Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / April 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Thick Outer Shell of Moon / by Hank Kroll

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BradGuth - 07 Mar 2008 19:15 GMT
This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
gamma saturated and dark as coal moon (in many places it's
considerably darker than coal).  It's a matter of fact that our moon
for its size offers an unusually thick shell or hull that's
extensively covered in tens of meters worth of highly electrostatic
charged dust, as well as chuck full of those surface mascon issues,
meaning that the lunar core is either of a low density substance
(possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
Brad Guth / Hank Kroll
Stan Engel - 07 Mar 2008 22:37 GMT
Brad, it's long past time that you were marched into a gas chamber.
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
> gamma saturated and dark as coal moon (in many places it's
> considerably darker than coal).

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

BradGuth - 10 Mar 2008 04:45 GMT
> > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

I realize that's exactly what those rich and powerful Jews of your
kind did to other Jews, plus putting down anyone else that made your
puppet warlord happy, but I'm not even the least bit Yiddish, so you
can't even put me on a stick for accomplishing another one of those
faith-based PR stunts.
. - Brad Guth
cjpolins@aol.com - 08 Mar 2008 12:14 GMT
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
> Brad Guth / Hank Kroll

Brad  How will the moons magnetic dust effect a compass?Does moon sand
pour? Does it take friction to get this electrostatic electricity to
work?  Sunbeam + Bert
Stephen Malbon - 08 Mar 2008 12:33 GMT
> Brad  How will the moons magnetic dust effect a compass?Does moon sand
> pour? Does it take friction to get this electrostatic electricity to
> work?  Sunbeam + Bert
The guy's an idiot, don't encourage him.
Saul Levy - 09 Mar 2008 20:20 GMT
You mean Brad and Hank, I hope?  lmao!

Saul Levy

>> Brad  How will the moons magnetic dust effect a compass?Does moon sand
>> pour? Does it take friction to get this electrostatic electricity to
>> work?  Sunbeam + Bert
>The guy's an idiot, don't encourage him.
BradGuth - 08 Mar 2008 17:32 GMT
On Mar 8, 4:14 am, cjpol...@aol.com wrote:

> > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> pour? Does it take friction to get this electrostatic electricity to
> work?  Sunbeam + Bert

? magnetic dust ?  where the hell did you get that from?

Obviously the moon's sootly like surface that's on average nearly dark
as coal should have a composite of iron dust, along with basalt,
titanium, thorium and radium dust, plus obviously it has that
substantial raw element of sodium to work with.

Of being electrostatic charged is not quite the same as being
magnetic, or is it?

Perhaps at night is where some of that electrostatic charged surface
material could become superconducting, because is certainly getting
cold enough to turn the gas of Rn222 into LRn222.

The solar wind that easily reaches to the raw naked surface of that
physically dark moon of ours is what likely creates the bulk of that
electrostatic charge, of perhaps creating several teravolts if one
could measure this energy differential that's existing between the
electrostatic charge of Earth and that of the charged moon along with
the orbital velocity of 1.023 km/s creating yet another charge
potential.

The fact of the moon core being of low density or semi-hollow may also
have some impact on the battery like worth of lunar energy storage
potential.
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth - 08 Mar 2008 17:37 GMT
Thick shell/crust, thin shell/crust or of whatever's in between, and
the grand ruse/sting of the NASA/Apollo century continues.  It seems
even via those new and extremely improved JAXA/Selene images are
simply not going to share and share alike, exactly as though there
stuff about our moon that of those in charge of our private parts do
not want us village idiots knowing about.

Mar 6, 2008
"KAGUYA Image Gallery" The HDTV image of Apollo 17 landing site taken
in last Nov. of 2007
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/index_e.html

Good luck seeing any pixel the least bit NASA/Apollo bright and shiny
upon that nearly coal dark moon.  Notice how a given FOV including
Earth is in sufficient color along with the moon's color saturation as
having been limited to 10% if not 5%, or as in many of their published
images as having been entirely turned off, even after pushing their
wussy color saturation and increasing the contrast of that moon
remains as though without mineral color or even as otherwise
unavoidably secondary/recoil bluish as obtained on those initial HDTV
images is oddly no longer the case.

For some odd reason, JAXA has become deathly afraid to honestly share
any of those HDTV full color spectrum of maximum colour saturation or
RGB dynamic range (DR/contrast) images, and even as having been
extensively limiting as to those terrific telephoto monochrome views
of what's worth 10 meters/pixel resolution have been excluded from
public view (especially excluding as to any of those supposed NASA/
Apollo landing sites).
. - Brad Guth

Apparently I've been using up far more than my fair share of this
Google/NOVA Usenet bandwidth, as having recently posted all of one new
topic and replied to a couple of others has my account down to its
knees or getting locked down, along with the usual gauntlet of my
having been getting those pesky multiple errors while trying to post
replies, receiving the final kill message of "Your account or Internet
address has exceeded our posting limit at this time, please try again
later." Perhaps this has something to do with my 7-day activity of
getting nearly 5000 views of my messages (nearly 700 per day) must be
why I've been so often nailed or cut off.  There's also so many of
those new and improved cookie spermware/fuckware (aka spyware) files
that my PC and ISP connection into the Usenet as gotten nearly
terminal before I start.
. - BG

> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
> Brad Guth / Hank Kroll
Saul Levy - 08 Mar 2008 20:22 GMT
Is Hank your publishing name, or your other kook name, Brad?  lmao!

Saul Levy

>This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
>astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>(possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
>Brad Guth / Hank Kroll
BradGuth - 09 Mar 2008 02:48 GMT
Hank Kroll is just another honest and extremely hard working guy that
I'm indirectly related to, his having lots of real world expertise in
his favor and willing to share, in that no matters how much collage
the likes of yourself will never muster up to half of what Hank Kroll
has to offer because you and other boxed souls can't seem to
deductively think for yourself.

Of course, unlike yourself and others of your kind, Hank and I do make
our fair share of honest mistakes, and in spite of what certain all-
knowing bigots might like to think, we tend to like most of humanity
even though some are Jewish and many others are not usually Jewish or
as nearly Third Reich polished and/or as pretend-atheistic as
yourself.

In other words, we're a couple of the few good-guys that would never
put one of our own kind on a stick for a faith-based PR stunt.

