http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/12/cranky-2nd-man-on-moon-blames-movies-for-k
ids-space-boredom/
Cranky 2nd Man on Moon Blames Movies for Kids' Space Boredom
by Peter Martin Jul 12th 2008 // 2:03PM
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom
What is it about ice cream that makes distinguished former astronauts
get so cranky? Buzz Aldrin, the second man to step foot on the Moon,
says that "fantastic and unbelievable" science fiction movies and
television shows are partly to blame for the boredom young people have
with the modern space program.
During an ice cream party this week, Aldrin told Sci-Fi Wire: "All the
shows where they beam people around and things like that have made
young people think that that is what the space program should be
doing. It's not realistic ... you can't possibly live up to the
expectations you have created in young people. Why do they get bored
with the space program? That's why."
Aldrin doesn't hate all science fiction films and TV shows -- just the
ones that deal with "fantasy and ... traveling seven times the speed
of light." He spoke favorably about Ron Howard's Apollo 13 and Tom
Hanks' From the Earth to the Moon series: "They were fascinating,
because it was reality history, and reality fiction can be good if you
stick to reality." Got that?
While not mentioning Star Trek or Star Wars, I'd guess those were some
of the culprits he had in mind. When he's not busy slagging science
fiction and fantasy, Aldrin hosts Unseen Moon, a National Geographic
Channel show. Hmm, I wonder if his show is "reality history" or
"reality fiction"?
---------
Having Art Deco post does not help either!
Saul Levy - 13 Jul 2008 20:43 GMT
It must be brain freeze, chatnoir! lmao!
A wicked and painful disorder!
Saul Levy
>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/12/cranky-2nd-man-on-moon-blames-movies-for-k
ids-space-boredom/
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>expectations you have created in young people. Why do they get bored
>with the space program? That's why."
BradGuth - 13 Jul 2008 21:28 GMT
> http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/12/cranky-2nd-man-on-moon-blames-m...
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Having Art Deco post does not help either!
Our NASA/Apollo DARPA right stuff (of mostly old farts) supposedly did
things that are still (40 years after the fact) technically
impossible, and there's still all sorts of highly classified need-to-
know or nondisclosure issues as mainstream policy. Go figure.
JAXA is deathly afraid of allowing public review of their most recent
archives of moon related science, including their terrific
observationology of having been mapping our Selene/moon at 10 meters/
pixel (in raw digital format that can easily be PhotoShop enlarged
upon).
- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
Saul Levy - 14 Jul 2008 07:50 GMT
This just shows that you, BradBoi, are living in the world of 40 years
ago! lmfjao!
So you haven't learned anything in the past 40 years!
Saul Levy
>Our NASA/Apollo DARPA right stuff (of mostly old farts) supposedly did
>things that are still (40 years after the fact) technically
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 14 Jul 2008 13:20 GMT
Cactus Saul What could turn the public off more on NASA going round and
round 220 miles up for the last 40 years. The shuttle relates well with
spending 100s of billions looking for water on Mars and the shuttles 40
years of orbiting ISS another low orbit piece of crap We could have
spent less and done more,but that would mean less money in the
Godfather's deep pockets Bert
BradGuth - 15 Jul 2008 19:56 GMT
> Cactus Saul What could turn the public off more on NASA going round and
> round 220 miles up for the last 40 years. The shuttle relates well with
> spending 100s of billions looking for water on Mars and the shuttles 40
> years of orbiting ISS another low orbit piece of crap We could have
> spent less and done more,but that would mean less money in the
> Godfather's deep pockets Bert
But you know deep in your snookered and dumbfounded heart that the
likes of Saul Levy are in charge of your private parts, as well as in
charge of your excessively spendy water, electrical and other energy
related matters, and you're clearly not willing to change anything (at
least not for the better).
What if beer starts costing you and other section-8 folks $10/can?
(will that get your attention?)
- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
Saul Levy - 15 Jul 2008 21:07 GMT
Is this an attempt, BradBoi, to claim I work for the Mafia? lmfjao!
No, I don't.
Saul Levy
>But you know deep in your snookered and dumbfounded heart that the
>likes of Saul Levy are in charge of your private parts, as well as in
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth