Space Forum / Astronomy / August 2008

check your history please, YID...

It's the FALSE hebrews, the non-semitic descendants of the caucassian
Khazar people converted to judaism in the 11th century, known as euro-
jews, that cause all problems by falsely claiming a middle-eastern
ancestry they never had.

Nope. That's exactly what Herzl wrote, you stupid, whiny jew c.nt.

On Aug 29, 12:42 am, LOVE Europe HATE the EU
<zzzxtyryyetytr...@googlemail.com> wrote:

Jews and their collaborators have a long western history of being
hated by moral Christians.

All Hail "DEPARTMENT OF GLOBAL ANTI-SEMITISM'
THE REAL MOTIVE BEHIND THE “DEPARTMENT OF GLOBAL ANTI-SEMITISM”
By Rev. Ted Pike

On October 16, 2004 President Bush signed into law the Global Anti-
Semitism Review Act. It establishes a special department within the
U.S. State Department to monitor global anti-Semitism, reporting
annually to Congress.

This is more “Hate Crimes” legislation, orchestrated by the
international Jewish religious, educational, and fraternal
organization, B’nai B’rith, and its Anti-Defamation League. The new
“Department of Global Anti-Semitism” is designed to make critics of
Israel not only into “anti-Semites” but ultimately into “domestic
terrorists.”

But first, what is anti-Semitism? Simple: It is the racist belief that
Jews, because of heredity, are evil, greedy, corrupting, subversive,
degenerate, etc. Hitler believed this. So do the KKK and certain
“Christian identity” and white supremacist groups.

Such dehumanization of Jews is evil, un-Christian, un-American.

On the other hand, if the actions of individual Jews, Jewish
institutions, Jewish religious or secular leaders, or the nation
Israel have been evil, then vehement criticism is not anti-Semitic. It
is courageous and laudable. Certainly, the Biblical prophets,
including Christ, engaged in vitriolic criticism of the sinful nation
Israel and its false leaders. No one considers them anti-Semitic.

TWISTED DEFINITIONS OF “ANTI-SEMITISM”

However, in its “Report on Global Anti-Semitism” and “Global Anti-
Semitism Report,” the U.S. State Department ignores the above
perspectives. Here is a list of beliefs or activities the U.S.
government now considers anti-Semitic:

Any assertion “that the Jewish community controls government, the
media, international business and the financial world” is anti-
Semitic.

“Strong anti-Israel sentiment” is anti-Semitic.

“Virulent criticism” of Israel’s leaders, past or present, is anti-
Semitic. According to the State Department, anti-Semitism occurs when
a swastika is portrayed in a cartoon decrying the behavior of a past
or present Zionist leader. Thus, a cartoon that includes a swastika to
criticize Ariel Sharon’s brutal 2002 invasion of the West Bank,
raining “hell-fire” missiles on hapless Palestinian men, women and
children, is anti-Semitic. Similarly, when the word “Zionazi” is used
to describe Sharon’s saturation bombing in Lebanon in 1982 (killing
17,500 innocent refugees), it is also “anti-Semitic.”

Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or
literature (especially the Talmud and Kabbalah) is anti-Semitic.

Criticism of the U.S. government and Congress for being under undue
influence by the Jewish-Zionist community (including AIPAC) is anti-
Semitic.

Criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism (the
“New World Order”) is anti-Semitic.

Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman
crucifixion of Christ is anti-Semitic.

Diminishing the “six million” figure of Holocaust victims is anti-
Semitic.

Calling Israel a “racist” state is anti-Semitic.

Asserting that there exists a “Zionist Conspiracy” is anti-Semitic.

Claiming that Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik Revolution
in Russia is anti-Semitic.

Making “derogatory statements about Jewish persons” is anti-Semitic.

Denying spiritually disobedient Jews the biblical right to re-occupy
Palestine is anti-Semitic.

Alleging that Mossad was behind the 9/11 attack is anti-Semitic.

ANTI-SEMITISM IS A “HATE CRIME”

In the Global Anti-Semitism Report, State Department spokespersons
Ambassador Edward O’Donnell and the head of the office of global anti-
Semitism, Ambassador Michael B. Kozak, defend the State Department’s
definitions. O’Donnell’s statement that he wants to “end all anti-
Semitism and other hate crimes” reveals that he considers anti-
Semitism a hate crime. Presumably, he would like such a “crime” to be
punished.

