You May Be On File
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Warhol - 17 Sep 2005 17:59 GMT ET Abductees - You May Be On File From Bill Hamilton skywatcher22@hotmail.com From UFOCCI's weblog file By Ray W. Boeche 9-16-5
Abduction cases are rapidly becoming standard fare in UFOlogy. The abduction of an individual, or individuals, and the subsequent "medical examination" which have been related countless times are famliar to most researchers. However, we may have a new twist to add to the old story.
In 1984, a Lincoln, Nebraska woman we will call simply "Joan," mentioned that she had experienced a recurring dream since childhood. In this dream, someone appears outside her bedroom window, and attempts to coax her to come with them. This subject arose during a casual conversation, and over the next few days, I made a decision to explore this dream with Joan, if she were willing to pursue it.
Joan (whose full name is on file and available to qualified reseachers with her permission) holds a position of some authority with a state governmental agency. An extremely intelligent and engaging woman, Joan had almost no prior knowledge of the UFO subject, and, in fact, was uninterested in it. She did, however, agree to explore this rcurring dream through the use of regressive hypnosis.
On April 11, 1984, Joan was hypnotically regressed to the point in time when the dream fist occurred. This, we discovered, was October 7, 1955, when Joan was 12 years old. The hypnosis was performed by Stacey Vornbrock, a psychological social worker, and a skilled hypnotist.
The story which unforlded was for the most part very similar to that of other abductees. She was awakened in her bedroom by a figure standing outside her window, who asked her to come with him. This entity was described as about four feet in height, dressed in a hite tight-fitting suit.
This entity conducts Joan on a "craft" which is resting on the ground in a large vacant lot next to her home. After entering, she is given the well-known medical exam described by others (sampling of skin tissue, blood, hair, etc.) and is returned to her home, and subsequently her bedroom.
The entity who escorted her from the bedroom, and subsequently performed the examination, was assisted by 5 other similar beings, who were described as identical, but slightly smaller, than the "leader." The leader, who Joan had originally met, was the only one who communicated with her. However, she indicated that she was able to discern what he was telling his apparent subordinates. This is where the totally new dimension enters.
According to Joan's testimony under hypnosis, the subordinates were quite worried about being caught, that it was too obvious a location with too many people nearby, and that they shouldn't take chances and endanger themselves. The leader told them apparently quite sternly that plans had changed, they had to make up time, and that's why Joan was chosen.
The leader then indicated to Joan that they had intended to examine someone else, a man who was out driving in his automobile, but he had returned home, (apparently an unexpected turn of events to the entities) and they were unable to pick him up then. The leader then indicated to the others not to be concerned, that he had done this many times before.
He then indicated to Joan that she was, quoting now, "very far back in the files, and they hadn't intended to choose her, but the change in plans necessitated it. This being then begins the examination, Joan having been instructed to lie on a smooth, metallic table. Clamps emerge from the table, holding her ankles, wrists, and head immobile. Again, without going into great detail, the examination which follows is quite similar to that related by many others.
However, throughout this examination, the leader apparently had to reassure the others that it was quite alright for this to be going on, and made mention several times again of Joan being "back in the files." This presents a novel idea, which could conceivably tie in with Budd Hopkin's work on abductions.
Hopkins had found that (as chronicled in his book Missing Time) many of the abductees he has worked with have had multiple experiences - first as a child, and then again later as an adult. Making the great assumption that what all of these people have experienced is exactly what they have described, is it not conceivable that the individuals abducted may indeed be "on file" - genetically, by random chance, or by some deliberative process which we could not begin to fathom? This appears to add an entirely new dimension to the entire abduction question.
One other startling fact emerged at the end of the abduction experience. The following information is so coincidentally strange, that I was quite literally shocked when it came out during the session. Joan was describing being back in her room, and the leader was reassuring her that she was alright, and she wouldn't remember the event in the morning. We asked Joan to recall this conversation exactly, word for word, much as if she were watching herself and this entity carry on a conversation. Here is the transcription of that conversation.
JOAN: I want to talk.
ENTITY: About what?
J: What went on?
E: Nothing.
J: Who are you?
E: An explorer.
J: An explorer of what?
E: An explorer of all.
J: Like who?
E: Like your christopher Columbus.
J: Should I be afraid?
E: Not of us.
J: Who should I be afraid of?
E: The men in black.
J: You mean the priests?
E: No, no, the men in black.
J: What men in black?
E: You don't have to be afraid.
J: What do they look like?
E: They're your people (Joan then described a mental picture of men dressed completely in black clothing - suits, overcoats, hats, sunglasses, gloves, which she said was the way the entity communicated this description to her).
J: What do they do?
E: They scare people.
J: Like ghosts?
E: No, like bad people scare others.
J: Like J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI?
E: No.
J: What will they do?
E: They don't want people to know we explorers won't hurt them.
J: Are you going to help us?
E: No, we're just explorers, but we watch.
J: What will they do?
E: You like animals.
J: Yes.
E: What if I tell you that they killed someone's dog because he saw some explorers.
J: Joan then goes on to describe a "mental motion picture," in which she is shown a man walking in the woods with his dog, when he stumbles on a landed UFO. Later that same night, she witnesses the men in black clothing come to his home, kill his dog, and question the man about what he had seen.
She is then made aware of these men in black calling the man's work place, discrediting him, causing the loss of his job. After suffering further harassment from friends and family, Joan is shown the man back in his home, placing a gun in his mouth, and pulling the trigger.
J: What else?
E: You're afraid - I don't want to tell you any more because I don't want you to be afraid. I've only told you this much because you are a child, and curious. Just know they are bad. You are safe.
J: Can you keep me safe?
E: No, when we are gone, we can do nothing more. The men in black won't know, you are too far back in our files.
J: Who should I tell?
E: You won't remember.
J: Who will know?
E: No one - they aren't watching you, not like the man in Maine. Don't be afraid, goodbye.
As I mentioned earlier, I was shocked to hear this portion of the session. Also, the first question which Joan asked upon awakening from the hypnotic state was "Have you ever heard of these men in black?" She literally had no concept that a term such as this even existed.
I am well aware of the doubts expressed by many researchers as to the validity of abduction cases as a whole. I feel, however, that the whole abduction question is one for serious consideration, and I doubt highly that they are all the products of the imagination, or the oft-touted "birth-trauma" memories. In short, I believe a great many of these people experienced something exceedingly strange, and which took place substantially as they claim it did.
I am also aware of the highly skeptical attitude taken by many researchers toward the question of the notorious men in black, or MIB reports. I have a great interest in this aspect of UFOlogy, and for approximately the last 3 years, I have been collecting as much substantiated information as possible for a serious book-length work on this subject. I am also certain that the question of the MIB phenomenon is not one to be taken lightly.
