Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Bin Ladens to buy Newcastle United?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Warhol - 08 Jul 2008 12:49 GMT
Bin Ladens to buy Newcastle United?
From the rumour mills.....

Quote:
Newcastle fans have reacted furiously after learning that relatives of
Osama Bin Laden are among the front runners to buy their club. The Bin
Ladens, who own a Saudi Arabian building firm, are set to bid £300m
for the Premier League club. (The Sun)
Saul Levy - 08 Jul 2008 14:57 GMT
And this is of Earth-shaking importance for what reason, WartPiggy?
lmfjao!

Are the going to blow it up once they buy it?

Saul Levy

>Bin Ladens to buy Newcastle United?
>From the rumour mills.....
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Ladens, who own a Saudi Arabian building firm, are set to bid £300m
>for the Premier League club. (The Sun)
Hagar - 08 Jul 2008 15:11 GMT
Seems like the conversion process for the general Limey population from
whatever to the Muslim faith is well ahead of schedule. Can't wait to see
Charles in a turban and his horse-faced Camilla in a veil ... finally.

> And this is of Earth-shaking importance for what reason, WartPiggy?
> lmfjao!
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>Ladens, who own a Saudi Arabian building firm, are set to bid £300m
>>for the Premier League club. (The Sun)
Seon Ferguson - 09 Jul 2008 10:34 GMT
>Bin Ladens to buy Newcastle United?
>From the rumour mills.....
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Ladens, who own a Saudi Arabian building firm, are set to bid £300m
>for the Premier League club. (The Sun)

Well Bush did fly the Binladens out after 911 when all flights were
canceled.
I'd be pissed as well.
B. H. Cramer - 09 Jul 2008 10:49 GMT
>>Bin Ladens to buy Newcastle United?
>>From the rumour mills.....
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Well Bush did fly the Binladens out after 911 when all flights were
> canceled.

That was just ole Dubya looking after the people who bailed him out of
bankruptcy. He looks after his mates, you've gotta give him that ;-)

> I'd be pissed as well.
Seon Ferguson - 10 Jul 2008 02:21 GMT
>That was just ole Dubya looking after the people who bailed him out of
>bankruptcy. He looks after his mates, you've gotta give him that ;-)

Yeah and threatening to fire any FBI agent who tried to investigate
the Binladens before 911. Is that more of the same?
Government Shill #2 - 09 Jul 2008 16:43 GMT
>>Bin Ladens to buy Newcastle United?
>>From the rumour mills.....
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>canceled.
>I'd be pissed as well.

Why? Did Martin Bryant's relatives have anything to do with killing 35 people at
Port Arthur? How about Julian Knight's family? Hoddle Street massacre their
fault? Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold. They killed 13 people and injured 23 at
Columbine High School. Are their families guilty of this crime as well?

No?

Then what is your problem with "Bush" flying the Bin Ladens out 8 days after
119? And how did Bush get the time off from being the president to be able to
fly to Saudi Arabia and back during that time of crisis?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2001/sep/21/warinafghanistan2001.september112001
<quote>
Binladin Group is not on any US blacklists and there is no evidence linking any
of Osama's 50 siblings to the attacks. In a statement last Friday, the head of
the family, Abdullah Awad Obood bin Laden, again distanced the company from the
man who has become the pariah of the family.

He reiterated that the family "has no connection with his works and activities"
and expressed "the strongest denunciation and condemnation of this sad event".
</quote>

Shill #2
--
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
LApert - 09 Jul 2008 22:47 GMT
>>> Bin Ladens to buy Newcastle United?
>> >From the rumour mills.....
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Shill #2

When such a disaster hits and a moratorium is declared on travel until
things are sorted out.. That means every f.cking body.
But a communist cocksuker like you would not give a sh.t about America's
security.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Government Shill #2 - 10 Jul 2008 16:31 GMT
>When such a disaster hits and a moratorium is declared on travel until
>things are sorted out.. That means every f.cking body.

http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch10.htm
<quote>
Flights of Saudi Nationals Leaving the United States
Three questions have arisen with respect to the departure of Saudi nationals
from the United States in the immediate aftermath of 9/11:

(1) Did any flights of Saudi nationals take place before national airspace
reopened on September 13, 2001? (2) Was there any political intervention to
facilitate the departure of Saudi nationals? (3) Did the FBI screen Saudi
nationals thoroughly before their departure?

First, we found no evidence that any flights of Saudi nationals, domestic or
international, took place before the reopening of national airspace on the
morning of September 13, 2001.24 To the contrary, every flight we have
identified occurred after national airspace reopened.25

Second, we found no evidence of political intervention. We found no evidence
that anyone at the White House above the level of Richard Clarke participated in
a decision on the departure of Saudi nationals. The issue came up in one of the
many video teleconferences of the interagency group Clarke chaired, and Clarke
said he approved of how the FBI was dealing with the matter when it came up for
interagency discussion at his level. Clarke told us, "I asked the FBI, Dale
Watson . . . to handle that, to check to see if that was all right with them, to
see if they wanted access to any of these people, and to get back to me. And if
they had no objections, it would be fine with me." Clarke added, "I have no
recollection of clearing it with anybody at the White House."26

Although White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card remembered someone telling him
about the Saudi request shortly after 9/11, he said he had not talked to the
Saudis and did not ask anyone to do anything about it. The President and Vice
President told us they were not aware of the issue at all until it surfaced much
later in the media. None of the officials we interviewed recalled any
intervention or direction on this matter from any political appointee.27

Third, we believe that the FBI conducted a satisfactory screening of Saudi
nationals who left the United States on charter flights.28 The Saudi government
was advised of and agreed to the FBI's requirements that passengers be
identified and checked against various databases before the flights
departed.29The Federal Aviation Administration representative working in the FBI
operations center made sure that the FBI was aware of the flights of Saudi
nationals and was able to screen the passengers before they were allowed to
depart.30

The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior to their
departures. They concluded that none of the passengers was connected to the 9/11
attacks and have since found no evidence to change that conclusion. Our own
independent review of the Saudi nationals involved confirms that no one with
known links to terrorism departed on these flights.31
</quote>

>But a communist cocksuker like you would not give a sh.t about America's
>security.

