Everything" That WORKS
>
[quoted text clipped - 152 lines]
> "OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
> "The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."
You didn't DOT your i's ..check with Sue.!!