Let me make some comments relative to this, since these two controversial topics are woven together in this instance. People in great numbers are having these experiences, both abductions, and MIB events. Of that there can be no doubt. Before criticizing this attitude, however, you must realize that we still have no firm, concrete proof of what the causal factor in these events might be.
At this point in time, we can see only the effect the descriptions of these events as given to us by the percipients. We don't know the cause. Is it a psychological phenomenon? If so, then what is triggering it? Budd Hopkins and Dr. Aphrodite Clamar have shown that the psychological profiles of many abduction victims show no abnormalities, but suggest that they have suffered a psychological trauma-like an abduction. So, if the cause is psychological, what is the intrusive factor which "tickles" the psyche into constructing this event. I cannot accept at this time, with the available facts, that it is either an overactive imagination, or a memory of the birth trauma. The same can be said of MIB experiences. What is the causal factor? I quite honestly don't know. And before anyone attempts to dismiss these events as being hoaxes, delusions, or plays for publicity, they had better be able to explain the many legitimate cases of MIB activity; the cases which have lain silent until, with much effort I have been able to ferret them out. No plays for publicity, no hoaxes, just a good many genuinely frightened people who have no idea why they experienced what they did.
At any rate, here is an abduction case which raises a good many questions -- many of which are rather uncomfortable to face. As a matter of fact, it was quite uncomfortable to make the decision to publish this report. However, unless we can look at all of the evidence with unbiased eyes, we will never be able to make any headway toward understanding these problems.
Bill Hamilton AstroScience Research Network http://www.astrosciences.info/ "I don't see the logic of rejecting data just because they seem incredible." Fred Hoyle
Saul Levy - 17 Sep 2005 20:05 GMT Did Fred Hoyle put in a disclaimer about crackpotism? He should have! Kook data is WORTHLESS!
Saul Levy
>ET Abductees - You >May Be On File [quoted text clipped - 246 lines] >"I don't see the logic of rejecting data just because they seem incredible." >Fred Hoyle anonymous.informer@gmail.com - 17 Sep 2005 21:53 GMT <snip>
AI was here.
================================================================
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/hauser1.html
TILMAN HAUSHERR
Tilman Joerg Hausherr, a German national, is bent on the destruction of religious rights in Germany. While claiming to be solely employed as a software developer, Hausherr somehow manages to spend the vast majority of his time vilifying the practices of minority religions and lobbying to severely restrict the rights of parishioners, if not eliminate them entirely.
In addition to his attacks on other religions, Hausherr has been harassing the Church of Scientology since late 1994. His acts of hatred include making threats against parishioners by posting their names and businesses on the Internet to encourage boycotts, hate "pickets," and email harassment, participating in hate demonstrations in an effort to intimidate parishioners from entering their Churches, and promoting the "picketing" of schools attended by the children of Scientologists.
While lobbying for the destruction of the Church internationally, Hausherr is particularly devoted to destroying parishioners' rights in Germany. In his internet postings, Hausherr applauds the psychiatric practice of Eugenics, the concept of creating a "pure" society by removing from it those who are considered "undesirable." Members of minority religions are high on Hausherr's list of undesirables and he wastes no opportunity to lobby his government to restrict their rights.
Hausherr is a strong supporter of Ursula Caberta, (see http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/caberta1.html) a Hamburg government official who works diligently to ensure that Scientologists are discriminated against in Germany. This includes harassing companies that hire Scientologists, generating anti-religious press, and lobbying the federal government to take actions to close Churches and affiliated Scientology organizations. One German court held that Caberta could be described as a "human rights violator." Recently, Caberta was fined for accepting $75,000 from an American anti-religious extremist in conflict with her obligation as a government official to remain neutral and objective (something she has never done).
Hausherr is so extreme as to promote James Randi, a so-called Skeptic dedicated to attacking any belief for which he considers there is insufficient proof. Religion is a favorite target of the Skeptics movement, obviously because many religious beliefs are based in faith. Hausherr has carried his skepticism so far as to participate in attacks on magicians, decrying their entertainments as fraudulent.
Hausherr is given as a "source" on Scientology on at least one internet page of Skeptic's links, which includes links to Dr. Stephen Barrett one of the earliest psychiatrists to attack Scientology. Hausherr has never been a Scientologist nor, it appears, has he ever made an honest attempt to study and understand the Church doctrines. Hausherr is, however, a strong supporter of psychiatry to the point where he even defends psychiatrists who have been convicted of such crimes as sexually molesting their patients. It is important to note that The Church of Scientology founded the Citizen's Commission on Human Rights which is devoted to exposing psychiatric crimes and the abuse of psychiatric patients.
Hausherr has attended several conferences given internationally by anti-religious movement organizations. He also works closely with Thomas Gandow, a Lutheran minister active in the movement to oppress the rights of religious minorities in Germany.
Besides attacking Scientology, Hausherr also posts to other internet newsgroups that malign a variety of spiritual beliefs including transcendental meditation and different branches of East Indian religions.
Based on the extent of his anti-religious activities, and a remarkable degree of access to normally restricted information, it is highly suspected that Hausherr in truth works for the German government. He often posts to the Internet detailed personal information about Scientology businessmen in the US and abroad that is not generally made available to the public. Hausherr also works closely with Roger Gonnet, (see http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/gonnet1.html) a French anti-religious extremist who appears to have equally remarkable access to French government documents that pertain to religious oppression in France.
================================================================
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/caberta1.html
URSULA CABERTA
Ursula Caberta is an employee of the Ministry of the Interior for the State of Hamburg, in Germany. The rights of religious minorities have come under attack in Germany in recent years causing the United States Department of State to formally admonish the German government for enacting legislation which violates international standards of human rights. Caberta is a driving force behind this anti-religious movement in Germany.
Caberta was responsible for hosting an annual "award" which was created for those who engage in anti-religious activities. Named the "Alternative Charlemagne Award," it mocks Germany's official Charlemagne Award which is presented yearly to international figures (such as former President Bill Clinton) who promote European unity and world peace. Caberta's "award," on the other hand, recognizes and encourages those who promote divisiveness and the persecution of religious minorities.
On January 14, 2003, the Hamburg Administrative Court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Interior Ministry from allowing Caberta from repeating certain public statements of a false and derogatory character about the Church of Scientology.
The Churches brought the case on the grounds that Caberta should be restrained as she has blatantly violated her duty of neutrality as a government employee - evidenced by her having personally received on June 26, 2000 a sum of $75,000 from a private individual who at that time was funding anti-Scientology litigation in the United States.
Under German law, a government employee may be sentenced for up to three years if the individual accepts an advantage for oneself in exchange for the execution of an official function on another's behalf. A penal investigation regarding this matter resulted in Ms. Caberta being fined 7,500 euros in June 2002. The Ministry apparently made no requirement that Caberta pay back the money: Nor did it restrain her due to the obvious conflict in any way.
The Hamburg Administrative Court, in its January 14, 2003 decision, found the loan and the circumstances under which it was given constituted a violation of neutrality. Caberta, the Court noted, "has not shown the slightest indication that she understands the inadmissibility of the acceptance of private financial support under the legal provisions for how official duties should be conducted."
The Court also made an unequivocal statement criticizing the Interior Ministry for failing to take strong and effective action against Caberta.
"However, it is not evident that independent from the penal proceeding, the government has conducted internal administrative investigations on this matter to determine whether Mrs. Caberta received the amount of $75,000 from a declared and active Scientology opponent 'for the performance of duties' in the meaning of Art. 331 Section 1 Penal Code. Looking at the overall circumstances it would at least have been appropriate to subject Mrs. Caberta, who is not a government official but an employee of the respondent, to a warning pursuant to labor law and to demand she immediately repay the amount of money received within a stated time limit."
The Hamburg Court found that:
"it would therefore have been urgently required on the part of the respondent [Interior Ministry] to emphatically notify this employee after the respondent learned of the granting of the loan but latest after the end of the penal proceeding, to remind her of her fundamental duty of neutrality as a public employee and, if necessary, to also guarantee this through a proper warning pursuant to labor law."
Caberta has a long record of hostility and discrimination towards the Scientology religion and its American and German members. On June 4, 1992, while still an MP, she told the Hamburg state parliament that "we will carry on and will free Germany from Scientology."
More than any other German official, she is responsible for the wide distribution of the "sect filters" that the State Department has frequently criticized as an abuse of human rights.
Indeed, in 2000, a German Scientologist living and working in the United States filed suit against Ms. Caberta after he was presented with her "sect filter" by a German company during contract negotiations. In a subsequent ruling by the U.S. federal court in Tampa, Florida, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Jenkins condemned Caberta's behavior throughout the litigation as "evasive", "unresponsive", "uncooperative" and "argumentative", and sanctioned her for non-compliance with court orders.
The U.S. State Department has itself criticized Caberta for human rights abuses against American citizens: She is the "sect commissioner" referred to in the 2000 Annual Human Rights Report for 2000 who made unfounded public accusations against Scientologists.
This is not the first time that German courts have found that Caberta had violated the German Constitution in abusing the rights of Scientologists. In 1994, the Hamburg State Court of Appeals enjoined the Interior Ministry from further distribution of an anti-Scientology booklet. The Court stated:
"The principle of neutrality and tolerance has been violated by the opponent by giving non objective opinions about the doctrine of the applicant... The opponent's restriction of the fundamental right of the applicant per article 4 subsect 1 and 2 GC is illegal to this extent."
================================================================
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/gonnet1.html
ROGER GONNET
On September 11, 2001, thousands of Americans were murdered in a series of terrorist attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center. Before a death toll could even be attempted, French anti-religious extremist, Roger Gonnet, was busy exploiting this cowardly terrorist act to spread messages of hatred using the Internet.
Although government and religious leaders throughout the world appealed for a calm, reasoned response to this tragedy, Roger Gonnet seized the opportunity to forward his own fanatic agenda, posting messages laced with anti-religious and anti-American sentiment to a newsgroup frequented by some violent extremists. This deliberate attempt to inflame bigoted individuals into some form of retaliation against religionists in a country still reeling from terrorist attacks, in itself could be considered an act of terrorism. But while despicable, considering Gonnet's associations and his history, it is unsurprising.
Roger Gonnet is a French national who promotes government control, and the eventual elimination, of all religions. He was part of a burgeoning anti-religious movement in France led by Alain Vivien, former President of France's now dissolved Interministerial Mission to Fight Against Sects (MILS).
MILS sponsored a law passed by France's Chamber of Deputies that allows the disbandment any religion whose beliefs the government disagrees with. This law is in violation of the Helsinki Accords, to which France is signatory, and has been condemned by both the United Nations Commission on Human Rights and the U.S. State Department, as well as the Catholic Church, Protestant Churches and numerous religious and human rights organizations.
Roger Gonnet was remarkably well-informed about the activities of MILS to the extent that he was very likely in their employ.
Gonnet has a long history of joining religions then attacking them once he has moved on. He has been a practicing Roman Catholic and a member of the Church of Scientology and later conducted vicious hate campaigns against both. He collects anti-religious propaganda of any nature, against any group, and posts this indiscriminately to his website in what appears to be an effort to whip up hatred against religion in general.
While apparently unemployed, Gonnet is somehow able to travel throughout France intimidating parishioners with hate demonstrations at their Churches. He consorts with copyright anarchist Zenon Panoussis, (see http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/panoussis1.html) and anti-religious extremist Gerald Armstrong, (see http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong1.html) who have both had judgments made against them in their own countries. Armstrong fled the U.S., first for Canada, then Europe, after a court levied heavy fines against him for violating the terms of a settlement agreement.
Gonnet has also traveled about Europe meeting with members of other hate organizations. He is closely connected to the anti-religious activities of Hamburg government employee Ursula Caberta in Germany.
Gonnet appears to spend the remainder of his time spreading hate propaganda on a variety of internet newsgroups. Gonnet has a close association with suspected German government operative, Tilman Hausherr, whose hate propaganda appears on French newsgroups translated by Gonnet.
On an English-speaking newsgroup, while discussing bomb threats against the Church of Scientology, Gonnet advocated blowing up Scientology churches.
When a bailiff later showed up at his door with a complaint against him for making this bomb threat, Gonnet quickly recanted and claimed he was "just joking."
Gonnet is a virulent defender of known explosives expert and convicted hate criminal, Keith Henson, (see http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/henson1.html) who fled the U.S. to avoid sentencing.
================================================================
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/panoussis1.html
ZENON PANOUSSIS
This question has puzzled the Net community since Panoussis appeared in 1996, single-handedly setting in motion a series of legal maneuvers which resulted in a hefty judgment against him for copyright infringement.
As a direct result, the Swedish legislature amended its law to protect the unpublished copyrighted works he infringed.
Copyright Anarchist
Zenon Panoussis began his harassment of the Church of Scientology in August 1996. At that time he posted unpublished copyrighted scriptures of the Church on his web site. These were removed through communication between Church lawyers and Panoussis' access provider.
Panoussis reacted by posting an order form to a newsgroup where he advertised the sale of these copyrighted materials by mail order. Church lawyers were forced to obtain a seizure order from the court in order to remove the copyrighted materials from his possession.
Still, Panoussis continued his anarchist campaign. He obtained other copies of the unpublished scriptures and deposited them in various government offices in Sweden, attempting to rely on a loophole in Sweden's law concerning access to documents in public document depositories. The Church was then forced to take Panoussis to court for copyright infringement. The case went to trial in 1998 and on September 14 of that year the court found Panoussis guilty of copyright infringement and issued a judgment against him. Panoussis appealed the decision. On March 9, 2001, the Swedish Appeals Court not only upheld the trial court's decision but increased the fees and costs against Panoussis.
