Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / January 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

NASA Tracks space bursts

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rap - 30 Jan 2005 06:24 GMT
NASA Tracks Three Space Bursts, Says Stellar Explosions Imminent

By Robert Roy Britt
Senior Science Writer

Three powerful bursts of energy from different regions of space could
presage spectacular explosions of huge stars, astronomers just
announced.

The eruptions are likely imminent.

Scientists around the world are scrambling to track the blasts, NASA
officials said last night. There is no danger to Earth from the
expected stellar explosions, called supernovas.

Yet never before have astronomers had such advance warning of the
faraway explosions. In fact, they don't even know if their forecasts
are right.

What is clear is that as the flashes develop into explosions -- or not
-- knowledge of how stars die is likely to grow.

'Beautiful' bursts

A blast of X-rays was spotted Sept. 12, and another on Sept. 16. Each
came from a different location in the sky and from galaxies far beyond
our own. A more powerful eruption was detected Sept. 24 from yet
another spot in the sky. This third flash, importantly, was on the
verge between an X-ray eruption and a more energetic gamma-ray burst,
which involves a more powerful form of radiation.

X-rays and gamma rays are types of light, just like less powerful
visible light and lowly radio waves. All are part of the
electromagnetic spectrum.

The three high-energy flashes were each discovered by NASA's orbiting
High-Energy Transient Explorer (HETE- 2) observatory. There is no
reason to suspect there's any connection between the three blasts.

"We think it's just a strange coincidence," George Ricker, of the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said in a telephone interview
today.

Telescopes around the world have since raced to track each event.

"Each burst has been beautiful," Ricker said. "Depending on how these
evolve, they could support important theories about supernova[s] and
gamma-ray bursts."

Ricker told SPACE.com the stars will likely go supernova 10 to 20 days
after the initial bursts that were spotted.

The initial events have faded beyond the visibility of small
professional telescopes and are now being monitored by some of the
world's largest ground-based observatories. Backyard astronomers
likely could not find the bursts, Ricker said.

Head-scratchers

Gamma-ray bursts are the most energetic events in the universe other
than the Big Bang. They briefly outshine entire galaxies. Astronomers
think each burst is related to the explosion of a very massive star
that has used up its main fuel. Much material is blasted into space,
and some falls back rapidly and collapses into a tiny sphere more
dense than most folks can imagine, resulting in the formation of a
black hole.

In some cases, however, the energy might be unleashed when two black
holes collide.

But experts are not sure why some supernovas are accompanied by
gamma-ray bursts and others seem to shoot out only X-rays (the latter
assumption has not even been convincingly determined). The leading
theory is that when a star collapses after exploding, it sends out two
incredibly swift jets of material, one along each of its poles. If a
jet is pointed toward Earth, the thinking goes, we see a gamma-ray
burst. Otherwise we note only the X rays.

Other theorists argue that gamma-ray bursts and X-ray flashes are
different animals altogether.

All this could become much clearer in coming days as the three new
eruptions are monitored by a global telescope network designed to
detect each of the different wavelengths of energy involved.

Nature on a rampage

The eruptions are all probably a billion or so light-year away, Ricker
said. That's relatively close in comparison to most gamma-ray bursts,
which may explain why the X-ray flashes have been seen at all.

"These past two weeks have been like 'cock, fire, reload,'" Ricker
said. "Nature keeps on delivering."

Until recently, the events leading up to gamma-ray bursts and black
hole formation had not been seen.

The bursts are known to come routinely from every direction in the
sky. But they last just seconds, sometimes less than a second, so in
most cases only the aftermath is witnessed. Astronomers hope this time
they've seen the prelude and can witness the entire process.

Observations of other events in recent years linked gamma-ray bursts
to supernovas. Now, follow-up observations of the Sept. 24 blast,
named GRB040924, suggests X-rays and gamma rays do indeed emanate from
the same event.

The recent bursts "may be the first time we see an X-ray flash lead to
a supernova," said theorist Stanford Woosley of the University of
California at Santa Cruz.
Barry Schwarz - 30 Jan 2005 22:18 GMT
>NASA Tracks Three Space Bursts, Says Stellar Explosions Imminent
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>The eruptions are likely imminent.

snip

>A blast of X-rays was spotted Sept. 12, and another on Sept. 16. Each
>came from a different location in the sky and from galaxies far beyond
>our own. A more powerful eruption was detected Sept. 24 from yet
>another spot in the sky. This third flash, importantly, was on the
>verge between an X-ray eruption and a more energetic gamma-ray burst,
>which involves a more powerful form of radiation.

snip

>The three high-energy flashes were each discovered by NASA's orbiting
>High-Energy Transient Explorer (HETE- 2) observatory. There is no
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said in a telephone interview
>today.

snip

>The initial events have faded beyond the visibility of small
>professional telescopes and are now being monitored by some of the
>world's largest ground-based observatories. Backyard astronomers
>likely could not find the bursts, Ricker said.

OK folks, which backyard astronomers does this guy know who have
equipment able to detect and display x-rays and gamma rays?  And how
much did it cost?  And do they ever bring it to star parties or
association viewings?

<<Remove the del for email>>
Jonathan Silverlight - 30 Jan 2005 23:00 GMT
>>The initial events have faded beyond the visibility of small
>>professional telescopes and are now being monitored by some of the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>much did it cost?  And do they ever bring it to star parties or
>association viewings?

The original article is a bit confusing, but gamma ray bursts have
optical counterparts (that's what the "ground-based observatories" see)
and those counterparts have been seen by amateurs. According to this
press release the brightest optical event recorded might have been seen
with the unaided eye if anyone had been looking at it at the right time
<http://www.brightsurf.com/news/april_03/GSFC_news_040203.html>.
Signature

Support the DEC Tsunami Appeal http://www.dec.org.uk/.
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.

G=EMC^2 Glazier - 31 Jan 2005 13:18 GMT
The greatest "gamma" burst ever recorded took place in 1999. For a few
seconds its energy was greater than that of the entire universe. It took
place 7 billion LY away. I think our gamma satellite detectors are
picking up these explosions each day. I use these explosions for my
mini-universe theory. Bert  PS these detecters were put in orbit to
detect Russian H-Bomb blasts when they were testing
Double-A - 31 Jan 2005 19:34 GMT
> The greatest "gamma" burst ever recorded took place in 1999. For a few
> seconds its energy was greater than that of the entire universe. It took
> place 7 billion LY away. I think our gamma satellite detectors are
> picking up these explosions each day. I use these explosions for my
> mini-universe theory. Bert  PS these detecters were put in orbit to
> detect Russian H-Bomb blasts when they were testing

Yes, they are detected about once a day, they say.

It is believed that the bursts come from distant galaxies.

The energy emitted by a  gamma burst is comparable to burning up the
entire mass-energy of the sun in a few tens of seconds.

That burst in 1999 gave a visable light afterglow of magnitude 9.  You
could have seen in with binoculars.

Want to get involved in observation of the afterglows?  For observers
with 8 inch or larger telescopes, there's never been a better time to
see cosmic explosions from the dawn of the Universe -- from the comfort
of your own backyard!

For information about joining the AAVSO GRB Network, please visit this
URL: http://www.aavso.org/grb/.

>From them you can get the coordinates for where to look when a burst
occurs, and then report your observations.
(Who says I don't post astronomy content!)


Double-A
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.