BTW, since this isn't your topic, why do you keep dropping the
intended cross-posting of "sci.space.history, alt.astronomy,
sci.astro, sci.space.policy, soc.history.what-if" ?
. - Brad Guth

> Is Hank your publishing name, or your other kook name, Brad?  lmao!
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >(possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
> >Brad Guth / Hank Kroll
Hagar - 12 Mar 2008 15:32 GMT
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
> Brad Guth / Hank Kroll

... sort of like your brain, eh ...
Pat Flannery - 12 Mar 2008 18:03 GMT
>>   It's a matter of fact that our moon
>> for its size offers an unusually thick shell or hull that's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> ... sort of like your brain, eh ...

This is interesting... the outside is rock, and the center is water.
What makes that interesting is that rocks sink in water, so the water
should be on the outside, not inside.

Pat
Painius - 12 Mar 2008 18:15 GMT
>>>   It's a matter of fact that our moon
>>> for its size offers an unusually thick shell or hull that's
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Pat

Interesting yes, because water tends to seep
down through porous rock "seeking its level".
So how does water determine its level?  Does
this have anything to do with "buoyancy"?

Why aren't Earth's oceans just dry beds of
arid, porous rock?  Did some supreme being
remember to include a high-grade "plastic
liner" beneath Earth's crust when s/he made
the planet?

happy days and...
  starry starry nights!

Signature

Indelibly yours,
Paine

P.S. Thank YOU for reading!

   P.P.S. (shh) Some secret sites...
      http://painellsworth.net
            http://savethechildren.org
                          http://eBook-eDen.secretsgolden.com

Jeff▲Relf - 13 Mar 2008 03:10 GMT
The core of the Milky Way, the solar system, and earth are all denser
than the outer regions... it's displacement... denser stuff sinks.
( Hmm... could that explain quantum gravity ? )

The core of the Milky Way shines with gamma rays ( from anti-matter );
it's an unimaginably powerful particle accelerator,
hydrogen atoms don't stand a chance there.

Likewise,
at the edge of the Milky Way, a hydrogen atom becomes Cold Dark Matter.
Hydrogen atoms are the exception, not the rule.
BradGuth - 13 Mar 2008 04:18 GMT
> >>>   It's a matter of fact that our moon
> >>> for its size offers an unusually thick shell or hull that's
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>              http://savethechildren.org
>                            http://eBook-eDen.secretsgolden.com

Earth's water, especially of the salty water, was a somewhat recent
deposit, whereas it did not otherwise emerge from within Earth.

If there's anything of any watery fluid or brine worthy substance
within the moon, it too was likely a deposit.

BTW, why is "Jeff▲Relf" changing the title of this topic?
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth - 12 Mar 2008 21:32 GMT
> >>   It's a matter of fact that our moon
> >> for its size offers an unusually thick shell or hull that's
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Pat

I never once said the lunar core was of water, although pockets or
geode like confinements of dense brines or a few other mineralogy
saturated fluids could very well exist.  My best SWAG has our moon's
interior as somewhat crystal dry and cavernous.
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth - 12 Mar 2008 21:38 GMT
> > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> ... sort of like your brain, eh ...

Speaking about what's within ones head (empty or otherwise):
Yes Hagar, there's more of me than your head full of crapolla can
imagine, whereas stipulated by "Painius" you are the reincarnation of
Carl Sagan, wishful thinking your way along as though the laws pf
physics and best available science that's peer replicated to death
doesn't matter, such as Mars not having squat worth of local energy to
work with, but lo and behold it seems you're not alone, because others
of your silly kind are wishing Mars had life, and not even as of all
that long ago, and that somehow the likes of robust and rad-hard Mars
life could still be found and of other imported life from Earth could
somehow coexist if only we could go there (at great public expense) in
person.

Our 'once upon a time' icy proto-moon is not as interpreted by our
faith-based NASA, but as a now humanly lethal place where only the
best of applied technology would give our frail DNA limited access to
that naked environment without our having to pay the ultimate price.

Our usenet contributor "Mitchell Jones" is by all accounts intelligent
and a very honest sorts of investigative research that so desperately
wants to believe that our NASA put folks with all the "right stuff"
onto the moon without hardly a scratch as based upon the undocumented
worth of our fly-by-rocket expertise, that was actually Semitic Third
Reich expertise from get to go.

More Lakes on Mars? / by Mitchell Jones:
***{As I see it, the prevailing practice of valuing social and
political expediency more highly than truth has already, and
irreversibly, done us in. The economies of the advanced nations of the
West have been looted down to the bare walls, and their industrial
capital has been transferred to nations that lack the cultural
heritage of freedom which is necessary to create and maintain such
assets. Ahead lies a hyperinflationary depression, a collapse of the
present global civilization, and a new dark age. During that dark age,
famine and disease will reduce the human population of the Earth by
billions, and most of those remaining will live in squalor and be
unable to read or write. Quaint notions such as science and freedom
will be long since forgotten, and questions such as whether life
exists on other planets will not cross the minds of average persons in
their lifetimes. The reality is that humans preferred spitting on the
truth to reaching for the stars, and so they are going to get the
future they deserve, rather than the future they expect. --MJ}***

Now we are on the same exact set of tracks, realizing that we are
essentially being snookered by those of us having "the right stuff",
and otherwise sufficiently under-educated and/or formally mainstream
disinformed to the point of our being continually dumbfounded past the
point of no return, is what seems entirely status quo.

It's not that pockets of surface liquid couldn't possibly coexist on
Mars, though of fresh water is pretty much out of the question, and
it's nearly as unlikely of those being of a sufficient brine or
mineral composite for having survived under such cold and nearly that
of a vacuum.  Thus far the mineralogy of Mars is sorely lacking in the
remains of common sea salt or be it rock salt, although of other yet
undiscovered salts or possibly even S8(sulphur) may be the norm if
ever liquids are discovered.

***{I'm not a fan of NASA by any stretch of the imagination. I believe
that NASA's managers are petrified by the possibility of life on Mars,
and punish anyone in the organization who interprets the data in a way
that suggests that life there is possible. The idea that there are
locations on Mars that are far enough below "sea level" for lakes of
liquid water to exist scares the hell out of them, because if such
notions caught the attention of the press, there would be a public
outcry in favor of manned missions to Mars. That would trigger another
sh.t fight for "funding" (loot) in congress between NASA and other
parasitic groups (the welfare lobby, the "environmentalist" lobby,
etc.)
any of which can put more bodies on the street than NASA. NASA would
be guaranteed to lose that fight, just as they lost the sh.t fight
after the Apollo program.

