What if gravity is an illusion? This illusion makes us miss its true
character. We are living with a false appearance of it.. That is why
its waves can't be found,for it fits with "illusionism" When we look
for the source for gravity or even hypothesis a source we are all
dreamers. oc has his dream I have my dream etc Bert
BradGuth - 19 Jun 2008 15:47 GMT
> What if gravity is an illusion? This illusion makes us miss its true
> character. We are living with a false appearance of it.. That is why
> its waves can't be found,for it fits with "illusionism" When we look
> for the source for gravity or even hypothesis a source we are all
> dreamers. oc has his dream I have my dream etc Bert
Gravity waves are those of nearly zero Hz.
You don't usually feel or otherwise detect DC until it's too late.
- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
Painius - 19 Jun 2008 17:07 GMT
> What if gravity is an illusion? This illusion makes us miss its true
> character. We are living with a false appearance of it.. That is why
> its waves can't be found,for it fits with "illusionism" When we look
> for the source for gravity or even hypothesis a source we are all
> dreamers. oc has his dream I have my dream etc Bert
Gravity an illusion. So are you saying that supernovas
are an illusion? Is it an illusion that the stupendous force
of the outward pressure of a star is contained and held in
by an illusion? Is the fact that you and i don't float away
into space just a product of our imaginations?
happy days and...
starry starry nights!

Signature
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth
P.S.: Thank YOU for reading!
P.P.S.: http://painellsworth.net
oldcoot - 19 Jun 2008 17:30 GMT
> "G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglaz...@webtv.net> wrote...
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> by an illusion? Is the fact that you and i don't float away
> into space just a product of our imaginations?
Among the VS'ers there's a certain school that says gravity is a
'fictitious' or pseudo force by dint of something-or-other "following
a space-time geodesic" or some such. If so, it's an awfully herculean
pseudoism to perform the VERY REAL stunts that gravity handily and
routinely performs throughout the cosmos.. like super and-hypernovas
and quasars.
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 19 Jun 2008 18:03 GMT
Panius & oc I expected very harsh treatment on this What if I posted
it with tongue in cheek Still action of two objects ATTRACTING EACH
OTHER OVER BILLIONS OF LYs of space is not easy thinking Bert PS dam
that cap key
Double-A - 19 Jun 2008 20:57 GMT
> Panius & oc I expected very harsh treatment on this What if I posted
> it with tongue in cheek Still action of two objects ATTRACTING EACH
> OTHER OVER BILLIONS OF LYs of space is not easy thinking Bert PS dam
> that cap key
WHAT IF distant objects don't attract each other, but the space
between them shrinks?
Double-A
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 19 Jun 2008 22:48 GMT
Double-A Very good for I have motion shrinking space and gravity and
motion are equivalent Thank you It all fits bert
Jeff▲Relf - 20 Jun 2008 08:00 GMT
Everything moves “ forward ” in time, no matter what;
so, when spacetime ( 4-D ) is warped, acceleration is the default.
Mark Earnest - 20 Jun 2008 04:08 GMT
>> What if gravity is an illusion? This illusion makes us miss its true
>> character. We are living with a false appearance of it.. That is why
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Gravity an illusion. So are you saying that supernovas
> are an illusion?
Not sure how you arrive at that one, but wait until we find out that the
barren
surface of Mars and the hectic surface of Venus are mere illusions.
oldcoot - 19 Jun 2008 21:14 GMT
> When we look
> for the source for gravity or even hypothesis a source we are all
> dreamers. oc has his dream I have my dream etc.
Then a number of people worldwide are dreamin' the same dream, Bert.
Independantly and without collaboration they see essentially the same
mechansim of gravity. Though their models differ superficially, they
see the same accelerating, 'reverse starburst' flow of the spatial
medium into mass with mass synonymous with flow sink.
Mark Earnest - 20 Jun 2008 04:06 GMT
> What if gravity is an illusion? This illusion makes us miss its true
> character. We are living with a false appearance of it.. That is why
> its waves can't be found,for it fits with "illusionism" When we look
> for the source for gravity or even hypothesis a source we are all
> dreamers. oc has his dream I have my dream etc Bert
I think that the first microbe mineral that was formed over the Earth
decided it did not wish to fly off into space, and so chose to believe it
would stick to the ground...
...and every creature since believed the same thing...
...and that is the only reason we stick to the ground.
IOW if we did not believe we would stick to the ground we in fact would not.
Painius - 20 Jun 2008 16:27 GMT
>> What if gravity is an illusion? This illusion makes us miss its true
>> character. We are living with a false appearance of it.. That is why
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> IOW if we did not believe we would stick to the ground we in fact would
> not.
Have you tested this?
happy days and...
starry starry nights!