Finally, the documents he deposited in the libraries were removed after Sweden changed its law on public documents to bring it into compliance with international copyright standards.
History of Unlawful Conduct and Acts of Violence
In addition to his unlawful copyright activities, Panoussis' history demonstrates a disrespect of the law and a potential for violence.
Panoussis arrived in Sweden in the late 1970s. He studied law at Stockholm University, but quit before completing his degree. He then appeared to drift from job to job without direction. At one point he served as a spokesperson for a group called the Anti-Olympic Committee. This group supported certain bombings that were staged in an effort to sabotage Sweden's plans to host the Olympics.
In 1978, Panoussis was convicted for theft. In mid 1992 he acted as a legal advisor in a dispute between a brother and sister over an apartment. In a unique display of problem-solving, Panoussis attacked the front door of one of the parties with an axe, after warning the person inside that he had "30 seconds to open the door".
In 1993, after an argument, Panoussis followed a man and his girlfriend home then attempted to run them over with his vehicle. After one failed attempt, Panoussis reversed the car and tried to hit them again. The man survived by jumping out of the path of the vehicle.
Nor are courts immune from Pannoussis' irrational displays. In a letter from April 1996, Panoussis stated to a court in Sweden: "If I lose my temper I may shoot him [referring to the other party in the case] in the head and spend the rest of my life in a mental institution."
Prior to leaving Sweden for Holland in December 1997, he was declared bankrupt with more than 300,000 Swedish Kroner in debts.
================================================================
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong1.html
GERALD ARMSTRONG
Gerald Armstrong is a former clerk in a Scientology church.
In former days, Armstrong hatched a plot to seize the Church's assets in collaboration with the Los Angeles IRS Criminal Investigation Division.
When the Church discovered this, its attorneys obtained permission from a Los Angeles police officer to conduct an investigation into Armstrong's plans. The investigation caught Armstrong on videotape stating that he intended to forge and then plant incriminating documents on Church premises, to be discovered in a subsequent raid. When challenged on how he would obtain proof of the allegations he intended to make, he responded that: "We don't have to prove a goddam thing. We don't have to prove sh.t. We just have to allege it."
As part of the same scheme, Armstrong planned to subvert a senior Scientology executive using sexual enticement in a scheme he titled "Operation Long Prong." This is documented both in his own handwriting and on video.
Since fleeing California, Armstrong, a native Canadian, has lived in British Columbia, Canada, and appears to have no gainful employment. Yet he has somehow managed to travel all over the world in pursuit of his hate agenda.
In 2000, Armstrong traveled to Europe to attend an anti- religious conference in Leipzig, Germany.
In 2001, Armstrong traveled extensively in Europe, joining in a hate march in France with extremist Roger Gonnet and visiting anti-religious groups in Russia and Denmark. At a meeting of hate groups in Russia, Armstrong met with deprogramming proponent Alexander Dvorkin. (see http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/dvorkin1.html)
In addition to his unlawful activities, Armstrong's mental stability is questionable. Armstrong once posted a message on the Internet concerning a letter he sent to Saddam Hussein during the Gulf War. In the letter, he offered himself to Hussein as a hostage in the Iraqi war. "If either side failed to perform any part of the agreement, the other side could execute me," he concluded. Armstrong makes clear in his posting that he did not think the letter to Hussein was a joke, but was deadly serious. He quite proudly republishes it and other similar writings from time to time. To further demonstrate how out of touch he is with reality, Armstrong had himself photographed by a newspaper naked while holding a globe to promote his theories of destroying all money.
================================================================
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/dvorkin1.html
ALEXANDER DVORKIN
Planting the Seeds of Hate
The idea of individual human rights is still new in Russia, having not existed for many decades. And as our vast country progresses through its difficult period of transition, we are learning that one thing has not changed: there are still some who seek power or profit at the expense of others, for changing the system does not automatically change the individuals within it.
Such is true in the area of freedom of religion. When restrictions on religious belief were lifted, many Russians quickly sought to fill the natural vacuum which was created when the spiritual nature of life had been denied. In our modern and scientific era, with open communication to the rest of the world, many people were interested in examining religious and spiritual questions from a wide range of sources -- to find answers that seemed most meaningful within the reality of their everyday lives.
But, as we could well learn from the West, religious diversity brings with it one problem of its own - the intolerant bigot who not only feels that all must believe only as he believes, but who is also willing to use force to suppress or destroy the beliefs of anyone choosing to follow a different path.
One such source of intolerance in Russia today is Alexander Dvorkin -- a Russian-born American who returned to Russia in 1990 after 20 years in the United States.
Infiltration of Corruption
While in the United States, Dvorkin worked for Radio Voice of America, which was at that time reportedly supported by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. Later, he worked for Radio Liberty -- also reportedly a CIA outfit.
After returning to Russia, Dvorkin began working at Moscow State University, but was dismissed in 1994 because of his increasingly intolerant behavior towards religious minorities. He currently works at the Russian Orthodox University in Moscow as that Church's spokesman on "sects." Unfortunately, his continued efforts to undermine religious freedom have already reflected badly on the Orthodox Church which, presumably, is unaware of the people overseas for whom he is acting as a puppet.
Dvorkin started his hateful actions towards new religious movements in Moscow in May, 1994, after being "educated" at the infamous "Dialogue Centre" in Denmark. From the name of this organization, one would assume that its role is to promote dialogue between different denominations; the truth is quite different.
In fact, most people who know of this facility refer to it disparagingly as the "Monologue Centre" because of the well known refusal of its director, Johannes Aagaard, to engage in dialogue, while deliberately issuing false and bigoted statements about other religions and even advocating violence towards their members.
Aagaard was, for example, declared persona non grata and refused entry to India because of his reputation for stirring up religious intolerance and hatred.
Dvorkin was apparently an apt student of the dialogue-without-dialogue principle, for the first thing he did upon returning to Moscow was organize a closed seminar. Anyone who might not agree with the ideas of the seminar was simply denied entrance. Even journalists who were known to be unprejudiced, like Jakov Krotov of the Moscow News, were forced out of the hall.
It is interesting that the majority of the groups that were attacked by Dvorkin at this conference were those who seek to help people understand their spirituality and to create a better environment for all. One of Dvorkin's speakers was, of course, Johannes Aagaard.
But also at Dvorkin's seminar were representatives of another organization -- and one which apparently had even greater influence over his thinking than Aagaard's Dialogue Center -- the American Cult Awareness Network (CAN). Dvorkin even stated on Russian television that he was Russia's CAN representative. It is ironic that at the time CAN was such a notorious hate group that it was quickly destroying itself.
Dragged, Screaming and Kicking
The threat that Dvorkin's intolerance poses to our nation is easy to see once light is shed upon his influences. CAN was founded by thrice-convicted criminal Ted Patrick. (see http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/false_exp/patrick1.html) Patrick's record includes a ban against re-entry to Canada after he traveled there to assault a 21-year-old woman who had converted from the Protestant Church of her upbringing to the Roman Catholic Church.