These State Department reports repeatedly equate “strong, anti-Israel
sentiment” and criticism of matters Jewish with “hate.” They give no
recognition to the possibility that such criticism might be sincerely
motivated not by hate but by moral indignation or even love for the
Jewish people.

The Report on Global Anti-Semitism repeatedly calls for passage, both
nationally and internationally, of “hate crime” legislation. These
laws, the brainchild of B’nai B’rith/ADL, also have as their ultimate
goal making it a “hate crime” to criticize Jews, matters Jewish, or
the state of Israel.

The Report on Global Anti-Semitism reeks with B’nai B’rith/ADL logic,
phraseology, and evidence of their incredible worldwide organizational
and statistic-gathering capacities. It contains thirty-three pages of
minute documentation of “anti-Semitic incidents” in fifty-eight
countries of the world, documentation which only B’nai B’rith/ADL,
with its offices in more than fifty countries, could compile or even
be that vitally interested in. Without a doubt, as with hate laws,
this Global Anti-Semitism Review Act is their creation.

CRITICISM-FREE ZONE FOR JEWS

Thus, the Department of Anti-Semitism, applauded and advised by B’nai
B’rith/ADL, is working to create a worldwide “criticism-free zone” for
Jews in the “New World Order” that is coming. This report ignores
whether criticisms of matters Jewish are true. What must be defended
are the sensitivities of the Jewish people! Consequently, relating
such unflattering realities as the anti-Christian, anti-Gentile
contents of the Talmud and Kabbalah, Jewish origins of bolshevism,
Jewish dominance of Hollywood and the media, Jewish control of
Congress through AIPAC, Zionist atrocities and abrasiveness in the
Middle East is anti-Semitic. It is “hate.” It does not matter that
such facts can be easily and extensively documented, often from
impeccable Jewish sources such as the Encyclopedia Judaica.

All such anti-Semitism, this report says, is a “scourge,” an
“intolerable burden,” which “for an increasingly interdependent world…
must be ended.”

On the other hand, according to the U.S. State Department, there does
exist some possibility that “objective criticism” of Israel and its
leaders can be tolerated - that is, just as long as such criticism
does not “cross the line” and become “strong anti-Israel sentiment”
and “virulent.” Such criticism should not “demonize” Jews, Jewish
religious or political leaders, or the state of Israel.

However, what may be considered “virulence” or “demonization” by
Zionists may be seen as nothing more than salty truth-telling by
critics of Israel. Hypocritically, the State Department itself is not
above “demonizing” strong critics of Israel in the most “virulent”
terms as a “plague” and “scourge” on mankind!

TURNING “ANTI-SEMITISM” INTO “DOMESTIC TERRORISM”

The State Department’s twisted definition of anti-Semitism provides
exponential opportunities to persecute Bible-believing Christians,
anti-war activists, Moslems, as well as publishers and broadcasters in
the years ahead. In fact, by turning “strong” criticism of the
American/Zionist coalition into “anti-Semitism and other hate crimes,”
the State Department opens the door to eventual characterization of
those who criticize Israel as not only anti-Semites but also as
“domestic terrorists.”

Here’s how it can be done:

Today, those who raise funds in America to support America’s and
Israel’s terrorist enemies are arrested as “domestic terrorists.” But
what if articulate Americans provided something else, potentially even
more valuable to Israel’s enemies: “strong criticism” of Israel? Such
could weaken Israel morally in the sight of the world, giving
justification to the claims of her terrorist enemies. Should they also
be punished?

As the Second World War was beginning in 1939, Charles Lindberg was
publicly critical of international Jews for inveigling America into a
war to destroy Hitler. Lindberg believed that Hitler should be allowed
to do what he wanted to do most, move east and destroy “Jewish
Communism” in Russia.

In 1944, 30 Americans, who agreed with Lindberg, were arrested for the
crime of “sedition,” weakening America’s resolve in the fight against
fascism. Later investigation under the Freedom of Information Act
revealed that the ADL, attempting to equate criticism of international
Jews with Nazism, had entirely created the FBI case.

