Thick Outer Shell of Moon / by Hank Kroll
|
|
Thread rating:  |
BradGuth - 07 Mar 2008 19:15 GMT This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically gamma saturated and dark as coal moon (in many places it's considerably darker than coal). It's a matter of fact that our moon for its size offers an unusually thick shell or hull that's extensively covered in tens of meters worth of highly electrostatic charged dust, as well as chuck full of those surface mascon issues, meaning that the lunar core is either of a low density substance (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... Brad Guth / Hank Kroll
Stan Engel - 07 Mar 2008 22:37 GMT Brad, it's long past time that you were marched into a gas chamber.
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically > gamma saturated and dark as coal moon (in many places it's > considerably darker than coal).
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
BradGuth - 10 Mar 2008 04:45 GMT > > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com I realize that's exactly what those rich and powerful Jews of your kind did to other Jews, plus putting down anyone else that made your puppet warlord happy, but I'm not even the least bit Yiddish, so you can't even put me on a stick for accomplishing another one of those faith-based PR stunts. . - Brad Guth
cjpolins@aol.com - 08 Mar 2008 12:14 GMT > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... > Brad Guth / Hank Kroll Brad How will the moons magnetic dust effect a compass?Does moon sand pour? Does it take friction to get this electrostatic electricity to work? Sunbeam + Bert
Stephen Malbon - 08 Mar 2008 12:33 GMT > Brad How will the moons magnetic dust effect a compass?Does moon sand > pour? Does it take friction to get this electrostatic electricity to > work? Sunbeam + Bert The guy's an idiot, don't encourage him.
Saul Levy - 09 Mar 2008 20:20 GMT You mean Brad and Hank, I hope? lmao!
Saul Levy
>> Brad How will the moons magnetic dust effect a compass?Does moon sand >> pour? Does it take friction to get this electrostatic electricity to >> work? Sunbeam + Bert >The guy's an idiot, don't encourage him. BradGuth - 08 Mar 2008 17:32 GMT On Mar 8, 4:14 am, cjpol...@aol.com wrote:
> > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > pour? Does it take friction to get this electrostatic electricity to > work? Sunbeam + Bert ? magnetic dust ? where the hell did you get that from?
Obviously the moon's sootly like surface that's on average nearly dark as coal should have a composite of iron dust, along with basalt, titanium, thorium and radium dust, plus obviously it has that substantial raw element of sodium to work with.
Of being electrostatic charged is not quite the same as being magnetic, or is it?
Perhaps at night is where some of that electrostatic charged surface material could become superconducting, because is certainly getting cold enough to turn the gas of Rn222 into LRn222.
The solar wind that easily reaches to the raw naked surface of that physically dark moon of ours is what likely creates the bulk of that electrostatic charge, of perhaps creating several teravolts if one could measure this energy differential that's existing between the electrostatic charge of Earth and that of the charged moon along with the orbital velocity of 1.023 km/s creating yet another charge potential.
The fact of the moon core being of low density or semi-hollow may also have some impact on the battery like worth of lunar energy storage potential. . - Brad Guth
BradGuth - 08 Mar 2008 17:37 GMT Thick shell/crust, thin shell/crust or of whatever's in between, and the grand ruse/sting of the NASA/Apollo century continues. It seems even via those new and extremely improved JAXA/Selene images are simply not going to share and share alike, exactly as though there stuff about our moon that of those in charge of our private parts do not want us village idiots knowing about.
Mar 6, 2008 "KAGUYA Image Gallery" The HDTV image of Apollo 17 landing site taken in last Nov. of 2007 http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/index_e.html
Good luck seeing any pixel the least bit NASA/Apollo bright and shiny upon that nearly coal dark moon. Notice how a given FOV including Earth is in sufficient color along with the moon's color saturation as having been limited to 10% if not 5%, or as in many of their published images as having been entirely turned off, even after pushing their wussy color saturation and increasing the contrast of that moon remains as though without mineral color or even as otherwise unavoidably secondary/recoil bluish as obtained on those initial HDTV images is oddly no longer the case.
For some odd reason, JAXA has become deathly afraid to honestly share any of those HDTV full color spectrum of maximum colour saturation or RGB dynamic range (DR/contrast) images, and even as having been extensively limiting as to those terrific telephoto monochrome views of what's worth 10 meters/pixel resolution have been excluded from public view (especially excluding as to any of those supposed NASA/ Apollo landing sites). . - Brad Guth
Apparently I've been using up far more than my fair share of this Google/NOVA Usenet bandwidth, as having recently posted all of one new topic and replied to a couple of others has my account down to its knees or getting locked down, along with the usual gauntlet of my having been getting those pesky multiple errors while trying to post replies, receiving the final kill message of "Your account or Internet address has exceeded our posting limit at this time, please try again later." Perhaps this has something to do with my 7-day activity of getting nearly 5000 views of my messages (nearly 700 per day) must be why I've been so often nailed or cut off. There's also so many of those new and improved cookie spermware/fuckware (aka spyware) files that my PC and ISP connection into the Usenet as gotten nearly terminal before I start. . - BG
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... > Brad Guth / Hank Kroll Saul Levy - 08 Mar 2008 20:22 GMT Is Hank your publishing name, or your other kook name, Brad? lmao!
Saul Levy
>This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard >astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >(possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... >Brad Guth / Hank Kroll BradGuth - 09 Mar 2008 02:48 GMT Hank Kroll is just another honest and extremely hard working guy that I'm indirectly related to, his having lots of real world expertise in his favor and willing to share, in that no matters how much collage the likes of yourself will never muster up to half of what Hank Kroll has to offer because you and other boxed souls can't seem to deductively think for yourself.
Of course, unlike yourself and others of your kind, Hank and I do make our fair share of honest mistakes, and in spite of what certain all- knowing bigots might like to think, we tend to like most of humanity even though some are Jewish and many others are not usually Jewish or as nearly Third Reich polished and/or as pretend-atheistic as yourself.