Do I give a sh.t about America's security? No, not really.

I leave the cocksucking to the wife.

Shill #2
--
Roses are red,
violets are blue,
one of us is a moron,
I think that it's you.
Seon Ferguson - 10 Jul 2008 02:25 GMT
>Why? Did Martin Bryant's relatives have anything to do with killing 35 people at
>Port Arthur? How about Julian Knight's family? Hoddle Street massacre their
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Then what is your problem with "Bush" flying the Bin Ladens out 8 days after
>119?

No one else was allowed to fly. Bush also threatened to arrest any FBI
agent who tried to investiagte the Binladens before 911. If thats not
corruption I dont know what is.
Also those people's relatives are not members of an islamofacist
country that hates America, opresses its own people and even funded
the 911 hijackers. They also didnt do buisness with president Bush.

>And how did Bush get the time off from being the president to be able to
>fly to Saudi Arabia and back during that time of crisis?

He allowed them to fly while everyone else was grounded.

>http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2001/sep/21/warinafghanistan2001.september112001
><quote>
>Binladin Group is not on any US blacklists and there is no evidence linking any
>of Osama's 50 siblings to the attacks. In a statement last Friday, the head of
>the family, Abdullah Awad Obood bin Laden, again distanced the company from the
>man who has become the pariah of the family.

Bush didnt know that when he allowed them to fly back to Saudi Arabia.

>He reiterated that the family "has no connection with his works and activities"
>and expressed "the strongest denunciation and condemnation of this sad event".
></quote>
Government Shill #2 - 10 Jul 2008 06:13 GMT
>>Why? Did Martin Bryant's relatives have anything to do with killing 35 people at
>>Port Arthur? How about Julian Knight's family? Hoddle Street massacre their
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>agent who tried to investiagte the Binladens before 911. If thats not
>corruption I dont know what is.

http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch10.htm
<quote>
Flights of Saudi Nationals Leaving the United States
Three questions have arisen with respect to the departure of Saudi nationals
from the United States in the immediate aftermath of 9/11:

(1) Did any flights of Saudi nationals take place before national airspace
reopened on September 13, 2001? (2) Was there any political intervention to
facilitate the departure of Saudi nationals? (3) Did the FBI screen Saudi
nationals thoroughly before their departure?

First, we found no evidence that any flights of Saudi nationals, domestic or
international, took place before the reopening of national airspace on the
morning of September 13, 2001.24 To the contrary, every flight we have
identified occurred after national airspace reopened.25

Second, we found no evidence of political intervention. We found no evidence
that anyone at the White House above the level of Richard Clarke participated in
a decision on the departure of Saudi nationals. The issue came up in one of the
many video teleconferences of the interagency group Clarke chaired, and Clarke
said he approved of how the FBI was dealing with the matter when it came up for
interagency discussion at his level. Clarke told us, "I asked the FBI, Dale
Watson . . . to handle that, to check to see if that was all right with them, to
see if they wanted access to any of these people, and to get back to me. And if
they had no objections, it would be fine with me." Clarke added, "I have no
recollection of clearing it with anybody at the White House."26

Although White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card remembered someone telling him
about the Saudi request shortly after 9/11, he said he had not talked to the
Saudis and did not ask anyone to do anything about it. The President and Vice
President told us they were not aware of the issue at all until it surfaced much
later in the media. None of the officials we interviewed recalled any
intervention or direction on this matter from any political appointee.27

Third, we believe that the FBI conducted a satisfactory screening of Saudi
nationals who left the United States on charter flights.28 The Saudi government
was advised of and agreed to the FBI's requirements that passengers be
identified and checked against various databases before the flights
departed.29The Federal Aviation Administration representative working in the FBI
operations center made sure that the FBI was aware of the flights of Saudi
nationals and was able to screen the passengers before they were allowed to
depart.30

The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior to their
departures. They concluded that none of the passengers was connected to the 9/11
attacks and have since found no evidence to change that conclusion. Our own
independent review of the Saudi nationals involved confirms that no one with
known links to terrorism departed on these flights.31
</quote>

>Also those people's relatives are not members of an islamofacist
>country that hates America, opresses its own people and even funded
>the 911 hijackers.

Oh! SO where a person lives has a bearing on whether they are guilty by
association or not. Fascist!

>They also didnt do buisness with president Bush.

Oh! So business ties are proof of guilt. Fascist!

>>And how did Bush get the time off from being the president to be able to
>>fly to Saudi Arabia and back during that time of crisis?
>>
>He allowed them to fly while everyone else was grounded.

No. He didn't. See above. Got any evidence to the contrary?

>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2001/sep/21/warinafghanistan2001.september112001
>><quote>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>Bush didnt know that when he allowed them to fly back to Saudi Arabia.

Even if true, how the hell do you know what the President of The United States
knew or didn't know?`

>>He reiterated that the family "has no connection with his works and activities"
>>and expressed "the strongest denunciation and condemnation of this sad event".
>></quote>

Shill #2
--
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
Seon Ferguson - 10 Jul 2008 08:37 GMT
>>>Why? Did Martin Bryant's relatives have anything to do with killing 35 people at
>>>Port Arthur? How about Julian Knight's family? Hoddle Street massacre their
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>morning of September 13, 2001.24 To the contrary, every flight we have
>identified occurred after national airspace reopened.25

Like these?
http://www.sptimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/30/archive/main313048.shtml
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/200828512758358
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34405

>Second, we found no evidence of political intervention. We found no evidence
>that anyone at the White House above the level of Richard Clarke participated in
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>known links to terrorism departed on these flights.31
></quote>

Ok so the FBi flew them out.

