Are the spins of stars far more important than presently believed?

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

fitz - 29 Jul 2008 17:54 GMT

Here's someone who thinks they are.

(Click link below:)

http://www.rbduncan.com/schrod.htm

This book was written by a mathematical physcist who was one of that
group who got us on the moon.

Reply to this Message

oldcoot - 29 Jul 2008 18:21 GMT

That's a pretty convoluted convocation of void-spacery, actually.
First these assertions are made :

"..the premise set forth in this book that this is indeed a scalar,
standing wave, resonance universe."

Then, "..all electrons give and receive tiny bits of energy among each
other and they do this basically (in all directions) in a scalar
manner.
...the electron is a scalar, standing wave, resonance that has a
spherical waveform."

Well, since the electron is a standing wave, this immediately begs the
question "A wave of 'What'?" Obviously a supporting medium is
demanded, just as you can't have a whirlpool of water without water.

Then in the remainder of the treatise, the very existance of such a
supporting medium (the 'aether') is methodically denied. Duh.

Reply to this Message

Painius - 29 Jul 2008 21:10 GMT

> That's a pretty convoluted convocation of void-spacery, actually.
> First these assertions are made :
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Then in the remainder of the treatise, the very existance of such a
> supporting medium (the 'aether') is methodically denied. Duh.

Yep, UR right, you ol' coot-- 'sgonna be a long, long
time before the void of science's empty head is finally
and completely filled.

Meanwhile, as to the question: "Are the spins of stars
far more important than presently believed?"...

naaaahhhhh

Well, okay, maybe.

But i seriously doubt if they can match "What's for
supper?" or "Hey Mildred, don't i have any clean socks?"
any time soon.

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

Signature

Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S.: Thank YOU for reading!

P.P.S.: http://painellsworth.net

Reply to this Message

chatnoir - 30 Jul 2008 16:12 GMT

> Here's someone who thinks they are.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> This book was written by a mathematical physcist who was one of that
> group who got us on the moon.

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=246635

excerpt:

Re: Schrödinger's Universe

> Schrödinger's Universe
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I agree with the premise set forth in this book that this is indeed a
> scalar, standing wave, resonance universe.

So why don't you just summarise which predictions the theory makes
that
differs from existing conventional theories, and how they can be
tested.

--
Dirk

Reply to this Message

Space Forum / Astronomy / July 2008

Are the spins of stars far more important than presently believed?