In other words, we're a couple of the few good-guys that would never put one of our own kind on a stick for a faith-based PR stunt.
BTW, since this isn't your topic, why do you keep dropping the intended cross-posting of "sci.space.history, alt.astronomy, sci.astro, sci.space.policy, soc.history.what-if" ? . - Brad Guth
> Is Hank your publishing name, or your other kook name, Brad? lmao! > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >(possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... > >Brad Guth / Hank Kroll Hagar - 12 Mar 2008 15:32 GMT > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... > Brad Guth / Hank Kroll ... sort of like your brain, eh ...
Pat Flannery - 12 Mar 2008 18:03 GMT >> It's a matter of fact that our moon >> for its size offers an unusually thick shell or hull that's [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > ... sort of like your brain, eh ... This is interesting... the outside is rock, and the center is water. What makes that interesting is that rocks sink in water, so the water should be on the outside, not inside.
Pat
Painius - 12 Mar 2008 18:15 GMT >>> It's a matter of fact that our moon >>> for its size offers an unusually thick shell or hull that's [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Pat Interesting yes, because water tends to seep down through porous rock "seeking its level". So how does water determine its level? Does this have anything to do with "buoyancy"?
Why aren't Earth's oceans just dry beds of arid, porous rock? Did some supreme being remember to include a high-grade "plastic liner" beneath Earth's crust when s/he made the planet?
happy days and... starry starry nights!
 Signature Indelibly yours, Paine
P.S. Thank YOU for reading!
P.P.S. (shh) Some secret sites... http://painellsworth.net http://savethechildren.org http://eBook-eDen.secretsgolden.com
Jeff▲Relf - 13 Mar 2008 03:10 GMT The core of the Milky Way, the solar system, and earth are all denser than the outer regions... it's displacement... denser stuff sinks. ( Hmm... could that explain quantum gravity ? )
The core of the Milky Way shines with gamma rays ( from anti-matter ); it's an unimaginably powerful particle accelerator, hydrogen atoms don't stand a chance there.
Likewise, at the edge of the Milky Way, a hydrogen atom becomes Cold Dark Matter. Hydrogen atoms are the exception, not the rule.
BradGuth - 13 Mar 2008 04:18 GMT > >>> It's a matter of fact that our moon > >>> for its size offers an unusually thick shell or hull that's [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > http://savethechildren.org > http://eBook-eDen.secretsgolden.com Earth's water, especially of the salty water, was a somewhat recent deposit, whereas it did not otherwise emerge from within Earth.
If there's anything of any watery fluid or brine worthy substance within the moon, it too was likely a deposit.
BTW, why is "Jeff▲Relf" changing the title of this topic? . - Brad Guth
BradGuth - 12 Mar 2008 21:32 GMT > >> It's a matter of fact that our moon > >> for its size offers an unusually thick shell or hull that's [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Pat I never once said the lunar core was of water, although pockets or geode like confinements of dense brines or a few other mineralogy saturated fluids could very well exist. My best SWAG has our moon's interior as somewhat crystal dry and cavernous. . - Brad Guth
BradGuth - 12 Mar 2008 21:38 GMT > > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > ... sort of like your brain, eh ... Speaking about what's within ones head (empty or otherwise): Yes Hagar, there's more of me than your head full of crapolla can imagine, whereas stipulated by "Painius" you are the reincarnation of Carl Sagan, wishful thinking your way along as though the laws pf physics and best available science that's peer replicated to death doesn't matter, such as Mars not having squat worth of local energy to work with, but lo and behold it seems you're not alone, because others of your silly kind are wishing Mars had life, and not even as of all that long ago, and that somehow the likes of robust and rad-hard Mars life could still be found and of other imported life from Earth could somehow coexist if only we could go there (at great public expense) in person.
Our 'once upon a time' icy proto-moon is not as interpreted by our faith-based NASA, but as a now humanly lethal place where only the best of applied technology would give our frail DNA limited access to that naked environment without our having to pay the ultimate price.
Our usenet contributor "Mitchell Jones" is by all accounts intelligent and a very honest sorts of investigative research that so desperately wants to believe that our NASA put folks with all the "right stuff" onto the moon without hardly a scratch as based upon the undocumented worth of our fly-by-rocket expertise, that was actually Semitic Third Reich expertise from get to go.
More Lakes on Mars? / by Mitchell Jones: ***{As I see it, the prevailing practice of valuing social and political expediency more highly than truth has already, and irreversibly, done us in. The economies of the advanced nations of the West have been looted down to the bare walls, and their industrial capital has been transferred to nations that lack the cultural heritage of freedom which is necessary to create and maintain such assets. Ahead lies a hyperinflationary depression, a collapse of the present global civilization, and a new dark age. During that dark age, famine and disease will reduce the human population of the Earth by billions, and most of those remaining will live in squalor and be unable to read or write. Quaint notions such as science and freedom will be long since forgotten, and questions such as whether life exists on other planets will not cross the minds of average persons in their lifetimes. The reality is that humans preferred spitting on the truth to reaching for the stars, and so they are going to get the future they deserve, rather than the future they expect. --MJ}***
Now we are on the same exact set of tracks, realizing that we are essentially being snookered by those of us having "the right stuff", and otherwise sufficiently under-educated and/or formally mainstream disinformed to the point of our being continually dumbfounded past the point of no return, is what seems entirely status quo.
It's not that pockets of surface liquid couldn't possibly coexist on Mars, though of fresh water is pretty much out of the question, and it's nearly as unlikely of those being of a sufficient brine or mineral composite for having survived under such cold and nearly that of a vacuum. Thus far the mineralogy of Mars is sorely lacking in the remains of common sea salt or be it rock salt, although of other yet undiscovered salts or possibly even S8(sulphur) may be the norm if ever liquids are discovered.
