Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / January 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What if?   (On hydrogen Atom)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 14 Jan 2008 13:59 GMT
What if a hydrogen atom was detected to have decayed?  Its been 30 years
since the day I saw the great pool of water used to detect hydrogen atom
decay go into operation at the U of Irvine Ca  They have this experiment
going on all over the world,and I never read of one light flashing
indicating hydrogen decaying.  This is now telling us that the universe
can last to infinity   Gravity's compression force transforms hydrogen
into all that is.    Bert
oldcoot - 14 Jan 2008 16:50 GMT
> What if a hydrogen atom was detected to have decayed?  Its been 30 years
> since the day I saw the great pool of water used to detect hydrogen atom
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> can last to infinity   Gravity's compression force transforms hydrogen
> into all that is.    Bert

> What if a hydrogen atom was detected to have decayed?

Yeah, kinda makes one wonder what process is powering the H atom and
its proton nucleus, accounting for their permanence.  :-)

> Its been 30 years
> since the day I saw the great pool of water used to detect hydrogen atom
> decay go into operation at the U of Irvine Ca  They have this experiment
> going on all over the world,and I never read of one light flashing
> indicating hydrogen decaying.
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 14 Jan 2008 21:00 GMT
oc  If one H-Atom decayed I would be wiser,but very sad.   Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 17 Jan 2008 17:51 GMT
We must get all the under gound hydrogen to save humankind. In doing so
we will end up with also all the helium that we can use for the next
5,000 years  Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 19 Jan 2008 13:51 GMT
What if a neutron star can tell us something about a black hole's
interior?  They relate to each  well. Both are created by the implosion
of a very large dense star(supernova)     Both are small with a great
gravity force.  There difference is the black hole has a three times
greater force of gravity,and no EM force can escape.  To shorten this
post I'll jump in by saying the gravity of a neutron star has pushed
electrons of atoms back into the nuclei,and its interior is neutrons
only   Neutron stars have no event horizons.  Now comes the black hole
Its event horizon strips the electrons from atoms,and reduces them to
photons(there building blocks) its great force of gravity compresses the
quarks together with no space between them. It takes away there positive
charge.  To sum this up it goes like this   Neutron stars "Its neutrons
all the way down"   Black holes its "Quarks all the way down"
Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 20 Jan 2008 13:39 GMT
What if the universe has reached a spacetime that has to much iron dust
in its nebula star producing clouds?  That is a subject worth
discussing.  Once read that the universe could be greatly affected by
iron atoms.  We know it puts the damper on fusion   Bert
Saul Levy - 21 Jan 2008 16:30 GMT
Sounds rather unlikely, BEERTbrain!  Too much hydrogen is the norm.

Saul Levy

>What if the universe has reached a spacetime that has to much iron dust
>in its nebula star producing clouds?  That is a subject worth
>discussing.  Once read that the universe could be greatly affected by
>iron atoms.  We know it puts the damper on fusion   Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 21 Jan 2008 16:54 GMT
Cactus Saul  Yes in the past spacetime there was more hydrogen and less
iron(relation ship). My post is to show in our present spacetime there
is less hydrogen(still 90%) but lots more iron,and it does not take much
iron mixed in the present nebula(hydrogen clouds) to make fusion harder
to be achieved.  It is only one of my ideas,but I think it is worth
thinking about  Bert
Saul Levy - 22 Jan 2008 06:36 GMT
Why think that way, BEERTbrain?  There are obviously billions of stars
still shining.  I can see them (the WartPlugs don't even look!).  I
doubt iron is a problem.  Is this another part of DOOM AND GLOOM
FOREVER!?

Saul Levy

>Cactus Saul  Yes in the past spacetime there was more hydrogen and less
>iron(relation ship). My post is to show in our present spacetime there
>is less hydrogen(still 90%) but lots more iron,and it does not take much
>iron mixed in the present nebula(hydrogen clouds) to make fusion harder
>to be achieved.  It is only one of my ideas,but I think it is worth
>thinking about  Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 23 Jan 2008 10:00 GMT
Cactus Saul   Our Sun will lose its fusion to iron.  Reality is iron is
the heaviest element a medium star can produce It uses up fusion energy
and creates a medium star to become a red giant. Iron is so very stable
that there will be balls of it every where in space when the last star
blinks out.  They will be the last objects black holes will absorb.
Bert
Saul Levy - 23 Jan 2008 19:01 GMT
The Sun will never evolve to the iron-creation stage, BEERTbrain!  It
isn't massive enough.  The Sun already contains essentially all the
iron it ever will.

