Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / April 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Does Stull really Touch  ???

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 22 Apr 2008 14:01 GMT
My thinking is stuff does not touch at the atomic level. I get this
thinking out of my "Spin is in theory" That tells me light does not
bounce. Reflection has nothing to do with photons hitting surface
electrons and bouncing back.  That is another one of those bad theories
that I keep pointing out over and over for years and years,but they are
still taught.  I think it irs harder to smash two gold atoms together
than for two galaxies to collide.I think we are miss reading the
particles coming out of an atom smasher  Think about this
Bert
Saul Levy - 22 Apr 2008 22:12 GMT
Yeah, sure, BEERTbrain!  lmao!

Those particles must be JEWISH then?  lmfjao!

Maybe YOU'RE wrong?

Saul Levy

>My thinking is stuff does not touch at the atomic level. I get this
>thinking out of my "Spin is in theory" That tells me light does not
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>particles coming out of an atom smasher  Think about this
>Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 23 Apr 2008 00:29 GMT
Cactus saul  Do you mean there are kosher particles in the micro realm.
At the atomic level I'm thinking electrons never fall into the nuclei to
stick to protons   Photons maybe.  It might be to tricky for you to
think about.this In the books two electrons can be smashed into each
other,but do they really touch???   Cactus Saul please don't give this
any heavy thinking,for you might rupture your kosher neurons   Bert
Saul Levy - 23 Apr 2008 17:21 GMT
I'm not kosher, BEERTbrain!  lmao!

Saul Levy

>Cactus saul  Do you mean there are kosher particles in the micro realm.
>At the atomic level I'm thinking electrons never fall into the nuclei to
>stick to protons   Photons maybe.  It might be to tricky for you to
>think about.this In the books two electrons can be smashed into each
>other,but do they really touch???   Cactus Saul please don't give this
>any heavy thinking,for you might rupture your kosher neurons   Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 23 Apr 2008 18:24 GMT
Cactus saul The word in Hebrew "kosher" translated in English means
"clean"  Don't be so hard on yourself. I bet you take a cold shower once
a month.sad but true. Queen Elizabeth only took 5 baths in her life. Its
no wonder she never got married.  Bert
Saul Levy - 24 Apr 2008 07:59 GMT
I think QEI had bigger problems then that, BEERTbrain!  lmao!

Many men would marry a DIRTY queen!  lmao!  Men were dirty back then
too.

I try not to take cold showers.

Saul Levy

>Cactus saul The word in Hebrew "kosher" translated in English means
>"clean"  Don't be so hard on yourself. I bet you take a cold shower once
>a month.sad but true. Queen Elizabeth only took 5 baths in her life. Its
>no wonder she never got married.  Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 24 Apr 2008 10:47 GMT
If there is motion between particles they can't touch. If there was no
motion absolute zero would be possible.  Molecules can be made almost to
touch.and create solids. Liquid and gas can have their structures to
almost touch as proven by solid hydrogen.          Taking in their tiny
sizes an atom of gold has space volume 99.999999999999999999 greater
than its matter particles. There is no way to squeeze gold atoms
electrons closer to the nuclei.  This no touch thinking needs lots of
deep thought           Trying to make stuff touch creates heat. Heat
makes touching harder.  All things try to keep their space(distance).
It is another of natures balancing acts.  A black hole has less inner
space and takes up less outer space than a proton's space taken up by
its 3 quarks.,and in the quantum realm the space between quarks is
almost infinitely small. Some 99.999999999999999999 smaller than a
Planck length   Go figure   Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 25 Apr 2008 13:13 GMT
Reality is if gluons(the strong force) can't get particles to touch
there is no touching in the micro realm   That means to me  No absolute
zero. No friction.  No bouncing  Lots of space          Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 30 Apr 2008 21:26 GMT
My "SPin is in Theory" can prove no particles can touch. Touching mean
no distance ,and never can the universe exist under that condition. Even
inside a BH all has to keep its distance even if the distance is
99.999999999999999999 less than a Planck length.  Bert
BradGuth - 23 Apr 2008 18:17 GMT
> Cactus saul  Do you mean there are kosher particles in the micro realm.
> At the atomic level I'm thinking electrons never fall into the nuclei to
> stick to protons   Photons maybe.  It might be to tricky for you to
> think about.this In the books two electrons can be smashed into each
> other,but do they really touch???   Cactus Saul please don't give this
> any heavy thinking,for you might rupture your kosher neurons   Bert

Saul thinks from between his DARPA spewing butt-cheeks.

BTW, I believe there are only secondary/recoil photons.
. - Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 24 Apr 2008 07:57 GMT
The Army's seen my butt cheeks, BradBoi, DARPA has not!  lmfjao!

Saul Levy

>> Cactus saul  Do you mean there are kosher particles in the micro realm.
>> At the atomic level I'm thinking electrons never fall into the nuclei to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>BTW, I believe there are only secondary/recoil photons.
>. - Brad Guth
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.