***{I'm not a fan of NASA by any stretch of the imagination. I believe that NASA's managers are petrified by the possibility of life on Mars, and punish anyone in the organization who interprets the data in a way that suggests that life there is possible. The idea that there are locations on Mars that are far enough below "sea level" for lakes of liquid water to exist scares the hell out of them, because if such notions caught the attention of the press, there would be a public outcry in favor of manned missions to Mars. That would trigger another sh.t fight for "funding" (loot) in congress between NASA and other parasitic groups (the welfare lobby, the "environmentalist" lobby, etc.) any of which can put more bodies on the street than NASA. NASA would be guaranteed to lose that fight, just as they lost the sh.t fight after the Apollo program.
Let me elaborate a bit.
After the successful moon landings, the interest of the public turned elsewhere, and a battle began in congress to divert NASA's funding back to more "important" uses, such as making sure every wino in a ditch had enough money in his pocket to buy his next bottle, if he regained consciousness. With the support of the public having evaporated, NASA was almost killed in that fight, and the lesson was not lost on NASA's managers: they know that a big public surge which enables them to put a mission on Mars will be followed by yet another loss of public interest and support, followed by a collapse of funding, and they are not about to go down that path. To them, a bird in the hand is sufficient. They aren't about to go after, or even think about, the two--or twenty--birds that are in the bush. --Mitchell Jones}***
No need to "elaborate a bit" because, I've been there and done that one at least a thousand fold in regard to Venus and our Moon, elaborating as to their faith-based analogy that's cloaked as a pretend-atheism of their being in denial or otherwise naysay to all that's off-world, in that they can jump as many fences and thus change sides of most any given war or argument as it takes. Apparently, all that's off-world has to be of inert eye-candy, meaning that for any number of their carefully chosen reasons is why there's no possibility of other viable forms of life to behold, much less of any complex evolved nature, because in their faith-based mindset only Earth is it for hosting complex life as we know it, and thereby everything else has to remain as inert eye-candy.
I believe that a sufficiently advanced form of intentionally deployed life may very well have given Mars a go for the money, so to speak, however that era would have been quite some time ago when Mars still had its magnetosphere, perhaps ten fold more atmospheric density and a planetary core that wasn't nearly frozen solid.
***"In fact, the possibility of color rebalancing coupled with the known propensity of bureaucrats and politicians to engage in "spin control" (i.e., lying), casts a pall of suspicion over all of the photographs retrieved by Mars orbiters/rovers. The prevalence of spin control means there is no way to be sure that any particular photo posted on a NASA or ESA website has not been rebalanced to suit the desires of upper management. In fact, I am quite sure that in any case where leaving the balance settings at the calibrated levels would cause a public reaction not desired by management, the photo will be rebalanced before publication. Fortunately, the mass of photos being received is enormous, and in many cases the regions on a photo that might cause an undesired public reaction are a tiny portion of the whole, hence likely to be overlooked until after publication. That scenario very much fits the case we are discussing. --Mitchell Jones}***
Those terribly pastel (aka low spectral DR) color images of the planet Mercury are another very good example of our NASA's efforts to continually snooker and dumbfound each and everyone of us. It's what they do best, especially if looking at the vast majority of their moon related Kodak moments that simply do not in any way appear as though taken from our physically dark moon, much less as unfiltered and oddly w/o Venus at better than twice the reflective/albedo index of Earth. So, you are 100% correct that our NASA hasn't been sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and they continually do this crap without so much as a speck of remorse or concern for the consequences of their actions, but then when ever has MI5/CIA shared whole truths about much of anything.
The deductive science of observationology is worth an honest look-see, and not just at the likes of whatever official eye-candy pictures have to offer, but of the 36 look per pixel worth of composite radar obtained images is also worthy of getting the best attention that our best expertise can muster, because of what's easily interpreted about Venus that isn't limited as to inert matters. . - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 16 Mar 2008 03:25 GMT >> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard >> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >... sort of like your brain, eh ... Wow, Lame-ar, you sure told him!
 Signature Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
John "C" - 16 Mar 2008 03:39 GMT "Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
> Wow, Lame-ar, you sure told him! That's right, Rump-Ranger!
HJ
Fred Hall - 16 Mar 2008 05:18 GMT On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:33:10 -0600, "John \"C\"" <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
>Rump-Ranger --
http://honestjohn777.multiply.com/
http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/HJC02/
BradGuth - 16 Mar 2008 06:10 GMT > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:33:10 -0600, "John \"C\"" > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/HJC02/ Say what? or rather say nothing. Are you just pretending at being Hitler?
Is there something dark and scary about our moon that you do not want to share and share alike?
. - Brad Guth
ah - 24 Mar 2008 12:02 GMT >> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:33:10 -0600, "John \"C\"" >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Is there something dark and scary about our moon that you do not want > to share and share alike? You're not yet prepared for the unfettered truth.
> . - Brad Guth
 Signature ah
BradGuth - 24 Mar 2008 17:25 GMT > >> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:33:10 -0600, "John \"C\"" > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > -- > ah Are you suggesting that you happen to know of this "unfettered truth"?
Why are you folks so deathly afraid to share and share alike?
What topics or external links can you offer about this "unfettered truth"? . - Brad Guth
Colonel Jake - 31 Mar 2008 08:18 GMT : "Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message : [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] : : HJ John "C" - 31 Mar 2008 18:26 GMT > : "Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message > : [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > : > [...] Cat got your tongue, Monkey-Boi?
Ninja col. Jake:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEtIoGQxqQs
Hee Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Number One
BradGuth - 31 Mar 2008 19:49 GMT On Mar 31, 9:26 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> > : "Art Deco" <e...@caballista.org> wrote in message > > : [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Number One Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their usual topic/author stalking and fuckology of trashing everything is sight, to the best they and other Semites of their Third Reich can muster. . - Brad Guth
John "C" - 31 Mar 2008 23:05 GMT > On Mar 31, 9:26 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > muster. > . - Brad Guth Right You Are!
HJ
BradGuth - 01 Apr 2008 01:51 GMT On Mar 31, 2:05 pm, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 9:26 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote: > > > "Colonel Jake" <SergeantY...@comcast.net> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > HJ Since 99.9% of Usenet is either a clone of Art Deco or simply those of his brown-nosed minionship to their Third Reich, it's hard to tell whom is not just another one of his pretend-atheism clowns. of course MI5/CIA isn't exactly innocent, nor would most any government agency or contractor to our corrupt government dare to be honest, much less moderate the like of their spooks and moles intended to foil any chance of the truth getting shared with the general public.
The cloak and dagger nature of these Art Deco types is clearly orchestrated along by those rich and powerful in charge of our private parts, and by taking as much of our hard earned loot as they can manage to steel by way of any means seen fit. Notice how they haven't one bad word to say about the higher cost of energy, and how they are consistently opposed to whatever renewable or less spendy energy alternatives outside of whatever their ENRON policy remains in full distribution control of. Home brew of whatever fuel(s) or that of renewable derived energy is simply taboo according to what these rusemasters are insisting, in that we have to use their spendy fossil or just as spendy energy from the grid as our only viable option.
Their private Federal Reserve Bank is just another cartel part of their Skull and Bones agenda on behalf of global domination, supported via our hard earned loot and of everything else they can manage to insider control (such as big energy), by simply owning the largest block of shares being good enough in most instances. . - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 01 Apr 2008 03:20 GMT >clone of Art Deco >his brown-nosed minionship [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >insider control >. - Brad Guth Classic GuthGobble.
 Signature "Classic erroneous presupposition." -- David Tholen
Art Deco - 01 Apr 2008 00:27 GMT >Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his >bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their >usual topic/author stalking and fuckology of trashing everything is >sight, to the best they and other Semites of their Third Reich can >muster. >. - Brad Guth Kook cleanup needed, Guthball is foaming again.
 Signature "Classic erroneous presupposition." -- David Tholen
Saul Levy - 01 Apr 2008 01:48 GMT Everything he says (repeats) is meaningless drivel, AD! lmao!
Saul Levy
>>Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his >>bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Kook cleanup needed, Guthball is foaming again. Kali - 01 Apr 2008 03:56 GMT In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco erfc@caballista.org said:
: >Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his : >bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] : : Kook cleanup needed, Guthball is foaming again. Oh, my. Semites of their Third Reich? How should this be interpreted, in terms of Godwin's Law?
 Signature Kali
Art Deco - 01 Apr 2008 04:04 GMT >In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco >erfc@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >Oh, my. Semites of their Third Reich? How should this be >interpreted, in terms of Godwin's Law? The 3Gs -- Godwin Guth Gobble. It needs a clause all by itself.
 Signature "Classic erroneous presupposition." -- David Tholen
TheBookman - 01 Apr 2008 04:59 GMT >>In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco >>erfc@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > The 3Gs -- Godwin Guth Gobble. It needs a clause all by itself. Doesn't Whorehole dabble in this realm, as well?
ESL!
 Signature Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG-WHISTLE AWARD MIKE "MIGUEL" CRANSTON, TRAINED BY BOOKMAN COOSN-266-06-89425 #14 People ruining UseNet lits #9 Top a.sholes on the Net lits #11 Most hated Usenetizens of all time lits #11 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
"I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely
"****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot."
"ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes
Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of Hitler. - Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.
WWFSMD?
Art Deco - 01 Apr 2008 13:57 GMT >>>In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco >>>erfc@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >Doesn't Whorehole dabble in this realm, as well? Correct. Most of the strange beasts who trample poor Godwin underfoot believe that the word "Ashkenazi" indicates that German Jews were responsible for all of the horrors of WWII. They are too stupid to realize that NAZI is actually an acronym. You may place Alexa into this category also.
 Signature "Classic erroneous presupposition." -- David Tholen
TheBookman - 01 Apr 2008 22:49 GMT >>>>In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco >>>>erfc@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > realize that NAZI is actually an acronym. You may place Alexa into > this category also. Gotta give Guthball credit (such as it is) - he clings tighter to his delusions than Alexa does. Or did he give up on his "life on Venus" binge?
ESL!
 Signature Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG-WHISTLE AWARD MIKE "MIGUEL" CRANSTON, TRAINED BY BOOKMAN COOSN-266-06-89425 #14 People ruining UseNet lits #9 Top a.sholes on the Net lits #11 Most hated Usenetizens of all time lits #11 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
"I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely
"****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot."
"ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes
Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of Hitler. - Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.
WWFSMD?
BradGuth - 02 Apr 2008 00:54 GMT > >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco > >>>>e...@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > ESL! You're still sleeping with our butt-cheek flapping Art Fartco?
I realize it's fully accepted if not being currently taught by Jews and especially of Zionists, but didn't your boss Hitler kind of frown on such man-on-man and otherwise pecker-to-mouth lifestyles of essentially screwing everything in sight, even if it's a pig? (no wonder Jews don't eat pig, as that would be the same as eating your own kind) . - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 02 Apr 2008 04:23 GMT >> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco >> >>>>e...@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] >own kind) >. - Brad Guth Hey look, Guthball has joined the faglaming bandwagon!
Hurrah!
 Signature "Classic erroneous presupposition." -- David Tholen
John "C" - 02 Apr 2008 05:08 GMT > >> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco > >> >>>>e...@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > Hey look, Guthball has joined the faglaming bandwagon! Well Deco, You're Quite a Fag!
HJ
TheBookman - 02 Apr 2008 08:16 GMT >>> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco >>> >>>>e...@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > Hurrah! Looks like teh old snip-n-run just didn't satisfy him any more.
ESL!
 Signature Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG-WHISTLE AWARD MIKE "MIGUEL" CRANSTON, TRAINED BY BOOKMAN COOSN-266-06-89425 #14 People ruining UseNet lits #9 Top a.sholes on the Net lits #11 Most hated Usenetizens of all time lits #11 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
"I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely
"****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot."
"ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes
Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of Hitler. - Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.
WWFSMD?
John "C" - 02 Apr 2008 13:40 GMT > >>> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco > >>> >>>>e...@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > > ESL! Surely you jest, "Snookie-Bookie".
DSL!
BradGuth - 03 Apr 2008 06:45 GMT On Apr 2, 5:31 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco > > >>> >>>>e...@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > > DSL! The only thing they jest is over hiding their Skull and Bones flatulence form of reverse evolution, that's actually working a whole lot better than they'd hoped. Apparently there are positive aspects of evolution via incest.
Notice how their mutations always end up using "alt.fan.art-bell, alt.usenet.kooks", because those are the one and only cozy cesspools they can honestly call home sweet home.
Let me guess, apparently Art Bell wasn't Jewish.
BTW, to a certified Jew or born-again Zionist, what the hell does "kook" (sounds like cook) stand for? . - Brad Guth
John "C" - 03 Apr 2008 18:38 GMT > On Apr 2, 5:31 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 76 lines] > "kook" (sounds like cook) stand for? > . - Brad Guth Both Art Deco's parents were 1st. cousins to each other, which explains Deco's birth defects.
HJ
BradGuth - 03 Apr 2008 18:04 GMT On Apr 3, 9:38 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> > On Apr 2, 5:31 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote: > > > "TheBookman" <TheBook...@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 93 lines] > > HJ Figures, doesn't it. Birds of a Semitic/Zionist feather as such do flock, fornicate and inseminate together.
BTW, why has our NASA terminated or banished the new and greatly improved science derived by the JAXA/Selene mission? . - Brad Guth
John "C" - 03 Apr 2008 22:16 GMT > On Apr 3, 9:38 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote: > > "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:e1c7e2fe-42a1-47ea-9b96-682a1d33e4cc@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Apr 2, 5:31 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote: > > > > "TheBookman" <TheBook...@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 100 lines] > improved science derived by the JAXA/Selene mission? > . - Brad Guth Honestly, I don't know.
HJ
BradGuth - 03 Apr 2008 22:02 GMT On Apr 3, 1:16 pm, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> > > "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 131 lines] > > HJ Apparently you and most others do not hardly know squat, as otherwise you wouldn't be so intent upon altering the topic name, like certain other incest mutated morons that we each know of, would do...
Perhaps we should ask of our rabbi Art Deco and brown-nosed company, of what's with all of their JAXA/Selene banishment? . - Brad Guth
eyeball - 03 Apr 2008 22:12 GMT > On Apr 3, 1:16 pm, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 144 lines] > of what's with all of their JAXA/Selene banishment? > . - Brad Guth I think it's just terrible that no one else can see past the brain washing to the truth as shown to us by Mr Guth. Sir,do you think if you arranged tv airtime (perhaps on a cable access show) you might find a more receptive audience?
BradGuth - 03 Apr 2008 22:26 GMT > > On Apr 3, 1:16 pm, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 149 lines] > Sir,do you think if you arranged tv airtime (perhaps on a cable access > show) you might find a more receptive audience? Anything outside of this Usenet anti-think-tank would become a "more receptive audience".
Unless we reconsidered brown-nosed clowns and the Borg like Third Reich collective as being audience worthy, as otherwise Usenet is pretty much 99.9% trashed out of its mind, and/or having dumbfounded itself past the point of no return. (and that's not just my opinion) . - Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 04 Apr 2008 01:36 GMT Brad couldn't show sh.t to a COW! lmao!
Saul Levy
>I think it's just terrible that no one else can see past the brain >washing to the truth as shown to us by Mr Guth. >Sir,do you think if you arranged tv airtime (perhaps on a cable access >show) you might find a more receptive audience? BradGuth - 03 Apr 2008 20:36 GMT > On Apr 2, 5:31 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 80 lines] > "kook" (sounds like cook) stand for? > . - Brad Guth Funny how others of phony names and as pretend-atheists can post into a given topic, as a reply along with their hijacked notion of renaming the topic, then subsequently able to retract or pull out their contribution, especially when weird I'm not allowed via Google/NOVA Usenet to do the same hit and run method, meaning that I'm not allowed to ever go back and edit or otherwise much less erase a given contribution of mine.
Must be another one of those pesky Semitic (aka Third Reich) things causing all of this Usenet problem I'm having, because it sure as hell is not Muslim related. . - Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 04 Apr 2008 01:31 GMT Why don't you start your own Usenet, Brad? lmfjao!
Saul Levy
>Funny how others of phony names and as pretend-atheists can post into >a given topic, as a reply along with their hijacked notion of renaming [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >is not Muslim related. >. - Brad Guth Art Deco - 03 Apr 2008 03:49 GMT >>>> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco >>>> >>>>e...@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > >Looks like teh old snip-n-run just didn't satisfy him any more. He thinks I'm a "rabbi".
<snicker>
 Signature "Classic erroneous presupposition." -- David Tholen
John "C" - 03 Apr 2008 05:15 GMT "Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
> <snicker> Still molesting teen boys, Pedo Deco?
HJ
Saul Levy - 02 Apr 2008 21:31 GMT GoofBall the racist PIGGY! lmfjao!
Saul Levy
>You're still sleeping with our butt-cheek flapping Art Fartco? > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >own kind) >. - Brad Guth Art Deco - 02 Apr 2008 02:09 GMT >>>>>In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco >>>>>erfc@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >Gotta give Guthball credit (such as it is) - he clings tighter to his >delusions than Alexa does. Or did he give up on his "life on Venus" binge? Guthball's latest schtick is to whine over and over that he needs someone to do a "3D supercomputer simulation" for him that will verify his kook ideas about the recent capture of the Moon, the position of Venus during the Apollo non-manned landings, and the trajectory of Sirius WRT the Earth. And he still clings to his kooky interpretations of his over-processed radar images of Venus.
 Signature "Classic erroneous presupposition." -- David Tholen
TheBookman - 02 Apr 2008 03:11 GMT >>>>>>In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco >>>>>>erfc@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > Sirius WRT the Earth. And he still clings to his kooky interpretations > of his over-processed radar images of Venus. Poor Brad. All he needs is a Daddy Ward, and a Mommy June, and he could star in his very own sitcom: "Leave it to Guthball"!