Patrick considered the Catholic Church a "cult" and, after dragging this Canadian woman into an auto, drove her to a secluded house where he subjected her to days of physical and emotional abuse in an effort to "persuade" her to leave her Church.
The unconscionable use of threats and violence is common among those who adopt Patrick's ways. In his own book, Patrick describes the kidnapping of a Christian who resisted by bracing himself against Patrick's escape auto; Patrick forced the man into the auto by squeezing his genitals until he collapsed in pain. "Then I hit," Patrick wrote, "shoving him head first into the back seat of the car and piling in on top of him."
Patrick was one of the first to use the term "deprogramming" to describe such coercive attempts to destroy religious belief. The word is an attempt to camouflage obviously criminal actions and make them appear legitimate. It implies that anyone who holds religious beliefs has been "programmed," and thereby suggests that "de-programming" is necessary to reverse this "process."
This theory has been utterly disproved by academics, numerous courts, and even the American Psychological Association and the American Sociological Association. The reasons are obvious: it violates a basic human right and every accepted standard of civilized conduct. In Patrick's own book he states that deprogramming "may be said to involve kidnapping at the very least, quite often assault and battery, almost invariably conspiracy to commit a crime and illegal restraint."
In the development of deprogramming, Patrick acknowledged a debt of gratitude to British psychiatrist William Sargant. Sargant's now condemned experiments in brainwashing produced techniques which, in his own words, would enable "the therapist [to] deliberately distort the facts of the patient's life-experience to achieve heightened emotional response and abreaction. In the drunken state of narcoanalysis, patients are prone to accept the therapist's false constructions." In other words, the victim can be brainwashed by deprogramming so that he not only denounces his religious beliefs, but now actually believes lies about his former religion implanted by the deprogrammer.
This is one of the reasons why Dvorkin's work is likely to continue to reflect badly on the Russian Orthodox Church. Due to his position, people may feel the methods he advocates reflect the ideology of the Church, when in fact they are purely of psychiatric origin.
And what is the true purpose of deprogramming, other than the irrational hatred caused by bigotry? It is money. In America, "deprogrammers" first spread alarming stories about any new or minority religion. Then, when they have family members or friends concerned about someone who is a member, they charge $10,000 or more to attempt to kidnap and "deprogram" the relative. As can be seen by the examples above, no religion is exempt. As long as they are paid, deprogrammers will attempt to take any parishioner away from any group or belief.
"Utterly Intolerable" Conduct
The criminal actions of CAN were revealed when a U.S. District Court found CAN and several individual CAN agents guilty in a kidnapping and assault case that the court described as "so outrageous in character and so extreme in degree as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community."
CAN's victim in this case was, and still is, a Christian, yet CAN branded his church a "cult" and decided he should be "rescued" by forced kidnapping.
The CAN agent selected for the "job" was Rick Ross, whose record includes a conviction for grand theft after attempting to embezzle $100,000 in jewelry from a store in Phoenix, Arizona. Ross was diagnosed by his prison psychiatrist as having "sociopathic inclinations."
After kidnapping the victim, Ross and his accomplices held him prisoner for five days while they tried to force him to denounce his Christian faith.
The jury in the Seattle court was so outraged by the violence of CAN's conduct that they fined Ross and CAN almost $5 million. CAN did not survive the judgment and declared bankruptcy. It was closed down in 1999 and later re-opened under new management dedicated to a different purpose - to foster true understanding and tolerance for religious minorities.
Unholy Alliances
But Dvorkin has other "friends," such as Carol Giambalvo, a member of another anti-religious hate group connected to the earlier CAN. Her book, which promotes deprogramming, was translated into Russian and distributed at an anti- religious seminar in St. Petersburg.
Dvorkin also has a similar-minded supporter in Germany -- Thomas Gandow, who has also been involved in attempted deprogrammings.
Victim A.K., who experienced Gandow's methods, was picked up from her house by two strangers and taken to visit Gandow. Her abductors refused to tell her where she was going and refused to let her out of the car. At Gandow's office, she was threatened with psychiatric incarceration, told that her daughter "might disappear," and given other warnings to "cooperate." A.K. was pregnant at the time and, under pressure, agreed to sign a letter stating she wanted to leave her religion. She was forced to add that the letter was signed "by my own will." The incident was so stressful that three weeks later she lost her baby.
Alexander Dvorkin is attempting to consign Russia to the same sort of extremism which plagued the communist era, calling for a fight with any individuals who believe differently -- even if they break no laws and are honest, hard-working citizens. We know what such an attitude meant for Germany in the 1930s. And we understand why the United Nations is now again criticizing the German government because of violations of human rights in the 1990s, as are the United States' State Department and human rights organizations.
Dvorkin's mandate is spreading hate propaganda about religious groups. He manipulates information, pulling quotes out of context in order to create "alarming" stories. He then uses his position in the Moscow Patriarchy to circulate this disinformation on government and official lines.
Why should Russia -- a country with a rich spiritual culture and potential -- tolerate such people, who spread nothing but the seeds of hatred?
The fact is, people are tired of being told what to do and how to believe. They want to find out for themselves and trust in their own answers.
Russia had too many years of false propaganda. Alexander Dvorkin should be free to follow his faith and to comment on the beliefs of others. But no one has the "right" to use lies to destroy another's beliefs. Having publicly declared himself to be the Russian representative of the now-obsolete American Cult Awareness Network, Dvorkin has at least made it known -- even if unintentionally -- that his information is of the most unreliable sort. Our country has come too far out of the errors of the past to allow the totalitarian attempts at thought control practiced by CAN to be planted here.
================================================================
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/false_exp/patrick1.html
TED PATRICK
Ted Patrick, the "father" of deprogramming and thrice-convicted felon, typifies the former Cult Awareness Network "deprogrammer" - prone to violence, scornful of the rights and beliefs of others, and willing to do anything for a price.
Patrick had been revered by the old Cult Awareness Network (CAN) its predecessor the Citizens Freedom Foundation, appearing as an honored guest and featured speaker at their conventions. His methods have been emulated by numerous deprogrammers, including Steven Hassan, Rick Ross, Hana Whitfield and many others.
Patrick worked to make kidnapping and assault appear socially acceptable. As long as the crime was directed against individuals whose beliefs could be made to seem odd or unusual to the rest of society, any common thug could earn substantial sums simply by billing himself a "deprogrammer."
Patrick's past reveals that he comes from a background which made him no stranger to crime. Patrick's father opted for the lucrative profession of pickup man for local mobsters running the numbers racket. Patrick began earning his living as a professional kidnapper and hired thug, targeting members of various religions for violent "deprogrammings." Patrick has admitted that deprogramming "may be said to involve kidnapping at the very least, quite often assault and battery, almost invariably conspiracy to commit a crime and illegal restraint."
Patrick has asserted that religions recruit members by hypnotizing them on the spot with "beams" emanating from the knees and elbows and other parts of the body. This to Patrick classified a potential victim as a "mindless robot" and fair game for violent tactics.
When once reminded that such tactics violate constitutional protections of the First Amendment, Patrick retorted by describing freedom of religion as "one of the biggest rackets the world has ever known."
Patrick's career has earned him a string of criminal indictments stretching from San Diego to New York. The charges range from kidnapping to violent abduction and sexual assault, including rape.
Brute force is the hallmark of Patrick's kidnappings. In a book defending his violent techniques, Patrick described the kidnapping of a Christian who resisted abduction by bracing himself against Patrick's getaway car. Patrick forced the man into the car by squeezing his genitals until he let out a howl and doubled up in pain. "Then I hit," Patrick wrote, "shoving him head first into the back seat of the car and piling in on top of him."
He described another abduction: "Joe and Goose [two of Patrick's henchmen] both had a hold of Ronnie ... so I started on the other guys, you know, Maceing them, hitting, whatever. The Mace didn't really work. I mean it worked, but they kept fighting. I'd spray somebody and then they were still kicking and I had to just kick them back."
Court papers filed in Massachusetts show that Patrick assaulted a man with a straight-edged razor during an abduction while, by Patrick's own accounts, other abductions have utilized kicks, punches and other forms of violence.
In Ohio, Patrick and several others were indicted after abducting a 20-year-old woman and taking her to Alabama, where she was repeatedly raped over the course of the seven-day "deprogramming." Patrick announced afterward that he was giving up deprogramming. At the time of the Ohio abduction, Patrick was on probation for abducting a Tucson waitress; his probation was revoked after it was learned he had accepted several thousand dollars for the "deprogramming" of the Ohio woman, and he served a year in jail.
One of Patrick's attacks, an unsuccessful deprogramming attempt on a Catholic nun in Canada, resulted in an official government prohibition against Patrick entering Canada. Ignoring this, Patrick slipped back and forth across the border numerous times to continue his career in Canada as a kidnapper-for-hire, eventually assaulting more than 50 people in that country.
Patrick, who received up to $15,000 plus $250 per day expenses for a single deprogramming, used violence not only to change individuals' religious beliefs but their political persuasions and even their sexual orientation. In one case, Patrick resorted to rape in an attempted deprogramming of a woman who was a lesbian.
Government prosecutors, wise to Patrick's lifestyle of violence and force, have jailed him repeatedly on numerous charges, with three felony convictions. Yet, in extremist circles, Patrick and his methods are still considered worth emulating. Ida Camburn has been a supporter of Patrick's and recommended the violent use of deprogramming. Keith Henson, a convicted hate criminal, advocates deprogramming and made this statement on the Internet in May 2001: "Deprogramming is currently out of style, but it or something much like it is badly needed."
Apart from his deprogramming activities, Patrick's criminal record includes charges of cocaine use and parole violations.
================================================================
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/henson1.html
KEITH HENSON
Keith Henson is an explosives expert and a convicted hate criminal. On July 19, 2000, he was arrested by the Riverside County, California, Sheriff's Office for making terrorist threats on the Internet against the Church of Scientology. On April 26, 2001, a jury found Henson guilty of having committed a hate crime under section 422.6 of the California Penal Code.
Henson was scheduled to appear for sentencing on May 16, 2001, but failed to appear and the Judge was forced to issue a warrant for his arrest. He soon surfaced in Canada where he was arrested by Immigration authorities for having failed to disclose his conviction in the United States. Toronto police were not fooled by Henson's pretense of harmlessness: "We get notified by Scientology, we check, and he's an undesirable," Toronto Police Fugitive Squad Detective Phil Glavin said of Henson. "We look on the Internet, and he's a self-proclaimed bomb expert." Henson was released on bail in Canada pending a final disposition of his case and is restrained from coming within 100 feet of any Scientology Church.
Meanwhile, on July 20, 2001, the Riverside County Judge sentenced Keith Henson in absentia to one-year in county jail. As an alternative, the Judge ruled that Henson could accept a six-month jail term, three years probation, and pay a $2,000 fine. He would be restricted from going near the Church he had harassed and be subject to search for explosive devices. The Judge also stated that when Henson returns to the United States he will, in addition, face up to half a year in jail and a $1,000 fine, plus penalty assessments, for having failed to appear at the sentencing hearing on May 16, 2001. At this writing, Henson remains a fugitive from justice.
HATE THREATS ON THE INTERNET
Following are some samples of the threats Henson has made against the Church on an anti-religious newsgroup:
August 6, 1995 "That is why we are out to *break* the CoS [Church of Scientology]."
August 13 1995 In response to a posting in which an extremist wrote about Scientology "=2E..I will see it in ruins," Henson wrote: "Ahh, I love the smell of gunpowder drifting on the morning breeze. Keith Henson."
August 14, 1995 "PS, And thanks for being a punching bag. We, of course, are in training for a considerably larger event, and CoS [Church of Scientology] makes a nice expendable sparing [sic] partner."
April 20, 1997 "PPS Killing the organization off entirely is the best way to change the future of Scientology."
August 8, 1998 "From where I stand, the spread of my legal shotgun takes in [name of Church member] *and* the [Church] lawyers."
June 5, 2000 (IRC Chat Channel) Henson: "heh. see my posting on the Mt. view picket? brent and I kicked a.s ..." "I am going to [church location] some time thiss [sic] week for several dasy [sic] picket till they starve. ..." Henson: "... it is fairly safe but we don't have too long to do it they are growing trees which will make the road invisible from inside." Lianna: "Keith: release some termites on their trees" Henson: "agent orange lia"
July 4, 2000 "My only option to get back in the work force is to destroy scientology root and branch."
July 7, 2000 "barb wrote: ... GPS readings of Gold Base is a good start..." "And a good topo map. The approach is clear from the south. Keith Henson"
July 10, 2000 "Modern weapons are accurate to a matter of a few tens of yards. The terminal guidence [sic] ones are good to single digits (Keith Henson)"
HENSON'S EXPERTISE WITH EXPLOSIVES
The following postings evidence the extent of Henson's expertise and interest in explosives:
June 22, 1997 From: [name removed] Re: Keith Henson "Keith Henson, an explosives enthusiast since the early 1960's, was describing to us last night at a Silicon Valley party just how accurate the instructions were in the transcripts of the McVeigh trial, as the experts pointed out the steps needed to make the liquid explosive 'Astrolight' (or 'Astrolite'). Keith pointed out that most of the "lay" reports had repeated some of the usual lay errors about ammonium nitrate and fuel oil bombs, but that the full court transcript "got it right" on the conversion of the precursors to the more effective liquid form."
July 9, 2000 From: Keith Henson "If you are interested in large firecrackers, go ask how to make them in rec.pyrotechnics. Though, it is simple enough, cardboard tube, gunpowder, and fuse. You can make the tubes from rolled newspaper."
The following quote about Keith Henson is drawn from the book "Great Mambo Chicken and the Transhuman Condition; Science Slightly Over The Edge" by Ed Regis. Henson was featured in this book as an individual who indulges in fringe sciences. The author also documents the extent of Henson's expertise with explosives.
"But he knew how to do it, of course, and so he took a two-hundred-pound lard can and put three pieces of primacord inside, looping them around so they completely covered the bottom. Then he poured the ammonium nitrate into the can, inserted sticks of dynamite all around the perimeter, and ran the primacord fuse up to a blasting cap on top of it all. The cap would fire the primacord, which in turn would set off the dynamite, which would crush the mass of ammonium nitrate until the necessary pressure was reached - a true implosion device, just like the atom bomb." Pg.50
Click these pages from the book for further documentation:
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/images/mambo1.jpg http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/images/mambo2.jpg
KEITH HENSON'S ANTI-SCIENTOLOGY ACTIVITIES
One of Henson's first postings to a Usenet anti-religious newsgroup is dated February 21, 1995. Since then Henson has posted thousands of hate messages to this group. Since February 1998 he has conducted hundreds of hate marches (he calls them "pickets") against various Scientology Churches and parishioners.
Henson plotted to have the Church's tax-exempt status revoked by the IRS yet, having failed to do so, subsequently sued the IRS on December 31, 1998. The suit was dismissed on August 30, 1999. Henson appealed it but the appeal was denied in late 2000.
KEITH HENSON'S TROUBLE WITH THE LAW
On October 31, 1997 Keith Henson was placed under a permanent injunction in Los Angeles for his harassment and physically violent behavior toward a Scientology parishioner. On November 1 and 26, 1997, Henson was arrested in Los Angeles for violating the restraining order that had been issued against him.
Henson was also found to have infringed upon a Scientology copyright. Following is an excerpt of the final judgment issued on May 14, 1998, against Henson by United States District Judge Ronald M. Whyte:
"Upon the decision of the court entered on April 15, 1997 granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and upon the unanimous verdict of the jury published on May 12, 1998, final judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff Religious Technology Center and against defendant H. Keith Henson that said defendant willfully infringed plaintiff's copyrighted work known as NOTs 34, and that said defendant shall pay to plaintiff the sum $75,000 in statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. =A7 504 (c). Defendant is also permanently enjoined from engaging in infringing activities as set forth in the court's permanent injunction dated June 16, 1997 and amended order on ex parte motion for emergency relief dated April 27, 1998."
On June 22, 1999, Henson was found in contempt of Court by United States District Judge Ronald M. Whyte, who ruled as follows:
"On June 22, 1999 this court issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law finding defendant in civil contempt and awarding $7,500 in attorney's fees. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that H. Keith Henson is adjudged in civil contempt and shall pay plaintiff Religious Technology Center the sum of $7,500 towards its attorney's fees incurred."
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In 1982, as part of the divorce proceedings between Henson and then wife Carolyn Meinel, Carolyn filed a signed affidavit of her expenses that Henson needed to cover as part of his spousal support. Listed under medical expenses were:
"$6,000 since May 1981 includes [an] operation and four-day hospital stay [for one of his daughters]; ... psychological counseling for [two of his daughters] as a result of father's sexual molestation of them."
Also in the case file was a note that Henson molested his two oldest daughters, at the time 12 and 13. Carolyn requested that Henson be jailed if he did not receive psychological counseling on the matter.
In 1987 Henson developed an interest in cryonics (the practice of freezing dead bodies in the belief that scientists will revive them sometime in the future). Henson, his wife and his two-year old daughter signed up with Alcor Life Extension Foundation, the organization that handles the freezing and storage of bodies or heads. Henson himself took part in the procedure of freezing people's bodies.
In that same year, Henson founded the Far Edge Committee. The group's sole purpose was to plan the "Far Edge Party", a gathering of "downloaded multiple selves" (assuming one could make many copies of oneself and download them into space) that was to be held in the far-off future on the other side of the Milky Way.
KEITH HENSON'S ALLIANCE WITH THE ANTI-RELIGIOUS MOVEMENT
Keith Henson claims that his attacks on the Church of Scientology began in 1995 after an upset he had regarding an Internet newsgroup. However, investigation has shown that Henson had set his sights on attacking Scientology years prior to this.
On June 14, 1988 Henson paid for a membership in the Cult Awareness Network (CAN), an organization which spread scurrilous allegations about new religious movements and acted as a referral house for deprogrammers. CAN declared bankruptcy after a $1.8 million judgment against them for their participation in the kidnapping and attempted deprogramming of a member of the Pentecostal faith.
Dave - 17 Sep 2005 22:02 GMT You should also have posted to alt.stories.amateur.
Phillip Kyle - 17 Sep 2005 23:03 GMT > ET Abductees - You > May Be On File [quoted text clipped - 255 lines] > "I don't see the logic of rejecting data just because they seem > incredible." Fred Hoyle Ever been to Bonnybridge?
 Signature Phil Kyle™ Uno Dos Tres Cuatro CINCO!!!!!!
"Be very aware that my willingness to continue to criticise your sig is infinite." -- Neil Barker
ross.institute@gmail.com - 18 Sep 2005 12:57 GMT To whom it may concern:
The "Relgious Freedom Watch" website is run by Scientology.
Attacks at that site and others about me have been responded to through a statement available online through the Internet since 1998.
See http://www.rickross.com/reference/scientology/Scien47.html
Rick A. Ross www.rickross.com
Raving Loonie - 19 Sep 2005 00:34 GMT > To whom it may concern: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Rick A. Ross > www.rickross.com PING: Art Deco
Looks like you have a professional 'kook' here ...
RL
Art Deco - 19 Sep 2005 01:14 GMT >> To whom it may concern: >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >RL There are others who are much more knowledgeable about the LRons on usenet than I am. Many things are not what they seem.
 Signature Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with both male and female genitalia."
"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."
-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
Dr. Flonkenstein - 19 Sep 2005 02:28 GMT >> To whom it may concern: >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > RL Look RL. You have been Formosa'd, but don't attract your own doom upon yourself posting to AUK, ok?
