Space Forum / Astronomy / August 2008

Nothingness. ? !!!
============ ========= =..

Nothingness of Space Could Illuminate the Theory of Everything .
============ ========.
Could the vacuum contain dark energy, gravity particles,
and frictionless gears?
by Tim Folger
published online July 18, 2008

When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum, that endless
infinite void.

http://discovermaga zine.com/ topics/space

http://discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/18-nothingness-of-space-theory-of-everything

#
" The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t
correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct
description
of something more complex? "

 / Paul Dirac ./
#
"Now we know that the vacuum can have all sorts of wonderful effects
over an enormous range of scales, from the microscopic to the cosmic,"

/ Peter Milonni.
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico./
============ ==.

What is the first law of Universe ?
=========.
The Physics is first of all Vacuum.
Vacuum is :T=0K.
It is the empty space between milliards of billions Galaxies.
* * *
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons gluons field .. etc.) was assembled in a single point.

It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the single
point. The answer is : EMPTINESS- NOTHING.!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
* * *
Once there was a Big Bang.
But in what space had the Big Bang taken place
and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?
Not in T=0K?
It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.
Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is
in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big
Bang ). But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will
change and decrease. What temperature can this radiation reach?
Not T=0K?
Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,
we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K.
============ =======.
About the theory of the Big Bang is written
the thick (very thick) books.
But anywhere do not write about the reason of the Big Bang.
Anybody does not know it.
I know.
Action, when the God opens his palm,
have named the "Big Bang".
And action, when the God compresses his palm,
have named " a single point".
============ ========= ======.

Now it is consider that Newton / Einstein’s laws
of gravitation are the first laws of Universe.
============
1.
Newton was a clever man therefore when he discovered his
" law of gravitation" he quickly understood that
soon or later the all matter in the Universe had to gather
in the " singular point".
And because this effect does not happen in the Nature,
Newton , being very religious man , thought that only God’s
power did not give the matter to gather in a " singular point".
2.
And then atheistic time came. They decided :
As God does not exist, so the all matter in Universe
must gather in a " singular point".
============ ====
I don’t agree that Newton / Einstein’s laws
of gravitation are the first laws of Universe.
Why?
1.
Take simple atom: proton and electron,( small distances).
Nobody interests in gravitation interaction between
proton and electron . There is not any theory about
gravitation interaction between proton and electron .
Everybody interests only in electrical ( nuclear)
interaction between them.
It means that Newton / Einstein’s laws of gravitation
are local and limited.
This law in the small ( nuclear) distance does not work.
2.
Take Universe ( cosmic distances).
There is not theory about gravitation interaction between
galaxy A. and galaxy Z. We don’t need it.
Why? For example.
Let’s imagine of all apple- trees on our Earth
as a galaxy, and apples as stars.
Nobody will interest in the interaction between
an apple- tree in New York ( galaxy A.) and
an apple- tree (cherry-tree) in Varanasi (galaxy Z.).
It means that Newton / Einstein’s laws of gravitation
are local and limited.
This law in the big cosmic distance does not work.
3.
Detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small
(the average density of all substance in the Universe is
approximately p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it is not able to isolate all
cosmic space in sphere. It mean that Universe (Vacuum) is infinite.
=========
Conclusion: Newton / Einstein’s laws of gravitation cannot be
" The first law of Universe."
============ ====
What is the second law of Universe ?
To answer of this question we must ask:
" What geometrical and physical parameters
have the particles in Vacuum T=0K? "
1.
Thermodynamics point.
Let us take some area of Vacuum and mark it with letter R.
The number of particles in this area of Vacuum
we will to mark with letter N.
When every particle of this area has gravity/ mass of rest: R/N= k.
============ =======
2.
Quantum (SRT) point.
Classic physics asserts, that in a Vacuum Ò=0Ê cease any motion
of particles, and the energy of Vacuum is equal zero.
The quantum physics asserts, that in a Vacuum Ò=0Ê there are
motion of particles, and the energy of Vacuum is not zero.
Let us take some energy area of Vacuum and mark it with letter E.
The mass of this energy area of Vacuum we will to mark with letter M.
When every particle of this area has energy/mass of rest: E/M= c^2,
( E=Mc^2, M=Ec^2.)
============ ========= ==
3.
Geometry and Physics.
The Modern Physics was started from two points:
thermodynamics and light.
1.
By studying the effect of thermodynamics, physicists came to the
opinion that the physical parameters like volume, temperature and
density (of particles mass) are enough to discover the laws of
thermodynamics, and they didn’t need to know something
concrete about single particle. But then, soon or later, all mass of
this
particles will stop it’s moving and the thermal/ radiation death
will come. Is it possible? No, it isn’t , some particles will radiate
and then QT evolved from this idea. Now the situation radically
change.
From studying mass of particles in thermodynamics Planck and
Einstein
began to study one individual particle (quantum of energy). It
seams that
it was logical to think about geometrical form of this particle,
but this
did not happen. And still now physicists do not think about concrete
particles, they are concerned about the " mathematical point".
2.
When physicists studied the behavior of light, they came to the
conclusion that light ( light quanta) can sometime be a particle as a
" mathematical point" and sometime a wave as a " mathematical
wave". From behavior of light the SRT was born and here the particle
is also " mathematical point". It is hard to understand, why nobody
think about geometrical form of light quanta if it is real particle.
3.
For many years, physicists used Euclidian (static and firm )
geometry for solving physical problems, and they thought there was
only one geometry.
But Lobachevsky and Bolyai had another opinion.
They thought that to use only Euclidian geometry was not enough to
explain all the effects in the Universe. Why, because our Universe
is not static and firm. The physical processes in Universe change
all the time so the Euclidian geometry also has to change. This lead
Lobachevsky and Bolyai to discover Non-Euclidian geometry which is
not static but elastic.
4.
Between the XIX and XX century, many physicists such Abraham,
Poincare, Lorentz and Einstein came to the conclusion that the
particle (electron) does not have constant mass, energy and length.
This means that an electron is not a firm particle. The electron is
an elastic particle and therefore his geometrical form can change.
All physicists know about this fact and took this fact in their
calculations. But which conclusion can be done from this fact? They
have no answer. Nobody interested about the borders of this changes.
5.
In 1915 Einstein said the mass and speed (moving mass) can change the
geometry of space. (GRT). It means the physics without geometry is a
limited part of science. It means the physics without geometry is
not complete (whole) part of science.
6.
The situation we see today is similar to the years between 1900 and
1928 when QT was created. Nothing changes.
Mathematicians use Non- Euclidian geometry and they do not know
the power of these changes from Euclidian to Non-Euclidian geometry.
They do not interested how these changes came.
And physicists use forces (energy, impulse, ...etc) without know
anything about geometrical changes of particles. They do not think
about this. For them the particle is only represented by
a " mathematical point".
After all, they say the situation in QT is crazy, the Nature is
paradoxical. I know why they say this, because one hand "physical
doesn,t know that the other hand "geometrical" does.
7.
Can we understand our " paradoxical" world?
The answer is clear. In the Natural world, physics and geometry
are one unit part in the evolutionary process, and this fact must be
reflected in any future theory of the evolution of matter (as a mass
and as an individual particle).
------------ --------- --.
The Natural world is not a " mathematical point".
Even the smallest object must have a geometrical form.
And on my opinion, only when we begin to think about light quanta as
a particle with a geometrical form we come from image to reality.
------------ -------.
P.S.
Italy. Railway station.
It was more then two hours till the departure of the train.
I went to the café and ordered a cup of coffee. Soon two men
and a very beautiful, slim woman took place opposite me.
They ordered something to drink and one of the man opened a
case of violin and took out a bow. He began to explain something
about a bow , carefully and gently touching it. Then another man
took this bow and also enthusiastically continued this conversation.
For half an hour the bow was passed from one hands to another
following with enthusiastic discussion.
And the beautiful woman looked at bow, at both these men without
saying a word. For half an hour I watched this group with admiration
and excitement. What a class! What a cultural level! What a beauty!
=======================..
And now let's imagine the bow pressed into a "mathematical point"
and  the musicians speak seriously about a  " mathematical point "
which must produce a sound from a violin. Everybody will say I
describe an idiotic situation. Well, I agree.
But why don’t anybody say it to physicists when they observe the
elementary particle as a " mathematical point " , without paying
attention to its geometrical form.
==========..
P.S.
When Feynman said " I think I can safely say that nobody understands
quantum mechanics. " it was only because nobody took into
consideration
the geometrical form of particle.
================.