ESL!
 Signature Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG-WHISTLE AWARD MIKE "MIGUEL" CRANSTON, TRAINED BY BOOKMAN COOSN-266-06-89425 #14 People ruining UseNet lits #9 Top a.sholes on the Net lits #11 Most hated Usenetizens of all time lits #11 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
"I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely
"****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot."
"ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes
Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of Hitler. - Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.
WWFSMD?
John "C" - 02 Apr 2008 04:24 GMT > >>>>>>: >Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his > >>>>>>: >bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > ESL! Not too bad, Old Timer.
DSL!
BradGuth - 03 Apr 2008 01:23 GMT On Apr 1, 7:24 pm, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> > >>>>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco > > >>>>>>e...@caballista.org said: [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > > DSL! Notice how the incest mutated DNA of their Zionism and pro Hitlerism is just about everywhere.
in the form of: "alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell"
. - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 03 Apr 2008 04:01 GMT >Notice how the incest mutated DNA of their Zionism and pro Hitlerism >is just about everywhere. > >in the form of: "alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell" > >. - Brad Guth What does 'A' have to do with 'B', Brad? You need to show your work.
 Signature "Classic erroneous presupposition." -- David Tholen
John "C" - 03 Apr 2008 05:14 GMT "Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
> What does 'A' have to do with 'B', Brad? You need to show your work. Still molesting teen boys, Pedo Deco?
HJ
John "C" - 03 Apr 2008 05:20 GMT > On Apr 1, 7:24 pm, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] > > . - Brad Guth I've noticed!
HJ
Paine - 01 Apr 2008 13:10 GMT > : > Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his > : > bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Oh, my. Semites of their Third Reich? How should this be > interpreted, in terms of Godwin's Law? Dear goddess Kali, these days i've seen Godwin's Law broken on UseNet more times than my heart!
Today's posters are far too hardened (or far too uninformed) to the events of WWII. Poor Adolf no longer gets no respect! <g>
ob-gyn: At least Mother Goose brought up "foam" indicating his belief that Brad and space may have similar quantum qualities.
happy days and... starry starry nights!
 Signature Indelibly yours, Paine
P.S. Thank YOU for reading!
P.P.S. (shh) Some secret sites... http://painellsworth.net http://savethechildren.org http://eBook-eDen.secretsgolden.com
Saul Levy - 01 Apr 2008 01:33 GMT Aw, what's wrong, Brad? Is your insanity getting to you? lmao!
Saul Levy
>Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his >bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their >usual topic/author stalking and fuckology of trashing everything is >sight, to the best they and other Semites of their Third Reich can >muster. >. - Brad Guth BradGuth - 17 Mar 2008 21:43 GMT Thick Outer Shell of Moon / by Hank Kroll
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... > Brad Guth / Hank Kroll Seems rather odd that the moon's tough crust that's so well populated with such massive though unusually shallow craters, and otherwise having those unusual mascon issues, plus on average so physically dark as coal, electrostatic dusty and unavoidably gamma and X-ray saturated, as such isn't worth even a good topic rant or two about its thick or thin crust, or of its unusually low mass interior that could be semi-hollow, if not containing a low density worth of a salty brine.
This form of topic/author banishment is almost as bad off as the JAXA Selene mission getting officially NASA sequestered until someone can plant a few items upon that physically dark moon, that should at least at that resolution of 10 m/pixel look as though something bright and shiny of our Apollo "right stuff" exist, just as previously specified to us by our NASA.
BTW, Venus is roughly at least twice the reflective/albedo worth of Earth, and since it's often passing enough nearby and/or as technically orbiting itself through the same FOV(frame of view) of our moon, and even at times including Earth, as such it would be nearly impossible for those terrific HDTV obtained color images as wide or even as telephoto views of our moon or those of moon+Earth to having always missed Venus, as for excluding that absolutely vibrant planet of Venus should actually be a pretty neat trick.
As such, I was just wondering as to what sort of pathetic excuses they're having to come up with, as to why the likes of Venus is never to be seen from any given JAXA mission related orbit of our moon, as seen and easily recorded by that terrific HDTV camera of superior DR(dynamic range) to film, and with such quality bandpass coated optics to boot? . - Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 18 Mar 2008 02:44 GMT Drivel? lmao!
Saul Levy
>Seems rather odd that the moon's tough crust that's so well populated >with such massive though unusually shallow craters, and otherwise [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] >optics to boot? >. - Brad Guth BradGuth - 18 Mar 2008 06:07 GMT Interesting that you think the regular laws of physics and best available science that's peer replicated outside of your NASA cult is "drivel". Must be another one of those pesky faith-based things, of what other pretend atheists have to go along with, or else. . - Brad Guth
> Drivel? lmao! > [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > >optics to boot? > >. - Brad Guth Saul Levy - 18 Mar 2008 18:32 GMT As Timberwolf clearly stated: You are making up this crap as you go along, Brad! lmao!
If you think you're following the laws of physics and best available science, you truly are an IDIOT! lmao!
The Universe does NOT follow your wishes anymore than it follows the WartPiggys'! lmao!
All you are producing is DRIVEL!
Saul Levy
>Interesting that you think the regular laws of physics and best >available science that's peer replicated outside of your NASA cult is [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> >> Saul Levy BradGuth - 19 Mar 2008 01:56 GMT > As Timberwolf clearly stated: You are making up this crap as you go > along,Brad! lmao! [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > >> Saul Levy Is that why you and others of your kind keep excluding the following?
sci.space.history, alt.astronomy, sci.astro, sci.space.policy, soc.history.what-if
What is it about our moon that's so dark and scary?
Why is JAXA under your NASA cold-war thumb?
Is your being a systematic born-again liar having some Third Reich complications? . - Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 19 Mar 2008 19:39 GMT I'm in alt.astronomy, Brad! Where have I excluded it? lmao!