>>Also those people's relatives are not members of an islamofacist
>>country that hates America, opresses its own people and even funded
>>the 911 hijackers.
>
>Oh! SO where a person lives has a bearing on whether they are guilty by
>association or not. Fascist!

Would you be comfy with the Binladen family owning your favorite team?

>>They also didnt do buisness with president Bush.

I meant to say did do buisness.

>Oh! So business ties are proof of guilt. Fascist!

Try telling that to people who think just because Barrack Obama's kids
went to the same school of a convicted terrorist he's a terrorist.
Or that just because Rev Right is a racist and radical Obama must be
racist and radical.
The fact of the matter is not everyone trusts the Binladen family.
Plus they live in a country that opreses women and kills Christains.

>>>And how did Bush get the time off from being the president to be able to
>>>fly to Saudi Arabia and back during that time of crisis?
>>>
>>He allowed them to fly while everyone else was grounded.
>
>No. He didn't. See above. Got any evidence to the contrary?

Yep the articles.

>>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2001/sep/21/warinafghanistan2001.september112001
>>><quote>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Even if true, how the hell do you know what the President of The United States
>knew or didn't know?`

Bush knew something? haha thats a good one.

>>>He reiterated that the family "has no connection with his works and activities"
>>>and expressed "the strongest denunciation and condemnation of this sad event".
>>></quote>
>
>Shill #2
Government Shill #2 - 10 Jul 2008 16:52 GMT
>>>>Why? Did Martin Bryant's relatives have anything to do with killing 35 people at
>>>>Port Arthur? How about Julian Knight's family? Hoddle Street massacre their
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>Like these?
>http://www.sptimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml

See above. "(1) Did any flights of Saudi nationals take place before national
airspace reopened on September 13, 2001?"

>http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/30/archive/main313048.shtml

This story says, right at the bottom, "Bin Laden is estranged from his family
and from Saudi Arabia, which revoked his citizenship in the early 1990s after he
was caught smuggling weapons from Yemen."

>http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/200828512758358

This one says "Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi ambassador to the US who is
said to have organised the exodus, met President George Bush on September 13,
2001, two days after the terror attacks."

See above. "(1) Did any flights of Saudi nationals take place before national
airspace reopened on September 13, 2001?"

>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34405

And this one says "Once the flight ban was lifted, two jumbo jets transported
the Saudis out of the country. The Boston Globe reported at the time that two
flights bound for Saudi Arabia with members of the bin Laden clan on board left
Logan on Sept. 18 and 19. Other reports put the departure date at Sept. 14."

See above. "(1) Did any flights of Saudi nationals take place before national
airspace reopened on September 13, 2001?"

>>Second, we found no evidence of political intervention. We found no evidence
>>that anyone at the White House above the level of Richard Clarke participated in
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>>
>Ok so the FBi flew them out.

Yes. After "The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior
to their departures. They concluded that none of the passengers was connected to
the 9/11 attacks and have since found no evidence to change that conclusion."

>>>Also those people's relatives are not members of an islamofacist
>>>country that hates America, opresses its own people and even funded
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>Would you be comfy with the Binladen family owning your favorite team?

Yes. Why not. They are business people. Unless you have a problem with Arabs. Do
you have a problem with Arabs Seon?

>>>They also didnt do buisness with president Bush.
>>
>I meant to say did do buisness.

So what? Bush used to be a businessman. The Bin Laden's are business people.
Business people do business with other business people 24 hours a day all over
the planet. IT IS NOT THEIR FAULT THAT ONE OF THEM IS A MURDEROUS JERK. Just
like Martin Bryant's family, Julian Knight's family, Ted Bundy's family, or any
other murderous jerk's family.

>>Oh! So business ties are proof of guilt. Fascist!
>>
>Try telling that to people who think just because Barrack Obama's kids
>went to the same school of a convicted terrorist he's a terrorist.

No. I don't live in America. I don't give a sh.t about Barrack Obama, or what
stupid people accuse him of. Why do you?

>Or that just because Rev Right is a racist and radical Obama must be
>racist and radical.

See above.

>The fact of the matter is not everyone trusts the Binladen family.

So f.cking what? There is no evidence that the family has ever done anything
wrong. Unless you have some. Do you? You're not convicting people without
evidence again, are you Seon?

>Plus they live in a country that opreses women and kills Christains.

So f.cking what? Those things are perfectly legal in that country. Not in favour
of an invasion to force your way of life on them, are you Seon? What a fascist.

>>>>And how did Bush get the time off from being the president to be able to
>>>>fly to Saudi Arabia and back during that time of crisis?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>Yep the articles.

There is *no* evidence in any of those articles that Bush allowed anyone to do
*anything*.

>>>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2001/sep/21/warinafghanistan2001.september112001
>>>><quote>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>Bush knew something? haha thats a good one.

The question, which you didn't answer, was how do you know, not about what Bush
knew.

How the hell do you know what the President of The United States knew or didn't
know?

Shill #2
--
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
BDK - 10 Jul 2008 17:39 GMT
> >>>>Why? Did Martin Bryant's relatives have anything to do with killing 35 people at
> >>>>Port Arthur? How about Julian Knight's family? Hoddle Street massacre their
[quoted text clipped - 174 lines]
> How the hell do you know what the President of The United States knew or didn't
> know?

Let me guess, he read it all on those koo-koo-kooky kookpages?

