 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI SpaceKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Space Forum / Astronomy / December 2007What are the best advances in Physics in last 10 years.
While I was in College I loved Physics. I know all Physics at College Level. Last 10 years has anything changed Has any new invention made. Has any Einstine or Newton Born Or all are running for Money and no development in Physics??? I am interested in Nuclear Physics, Super Conductorm Optics, Magnetism etc. Has any new thing developed or any new concept??? Or Physics is dead. Ya, I heard Computer Chips are growing fast But thats not Physics. That is just an improvement of an old concept. I am talking about any new strange Law Discovered in Science? I think these days Scientists get a lot of Pay/ Perks but the Output is Zero. Science is good till it is used Just for Fun.... But if you make Weapons it is the worst thing in the world. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html > While I was in College I loved Physics. > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Bye > Sanny I'd say recent revelations about small forces, e.g. the Casimir and Van der Waals effects rank right up there. Levitation is now a reality, at least at submicron distances. Who knows where that will lead eventually. Maybe even travel at > c. > Science is good till it is used Just for Fun.... But if you make > Weapons it is the worst thing in the world. Excuse me ? Most scientific advancement has been through weapons research. Necessity is the mother of invention.... The necessity to feed one's self.....and especially the necessity to kill a threat or those that get between you and that nubile young female with the large hoots. **Conan: To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women! Example- There was no "terrorism" before "Baywatch" was broadcast into the middleastern nations....you ever consider that ? Those cameljockeys saw Pamela Anderson and suddenly the "Great Satan" needed to be conquered......"for Allah"...yeah right. > While I was in College I loved Physics. > > I am interested in Nuclear Physics, Super Conductorm Optics, Magnetism > etc. Has any new thing developed or any new concept??? This, from the European space agency, would have to rank near the top of the list: http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/gsp/Experimental_Detection.pdf This research is showing that gravitic effects are obtained *only* under conditions of acceleration (or deceleration) of the superconducting ring. It's the among the first repeatable lab experiments demonstrating the equivalence of gravity and acceleration. It also shows that work on modulation or control of gravity is at about the Franklin's kite stage. > I am talking about any > new strange Law Discovered in Science? Well, gravity-acceleration equivalence was first *described* by Einstein in his famous "elevator" thought experiment. The European Space Agency is at the embryonic stage of demonstrating equivalence in the lab. Here is an abridged outline of the paper just posted: http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html Also this Russian guy, a sort of gadfly scientist, has stumbled upon a superconducting-discharge system that (repeatably) generates wave impulses that bear the unmistakable signature of *gravitational waves*. The wave packets can be focused (or collimated), and can strongly displace pendulums and knock over objects at a distance. And the waves are of _longitudinal_ polarization (Zinni take note). http://superconductors.org/gravity.pdf oc Gee, Sanny, seems you haven't been reading all the new stuff from BEERTbrain (G=EMC^2)? lmao! Saul Levy >While I was in College I loved Physics. > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >Bye >Sanny > While I was in College I loved Physics. > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Play Chess at:http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html It is mostly Engineers who make our modern world though physicists do play an initial role. It is true that the fundamental concepts have not changed but that chips have got smaller and faster. We don't yet have full optical computers or DNA computing etc (or even quantum computers that can do a real job). If you compare with 20 years ago there has been huge changes however - Internet access for nearly all, mobile phones that have live video chat,DVD writers, small portable music players that hold GBytes of songs in reasonably high quality,digital TV transmission,HD TV,laptop computers,palmtop pcs , small solidate state memories with vast storeage,solid-state digital cameras and so on. As for fundamental Physics, well a few things - slowing down of light I seem to remember?? Hardy >While I was in College I loved Physics. > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >Bye >Sanny A new aspect I have found fascinating is the acceptance of and the efforts to confirm (if only by inference), higher dimensions. Many new theories assume 5th, 6th and higher dimensions of some sort. EM theories that consider higher dimensions make sense. Entanglement in quantum effects, demand higher dimensions. Of course then there is string theory that derives from the math of real 3D strings but matches measured phenomena assuming higher dimensions. : >While I was in College I loved Physics. : > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] : Of course then there is string theory that derives from the math of real : 3D strings but matches measured phenomena assuming higher dimensions. Sounds just like the old acceptance of virgin births on the 25th of Dec. Some people will believe any crap. > : On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 09:19:29 -0800 (PST), Sanny <softtanks@hotmail.