Let me elaborate a bit.

After the successful moon landings, the interest of the public turned
elsewhere, and a battle began in congress to divert NASA's funding
back to more "important" uses, such as making sure every wino in a
ditch had enough money in his pocket to buy his next bottle, if he
regained consciousness. With the support of the public having
evaporated, NASA was almost killed in that fight, and the lesson was
not lost on NASA's managers: they know that a big public surge which
enables them to put a mission on Mars will be followed by yet another
loss of public interest and support, followed by a collapse of
funding, and they are not about to go down that path. To them, a bird
in the hand is sufficient. They aren't about to go after, or even
think about, the two--or twenty--birds
that are in the bush.
--Mitchell Jones}***

No need to "elaborate a bit" because, I've been there and done that
one at least a thousand fold in regard to Venus and our Moon,
elaborating as to their faith-based analogy that's cloaked as a
pretend-atheism of their being in denial or otherwise naysay to all
that's off-world, in that they can jump as many fences and thus change
sides of most any given war or argument as it takes.  Apparently, all
that's off-world has to be of inert eye-candy, meaning that for any
number of their carefully chosen reasons is why there's no possibility
of other viable forms of life to behold, much less of any complex
evolved nature, because in their faith-based mindset only Earth is it
for hosting complex life as we know it, and thereby everything else
has to remain as inert eye-candy.

I believe that a sufficiently advanced form of intentionally deployed
life may very well have given Mars a go for the money, so to speak,
however that era would have been quite some time ago when Mars still
had its magnetosphere, perhaps ten fold more atmospheric density and a
planetary core that wasn't nearly frozen solid.

***"In fact, the possibility of color rebalancing coupled with the
known propensity of bureaucrats and politicians to engage in "spin
control" (i.e., lying), casts a pall of suspicion over all of the
photographs retrieved by Mars orbiters/rovers. The prevalence of spin
control means there is no way to be sure that any particular photo
posted on a NASA or ESA website has not been rebalanced to suit the
desires of upper management. In fact, I am quite sure that in any case
where leaving the balance settings at the calibrated levels would
cause a public reaction not desired by management, the photo will be
rebalanced before publication. Fortunately, the mass of photos being
received is enormous, and in many cases the regions on a photo that
might cause an undesired public reaction are a tiny portion of the
whole, hence likely to be overlooked until after publication. That
scenario very much fits the case we are discussing.
--Mitchell Jones}***

Those terribly pastel (aka low spectral DR) color images of the planet
Mercury are another very good example of our NASA's efforts to
continually snooker and dumbfound each and everyone of us.  It's what
they do best, especially if looking at the vast majority of their moon
related Kodak moments that simply do not in any way appear as though
taken from our physically dark moon, much less as unfiltered and oddly
w/o Venus at better than twice the reflective/albedo index of Earth.
So, you are 100% correct that our NASA hasn't been sharing the whole
truth and nothing but the truth, and they continually do this crap
without so much as a speck of remorse or concern for the consequences
of their actions, but then when ever has MI5/CIA shared whole truths
about much of anything.

The deductive science of observationology is worth an honest look-see,
and not just at the likes of whatever official eye-candy pictures have
to offer, but of the 36 look per pixel worth of composite radar
obtained images is also worthy of getting the best attention that our
best expertise can muster, because of what's easily interpreted about
Venus that  isn't limited as to inert matters.
. - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 16 Mar 2008 03:25 GMT
>> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
>> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>... sort of like your brain, eh ...

Wow, Lame-ar, you sure told him!

Signature

Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

John "C" - 16 Mar 2008 03:39 GMT
"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message

> Wow, Lame-ar, you sure told him!

That's right, Rump-Ranger!

HJ
Fred Hall - 16 Mar 2008 05:18 GMT
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:33:10 -0600, "John \"C\""
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:

>Rump-Ranger

--

http://honestjohn777.multiply.com/

http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/HJC02/
BradGuth - 16 Mar 2008 06:10 GMT
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:33:10 -0600, "John \"C\""
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/HJC02/

Say what?  or rather say nothing.  Are you just pretending at being
Hitler?

Is there something dark and scary about our moon that you do not want
to share and share alike?

. - Brad Guth
ah - 24 Mar 2008 12:02 GMT
>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:33:10 -0600, "John \"C\""
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Is there something dark and scary about our moon that you do not want
> to share and share alike?

You're not yet prepared for the unfettered truth.

> . - Brad Guth

Signature

ah

BradGuth - 24 Mar 2008 17:25 GMT
> >> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:33:10 -0600, "John \"C\""
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> --
> ah

Are you suggesting that you happen to know of this "unfettered truth"?

Why are you folks so deathly afraid to share and share alike?

What topics or external links can you offer about this "unfettered
truth"?
. - Brad Guth
Colonel Jake - 31 Mar 2008 08:18 GMT
: "Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
:
: HJ
John "C" - 31 Mar 2008 18:26 GMT
> : "Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
> :
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> :
> [...]

Cat got your tongue, Monkey-Boi?

Ninja col. Jake:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEtIoGQxqQs

Hee   Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

Number One
BradGuth - 31 Mar 2008 19:49 GMT
On Mar 31, 9:26 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:

> > : "Art Deco" <e...@caballista.org> wrote in message
> > :
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Number One

Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his
bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their
usual topic/author stalking and fuckology of trashing everything is
sight, to the best they and other Semites of their Third Reich can
muster.
. - Brad Guth
John "C" - 31 Mar 2008 23:05 GMT
> On Mar 31, 9:26 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> muster.
> . - Brad Guth

Right You Are!

HJ
BradGuth - 01 Apr 2008 01:51 GMT
On Mar 31, 2:05 pm, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:

> > On Mar 31, 9:26 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> > > "Colonel Jake" <SergeantY...@comcast.net> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> HJ

Since 99.9% of Usenet is either a clone of Art Deco or simply those of
his brown-nosed minionship to their Third Reich, it's hard to tell
whom is not just another one of his pretend-atheism clowns.  of course
MI5/CIA isn't exactly innocent, nor would most any government agency
or contractor to our corrupt government dare to be honest, much less
moderate the like of their spooks and moles intended to foil any
chance of the truth getting shared with the general public.