> Shill #2
> --
> I am not young enough to know everything.
>  Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)

Signature

BDK

kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

Government Shill #2 - 10 Jul 2008 17:47 GMT
>> >>>>Why? Did Martin Bryant's relatives have anything to do with killing 35 people at
>> >>>>Port Arthur? How about Julian Knight's family? Hoddle Street massacre their
[quoted text clipped - 176 lines]
>
>Let me guess, he read it all on those koo-koo-kooky kookpages?

Seon's a worry. Not least because he seems to be condemning the Bin Laden family
without trial. A thing he claims to abhor.

Shill #2
--
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
Seon Ferguson - 11 Jul 2008 09:40 GMT
>This story says, right at the bottom, "Bin Laden is estranged from his family
>and from Saudi Arabia, which revoked his citizenship in the early 1990s after he
>was caught smuggling weapons from Yemen."

Sure if you want to believe that...

>>http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/200828512758358
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>See above. "(1) Did any flights of Saudi nationals take place before national
>airspace reopened on September 13, 2001?"

Those flights left on September 13th. now all we need to do is figure
out if it was before or after the airspace reopened.

>Yes. After "The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior
>to their departures. They concluded that none of the passengers was connected to
>the 9/11 attacks and have since found no evidence to change that conclusion."

Did they come to that conclusion before or after they flew them out?

>>>>Also those people's relatives are not members of an islamofacist
>>>>country that hates America, opresses its own people and even funded
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Yes. Why not. They are business people. Unless you have a problem with Arabs. Do
>you have a problem with Arabs Seon?

No I have a problem with wahhabists or jihadists who want to force me
to convert to there Religion and with any country that doesnt give
women equal rights and still kills Witches or gay people.

>>>>They also didnt do buisness with president Bush.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>like Martin Bryant's family, Julian Knight's family, Ted Bundy's family, or any
>other murderous jerk's family.

I still dont trust them.

>>>Oh! So business ties are proof of guilt. Fascist!
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>No. I don't live in America. I don't give a sh.t about Barrack Obama, or what
>stupid people accuse him of. Why do you?

Because I care when politicans get smeared.

>>Or that just because Rev Right is a racist and radical Obama must be
>>racist and radical.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>wrong. Unless you have some. Do you? You're not convicting people without
>evidence again, are you Seon?

I just dont trust the Binladens or anyone from Saudi Arabia who
accepts a women getting lashed just for reporting a rape..

>>Plus they live in a country that opreses women and kills Christains.
>
>So f.cking what? Those things are perfectly legal in that country. Not in favour
>of an invasion to force your way of life on them, are you Seon? What a fascist.

I guess killing Jews in the Holocaust would be ok because it was the
Nazi's "way of life"

>>>>>And how did Bush get the time off from being the president to be able to
>>>>>fly to Saudi Arabia and back during that time of crisis?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>There is *no* evidence in any of those articles that Bush allowed anyone to do
>*anything*.

No I guess I need to start saying the FBI.

>>>>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2001/sep/21/warinafghanistan2001.september112001
>>>>><quote>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>How the hell do you know what the President of The United States knew or didn't
>know?

I dont know he isnt telling anyone.

>Shill #2
>--
>I am not young enough to know everything.
> Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
Government Shill #2 - 11 Jul 2008 16:26 GMT
>>This story says, right at the bottom, "Bin Laden is estranged from his family
>>and from Saudi Arabia, which revoked his citizenship in the early 1990s after he
>>was caught smuggling weapons from Yemen."
>>
>Sure if you want to believe that...

It was from a story *YOU* quoted! This one:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/30/archive/main313048.shtml

Apparently *you* believed the rest of the article.

>>>http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/200828512758358
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Those flights left on September 13th. now all we need to do is figure
>out if it was before or after the airspace reopened.

READ!!!

It says "...national airspace reopened on September 13, 2001".

More evidence?

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CWU/is_2001_Sept_13/ai_78231864
US airspace reopens
Airline Industry Information,  Sept 13, 2001  
AIRLINE INDUSTRY INFORMATION-(C)1997-2001 M2 COMMUNICATIONS LTD

"US airspace reopened to commercial flights at 1100 EDT today (13 September),
but passengers are likely to face widespread delays for some time."

>>Yes. After "The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior
>>to their departures. They concluded that none of the passengers was connected to
>>the 9/11 attacks and have since found no evidence to change that conclusion."
>>
>Did they come to that conclusion before or after they flew them out?

READ!!!!

"The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior to their
departures."

"The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior to their
departures."

"The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior to their
departures."

You do know what "prior" means?

"The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior to their
departures. They concluded that none of the passengers was connected to the 9/11
attacks and have since found no evidence to change that conclusion."

>>>>>Also those people's relatives are not members of an islamofacist
>>>>>country that hates America, opresses its own people and even funded
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>No I have a problem with wahhabists or jihadists who want to force me

And you have evidence that the members of the Bin Laden family that was flown
out of the US on September 13 where Wahhabists, or Jihadists? Maybe you should
work for the FBI.

>to convert to there Religion and with any country that doesnt give
>women equal rights and still kills Witches or gay people.

So because these people live in a particular country you would take away their
rights in another country? You're not related to Mussolini, or Stalin, are you?

>>>>>They also didnt do buisness with president Bush.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
>I still dont trust them.

They are guilty of nothing! Ever heard of "innocent until proven guilty"? You
seem to be discriminating against these people based on where they live. What a
racist!

>>>>Oh! So business ties are proof of guilt. Fascist!
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>Because I care when politicans get smeared.

All politicians *should* be smeared. They should be made to parade about in
funny outfits and stand still for anyone who wants to hurl rotten vegetables at
them.

>>>Or that just because Rev Right is a racist and radical Obama must be
>>>racist and radical.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>I just dont trust the Binladens or anyone from Saudi Arabia who
>accepts a women getting lashed just for reporting a rape..

Racist!

>>>Plus they live in a country that opreses women and kills Christains.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I guess killing Jews in the Holocaust would be ok because it was the
>Nazi's "way of life"

Hmm... kOOker tactic #23. Head off at a tangent.

>>>>>>And how did Bush get the time off from being the president to be able to
>>>>>>fly to Saudi Arabia and back during that time of crisis?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>No I guess I need to start saying the FBI.

Hurray!

>>>>>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2001/sep/21/warinafghanistan2001.september112001
>>>>>><quote>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>
>I dont know

No. You don't. So stop saying things like "Bush didn't know that when he allowed
them to fly back to Saudi Arabia."

>he isnt telling anyone.

He probably wasn't even consulted.

Shill #2
--
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
Seon Ferguson - 12 Jul 2008 02:28 GMT
>Apparently *you* believed the rest of the article.

I believe they say they cut all ties from Osama but I still have my
doubts.

>READ!!!
>
>It says "...national airspace reopened on September 13, 2001".

So what was the big deal Michael Moore was making in faranheit 911?

>READ!!!!
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>You do know what "prior" means?

Yes but did they decide they had no links to 911 before theyw hisked
the Saudi's away?

>"The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior to their
>departures. They concluded that none of the passengers was connected to the 9/11
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>out of the US on September 13 where Wahhabists, or Jihadists? Maybe you should
>work for the FBI.

Well Wahabbi Islam is one of the most popular forms of islam over
there. Most Saudi's hate America and probally think 911 was a good
thing.

>>to convert to there Religion and with any country that doesnt give
>>women equal rights and still kills Witches or gay people.
>
>So because these people live in a particular country you would take away their
>rights in another country? You're not related to Mussolini, or Stalin, are you?

There rights to what, kill innocent people? Is that a right now?

>>>>>>They also didnt do buisness with president Bush.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>seem to be discriminating against these people based on where they live. What a
>racist!

No based on there last name, the fact that they probally support
opressing women and junk.

>>>>>Oh! So business ties are proof of guilt. Fascist!
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>funny outfits and stand still for anyone who wants to hurl rotten vegetables at
>them.

They should be but when its something stupid like the guy who's kids
go to the same school as him isnt that going a bit to far?

>>I just dont trust the Binladens or anyone from Saudi Arabia who
>>accepts a women getting lashed just for reporting a rape..
>
>Racist!

I guess I'm racist for being against Communist China or the dictator
of North korea throwing anyone who questions one aspect of government
policy in concetration camps.

>>>>Plus they live in a country that opreses women and kills Christains.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Hmm... kOOker tactic #23. Head off at a tangent.

No its perfectly on topic. If I cant be against tyranny in other
countries because I dont live there and shouldnt push my silly values
of freedom and liberty onto them then in essence I shouldnt be allowed
to hate Hitler for what he did to the Jews or be against the
Holocaust.
Government Shill #2 - 12 Jul 2008 09:31 GMT
>>READ!!!
>>
>>It says "...national airspace reopened on September 13, 2001".
>>
>So what was the big deal Michael Moore was making in faranheit 911?

You tell me. Do you believe anything Michael Moore has to say? He is not the
first person who springs to my mind when I am looking for a source of unbiased
information.

>>READ!!!!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Yes but did they decide they had no links to 911 before theyw hisked
>the Saudi's away?

For f.ck's Sake! READ. BELOW! What does the paragraph below say?

>>"The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior to their
>>departures. They concluded that none of the passengers was connected to the 9/11
>>attacks and have since found no evidence to change that conclusion."

Did you *read* it this time?

>>>>>>>Also those people's relatives are not members of an islamofacist
>>>>>>>country that hates America, opresses its own people and even funded
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>there. Most Saudi's hate America and probally think 911 was a good
>thing.

So? Why does this preclude these people from buying a sporting team?

Just because most of some people are something does not mean that the people in
question are. You present no evidence. Again. You are judging these people on
this same lack of evidence. Pre judging them. pre-judge. prejudice. You are
prejudiced. Racist!

>>>to convert to there Religion and with any country that doesnt give
>>>women equal rights and still kills Witches or gay people.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>There rights to what, kill innocent people? Is that a right now?

The f.cking word it *their* moron!

What innocent people have been killed by the Bin Laden family (those that want
to buy Newcastle United) in Great Britain? Evidence please.

The conversation was...

I said "So because these people live in a particular country you would take away
their rights in another country?"

IE because the Bin Ladens live in Saudi Arabia you want to stop them buying a
football team. You came back with...

"The[ir] rights to what, kill innocent people? Is that a right now?"

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/non+sequitur
non sequitur  
 
Main Entry: non se·qui·tur  
Pronunciation: \'nän-'se-kw?-t?r also -?tu?r\
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin, it does not follow
Date: 1540
1: an inference that does not follow from the premises; specifically : a fallacy
resulting from a simple conversion of a universal affirmative proposition or
from the transposition of a condition and its consequent
2: a statement (as a response) that does not follow logically from or is not
clearly related to anything previously said

>>>>>>>They also didnt do buisness with president Bush.
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>
>No based on there last name,

There's that prejudice again.

So based on this theory all of the Bryants in the world are liable to go crazy
with a rifle at an historical site and shoot dozens of people? Anyone named
Ferguson is going to be totally incapable of working out the difference between
their, there, and they're? Anyone named Costello is going to be a penny pinching
miserly scrooge, who becomes Treasurer and taxes people silly? Oh... wait...
there is another Costello who "is recognised as one of Australia’s leading
voices on social justice issues, having spearheaded public debates on gambling,
urban poverty, homelessness, reconciliation and substance abuse." and "...Chief
Executive of World Vision Australia."

A persons last name tells you *their* ancestry. It tells you *nothing* about
their character.

> the fact that they probally support opressing women and junk.

Probably? PROBABLY!? How can you sit there and dictate what these people can or
can not buy based on prejudice and f.cking PROBABLY?

Is Britain a free country? Are people allowed to buy things in a free country
with a free market economy? What would preclude someone from buying something in
a free market economy? Perhaps evidence of criminal activity. At least it
should. DO you have any actual evidence that the members of the Bin Laden family
that want to buy Newcastle United are guilty of anything you have ascribed to
them? REAL evidence. Proven evidence. No? Then you are just as prejudiced, just
as racist, as the nut cases you rant on at day after day in these fora.

Shill #2
--
I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and reasoning,
confirmed by independent observers. I'll believe anything, no matter how wild
and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it. The wilder and more ridiculous
something is, however, the firmer and more solid the evidence will have to be.
Isaac Asimov - The Roving Mind (1983)
Seon Ferguson - 12 Jul 2008 09:39 GMT
>Probably? PROBABLY!? How can you sit there and dictate what these people can or
>can not buy based on prejudice and f.cking PROBABLY?

I never said they shouldnt be allowed to buy a team I said if I was a
fan I would be pissed and those fans have as much of a right to be
pissed as they do to buy a team.

>Is Britain a free country? Are people allowed to buy things in a free country
>with a free market economy? What would preclude someone from buying something in
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Shill #2

Oh i thought you meant they should have a right to kill innocent
people. No they should have a right to buy a football team but those
fans should have a right to be outraged.
You have a point about Michael Moore. he's about as biased as fox
news.
What i was asking is did the FBI find them innocent on the day they
flew out on September 13th.
Government Shill #2 - 12 Jul 2008 09:54 GMT
>What i was asking is did the FBI find them innocent on the day they
>flew out on September 13th.

"The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior to their
departures. They concluded that none of the passengers was connected to the 9/11
attacks and have since found no evidence to change that conclusion."

1. "The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior to their
departures."

2. "They concluded that none of the passengers was connected to the 9/11
attacks..."

3. "...and have since found no evidence to change that conclusion."

What part of this don't you understand?

Shill #2
--
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
BDK - 12 Jul 2008 19:18 GMT
> >What i was asking is did the FBI find them innocent on the day they
> >flew out on September 13th.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> I am not young enough to know everything.
>  Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)

It seems like maybe all of it, since he's had to have read it a few
times by now...

The boy concerns me at times.

Signature

BDK

kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

Government Shill #2 - 12 Jul 2008 19:22 GMT
>> >What i was asking is did the FBI find them innocent on the day they
>> >flew out on September 13th.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>The boy concerns me at times.

It is just... staggering. I must have posted that 1/2 a dozen times, at least.
And yet he keeps asking the same dumb question.

Shill #2
--
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
Iarnrod - 11 Jul 2008 17:00 GMT
> >This story says, right at the bottom, "Bin Laden is estranged from his family
> >and from Saudi Arabia, which revoked his citizenship in the early 1990s after he
> >was caught smuggling weapons from Yemen."
>
> Sure if you want to believe that...

For f.ck’S SAKE, it’s YOUR CITE!!

Either you posted it because you believe it or you don’t. WTF is wrong
with you?

> >>http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/20082851275...
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Those flights left on September 13th. now all we need to do is figure
> out if it was before or after the airspace reopened.

Moron, it was AFTER. Read the friggin sources.

> >Yes. After "The FBI interviewed all persons of interest on these flights prior
> >to their departures. They concluded that none of the passengers was connected to
> >the 9/11 attacks and have since found no evidence to change that conclusion."
>
> Did they come to that conclusion before or after they flew them out?

What’s your guess, dipshit?

> >>>>Also those people's relatives are not members of an islamofacist
> >>>>country that hates America, opresses its own people and even funded
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> to convert to there Religion and with any country that doesnt give
> women equal rights and still kills Witches or gay people.

So you’re gay?

> >>>>>And how did Bush get the time off from being the president to be able to
> >>>>>fly to Saudi Arabia and back during that time of crisis?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> No I guess I need to start saying the FBI.

And you also need to start saying you f.cked up… none of the public
flew before the airspace was reopened.
Seon Ferguson - 12 Jul 2008 02:34 GMT
>So you’re gay?

i'm against people being stoned to death for practicing Witchcraft as
well. It doesnt mean I'm a Witch. I'm against people being stoned to
death for adultury, it doesnt mean I'd ever cheat on my wife if I ever
get married,  I also believe white people are equal to black people.
it doesnt mean I'm black. I also believe men and women are equal. It
doesnt mean I'm a women. Well I wasnt last time I checked anyway.
Get my point? But it doesnt really matter if you call me gay I know
I'm straight and thats all that matters.
I hope you enjoyed my little speech.
Oh yeah and govshill I forgot to point out Islam is not a race. If
Muslims were from Saudi Arabia and they were more moderate I wouldnt
mind them owning my favorite team. Its extremist Islam or wahabbisim
that I am against.
Government Shill #2 - 12 Jul 2008 09:46 GMT
>Oh yeah and govshill I forgot to point out Islam is not a race.

So? You are accusing these people because of where they live and what their
names are.

You are a racist!

http://www.hri.org/docs/ICERD66.html
UNITED NATIONS
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination

PART I
Article 1
In this Convention, the term "racial discrimination" shall mean any distinction,
exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national
or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the
recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and
fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other
field of public life.

Take special note of this:

"..."racial discrimination" shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction
or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin..."