Records revealed that the ADL was “only warming up” by pursuing
sedition convictions against 30 innocent Americans. Their ultimate
ambition was to imprison prominent critics of evil Jewish leadership,
especially Charles Lindberg. Fortunately, ADL’s attempt to transform
30 critics of international Jews into “Nazis” failed when the judge
died and the case was dissolved.

Today, America and Israel are allies in the “war on terror.” Tomorrow,
especially if the war on terror intensifies and America and Israel
cooperate even more closely, criticism of America’s ally in the war on
terrorism may be construed as “aiding and abetting the enemy.” Such
“strong criticism” or anti-Semitism may be seen as not only weakening
Israel, but America itself.

Turning millions of Americans into anti-Semites for criticizing Israel
is thus a transition toward ADL’s ultimate goal: making such persons
“enemies of the war on terror,” i.e., “domestic terrorists.”

They then can be prosecuted under Homeland Security laws.

CANADA: ALREADY MAKING “ANTI-SEMITES” INTO “DOMESTIC TERRORISTS”

In Canada, we are seeing exactly this happen. Ernst Zundel is a
Holocaust revisionist who doubts that a full six million Jews were
deliberately murdered by the Nazis, largely by gassing. He asserts
that untold numbers of Jews in German internment camps, especially in
the last years of the war, died not in gas chambers, but as a result
of massive, well-documented typhus epidemics, which also killed
countless Poles, Gypsies, Russians, etc. Yet in Canada, thanks to ADL/
B’nai B’rith, it is a “hate crime” to lesson to any degree the six
million figure of Holocaust dead, or that most of them died in gas
chambers. Such diminishment is anti-Semitism, a “hate crime”
punishable by harsh fines and imprisonment. Several years ago Zundel
was deported from his home in Tennessee back to Canada to spend more
than two years in solitary confinement in a Canadian prison. He was
then deported back to his native Germany where he remains in prison.

Under what charge have Canadian authorities been holding him?

You guessed it. He is a “terrorist threat!”

So it will be for millions of Americans tomorrow if ADL/B’nai B’rith
have their way and the Department of Anti-Semitism’s twisted
definitions of anti-Semitism are allowed to stand.

The Department of Global Anti-Semitism is informing the world who the
“domestic terrorists” of tomorrow will be.

They are you and I.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

WHAT CAN WE DO?

We can do plenty!

Call our members of Congress toll-free at 1-877-762-8762

Call the U.S. State Department comment line at 1-202-647-4000

Demand that all funding and authority for the development of the
Department of Anti-Semitism be rescinded.

Demand that Congressional hearings be held to re-formulate a workable,
balanced definition of “anti-Semitism” - one that protects Bible-
believing Christians, critics of Israel, and Moslems from persecution
as “anti-Semites.”

Also, call into talk shows, especially large, syndicated ones.

Since the threat of hate laws is “taboo” on most large shows, do not
tell the talk show operator that you want to comment on that subject.
If the topic of the day is even remotely related to the issue of free
speech, terrorism, the Mid-East, etc., begin with those topics but
quickly move the discussion to the threat of hate laws. Describe how
free speech is lost in Canada; how eleven Christians were arrested
under Pennsylvania’s hate law; how the “Department of Anti-semitism”
would make many Americans into anti-semites.

Talk show hosts: For an interview with Rev. Ted Pike on the
“Department of Anti-Semitism,” call 503-631-3808.

For many articles on “hate crimes” legislation and B’nai B’rith’s role
in creating it, visit www.truthtellers.org.
__________________

Demand that Congressional hearings be held to re-formulate a workable,
balanced definition of “anti-Semitism” - one that protects Bible-
believing Christians, critics of Israel, and Moslems from persecution
as “anti-Semites.”

I would guess that writing your jewish Congress person about this will
get your name on a list of potential domestic terrorists.

A better idea is to demand that the term "anti-Semitism" remain
unregulated by government and allow people themselves to regulate it
by free speech. If a jew is insulted, they can return the insult or
explain why it does not apply, hence, free speech.

Once we allow any government to regulate "anti-Semitism", then that
government should be obligated to regulate "anti-Catholicism", "anti-
Americanism", and ultimately, any criticism about anything including
government officials themselves. Regulating speech leads to
dictatorship and tyranny.

Thought control is best exercised by the individual using the free
will they were born with, not governments, none of which have
conscience or mercy.