The cloak and dagger nature of these Art Deco types is clearly
orchestrated along by those rich and powerful in charge of our private
parts, and by taking as much of our hard earned loot as they can
manage to steel by way of any means seen fit.  Notice how they haven't
one bad word to say about the higher cost of energy, and how they are
consistently opposed to whatever renewable or less spendy energy
alternatives outside of whatever their ENRON policy remains in full
distribution control of.  Home brew of whatever fuel(s) or that of
renewable derived energy is simply taboo according to what these
rusemasters are insisting, in that we have to use their spendy fossil
or just as spendy energy from the grid as our only viable option.

Their private Federal Reserve Bank is just another cartel part of
their Skull and Bones agenda on behalf of global domination, supported
via our hard earned loot and of everything else they can manage to
insider control (such as big energy), by simply owning the largest
block of shares being good enough in most instances.
. - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 01 Apr 2008 03:20 GMT
>clone of Art Deco
>his brown-nosed minionship
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>insider control
>. - Brad Guth

Classic GuthGobble.

Signature

"Classic erroneous presupposition."
 -- David Tholen

Art Deco - 01 Apr 2008 00:27 GMT
>Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his
>bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their
>usual topic/author stalking and fuckology of trashing everything is
>sight, to the best they and other Semites of their Third Reich can
>muster.
>. - Brad Guth

Kook cleanup needed, Guthball is foaming again.

Signature

"Classic erroneous presupposition."
 -- David Tholen

Saul Levy - 01 Apr 2008 01:48 GMT
Everything he says (repeats) is meaningless drivel, AD!  lmao!

Saul Levy

>>Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his
>>bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Kook cleanup needed, Guthball is foaming again.
Kali - 01 Apr 2008 03:56 GMT
In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco
erfc@caballista.org said:  

: >Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his
: >bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
:
: Kook cleanup needed, Guthball is foaming again.

Oh, my. Semites of their Third Reich? How should this be
interpreted, in terms of Godwin's Law?

Signature

Kali

Art Deco - 01 Apr 2008 04:04 GMT
>In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco
>erfc@caballista.org said:  
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Oh, my. Semites of their Third Reich? How should this be
>interpreted, in terms of Godwin's Law?

The 3Gs -- Godwin Guth Gobble.  It needs a clause all by itself.

Signature

"Classic erroneous presupposition."
 -- David Tholen

TheBookman - 01 Apr 2008 04:59 GMT
>>In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco
>>erfc@caballista.org said:  
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> The 3Gs -- Godwin Guth Gobble.  It needs a clause all by itself.

Doesn't Whorehole dabble in this realm, as well?  

ESL!

Signature

Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast)
Clue-Bat Wrangler
Keeper of the Nickname Lists
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005
BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG-WHISTLE AWARD
MIKE "MIGUEL" CRANSTON, TRAINED BY BOOKMAN
COOSN-266-06-89425
#14 People ruining UseNet lits
#9 Top a.sholes on the Net lits
#11 Most hated Usenetizens of all time lits
#11 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine

"I'd love to kill you in a ring"  - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely

"****SPV.......  So yes I am an idiot."

"ASK THE NWS,  YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich.  In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?

Art Deco - 01 Apr 2008 13:57 GMT
>>>In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco
>>>erfc@caballista.org said:  
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>Doesn't Whorehole dabble in this realm, as well?  

Correct.  Most of the strange beasts who trample poor Godwin underfoot
believe that the word "Ashkenazi" indicates that German Jews were
responsible for all of the horrors of WWII.  They are too stupid to
realize that NAZI is actually an acronym.  You may place Alexa into
this category also.

Signature

"Classic erroneous presupposition."
 -- David Tholen

TheBookman - 01 Apr 2008 22:49 GMT
>>>>In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco
>>>>erfc@caballista.org said:  
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> realize that NAZI is actually an acronym.  You may place Alexa into
> this category also.

Gotta give Guthball credit (such as it is) - he clings tighter to his
delusions than Alexa does.  Or did he give up on his "life on Venus" binge?

ESL!

Signature

Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast)
Clue-Bat Wrangler
Keeper of the Nickname Lists
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005
BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG-WHISTLE AWARD
MIKE "MIGUEL" CRANSTON, TRAINED BY BOOKMAN
COOSN-266-06-89425
#14 People ruining UseNet lits
#9 Top a.sholes on the Net lits
#11 Most hated Usenetizens of all time lits
#11 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine

"I'd love to kill you in a ring"  - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely

"****SPV.......  So yes I am an idiot."

"ASK THE NWS,  YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich.  In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?

BradGuth - 02 Apr 2008 00:54 GMT
> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco
> >>>>e...@caballista.org said:
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> ESL!

You're still sleeping with our butt-cheek flapping Art Fartco?

I realize it's fully accepted if not being currently taught by Jews
and especially of Zionists, but didn't your boss Hitler kind of frown
on such man-on-man and otherwise pecker-to-mouth lifestyles of
essentially screwing everything in sight, even if it's a pig?  (no
wonder Jews don't eat pig, as that would be the same as eating your
own kind)
. - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 02 Apr 2008 04:23 GMT
>> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco
>> >>>>e...@caballista.org said:
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>own kind)
>. - Brad Guth

Hey look, Guthball has joined the faglaming bandwagon!

Hurrah!

Signature

"Classic erroneous presupposition."
 -- David Tholen

John "C" - 02 Apr 2008 05:08 GMT
> >> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco
> >> >>>>e...@caballista.org said:
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Hey look, Guthball has joined the faglaming bandwagon!

Well Deco, You're Quite a Fag!

HJ
TheBookman - 02 Apr 2008 08:16 GMT
>>> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco
>>> >>>>e...@caballista.org said:
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Hurrah!

Looks like teh old snip-n-run just didn't satisfy him any more.  

ESL!

Signature

Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast)
Clue-Bat Wrangler
Keeper of the Nickname Lists
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005
BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG-WHISTLE AWARD
MIKE "MIGUEL" CRANSTON, TRAINED BY BOOKMAN
COOSN-266-06-89425
#14 People ruining UseNet lits
#9 Top a.sholes on the Net lits
#11 Most hated Usenetizens of all time lits
#11 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine

"I'd love to kill you in a ring"  - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely

"****SPV.......  So yes I am an idiot."

"ASK THE NWS,  YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich.  In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?

John "C" - 02 Apr 2008 13:40 GMT
> >>> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco
> >>> >>>>e...@caballista.org said:
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> ESL!

Surely you jest, "Snookie-Bookie".

DSL!
BradGuth - 03 Apr 2008 06:45 GMT
On Apr 2, 5:31 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:

> > >>> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco
> > >>> >>>>e...@caballista.org said:
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
> DSL!