That's you Seon. Discriminating based on descent, national AND ethnic origin.

>If Muslims were from Saudi Arabia and they were more moderate I wouldnt
>mind them owning my favorite team. Its extremist Islam or wahabbisim
>that I am against.

And you have provided no evidence that any person wishing to buy Newcastle
United is Islamic extremist or Whabbist. NONE.

Shill #2
--
I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and reasoning,
confirmed by independent observers. I'll believe anything, no matter how wild
and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it. The wilder and more ridiculous
something is, however, the firmer and more solid the evidence will have to be.
Isaac Asimov - The Roving Mind (1983)
Saul Levy - 12 Jul 2008 14:35 GMT
The U.N., after the Chinese, are the MOST RACIST ORGANIZATION ON
EARTH!

This bill is a total JOKE!

Saul Levy

>UNITED NATIONS
>International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other
>field of public life.
Seon Ferguson - 13 Jul 2008 01:41 GMT
>>Oh yeah and govshill I forgot to point out Islam is not a race.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> You are a racist!

Wow govshill I didnt realise you were so politically correct.

> http://www.hri.org/docs/ICERD66.html
> UNITED NATIONS
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> be.
> Isaac Asimov - The Roving Mind (1983)
Government Shill #2 - 13 Jul 2008 08:56 GMT
>>>Oh yeah and govshill I forgot to point out Islam is not a race.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Wow govshill I didnt realise you were so politically correct.

I'm not. I'm the most un-PC old fart you are likely to meet.

I am just trying to point out your double standard. In one thread you'll rant on
and on about people's rights, how everyone should be treated fairly, how no one
should be arrested unless there is sound evidence that they broke the law, yadda
yadda yadda... And in this thread you have all but crucified a bunch of people
because of their family name and where they live. Nothing else. No facts. No
evidence. No rights. No trial. They should have been detained, without just
cause, because their name is Bin Laden. Right?

Shill #2
--
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
Seon Ferguson - 13 Jul 2008 09:22 GMT
>>>>Oh yeah and govshill I forgot to point out Islam is not a race.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> just
> cause, because their name is Bin Laden. Right?

I dont think they should be detained but they should have at least been
questioned (which they were) like do you know the whereabouts of osama etc.
What I was against was that Muslims were arrested after 911 left right and
centre and the Binladens were simply flown out. Or at least that's what I
thought.
I still dont like how Muslim countries, specificly whabbist one's, treat
women.
Government Shill #2 - 13 Jul 2008 09:55 GMT
>>>>>Oh yeah and govshill I forgot to point out Islam is not a race.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>centre and the Binladens were simply flown out. Or at least that's what I
>thought.

And based on what you (incorrectly) thought, you were pissed off that these
people were buying a soccer team. In England.

Sounds like prejudice to me.

Shill #2
--
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
Seon Ferguson - 13 Jul 2008 10:30 GMT
>>>>>>Oh yeah and govshill I forgot to point out Islam is not a race.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Sounds like prejudice to me.

Prejudice to a last name. Yes. But since the FBI did clear there names
before they flew out on September 13th and they didnt get any special
treatment then I probally wouldnt care that much.
Iarnrod - 12 Jul 2008 20:26 GMT
> >So you’re gay?
>
> i'm against people being stoned ...

Then why do you post like your high on reefer?

>  But it doesnt really matter if you call me gay I know
> I'm straight and thats all that matters.

Sure, sure. Starting to doubt yourslef, I can tell. You'll be dreaming
about guys soon,... It's all too real.

> I hope you enjoyed my little speech.

A bit too defensive, I'd say. Probably thinking about a guy with a
hard-on when you wrote it.

> Oh yeah and govshill I forgot to point out Islam is not a race. If
> Muslims were from Saudi Arabia and they were more moderate I wouldnt
> mind them owning my favorite team. Its extremist Islam or wahabbisim
> that I am against.

Stop answering different posts in your reply to me, gay Seon.
Seon Ferguson - 13 Jul 2008 01:43 GMT
On Jul 11, 7:34 pm, Seon Ferguson <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:00:21 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >So you’re gay?
>
> i'm against people being stoned ...

I believe the quote was "i'm against people being stoned to death for
practicing Witchcraft as
well"

>Then why do you post like your high on reefer?

>  But it doesnt really matter if you call me gay I know
> I'm straight and thats all that matters.

>Sure, sure. Starting to doubt yourslef, I can tell. You'll be dreaming
>about guys soon,... It's all too real.

Only for you baby.

> I hope you enjoyed my little speech.

>A bit too defensive, I'd say. Probably thinking about a guy with a
>hard-on when you wrote it.

Only for you.

> Oh yeah and govshill I forgot to point out Islam is not a race. If
> Muslims were from Saudi Arabia and they were more moderate I wouldnt
> mind them owning my favorite team. Its extremist Islam or wahabbisim
> that I am against.

>Stop answering different posts in your reply to me, gay Seon.

Lol for you I'll be anything.
Iarnrod - 13 Jul 2008 03:45 GMT
> On Jul 11, 7:34 pm, Seon Ferguson <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> > i'm against people being stoned ...

> >Then why do you post like your high on reefer?

> >  But it doesnt really matter if you call me gay I know
> > I'm straight and thats all that matters.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Lol for you I'll be anything.

Then be "gone," sweetie.
Seon Ferguson - 13 Jul 2008 04:19 GMT
On Jul 12, 6:43 pm, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Iarnrod" <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> > i'm against people being stoned ...

> >Then why do you post like your high on reefer?

> > But it doesnt really matter if you call me gay I know
> > I'm straight and thats all that matters.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Lol for you I'll be anything.

>Then be "gone," sweetie.