 Signature mhm 27x12 smeeter #28 Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21 Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@enter.net> CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook: http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
in Message-ID:<adurg15tk0vd6ip6r1lh297cequd35addb@4ax.com> Alexa "Crackpot" Cameron explains electromagnetism, and how the sun has an 'iron core': "The sun and the earth are 'magnets', each with an iron based core, and both have an electrical force between them."
in Message-ID: <rjise19nrclufrgjg5ragcpbbihn3coliv@4ax.com> Mark "Woody" Ferguson shows his mastery of the English language: "With patients and practice you could be nominated next time around..."
in Message-MID: <k1kte1hu59khhkt4m1g42g52gkacmcokin@4ax.com> Mark "The illiterate" Ferguson astonishes everybody saying: "Oh, for f.cks sake, Gary no matter how angery he thinks he makes there are lines I will not cross unless I believe what I say is the true, I know more then you."
in Message-ID: <lhic01pc5svudk22n6rpcvovskdmpi3ir8@4ax.com> Alexa "Tequila Titsz" Cameron explains world religions: "The jews roots are islamic."
in Message-ID: <j1b5c1l2629tc6afu575d5puclm321knok@4ax.com> Alexa "dumbass" Cameron shows her knowledge of history: "WRONGO. There was NO Bible before King James had it written."
in Message-ID: <5g89d15kbjd3cd7i6fn9c3ke93n12dm406@4ax.com> Alexa "Word Salad" Cameron shows her knowledge of science: "Einstein never found the double superimposed doubl 'equilateral' triangle."
in Message-ID: <1rfee1d5iuhq3piii8b9dtq9rtk5uatr1h@4ax.com> Alexa "Kook of the year 2004" Cameron uses words she doesn't understand again: "Why is the Pentagon killing American citizens with non-lethal technology?"
in Message-ID: <2mrge1phgk68ourdt2eq8thne0h7hv0sb6@4ax.com> Alexa "Imnotalexadammit" Cameron has problems with that extra finger on her hand: "Why do the Jews use the Star of David as symbolic of the Pentagon, or Pentagram?"
reminder: Message-ID: <pan.2005.09.01.00.52.15.77207@localhost.localdomain> The quote naziwhore Don Ocean stole.
Raving Loonie - 19 Sep 2005 02:46 GMT > >> To whom it may concern: > >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Look RL. You have been Formosa'd, but don't attract your own doom upon > yourself posting to AUK, ok? I hear enough about the Scientology crap in ASAD.
It's everyone's problem. I'll get that doom from the Scientologist one way or the other with or w/o AUK.
I don't get it. What are you afraid of Flonkenstein. ... REAL KOOKS, maybe ?
[ alt.usenet.kooks trimmed to protect your sensibilites ... ]
RL
Art Deco - 19 Sep 2005 03:36 GMT >> >> To whom it may concern: >> >> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > [ alt.usenet.kooks trimmed to protect your sensibilites ... ] And his ever reading your reply -- his NSP doesn't carry Saucerhead Central.
>RL
 Signature Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with both male and female genitalia."
"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."
-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
anonymous.informer@gmail.com - 19 Sep 2005 20:44 GMT "HE [Rick Ross] HAS A TREMENDOUS CAPACITY TO DENY THE SERIOUSNESS OF PROBLEMS WHICH HE FACES" -Thomas P. O'Brien, M.D. St. Joseph Hospital Mental Health Center November 26, 1975
"IT'S PRETTY DISGUSTING THE WAY THEY MAKE SUCH A BIG DEAL ABOUT THINGS." - Rick Ross
- Anonymous
================================================================
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/false_exp/RICK_ROSS_AND_THE_ROSS_INSTITUTE
RICK ROSS AND THE "ROSS INSTITUTE"
Although Rick Ross promotes himself as a professional "cult expert", a review of his educational background shows that quite apart from being anti-Christian (he refers to Christians as Bible bangers) has no religious educational credentials whatsoever. To the contrary, his only formal education is a high school diploma. Self-aggrandizement and personal financial reward seem to be Ross' primary motive for his attacks on Christians and members of other faiths.
As documented herein, an unbiased review of Ross' activities overwhelmingly supports the conclusion that Ross systematically engages in anti-social and often illegal activity and disguises this in the name of "help." "Deprogramming," which appears to be his main source of income, is such an activity.
Ross specializes in garnering media attention to create fear and suspicion in the family members of individuals in minority religious groups. He then exploits this fear to get them to pay him thousands of dollars in fees to coerce people out of their chosen religious affiliation. Close scrutiny of Ross' "successful" deprogrammings very often finds broken families and dehumanized individuals who were coreced, lied to, brainwashed and degraded by deprogrammers into renouncing their religious beliefs.
Public records reveal that Ross has been the subject of at least three arrests, including an attempted burglary, embezzlement of $100,000 worth of jewelry from a jewelry store, and kidnapping. Thow of these arrests resulted in convictions. In the third, Ross' co-conspirators plead guilty to lesser charges while Ross evaded being found guilty. Ross was sued civilly by the victim in the same kidnapping incident and was punished by the jury for over $3 million in compensatory and punitive damages.
Although Ross claims in media interviews that his criminal activity ceased with the 1975 jewelry heist, which he brushes off as an act of his youth for which he has taken responsibility, Ross has continued his pattern and practice of criminal activity against others. For example, in the above mentioned civil kidnapping case, the verdict issued by the jury stated that Ross had "acted recklessly in a way that is so outrageous in character and so extreme as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community."
As a further note on Ross' predisposition to criminal behavior and violation of the rights of others, when Ross challenged the finding in the civil kidnapping case, the Court upheld the punitive damages award and observed, "A large award of punitive damages is also necessary under the recidivism and mitigation aspects of the factors cited in Haslip. Specificially, the Court notes that Mr. Ross himself testified that he had acted similarly in the past and would continue to conduct 'deprogrammings' in the future."
Ross' criminal activity in this kidnapping case single-handedly brought about the demise to the Cult Awareness Network, which was exposed to be a criminal referral network for kidnappers. The jury also issued a finding against CAN for $1.8 million, which bankrupted the group.
Rick Ross' character was further demonstrated when he filed for personal bankruptcy in the face of the $3 million judgement against him. As part of the bankruptcy, Ross discharged a $17,500 debt to his elderly mother.
Despite these arrests and censure from the crouts, Ross has not reformed and has continued to commit criminal and anti-social acts. For example he blatantly admits on his web site that he has commiteed over a dozen involuntary deprogrammings (kidnappings) on adult individuals, mainly Christians, and at least that many more on minors. Ross neatly omits these matters when establishing himself with media and instead focuses only on the 1975 arrests which he attempts to dismiss as "his youth" although he was 22 years old.
The Ross Institute is Ross' latest money scam. The "Institute" is actual a mail drop just across the street from Ross' apartment in Jersey City, which he shares with a Haryonto Soedarpo. Though Ross and Soedarpo have shared the same apartment since at least 1998 in New Jersey and earlier in Phoenix, Soedarpo's role in the Ross Institute is nebulous. Soedarpo, like Ross, has no degree in religious studies or counseling. While Ross promotes the "Institute" as a tax-exempt, non-profit organization and solicits donations from the public, the "Institute" is clearly a front and promotional arm for Ross' deprogramming business.
More... http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/false_exp/RICK_ROSS_AND_THE_ROSS_INSTITUTE.PDF
|
|
|