Your brain continues it's long slow ride into senility.  Note to
frootie:  It's past time for BEERTbrain to be committed.  His theories
are now past being of any use to anyone.

Saul Levy

>Cactus Saul   Our Sun will lose its fusion to iron.  Reality is iron is
>the heaviest element a medium star can produce It uses up fusion energy
>and creates a medium star to become a red giant. Iron is so very stable
>that there will be balls of it every where in space when the last star
>blinks out.  They will be the last objects black holes will absorb.
>Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 23 Jan 2008 20:31 GMT
Saul Saul   No more iron for the Sun  Oh Ya  Bert
Saul Levy - 24 Jan 2008 19:10 GMT
Then why did you say the opposite, BEERTbrain?

Saul Levy

>Saul Saul   No more iron for the Sun  Oh Ya  Bert
sldesear@aol.com - 25 Jan 2008 14:54 GMT
> Then why did you say the opposite, BEERTbrain?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Cactus saul Reality is medium size stars such as our Sun can create
iron,and all heavier elements are created in very dense stars.Iron
atoms kill fusion  Get the picture  Sunbeam+Bert
oldcoot - 25 Jan 2008 17:12 GMT
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:31:05 -0500, herbertglaz...@webtv.net (G=EMC^
wrote,

> ...medium size stars such as our Sun can create
> iron...

'Fraid not, Bert. The Sun isn't massive enough to 'make' iron by
fusion, although it may `contain` trace amounts of iron and other
heavy elements. It's only massive enough to fuse as far as oxygen.
oc
Saul Levy - 25 Jan 2008 18:28 GMT
Iron is NOT created in our Sun, BEERTbrain!  Give me a source for that
information please!

Saul Levy

>> Then why did you say the opposite, BEERTbrain?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>iron,and all heavier elements are created in very dense stars.Iron
>atoms kill fusion  Get the picture  Sunbeam+Bert
sldesear@aol.com - 26 Jan 2008 13:27 GMT
> Iron is NOT created in our Sun, BEERTbrain!  Give me a source for that
> information please!
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Cactus Saul  Earth has solid and liquid core  This begs  the question
How come I'm hlding a iron meteorite,and the solar system when the Sun
was just a great gas disk What happened to all the iron? It only ended
up at the Earth's core. Why is it the Moon has no iron core.You know
the Sun has more iron than the rest of the solar system. Yes I do
remember reading mediam stars can create heavy elements,but iron is
the end,and heavy elements are created by larger denser
stars(supernovas)  We know more about the core of the Sun than the
Earth's core Sunbeam
Saul Levy - 26 Jan 2008 19:35 GMT
That looks a lot more like a post from BEERTbrain!  How do I know?
From the spelling errors and the rambling discussion of unrelated
thoughts!  lmao!

Saul Levy

>> Iron is NOT created in our Sun, BEERTbrain!  Give me a source for that
>> information please!
>>
>> Saul Levy

>Cactus Saul  Earth has solid and liquid core  This begs  the question
>How come I'm hlding a iron meteorite,and the solar system when the Sun
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>stars(supernovas)  We know more about the core of the Sun than the
>Earth's core Sunbeam
sldesear@aol.com - 26 Jan 2008 23:50 GMT
> That looks a lot more like a post from BEERTbrain!  How do I know?
> From the spelling errors and the rambling discussion of unrelated
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

It is my post Cactus Saul so best I sign Bert and not get Sunbeam in
trouble.  Bert
Saul Levy - 30 Jan 2008 00:21 GMT
Yes, that's best, BEERTbrain!

You haven't said a thing about your totally incorrect snow forecast
for Tucson.  I didn't see one anyway.

Saul Levy

>It is my post Cactus Saul so best I sign Bert and not get Sunbeam in
>trouble.  Bert
Jeff☠Relf - 26 Jan 2008 01:47 GMT
We know very little about the core of the earth or sun.
That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole is so cool.
Saul Levy - 26 Jan 2008 19:19 GMT
The parameters for every point in the Sun is now known.

Saul Levy

>We know very little about the core of the earth or sun.
>That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole is so cool.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.