Lol sorry hon I'll be anything but that. I'm here so get used to it.
Iarnrod - 13 Jul 2008 05:40 GMT
> On Jul 12, 6:43 pm, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Lol sorry hon I'll be anything but that. I'm here so get used to it.

So you are an admitted liar? OK.
Seon Ferguson - 13 Jul 2008 06:08 GMT
On Jul 12, 9:19 pm, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Iarnrod" <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Lol sorry hon I'll be anything but that. I'm here so get used to it.

>So you are an admitted liar? OK.

Lol whatever you say dear.
Don Ocean - 09 Jul 2008 22:44 GMT
>> Bin Ladens to buy Newcastle United?
>>From the rumour mills.....
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> canceled.
> I'd be pissed as well.

It would have been okay, if Wrongway Corrigan was the Pilot.
Iarnrod - 10 Jul 2008 20:13 GMT
> >Bin Ladens to buy Newcastle United?
> >From the rumour mills.....
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Well Bush did fly the Binladens out after 911 when all flights were
> canceled.

Really? Got a cite for that?

> I'd be pissed as well.

You're too ignorant to be pissed.
Government Shill #2 - 10 Jul 2008 21:00 GMT
>> >Bin Ladens to buy Newcastle United?
>> >From the rumour mills.....
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Really? Got a cite for that?

I'd have thought he was too busy to be flying anyone anywhere.

Shill #2
--
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
Seon Ferguson - 11 Jul 2008 09:42 GMT
>Really? Got a cite for that?

http://www.sptimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/30/archive/main313048.shtml
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/200828512758358
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34405

I was wrong it was the FBI who allowed them to fly out.

>> I'd be pissed as well.
>
>You're too ignorant to be pissed.

They are 2 kinds of ignorant people. Those who admit to there
ignorance and those who pretend they arent. I admit I am ignorant so
which one are you?
Iarnrod - 11 Jul 2008 16:55 GMT
> >Really? Got a cite for that?
>
> http://www.sptimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtmlhttp://www
.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/30/archive/main313048.shtmlhttp://news.sky.com/skyn
ews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/20082851275...http://www.worldnetdaily.com/new
s/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34405

>
> I was wrong it was the FBI who allowed them to fly out.

And.......

It was not durng the period when all flights were banned.....

You forgot that part.

> >> I'd be pissed as well.
>
> >You're too ignorant to be pissed.
>
> They are 2 kinds of ignorant people. Those who admit to there...

"there!" BWAHAHAAHAAA!!!!

> ... ignorance and those who pretend they arent. I admit I am ignorant so
> which one are you?

Yo, stupid, I am NEITHER!! Knowing what I talk about is a huge
advantage.
Seon Ferguson - 12 Jul 2008 02:44 GMT
>It was not durng the period when all flights were banned.....
>
>You forgot that part.

I guess Michael Moore decieved me yet again.

>> >> I'd be pissed as well.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>"there!" BWAHAHAAHAAA!!!!

They're?
Its not their. their: thats their object

>> ... ignorance and those who pretend they arent. I admit I am ignorant so
>> which one are you?
>
>Yo, stupid, I am NEITHER!! Knowing what I talk about is a huge
>advantage.

And you know why were here? the nature of life, the universe and
everything? in that catagory most of us are ignorant and if we think
we know the answers we probally dont.
As for knowing what I talk about I'm trying to change my way's.
Iarnrod - 12 Jul 2008 20:30 GMT
> >It was not durng the period when all flights were banned.....
>
> >You forgot that part.
>
> I guess Michael Moore decieved me yet again.

Moore didn't say the flights occurred when airspace was closed. Learn
to comprehend.

> >> >> I'd be pissed as well.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> They're?
> Its not their. their: thats their object

HOLYCRAP!!

"Those who admit to that there ignorance!" "Those who admit to they
are ignorance!" According to you, those are the two choices!
BWAHAAAHAAHA!! Which one did you mean?

You eliminated the only correct one, even after having to think about
it!

BWAHAHAHHAAA!!!!

Now you know why I want you to STFU about stuff in my country.

> >> ... ignorance and those who pretend they arent. I admit I am ignorant so
> >> which one are you?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> we know the answers we probally dont.
> As for knowing what I talk about I'm trying to change my way's.

Not too successfully eh?
Seon Ferguson - 13 Jul 2008 01:45 GMT
On Jul 11, 7:44 pm, Seon Ferguson <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:55:27 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I guess Michael Moore decieved me yet again.

Moore didn't say the flights occurred when airspace was closed. Learn
to comprehend.

> >> >> I'd be pissed as well.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> They're?
> Its not their. their: thats their object

HOLYCRAP!!

"Those who admit to that there ignorance!" "Those who admit to they
are ignorance!" According to you, those are the two choices!
BWAHAAAHAAHA!! Which one did you mean?

You eliminated the only correct one, even after having to think about
it!

BWAHAHAHHAAA!!!!

Now you know why I want you to STFU about stuff in my country.

> >> ... ignorance and those who pretend they arent. I admit I am ignorant
> >> so
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> we know the answers we probally dont.
> As for knowing what I talk about I'm trying to change my way's.

>Not too successfully eh?

No but you have a point i wasnt thinking.
Seon Ferguson - 13 Jul 2008 03:39 GMT
On Jul 11, 7:44 pm, Seon Ferguson <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:55:27 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I guess Michael Moore decieved me yet again.

>Moore didn't say the flights occurred when airspace was closed. Learn
>to comprehend.

So what was his beef? If the FBI flew the Binladen family out when people
were allowed to fly again who cares? As govshill says the FBi investigated
the Binladens.
I guess maybe my opinion of Bush has been changed by bias doccumentaries. I
cant think of a single unbiased one I have seen.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.