The only thing they jest is over hiding their Skull and Bones
flatulence form of reverse evolution, that's actually working a whole
lot better than they'd hoped.  Apparently there are positive aspects
of evolution via incest.

Notice how their mutations always end up using "alt.fan.art-bell,
alt.usenet.kooks", because those are the one and only cozy cesspools
they can honestly call home sweet home.

Let me  guess, apparently Art Bell wasn't Jewish.

BTW, to a certified Jew or born-again Zionist, what the hell does
"kook" (sounds like cook) stand for?
. - Brad Guth
John "C" - 03 Apr 2008 18:38 GMT
> On Apr 2, 5:31 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
> "kook" (sounds like cook) stand for?
> . - Brad Guth

Both Art Deco's parents were 1st. cousins to each other, which explains
Deco's birth defects.

HJ
BradGuth - 03 Apr 2008 18:04 GMT
On Apr 3, 9:38 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:

> > On Apr 2, 5:31 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> > > "TheBookman" <TheBook...@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 93 lines]
>
> HJ

Figures, doesn't it.  Birds of a Semitic/Zionist feather as such do
flock, fornicate and inseminate together.

BTW, why has our NASA terminated or banished the new and greatly
improved science derived by the JAXA/Selene mission?
. - Brad Guth
John "C" - 03 Apr 2008 22:16 GMT
> On Apr 3, 9:38 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> > "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:e1c7e2fe-42a1-47ea-9b96-682a1d33e4cc@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

> > > On Apr 2, 5:31 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> > > > "TheBookman" <TheBook...@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 100 lines]
> improved science derived by the JAXA/Selene mission?
> . - Brad Guth

Honestly, I don't know.

HJ
BradGuth - 03 Apr 2008 22:02 GMT
On Apr 3, 1:16 pm, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> > > "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 131 lines]
>
> HJ

Apparently you and most others do not hardly know squat, as otherwise
you wouldn't be so intent upon altering the topic name, like certain
other incest mutated morons that we each know of, would do...

Perhaps we should ask of our rabbi Art Deco and brown-nosed company,
of what's with all of their JAXA/Selene banishment?
. - Brad Guth
eyeball - 03 Apr 2008 22:12 GMT
> On Apr 3, 1:16 pm, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 144 lines]
> of what's with all of their JAXA/Selene banishment?
> . - Brad Guth

I think it's just terrible that no one else can see past the brain
washing to the truth as shown to us by Mr Guth.
Sir,do you think if you arranged tv airtime (perhaps on a cable access
show) you might find a more receptive audience?
BradGuth - 03 Apr 2008 22:26 GMT
> > On Apr 3, 1:16 pm, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 149 lines]
> Sir,do you think if you arranged tv airtime (perhaps on a cable access
> show) you might find a more receptive audience?

Anything outside of this Usenet anti-think-tank would become a "more
receptive audience".

Unless we reconsidered brown-nosed clowns and the Borg like Third
Reich collective as being audience worthy, as otherwise Usenet is
pretty much 99.9% trashed out of its mind, and/or having dumbfounded
itself past the point of no return. (and that's not just my opinion)
. - Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 04 Apr 2008 01:36 GMT
Brad couldn't show sh.t to a COW!  lmao!

Saul Levy

>I think it's just terrible that no one else can see past the brain
>washing to the truth as shown to us by Mr Guth.
>Sir,do you think if you arranged tv airtime (perhaps on a cable access
>show) you might find a more receptive audience?
BradGuth - 03 Apr 2008 20:36 GMT
> On Apr 2, 5:31 am, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 80 lines]
> "kook" (sounds like cook) stand for?
> . - Brad Guth

Funny how others of phony names and as pretend-atheists can post into
a given topic, as a reply along with their hijacked notion of renaming
the topic, then subsequently able to retract or pull out their
contribution, especially when weird I'm not allowed via Google/NOVA
Usenet to do the same hit and run method, meaning that I'm not allowed
to ever go back and edit or otherwise much less erase a given
contribution of mine.

Must be another one of those pesky Semitic (aka Third Reich) things
causing all of this Usenet problem I'm having, because it sure as hell
is not Muslim related.
. - Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 04 Apr 2008 01:31 GMT
Why don't you start your own Usenet, Brad?  lmfjao!

Saul Levy

>Funny how others of phony names and as pretend-atheists can post into
>a given topic, as a reply along with their hijacked notion of renaming
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>is not Muslim related.
>. - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 03 Apr 2008 03:49 GMT
>>>> >>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco
>>>> >>>>e...@caballista.org said:
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
>Looks like teh old snip-n-run just didn't satisfy him any more.  

He thinks I'm a "rabbi".

<snicker>

Signature

"Classic erroneous presupposition."
 -- David Tholen

John "C" - 03 Apr 2008 05:15 GMT
"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message

> <snicker>

Still molesting teen boys, Pedo Deco?

HJ
Saul Levy - 02 Apr 2008 21:31 GMT
GoofBall the racist PIGGY!  lmfjao!

Saul Levy

>You're still sleeping with our butt-cheek flapping Art Fartco?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>own kind)
>. - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 02 Apr 2008 02:09 GMT
>>>>>In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco
>>>>>erfc@caballista.org said:  
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>Gotta give Guthball credit (such as it is) - he clings tighter to his
>delusions than Alexa does.  Or did he give up on his "life on Venus" binge?

Guthball's latest schtick is to whine over and over that he needs
someone to do a "3D supercomputer simulation" for him that will verify
his kook ideas about the recent capture of the Moon, the position of
Venus during the Apollo non-manned landings, and the trajectory of
Sirius WRT the Earth.  And he still clings to his kooky interpretations
of his over-processed radar images of Venus.

Signature

"Classic erroneous presupposition."
 -- David Tholen

TheBookman - 02 Apr 2008 03:11 GMT
>>>>>>In <310320081727597608%erfc@caballista.org>, Art Deco
>>>>>>erfc@caballista.org said:  
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> Sirius WRT the Earth.  And he still clings to his kooky interpretations
> of his over-processed radar images of Venus.

Poor Brad.  All he needs is a Daddy Ward, and a Mommy June, and he could
star in his very own sitcom: "Leave it to Guthball"!  

ESL!

Signature

Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast)
Clue-Bat Wrangler
Keeper of the Nickname Lists
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005
BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG-WHISTLE AWARD
MIKE "MIGUEL" CRANSTON, TRAINED BY BOOKMAN
COOSN-266-06-89425
#14 People ruining UseNet lits
#9 Top a.sholes on the Net lits
#11 Most hated Usenetizens of all time lits
#11 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine

"I'd love to kill you in a ring"  - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely

"****SPV.......  So yes I am an idiot."

"ASK THE NWS,  YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich.  In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?

John "C" - 02 Apr 2008 04:24 GMT
> >>>>>>: >Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his
> >>>>>>: >bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> ESL!

Not too bad, Old Timer.

DSL!
BradGuth - 03 Apr 2008 01:23 GMT
On Apr 1, 7:24 pm, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:

> > >>>>>>In <310320081727597608%e...@caballista.org>, Art Deco
> > >>>>>>e...@caballista.org said:
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>
> DSL!

Notice how the incest mutated DNA of their Zionism and pro Hitlerism
is just about everywhere.

in the form of: "alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell"

. - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 03 Apr 2008 04:01 GMT
>Notice how the incest mutated DNA of their Zionism and pro Hitlerism
>is just about everywhere.
>
>in the form of: "alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell"
>
>. - Brad Guth

What does 'A' have to do with 'B', Brad?  You need to show your work.

Signature

"Classic erroneous presupposition."
 -- David Tholen

John "C" - 03 Apr 2008 05:14 GMT
"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message

> What does 'A' have to do with 'B', Brad?  You need to show your work.

Still molesting teen boys, Pedo Deco?

HJ
John "C" - 03 Apr 2008 05:20 GMT
> On Apr 1, 7:24 pm, "John \"C\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>
> . - Brad Guth

I've noticed!

HJ
Paine - 01 Apr 2008 13:10 GMT
> : > Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his
> : > bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Oh, my. Semites of their Third Reich? How should this be
> interpreted, in terms of Godwin's Law?

Dear goddess Kali, these days i've seen Godwin's
Law broken on UseNet more times than my heart!

Today's posters are far too hardened (or far too
uninformed) to the events of WWII.  Poor Adolf
no longer gets no respect!  <g>

ob-gyn:  At least Mother Goose brought up "foam"
indicating his belief that Brad and space may have
similar quantum qualities.

happy days and...
  starry starry nights!

Signature

Indelibly yours,
Paine

P.S. Thank YOU for reading!

   P.P.S. (shh) Some secret sites...
      http://painellsworth.net
            http://savethechildren.org
                          http://eBook-eDen.secretsgolden.com

Saul Levy - 01 Apr 2008 01:33 GMT
Aw, what's wrong, Brad?  Is your insanity getting to you?  lmao!

Saul Levy

>Once again those brown-nosed clowns of what rabbi Art Fucko and of his
>bed-wetting partner Colonel Jake are in good semitic form, doing their
>usual topic/author stalking and fuckology of trashing everything is
>sight, to the best they and other Semites of their Third Reich can
>muster.
>. - Brad Guth
BradGuth - 17 Mar 2008 21:43 GMT
Thick Outer Shell of Moon / by Hank Kroll
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
> Brad Guth / Hank Kroll

Seems rather odd that the moon's tough crust that's so well populated
with such massive though unusually shallow craters, and otherwise
having those unusual mascon issues, plus on average so physically dark
as coal, electrostatic dusty and unavoidably gamma and X-ray
saturated, as such isn't worth even a good topic rant or two about its
thick or thin crust, or of its unusually low mass interior that could
be semi-hollow, if not containing a low density worth of a salty
brine.

This form of topic/author banishment is almost as bad off as the JAXA
Selene mission getting officially NASA sequestered until someone can
plant a few items upon that physically dark moon, that should at least
at that resolution of 10 m/pixel look as though something bright and
shiny of our Apollo "right stuff" exist, just as previously specified
to us by our NASA.

BTW, Venus is roughly at least twice the reflective/albedo worth of
Earth, and since it's often passing enough nearby and/or as
technically orbiting itself through the same FOV(frame of view) of our
moon, and even at times including Earth, as such it would be nearly
impossible for those terrific HDTV obtained color images as wide or
even as telephoto views of our moon or those of moon+Earth to having
always missed Venus, as for excluding that absolutely vibrant planet
of Venus should actually be a pretty neat trick.

As such, I was just wondering as to what sort of pathetic excuses
they're having to come up with, as to why the likes of Venus is never
to be seen from any given JAXA mission related orbit of our moon, as
seen and easily recorded by that terrific HDTV camera of superior
DR(dynamic range) to film, and with such quality bandpass coated
optics to boot?
. - Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 18 Mar 2008 02:44 GMT
Drivel?  lmao!

Saul Levy

>Seems rather odd that the moon's tough crust that's so well populated
>with such massive though unusually shallow craters, and otherwise
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>optics to boot?
>. - Brad Guth
BradGuth - 18 Mar 2008 06:07 GMT
Interesting that you think the regular laws of physics and best
available science that's peer replicated outside of your NASA cult is
"drivel".  Must be another one of those pesky faith-based things, of
what other pretend atheists have to go along with, or else.
. - Brad Guth

> Drivel?  lmao!
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> >optics to boot?
> >. - Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 18 Mar 2008 18:32 GMT
As Timberwolf clearly stated:  You are making up this crap as you go
along, Brad!  lmao!

If you think you're following the laws of physics and best available
science, you truly are an IDIOT!  lmao!

The Universe does NOT follow your wishes anymore than it follows the
WartPiggys'!  lmao!

All you are producing is DRIVEL!

Saul Levy

>Interesting that you think the regular laws of physics and best
>available science that's peer replicated outside of your NASA cult is
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>> Saul Levy
BradGuth - 19 Mar 2008 01:56 GMT
> As Timberwolf clearly stated:  You are making up this crap as you go
> along,Brad!  lmao!
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> >> Saul Levy

Is that why you and others of your kind keep excluding the following?

sci.space.history, alt.astronomy, sci.astro, sci.space.policy,
soc.history.what-if

What is it about our moon that's so dark and scary?

Why is JAXA under your NASA cold-war thumb?

Is your being a systematic born-again liar having some Third Reich
complications?
. - Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 19 Mar 2008 19:39 GMT
I'm in alt.astronomy, Brad!  Where have I excluded it?  lmao!

As for the other newsgroups:  I don't read them.  I used to read
sci.astro, but it got so worthless (DRIVEL!  lmao!) that I deleted it.