As for the other newsgroups: I don't read them. I used to read sci.astro, but it got so worthless (DRIVEL! lmao!) that I deleted it.
The rest is more of your DRIVEL! No ones cares less about it than I! lmao! None of it has any importance to the real Universe.
Saul Levy
>> As Timberwolf clearly stated: You are making up this crap as you go >> along,Brad! lmao! [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >complications? >. - Brad Guth BradGuth - 20 Mar 2008 23:16 GMT > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... > Brad Guth / Hank Kroll "The thick outer shell of the moon" by hank Kroll isn't so much about our Apollo troops as having "the right stuff", and of their having gone or not having gone to the moon's surface. However, clearly of our very own orbital obtained images and especially via those of JAXA Selene are holding back. The truth about our older than Earth moon isn't getting told, but then truths about Venus are as equally taboo/ nondisclosure rated because I'm not one of them, and otherwise because it's not as scripted within their Old Testament. .- Brad Guth
BradGuth - 22 Mar 2008 00:10 GMT What's with gabi40 ?
Why is there no official Usenet objection to such useless topics, as infomercial spam or worse?
Usenet damage-control / by Brad Guth In case some of you nice folks haven't quite noticed the ongoing flak of whatever's mainstream or bust, outside of my absolutely crappy local ISP(Centurytel) and Usenet account getting remote trashed on a fairly regular basis (if you can further imagine, it seems Centurytel has foiled access to their own 253 area code without ever blocking or otherwise degrading normal voice/telephone usage) is a pretty neat system wide outage (as they claim) of their keeping our words off the internet unless we sign up for their more ENRON spendy DSL services.
Perhaps we should take a little reflective quiet time to fully appreciate all the recent intellectual and anti-science imposed gauntlets of this Usenet topic/author stalking and blockage, whereas instead of the truth we're seeing forced topic stacking of such wordy disinformation crapolla so that the general public or media doesn't get an honest wind or otherwise bother to look deep enough into this mainstream cesspool of Usenet, as to discover what's really going down the drain.
It's exactly like the cloak and dagger worth of those NASA Apollo false or dishonest topics having key search words of NASA, Apollo, moon landing and hoax continually included within each and every one of those phony postings of obviously bogus topics that also include naughty smut and porn related context, as clearly intended in order to cause automatic filtering of what public schools ever get to read, as well as to divert the honest research intentions of others, by way of those hidden or cloak and dagger means that essentially wash-out or force-purge all previous forms of perfectly serious related topics out of their Google/NOVA archives, and thus getting removed from their infowar and otherwise mainstream hype configured Usenet, so that only the mainstream status quo of topics in 100% support of government and of their faith-based NASA/Apollo side of this issue remains accessible to the public.
In them good old days of applying this form of government and theological extremist oversight or merely orchestrated clownism, as such this tactic was mainstream swarm like accomplished via witch and book burnings that achieved their form of mainstream damage-control trickery of that dark-side era, as well as if need be having put those of their own kind on a stick for yet another shock and awe worth of a faith-based PR stunt wasn't overlooked.
BTW, my for-real phone of 253-8576061 and email of bradguth@gmail or bradguth@yahoo (among others) has always been answered by myself, so if you're not getting through or you believe that I'm not answering my phone or otherwise not reading or much less returning your email, it's simply not the least bit intentionally because of myself, but instead it's more than likely of those calls or emails of yours have been getting systematically intercepted, modified and/or diverted by those in charge, and otherwise skewed by those having the most to lose, especially if they're not doing their spook and mole like jobs at keeping the rest of us supposed village idiots snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no return.
If this bad situation that's clearly getting worse isn't exactly what those global domination Zionists and of their puppet Hitler warlord (aka partner in crimes against humanity) had in mind, as having since been replaced by our GW Bush and of his born-again faith of brown- nosed minions, then what the hell is?
Seems via presidential signings and of those DHS powers of God has entirely excluded all others from taking proper action. Again, it's all very Third Reich and otherwise warlord like. . - Brad Guth
> > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > it's not as scripted within their Old Testament. > .- Brad Guth Saul Levy - 22 Mar 2008 04:42 GMT Why would anyone want to call you, Brad? lmao!
Saul Levy
>BTW, my for-real phone of 253-8576061 and email of bradguth@gmail or >bradguth@yahoo (among others) has always been answered by myself, so [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >keeping the rest of us supposed village idiots snookered and >dumbfounded past the point of no return. BradGuth - 23 Mar 2008 01:09 GMT > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... > Brad Guth / Hank Kroll According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's crust is worth 60 km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the average crust of Earth. This means the core is either of extremely low density, or it's somewhat hallow. . - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 23 Mar 2008 04:19 GMT >> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard >> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >it's somewhat hallow. >. - Brad Guth Or that Brad Guth doesn't understand the websites he tries to read.
 Signature "Classic erroneous presupposition." -- David Tholen
BradGuth - 23 Mar 2008 05:49 GMT > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... > Brad Guth / Hank Kroll According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's crust is worth on average 60+ km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the average crust of Earth. This means the core is either of extremely low density (possibly of sodium or even salty brine like), or perhaps it's somewhat hallow, as well as whatever is within that core being poorly compacted due to the low amount of core mass that's offering such an insufficient amount of gravity.
Other science has that average crust thickness at nearly 70 km, and on average (including those many surface mascon issues) of nearly 6 g/cm3 if not somewhat greater crust density (especially of those impressive mascon areas). . - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 23 Mar 2008 16:36 GMT >According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's >crust is worth on average 60+ km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the >average crust of Earth. This means the core is either of extremely How many more times are you going to post the same screed, Brad?
 Signature "Classic erroneous presupposition." -- David Tholen
TheBookman - 23 Mar 2008 17:06 GMT >>According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's >>crust is worth on average 60+ km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the >>average crust of Earth. This means the core is either of extremely > > How many more times are you going to post the same screed, Brad? He'll continue until the listening audience(tinla) accepts his valuation of the moon's crust.
