> It seems more and more people are willing to go against the mainstream
> and say we see evidence of artificial structures on Mars, and in some
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> astronaut that there is evidence of Life on other planets. Go figure,
> he must be just another 'kook' like me.
Saying there may be evidence of life on other planets doesn't make you a
kook. For example, the amino acide content of comets and planetary nebula
could be taken as evidence of life elsewhere. One could imagine that
atmospheric gas ratios could provide some evidence, depending upon the
models that you use. Statistical arguments certainly provide evidence of
life on other planets. Nothing kooky about believing there is evidence for
life on other plantes.
However, what is seriously kooky is believeing that 4 billion year old
Martian egyptians buily pyramids in the Moon.
> ---
>
> http://www.keithlaney.com/A%20hidden%20mission/A17HMp1.html
> http://www.keithlaney.com/TargetMarsHome/ThreeArtificialStructures.html
I can't believe that in the hundreds of thousands of photos of the moon and
mars, you couldn't finds structures which looked more artificial. These
"perfectly formed triangles" resemble nothing so much as craters the shape
of 10 kms wide lumps of cow sh.t, providing evidence not of intelligent
Martians so much as a massive dairy industry in the Moon and Mars's distant
past.
Mad Scientist - 24 Jul 2004 05:26 GMT
>>It seems more and more people are willing to go against the mainstream
>>and say we see evidence of artificial structures on Mars, and in some
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> life on other planets. Nothing kooky about believing there is evidence for
> life on other plantes.
Whatever you say there dweeb.
> However, what is seriously kooky is believeing that 4 billion year old
> Martian egyptians buily pyramids in the Moon.
Man you are f.cked up!
>>---
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Martians so much as a massive dairy industry in the Moon and Mars's distant
> past.
Mad Scientist - 25 Jul 2004 16:30 GMT
>>It seems more and more people are willing to go against the mainstream
>>and say we see evidence of artificial structures on Mars, and in some
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Saying there may be evidence of life on other planets doesn't make you a
> kook.
Tell that to the kooks.
For example, the amino acide content of comets and planetary nebula
> could be taken as evidence of life elsewhere. One could imagine that
> atmospheric gas ratios could provide some evidence, depending upon the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> However, what is seriously kooky is believeing that 4 billion year old
> Martian egyptians buily pyramids in the Moon.
Duh!
It should be obvious by now that the real kooks spend absolutely NO TIME
discussing anything important, rather they show themselves to be
obsessed with utter nonsense. Check out the post on Martian pyramids.
No discussion whatsoever of the images. None! Plenty of responses
though, and not one of them worth more than my dogshit.
>>---
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Martians so much as a massive dairy industry in the Moon and Mars's distant
> past.
Paul Lawler - 25 Jul 2004 20:51 GMT
> It should be obvious by now that the real kooks spend absolutely NO TIME
> discussing anything important, rather they show themselves to be
> obsessed with utter nonsense. Check out the post on Martian pyramids.
> No discussion whatsoever of the images. None! Plenty of responses
> though, and not one of them worth more than my dogshit.
Wow... I guess they were right. On the Internet, no one knows you're a dog!
Jonathan Silverlight - 26 Jul 2004 22:56 GMT
>Wow... I guess they were right. On the Internet, no one knows you're a dog!
I'm amused to see that even Eric Crew apparently doesn't want this guy
on his side.
Mad Scientist - 30 Jul 2004 03:13 GMT
>> Wow... I guess they were right. On the Internet, no one knows you're a
>> dog!
>
> I'm amused to see that even Eric Crew apparently doesn't want this guy
> on his side.
Its a matter of language. I have been saying for years that our
universe is just one of many electromagnetic spectrums. He calls this
the 'electric' universe. I don't disagree with all of his conclusions,
but he says nothing about the light cone in terms of matter and
anti-matter particles. Thus how does he account for stars apppearing in
an invisible spectrum or for 'dark mass'? Electron relationships with
matter waves is just one key to understanding the universe that I
support. So I doubt very highly if Eric Crew knew what 'side' I am on,
he would have no problem with its basic theories.
Wally Anglesea - 31 Jul 2004 01:03 GMT
> >> Wow... I guess they were right. On the Internet, no one knows you're a
> >> dog!
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Its a matter of language. I have been saying for years that our
> universe is just one of many electromagnetic spectrums.
Is this when God agreed with you?
> It seems more and more people are willing to go against the mainstream
> and say we see evidence of artificial structures on Mars, and in some
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> http://www.keithlaney.com/A%20hidden%20mission/A17HMp1.html
> http://www.keithlaney.com/TargetMarsHome/ThreeArtificialStructures.html
One word. Bullshit.
That seems to be all you are capable of, doesn't it?
Do you collect crap websites?
What makes you think the bullshit sites you frequent know the difference
between nutty claims and the truth?
Mad Scientist - 24 Jul 2004 14:05 GMT
I don't expect kooks like you to comprehend anything other than your own
arese.
>>It seems more and more people are willing to go against the mainstream
>>and say we see evidence of artificial structures on Mars, and in some
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> What makes you think the bullshit sites you frequent know the difference
> between nutty claims and the truth?
Mad Scientist - 24 Jul 2004 14:45 GMT
Kook
>>It seems more and more people are willing to go against the mainstream
>>and say we see evidence of artificial structures on Mars, and in some
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> What makes you think the bullshit sites you frequent know the difference
> between nutty claims and the truth?
> It seems more and more people are willing to go against the mainstream
> and say we see evidence of artificial structures on Mars, and in some
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> http://www.keithlaney.com/A%20hidden%20mission/A17HMp1.html
> http://www.keithlaney.com/TargetMarsHome/ThreeArtificialStructures.html
ASSHAT ALERT!!!!
Mad Scientist - 24 Jul 2004 14:45 GMT
Kook alert!
>>It seems more and more people are willing to go against the mainstream
>>and say we see evidence of artificial structures on Mars, and in some
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> ASSHAT ALERT!!!!
Wally Anglesea™ - 25 Jul 2004 00:19 GMT
>Kook alert!
http://home.pacifier.com/~dkossy/kooksmus.html
>>>It seems more and more people are willing to go against the mainstream
>>>and say we see evidence of artificial structures on Mars, and in some
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>> ASSHAT ALERT!!!!

Signature
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
Mad Scientist - 25 Jul 2004 16:27 GMT
Wally who is competing for the number 1 Kook award, shows how much of a
kook he is recommending kook websites.
See: Kook tactic number 2. Focus only on insanity while claiming others
aren't interested in science.
>>Kook alert!
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>>
>>>ASSHAT ALERT!!!!
> It seems more and more people are willing to go against the mainstream
> and say we see evidence of artificial structures on Mars, and in some
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> http://www.keithlaney.com/A%20hidden%20mission/A17HMp1.html
> http://www.keithlaney.com/TargetMarsHome/ThreeArtificialStructures.html
Arthur C Clarke said it? It must be true. And don't anyone dare say
anything against it.
Hes so good at fortelling the future, he didn even see the demise of Pan
Am!!