The rest is more of your DRIVEL!  No ones cares less about it than I!
lmao!  None of it has any importance to the real Universe.

Saul Levy

>> As Timberwolf clearly stated:  You are making up this crap as you go
>> along,Brad!  lmao!
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>complications?
>. - Brad Guth
BradGuth - 20 Mar 2008 23:16 GMT
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
> Brad Guth / Hank Kroll

"The thick outer shell of the moon" by hank Kroll isn't so much about
our Apollo troops as having "the right stuff", and of their having
gone or not having gone to the moon's surface.  However, clearly of
our very own orbital obtained images and especially via those of JAXA
Selene are holding back.  The truth about our older than Earth moon
isn't getting told, but then truths about Venus are as equally taboo/
nondisclosure rated because I'm not one of them, and otherwise because
it's not as scripted within their Old Testament.
.- Brad Guth
BradGuth - 22 Mar 2008 00:10 GMT
What's with gabi40 ?

Why is there no official Usenet objection to such useless topics, as
infomercial spam or worse?

Usenet damage-control / by Brad Guth
In case some of you nice folks haven't quite noticed the ongoing flak
of whatever's mainstream or bust, outside of my absolutely crappy
local ISP(Centurytel) and Usenet account getting remote trashed on a
fairly regular basis (if you can further imagine, it seems Centurytel
has foiled access to their own 253 area code without ever blocking or
otherwise degrading normal voice/telephone usage) is a pretty neat
system wide outage (as they claim) of their keeping our words off the
internet unless we sign up for their more ENRON spendy DSL services.

Perhaps we should take a little reflective quiet time to fully
appreciate all the recent intellectual and anti-science imposed
gauntlets of this Usenet topic/author stalking and blockage, whereas
instead of the truth we're seeing forced topic stacking of such wordy
disinformation crapolla so that the general public or media doesn't
get an honest wind or otherwise bother to look deep enough into this
mainstream cesspool of Usenet, as to discover what's really going down
the drain.

It's exactly like the cloak and dagger worth of those NASA Apollo
false or dishonest topics having key search words of NASA, Apollo,
moon landing and hoax continually included within each and every one
of those phony postings of obviously bogus topics that also include
naughty smut and porn related context, as clearly intended in order to
cause automatic filtering of what public schools ever get to read, as
well as to divert the honest research intentions of others, by way of
those hidden or cloak and dagger means that essentially wash-out or
force-purge all previous forms of perfectly serious related topics out
of their Google/NOVA archives, and thus getting removed from their
infowar and otherwise mainstream hype configured Usenet, so that only
the mainstream status quo of topics in 100% support of government and
of their faith-based NASA/Apollo side of this issue remains accessible
to the public.

In them good old days of applying this form of government and
theological extremist oversight or merely orchestrated clownism, as
such this tactic was mainstream swarm like accomplished via witch and
book burnings that achieved their form of mainstream damage-control
trickery of that dark-side era, as well as if need be having put those
of their own kind on a stick for yet another shock and awe worth of a
faith-based PR stunt wasn't overlooked.

BTW,  my for-real phone of 253-8576061 and email of bradguth@gmail or
bradguth@yahoo (among others) has always been answered by myself, so
if you're not getting through or you believe that I'm not answering my
phone or otherwise not reading or much less returning your email, it's
simply not the least bit intentionally because of myself, but instead
it's more than likely of those calls or emails of yours have been
getting systematically intercepted, modified and/or diverted by those
in charge, and otherwise skewed by those having the most to lose,
especially if they're not doing their spook and mole like  jobs at
keeping the rest of us supposed village idiots snookered and
dumbfounded past the point of no return.

If this bad situation that's clearly getting worse isn't exactly what
those global domination Zionists and of their puppet Hitler warlord
(aka partner in crimes against humanity) had in mind, as having since
been replaced by our GW Bush and of his born-again faith of brown-
nosed minions, then what the hell is?

Seems via presidential signings and of those DHS powers of God has
entirely excluded all others from taking proper action.  Again, it's
all very Third Reich and otherwise warlord like.
. - Brad Guth

> > This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> > astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> it's not as scripted within their Old Testament.
> .- Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 22 Mar 2008 04:42 GMT
Why would anyone want to call you, Brad?  lmao!

Saul Levy

>BTW,  my for-real phone of 253-8576061 and email of bradguth@gmail or
>bradguth@yahoo (among others) has always been answered by myself, so
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>keeping the rest of us supposed village idiots snookered and
>dumbfounded past the point of no return.
BradGuth - 23 Mar 2008 01:09 GMT
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
> Brad Guth / Hank Kroll

According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's
crust is worth 60 km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the average crust
of Earth.  This means the core is either of extremely low density, or
it's somewhat hallow.
. - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 23 Mar 2008 04:19 GMT
>> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
>> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>it's somewhat hallow.
>. - Brad Guth

Or that Brad Guth doesn't understand the websites he tries to read.

Signature

"Classic erroneous presupposition."
 -- David Tholen

BradGuth - 23 Mar 2008 05:49 GMT
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
> Brad Guth / Hank Kroll

According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's
crust is worth on average 60+ km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the
average crust of Earth.  This means the core is either of extremely
low density (possibly of sodium or even salty brine like), or perhaps
it's somewhat hallow, as well as whatever is within that core being
poorly compacted due to the low amount of core mass that's offering
such an insufficient amount of gravity.

Other science has that average crust thickness at nearly 70 km, and on
average (including those many surface mascon issues) of nearly 6 g/cm3
if not somewhat greater crust density (especially of those impressive
mascon areas).
. - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 23 Mar 2008 16:36 GMT
>According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's
>crust is worth on average 60+ km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the
>average crust of Earth.  This means the core is either of extremely

How many more times are you going to post the same screed, Brad?

Signature

"Classic erroneous presupposition."
 -- David Tholen

TheBookman - 23 Mar 2008 17:06 GMT
>>According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's
>>crust is worth on average 60+ km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the
>>average crust of Earth.  This means the core is either of extremely
>
> How many more times are you going to post the same screed, Brad?

He'll continue until the listening audience(tinla) accepts his valuation of
the moon's crust.  

Personally, I don't believe that "worth" is a valid measurement for
geology, but YMMV.  

ESL!