In 1787, French physicist Jack Charles found out that at
a decrease of gas temperature to 1 degree, its volume decreases
on 1/273 : " Charles' law ". And  when the  temperature reaches
-273 degrees  the volume disappears.
This law was confirmed by others of physicists:
Gay-Lussac ( 1802), W. Nernst ( 1910), A. Einstein ( 1925)
All these laws (as consequence from the Third Law of
Thermodynamics ) tell, when the temperature goes closer to
zero T=0K, then the particles lose more their volume.
The volume of these particles aspires to infinity.
Unless can it be? No.
It prohibits with the "Law of conservation and transformation
energy". Its mean, when volume of the particles disappear they
become indefinitely flat circles - phantoms.
So, they can only change  its geometrical form and its kinetic
energy and become  “flat particles” with potential energy.
These flat particles must have geometrical form of a circle
C/D= pi = 3,14…..So, it is mistaken to think about elementary
Particle  as about a "mathematical point".
What does "indefinitely flat circles means?
It means, that we cannot reach Absolute Vacuum T=0K
and we cannot reach density of the particle in the rest .
============ ========= .
4.
Mathematical point.
In mathematics, such condition of the particle in Vacuum
is characterized with the imaginary quantity : i^2=-1.
============ ========= ========= .
The quantum physics approves, that `virtual particles`
exist in Vacuum
Astrophysics approves, that "latent mass", "invisible particles",
'missing mass', 'dark matter' exist in Vacuum.
Everything was created from them.
But nobody knows that it is.
They say, that 90% or more of the matter in the Universe is unseen.
They are right.
============ ========= .
We have now whole bouquet of formulas to begin
to paint the picture of creating the Existence.

C/D=pi , E=Mc^2, R/N=k , h = 0 , i^2 = -1 .
============ ========= ========= =====.
Does not anybody see how beautiful
this bouquet of formulas?
============ .
Israel Ssdovnik./ Socratus.
http://www.socratus .com
http://www.wbabin. net
===============..