Signature
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth
P.S.: Thank YOU for reading!
P.P.S.: http://painellsworth.net
oldcoot - 20 Jun 2008 17:26 GMT
> "Mark Earnest" <gmearn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Have you tested this?
Musta discovered the leviton. :-)
Mark Earnest - 21 Jun 2008 02:16 GMT
>>> What if gravity is an illusion? This illusion makes us miss its true
>>> character. We are living with a false appearance of it.. That is why
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Have you tested this?
Sure, by building model balsa airplanes, which by our belief in the airfoil,
defy the law of gravity.
Painius - 21 Jun 2008 06:07 GMT
>>>> What if gravity is an illusion? This illusion makes us miss its true
>>>> character. We are living with a false appearance of it.. That is why
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Sure, by building model balsa airplanes, which by our belief in the
> airfoil, defy the law of gravity.
Airplanes do not "defy gravity". Actually, they *use*
gravity in order to fly. There are four forces that
enable an airplane to fly...
thrust, drag, lift and WEIGHT.
Defying gravity... actually defying gravity... will take
a lot more than "belief".
And that is my belief.
happy days and...
starry starry nights!

Signature
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth
P.S.: Thank YOU for reading!
P.P.S.: http://painellsworth.net
oldcoot - 06 Jul 2008 19:52 GMT
> "Mark Earnest" <gmearn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Defying gravity... actually defying gravity... will take
> a lot more than "belief".
A conventional airplane *relies on* gravity to maintain stability in
level flight. To fly hands-off and in an auto-stable condition is an
exquisite balancing act between weight of the nose trying to push the
nose down, and the force of airflow 'down' against the horizontal
tailplane pushing the nose 'up' (the 'fulcrum' between the two forces
being the wing's center of lift, or mean aerodynamic center). Center
of gravity (CG) is placed slightly forward of the 'fulcrum' to
maintain this delicate balance.
Timberwoof - 06 Jul 2008 19:59 GMT
In article
<b64abf65-4892-4b5d-a01e-0ad1b3a423f9@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Mark Earnest" <gmearn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> of gravity (CG) is placed slightly forward of the 'fulcrum' to
> maintain this delicate balance.
It gets better ... Airplane wings are commonly V-shaped so that in
level flight, each wing has slightly less than optimal lift. But should
a gust of wind tilt the plane a bit, so that one wing is horizontal and
the other at an even higher angle, the wing on the "down" side now has
more lift than the wing on the "up" side. This inequality in up vectors
coupled with the down vector of the fuselage of the plane (provided by
gravity) servers to stabilize the airplane's roll angle.

Signature
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.
oldcoot - 06 Jul 2008 20:18 GMT
On Jul 6, 11:59 am, Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@inferNOnoSPAMsoft.com>
wrote:
> In article
> <b64abf65-4892-4b5d-a01e-0ad1b3a42...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> coupled with the down vector of the fuselage of the plane (provided by
> gravity) servers to stabilize the airplane's roll angle.
Exactly. The 'V' is termed dihedral. Also, a high-winged plane with
'no' dihedral maintains roll stability simply by the pendulum effect
of the fuselage hanging below the wing. Gravity provides stabilization
in the roll axis as well as in the pitch axis.