 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI SpaceKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Space Forum / Astronomy / March 2005Dark Matter, another explanation
http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/ripples_spacetime_dark_energy.html nightbat wrote > http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/ripples_spacetime_dark_energy.html nightbat Yes, and thanks Ray for that link for it only points out how the referenced more established cosmologists have run out of present options to hopefully explain the observed expanding Universe. The reference link sites the apparent need to go beyond the present cosmic horizon an area that oc via Wolter's theoretical pointing had purposed long ago. The need for outer or multi Universe presentation to hopefully close the gravitational loop is what most all present day astro theorists rely on or base their profound intricate theoretical models. Except for one, the nightbat mysterious Mother of all comets, the " Black Comet ". ponder on, the nightbat > nightbat wrote http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/ripples_spacetime_dark_energy.html > nightbat > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > ponder on, > the nightbat It would sound as though we, and all we can see, may only be a tidal pool being swept over by cosmic waves from the cosmic ocean beyond. It has been said that all we see may be only the foam, but now it would appear that we might not even be in the ocean! How insignificant is our place in the grander scale of things! Yet super-egotists like Bert still persist in thinking we are at the center of it all! But this is still only our best way of looking at things so far. Come the Black Comet...! Double-A > It would sound as though we, and all we can see, may only be a tidal > pool being swept over by cosmic waves from the cosmic ocean beyond. It > has been said that all we see may be only the foam, but now it would > appear that we might not even be in the ocean! How insignificant is > our place in the grander scale of things! 'Significance' has no absolute meaning - it's a human concept. If you were never born the universe wouldn't exist. If you live to be 100 that would be at best 0.000007% of the known lifespan of universe (13.7 bil yrs). The fact you're going to die one day means you're insignificant anyway without even considering your place in the greater universe. nightbat wrote > > It would sound as though we, and all we can see, may only be a tidal > > pool being swept over by cosmic waves from the cosmic ocean beyond. It [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > The fact you're going to die one day means you're insignificant anyway > without even considering your place in the greater universe. nightbat A dog sh.tting on the public sidewalk apparently is Universe significant, for they passed a law against it in NYC. And contrary to your opinion Double-A has so significantly and brilliantly contributed to these science newsgroups, that even reported long life net far advanced Darla star folks have taken notice. (:~) ponder on, the nightbat Hi Double-A This super-egotist has posted many times that the universe even if finite is to big to mark its center. Being in a 44 billion diameter dense cloud(fog) would be impossible to find its center(yes?) I have further posted that humankind could very well be the only conscious life in the universe,and the universe created humankind so it could see itself. It would put us in the center for best viewing in all directions. Yes Double-A you can throw back at me. We are not in the center of the solar system. We are very far from the center of our galaxy. You however can't say where the Milky Way is in relation to the universe's center or outer edge The fact is we have listened hard for many years for just one signal telling us "we are not alone" So far that has told us "we are alone" Until Double-A you can prove we are not alone I will remain your egotistical virtual friend Bert who is nice enough to put you with me in the center of the universe No thank you is necessary. We would not want to be in the exact center of the universe any more than we would want to be in the center of our galaxy. Bert > Hi Double-A This super-egotist has posted many times that the universe > even if finite is to big to mark its center. Being in a 44 billion [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > you is necessary. We would not want to be in the exact center of the > universe any more than we would want to be in the center of our galaxy. we always ask if there is a center. We never seem to question, does it matter?  SignatureBV Webporgmaster of iheartmypond.com http://www.iheartmypond.com Help IHeartMyPond.com, by doing all of your eBay shopping via our eBay Affiliate Link: http://www.kqzyfj.com/click-1609574-10357516. It doesn't cost you anything, but an extra click! Hi BV It does matter if like our galaxy the center of the universe has a huge BH Bert Dark Matter.invisible matter 2 billion LY of gravity lines in space can be used for the universe's missing gravity. Bert Oops forgot about the intrinsic energy in space. Hi Ray,and nightbat My "what if" has the missing gravity coming from the mutual gravity waves of all the other universes. My idea is gravity can't be blocked.No matter if these muli-universes are separated by a membrane or trillions of LY. My saying there are as many universes as flakes of snow in an endless storm fits well with this theory. The fact that gravity waves go to infinity helps this theory.The fact that gravities force obeys the inverse square law does not hurt this theory because of the infinite number of universes. I see this on a large scale as a grid(lines of gravity force) It is this gravity grid that creates inertia. That makes the fact that gravity and inertia are in reality the same. It must be a good theory because I explained it to a bar maid,and she understood it. Its also short Bert nightbat wrote > Hi Ray,and nightbat My "what if" has the missing gravity coming from > the mutual gravity waves of all the other universes. My idea is gravity [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > because I explained it to a bar maid,and she understood it. Its also > short Bert nightbat Hmmmmm, more importantly Bert, did you get her name and number? the nightbat > Hi Ray,and nightbat My "what if" has the missing gravity coming from > the mutual gravity waves of all the other universes. My idea is [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > theory because I explained it to a bar maid,and she understood it. > Its also short Bert Did you see the Elegant Universe programme on Nova and it's still there available for viewing. The idea of gravity leaking from universe to universe is suggested there. May also prove to be a way to communicate with another universe via this leaking gravity ;-). It's a good programme, I seen it twice now. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html Might watch it again later ;-) Hi Ray Brian Greene took the place of Richard Feynman for me. Feynman was my ideal. Yes I did see that program ,and have the book elegant universe. My term "Its gravity all the way down" fits well with multi-universes. Bert > nightbat wrote > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > ponder on, > the nightbat I expect it was getting a little embarrassing for them, so much of the stuff yet nowhere to be seen or had. Something had to change and maybe this will be it. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.