Personally, I don't believe that "worth" is a valid measurement for geology, but YMMV.
ESL!
 Signature Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG-WHISTLE AWARD MIKE "MIGUEL" CRANSTON, TRAINED BY BOOKMAN COOSN-266-06-89425 #14 People ruining UseNet lits #9 Top a.sholes on the Net lits #11 Most hated Usenetizens of all time lits #11 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
"I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely
"****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot."
"ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes
Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of Hitler. - Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.
WWFSMD?
BradGuth - 23 Mar 2008 18:32 GMT > >>According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's > >>crust is worth on average 60+ km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > WWFSMD? Why are you so literally into brown-nosing Art Deco. Are you not allowed to think for yourself, or is it simply another one of those pesky Zionist Third Reich things you incest cultivated clowns of topic/ author fuckology have to live with? . - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 23 Mar 2008 20:01 GMT >> >>According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's >> >>crust is worth on average 60+ km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] >author fuckology have to live with? >. - Brad Guth Have you been taking laming lessons from Fagar, Brad?
 Signature "Classic erroneous presupposition." -- David Tholen
Art Deco - 23 Mar 2008 19:49 GMT >>>According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's >>>crust is worth on average 60+ km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >Personally, I don't believe that "worth" is a valid measurement for >geology, but YMMV. As long as you phrase it as a "SWAG", Brad is cool with that.
 Signature "Classic erroneous presupposition." -- David Tholen
BradGuth - 26 Mar 2008 14:35 GMT > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... > Brad Guth / Hank Kroll Of course we always have the following infomercial spew of skewed science as based upon NASA's conditional laws of physics and evidence excluded, to look forward to.
Mythbustin' the Moon Hoax "Update: I've been told the episode does not air April 25. The air date has not been set yet, but I'll make sure I announce it when it is!"
· # Forreston 17 Mar 2008 at 11:55 am "I wonder if this will ever be aired. It would be interesting to find out what they prove or disprove. After seeing the air date change to TBA, I wonder just how much was a hoax!"
http://www.duggback.com/space/Mythbusters_to_tackle_the_moon_landing_hoaxes/
Unfortunately, this forever ongoing infowar of supposed Apollo moon landing hoax Mythbustin' doesn't bother to cover several of the most important and easily peer replicated factors, that'll just as easily prove our NASA/Apollo wizards never set a human footprint on the moon. Remember, if they had absolute proof positive on behalf of all that's NASA/Apollo, as such it would have been mainstream published along with multiple peer replicated support that's entirely independent from any sort of NASA or other government loot or background moderation. Unfortunately, not even Google/NOVA is the least bit independent. . - Brad Guth
BradGuth - 27 Mar 2008 20:52 GMT > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... > Brad Guth / Hank Kroll According to terrestrial and orbital obtained science data about our physically dark and otherwise massive ratio of an orbital mascon (aka moon), its crust is at least upon average 64 km (some having it at 61 km, and others at 68 km), with the low density core being of whatever substance is either salt or sodium like, if not relatively hollow in sufficient places. . - Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 27 Mar 2008 23:15 GMT I think it's YOUR BRAIN which as hollow spaces, Brad! lmao!
Mad cow comes to mind! lmao!
Saul Levy
>> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard >> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >sufficient places. >. - Brad Guth BradGuth - 30 Mar 2008 17:59 GMT > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow... > Brad Guth / Hank Kroll It seems there's still too much that's cloak and dagger worthy or of ongoing disinformation and the exclusion of evidence that's ongoing about our moon, as to not perceive that we're being officially snookered and otherwise dumbfounded to death by our own kind.
MOM (Motive, Opportunity and Means) = USA/USSR race to the moon
Like most everything published of our NASA/Apollo moon landing, everything on the following NASA page is either a lie or an exclusion of whatever evidence that's the least bit contrary to their agenda. It is not the least bit unusual for governments or of their brown- nosed minions to lie, because it is so often of what they do best. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/
Each and every unfiltered Kodak moment as supposedly obtained while on the moon is bogus/fake, and as such are only too easily proven as such without hardly a fight because, peer replicated science as based upon the regular laws of physics is what works perfectly each and every time. Oddly their own Kodak partners in crimes against humanity refuse to step into this NASA/Apollo cesspool O-Ring cult of fire.
There is more than a dozen specifics about such fly-by-rocket technology, photographics, as well as that of physical and environmental considerations that simply would not hold up in any actual court of law if required to support the official record. But then we all know as a matter of fact that our government does not play by any set of fair rules, whereas even those rules of their own making are freely skewed in order to suit or otherwise banish whatever the situation demands.
The list of viable topics as fair arguments can be as short or as long as you like, but remember that uncovering only one lie need be the case of proving without possible doubt that we humans have not walked on our physically dark moon as officially scripted by our NASA, or of having been robotically traveled upon as touted by the USSR/Russian side of this tango. There's also the forever orchestrated clownism swarm of internet/usenet agents (aka spooks and moles) doing their usual cloak and dagger thing, of stalking authors for the intent of making topics that do not fully support the mainstream status quo as muddy and/or as clownish and otherwise as smut polluted topics as possible. Even hundreds of intentionally bogus topics of pure gibberish smut incorporating key wordage as NASA, Apollo, moon landing, fake and hoax have been created and posted by those in charge of their PR damage-control, which seems downright silly and otherwise extremely odd as to why they'd have to resort or otherwise allow such childish and adult porn tactics.
With an existing overkill worth of efficient spysat imaging resolution of that very same era, and of far better resolution since, seems rather odd that such continued and robotically affordable science gathering of absolutely terrific (0.1 m) resolution, and even capable of full/extended tri-color spectrum details on behalf of mineral and deposit mapping as rather easily obtained from a close lunar orbit, was never accomplished to the degree technically possible by our crack MI5/CIA/NSA and Air Force spy-masters of our mutually perpetrated cold- war era, as well as recently JAXA/Selene has been place into a no-win situation so that their HDTV color and other high resolu
|
|