Signature

Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast)
Clue-Bat Wrangler
Keeper of the Nickname Lists
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005
BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG-WHISTLE AWARD
MIKE "MIGUEL" CRANSTON, TRAINED BY BOOKMAN
COOSN-266-06-89425
#14 People ruining UseNet lits
#9 Top a.sholes on the Net lits
#11 Most hated Usenetizens of all time lits
#11 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine

"I'd love to kill you in a ring"  - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely

"****SPV.......  So yes I am an idiot."

"ASK THE NWS,  YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich.  In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?

BradGuth - 23 Mar 2008 18:32 GMT
> >>According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's
> >>crust is worth on average 60+ km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> WWFSMD?

Why are you so literally into brown-nosing Art Deco.  Are you not
allowed to think for yourself, or is it simply another one of those
pesky Zionist Third Reich things you incest cultivated clowns of topic/
author fuckology have to live with?
. - Brad Guth
Art Deco - 23 Mar 2008 20:01 GMT
>> >>According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's
>> >>crust is worth on average 60+ km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>author fuckology have to live with?
>. - Brad Guth

Have you been taking laming lessons from Fagar, Brad?

Signature

"Classic erroneous presupposition."
 -- David Tholen

Art Deco - 23 Mar 2008 19:49 GMT
>>>According to Dr. Gary Latham (NASA's chief seismologist), the moon's
>>>crust is worth on average 60+ km, roughly 4~5 times as thick as the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Personally, I don't believe that "worth" is a valid measurement for
>geology, but YMMV.  

As long as you phrase it as a "SWAG", Brad is cool with that.

Signature

"Classic erroneous presupposition."
 -- David Tholen

BradGuth - 26 Mar 2008 14:35 GMT
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
> Brad Guth / Hank Kroll

Of course we always have the following infomercial spew of skewed
science as based upon NASA's conditional laws of physics and evidence
excluded, to look forward to.

Mythbustin' the Moon Hoax
"Update: I've been told the episode does not air April 25. The air
date has not been set yet, but I'll make sure I announce it when it
is!"

·  # Forreston 17 Mar 2008 at 11:55 am  "I wonder if this will ever be
aired. It would be interesting to find out what they prove or
disprove. After seeing the air date change to TBA, I wonder just how
much was a hoax!"

http://www.duggback.com/space/Mythbusters_to_tackle_the_moon_landing_hoaxes/

Unfortunately, this forever ongoing infowar of supposed Apollo moon
landing hoax Mythbustin' doesn't bother to cover several of the most
important and easily peer replicated factors, that'll just as easily
prove our NASA/Apollo wizards never set a human footprint on the
moon.  Remember, if they had absolute proof positive on behalf of all
that's NASA/Apollo, as such it would have been mainstream published
along with multiple peer replicated support that's entirely
independent from any sort of NASA or other government loot or
background moderation.  Unfortunately, not even Google/NOVA is the
least bit independent.
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth - 27 Mar 2008 20:52 GMT
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
> Brad Guth / Hank Kroll

According to terrestrial and orbital obtained science data about our
physically dark and otherwise massive ratio of an orbital mascon (aka
moon), its crust is at least upon average 64 km (some having it at 61
km, and others at 68 km), with the low density core being of whatever
substance is either salt or sodium like, if not relatively hollow in
sufficient places.
. - Brad Guth
Saul Levy - 27 Mar 2008 23:15 GMT
I think it's YOUR BRAIN which as hollow spaces, Brad!  lmao!

Mad cow comes to mind!  lmao!

Saul Levy

>> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
>> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>sufficient places.
>. - Brad Guth
BradGuth - 30 Mar 2008 17:59 GMT
> This topic isn't nearly as hocus-pocus worthy as having our rad-hard
> astronauts as though walking moonsuit butt-naked upon that physically
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (possibly of a salty brine) or semi-hallow...
> Brad Guth / Hank Kroll

It seems there's still too much that's cloak and dagger worthy or of
ongoing disinformation and the exclusion of evidence that's ongoing
about our moon, as to not perceive that we're being officially
snookered and otherwise dumbfounded to death by our own kind.

MOM (Motive, Opportunity and Means) = USA/USSR race to the moon

Like most everything published of our NASA/Apollo moon landing,
everything on the following NASA page is either a lie or an exclusion
of whatever evidence that's the least bit contrary to their agenda.
It is not the least bit unusual for governments or of their brown-
nosed minions to lie, because it is so often of what they do best.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm
http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/

Each and every unfiltered Kodak moment as supposedly obtained while on
the moon is bogus/fake, and as such are only too easily  proven as
such without hardly a fight because, peer replicated science as based
upon the regular laws of physics is what works perfectly each and
every time.  Oddly their own Kodak partners in crimes against humanity
refuse to step into this NASA/Apollo cesspool O-Ring cult of fire.

There is more than a dozen specifics about such fly-by-rocket
technology, photographics, as well as that of physical and
environmental considerations that simply would not hold up in any
actual court of law if required to support the official record.  But
then we all know as a matter of fact that our government does not play
by any set of fair rules, whereas even those rules of their own making
are freely skewed in order to suit or otherwise banish whatever the
situation demands.

The list of viable topics as fair arguments can be as short or as long
as you like, but remember that uncovering only one lie need be the
case of proving without possible doubt that we humans have not walked
on our physically dark moon as officially scripted by our NASA, or of
having been robotically traveled upon as touted by the USSR/Russian
side of this tango.  There's also the forever orchestrated clownism
swarm of internet/usenet agents (aka spooks and moles) doing their
usual cloak and dagger thing, of stalking authors for the intent of
making topics that do not fully support the mainstream status quo as
muddy and/or as clownish and otherwise as smut polluted topics as
possible.  Even hundreds of intentionally bogus topics of pure
gibberish smut incorporating key wordage as NASA, Apollo, moon
landing, fake and hoax have been created and posted by those in charge
of their PR damage-control, which seems downright silly and otherwise
extremely odd as to why they'd have to resort or otherwise allow such
childish and adult porn tactics.

With an existing overkill worth of efficient spysat imaging resolution
of that very same era, and of far better resolution since, seems
rather odd that such continued and robotically affordable science
gathering of absolutely terrific (0.1 m) resolution, and even capable
of full/extended tri-color spectrum details on behalf of  mineral and
deposit mapping as rather easily obtained from a close lunar orbit,
was never accomplished to the degree technically possible by our crack
MI5/CIA/NSA and Air Force spy-masters of our mutually perpetrated cold-
war era, as well as recently JAXA/Selene has been place into a no-win
situation so that their HDTV color and other high resolu