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > Sounds just like the old acceptance of virgin births on the 25th of Dec. > Some people will believe any crap. IAWTP happy new-year days and... starry starry nights!  SignatureIndelibly yours, Paine P.S. Thank you very much! P.P.S. (shh) Some secret sites... http://painellsworth.net http://savethechildren.org/ http://home.secretsgolden.com > While I was in College I loved Physics. > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Play Chess at:http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html Last fundamental discoveries are detection of charged scatterable elementary particles inside nucleons, quarks up and quarks down, end of the 1960's. Detection of highest density elementary scatterable particle, tau, which is an excited state of the electron, just like the muon, in the early 1970's. Except for these, all of your 1950's physics refs are as fresh as this morning's roses. The rest has only been hypothetical going in circles for the past 50 years. André Michaud On Dec 27, 8:37 am, s...@microtec.net wrote: > The rest has only been hypothetical going in circles for the past > 50 years. ..with some notable exceptions being very recent, i.e., the European Space Agency's pioneering research on gravity-acceleration equivalence (posted earlier in this thread). They've shown that gravitic effects occur only under conditions of acceleration (or deceleration). But these researchers are still locked under the 'no medium', space-as- void mandate. Thus they remain oblivious to the _accelerating flow of space itself_ as the causal mechanism of gravity. Until science can unshackle itself from the rediculous and childish void-space paradigm, it will never grasp the mechanism of gravity or get past the present 'Franklin's kite' stage of gravity research. On Dec 27, 6:37 pm, s...@microtec.net wrote: > > While I was in College I loved Physics. > [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > - Show quoted text - ---------- right !! i t i s stuck in the mudd and will be as long as no some basic paradigms will be changed the only adnance is by engineering achievments as someone above saied ATB Y.Porat ------------------------- > ---------- > right !! > i t i s stuck in the mudd > and will be as long as no some basic paradigms will be > changed Yeah, like the void-space paradigm(VSP). As stated numerous times here, all it would take is one simple adjustment to the sitting paradigm: replace the 'Void' with the hyperpressurized, sub-Planck- wavelength Plenum of space.. and recognize it as expansible/ compressible and amenable to *density gradients*. This would bring General Relativity out of its present 'flat earth' status. GR is currently 'flat' since its math makes no provision for density gradients such as the one across extreme cosmological distances. Obviously, whether or not space is a universally- isotropic 'Void' (as it is under the sitting paradigm) has profound implications in cosmology, such as the ultimate fate of the universe. > On Dec 27, 10:00 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote:> ---------- > > right !! [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > isotropic 'Void' (as it is under the sitting paradigm) has profound > implications in cosmology, such as the ultimate fate of the universe. I happen to like that artificial gravity wave thing. However, it seems that most anything you have to share isn't of what these folks want to hear. Why is that? - Brad Guth >> On Dec 27, 10:00 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote:> ---------- >> > right !! [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > - Brad Guth Isn't it obvious, Brad? The folks here that don't want to hear what oc has to share are completely stuck within the Void Space Paradigm (VSP). They just can't seem to get the empty space out from between their ears! <g> happy new-year days and... starry starry nights! SignatureIndelibly yours, Paine P.S. Thank YOU for reading! P.P.S. (shh) Some secret sites... http://painellsworth.net http://savethechildren.org http://home.secretsgolden.com > >> On Dec 27, 10:00 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote:> ---------- > >> > right !! [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > http://savethechildren.org > http://home.secretsgolden.com That must also be the reasons why I'm continually having to deal with their Usenet spermware/fuckware, of which their Google/NOVA servers have always known about. - Brad Guth > ...it > seems that most anything you have to share isn't of what these folks > want to hear. Why is that? It's the same paradigmatic dynamic with the status quo that prevailed under geocentrism. It's simply "the way it is", and nothing can change it except the passage of time. What is TRULY amazing though, is how the present paradigm became so powerfully and totally entrenched in its scarcely 80 years of existance, compared to the many centuries of geocentrism's reign. The VSP is like in the movie "Alien" where the thing suddenly hatched out and devoured everything in sight. :-) > > ...it > > seems that most anything you have to share isn't of what these folks [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > under geocentrism. It's simply "the way it is", and nothing can change > it except the passage of time. Are we talking of our having to tough this one out for hundreds or thousands of years, or is this swarm like mainstream mindset going to coexist in the realm of millions of years? > What is TRULY amazing though, is how the present paradigm became so > powerfully and totally entrenched in its scarcely 80 years of > existance, compared to the many centuries of geocentrism's reign. > The VSP is like in the movie "Alien" where the > thing suddenly hatched out and devoured everything in sight. :-) Somewhat born-again Hitler/Bush like, and now the entire world has to repay the ultimate price. Now I understand, that the situation has become essentially hopeless and without remorse regardless of the consequences, just like in those good old Roman and Zionist days of folks putting their own kind on a stick for yet another faith-based PR stunt. - Brad Guth > While I was in College I loved Physics. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > new strange Law Discovered in Science? I think these days Scientists > get a lot of Pay/ Perks but the Output is Zero. Er, first you announce that the Input is Zero (you haven't read anything about physics in the last 10 years) and then conclude from that that the output is zero (you don't know anything that's happened in the last 10 years, so nothing must have happened). I think some pretty interesting things are happening in cosmology. There are a few mysteries out there, like neutron stars that don't seem to fit standard stellar evolution models, and an unexplained nonlinearity in the rate of universe expansion vs. time. I think we're on the verge of some fundamental new theories in the evolution of the universe. Planet-searching is pretty cool too. A lot of new planets have been discovered in the last few years. That seems to be really exploding. - Randy nightbat wrote Science Team Officer Randy Poe >>While I was in College I loved Physics. >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >>new strange Law Discovered in Science? I think these days Scientists >>get a lot of Pay/ Perks but the Output is Zero. > Science Officer Randy Poe > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > - Randy nightbat Correct Officer Poe and for your long time profound contributions to net science newsgroups your Captain rank bars are in order. Congratulations Captain Randy Poe and may you wear your honorary Science Team Commissioned bars in good duty health. cheers, the nightbat > > While I was in College I loved Physics. > [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > - Randy ----------------- if you consider finding holes in the existinmg theories as *advance* -- than yes - there is a lot of 'advance' (:-) Y.Porat ---------------------------------- > While I was in College I loved Physics. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I am interested in Nuclear Physics, Super Conductorm Optics, Magnetism > etc. Has any new thing developed or any new concept??? The world of fiber systems has only just begun. Magmetism is a dead subject, since all the magnetic equipment has been confiscated by moron governments throughout the world. So the only possible anything could advance is by going nowhere real fast. > Or Physics is dead. > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Play Chess at:http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html On Dec 28, 2:52 am, "zzbun...@netscape.net" <zzbun...@netscape.net> wrote: > > While I was in College I loved Physics. > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > governments throughout the world. So the only > possible anything could advance is by going nowhere real fast. That's largely because the stooges have turned geometric optics ' into an irrecoverable patient in the Oprah Winfrey ward. > > Or Physics is dead. > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > - Show quoted text - > While I was in College I loved Physics. > Has any new thing developed or any new concept??? > Or Physics is dead. Physics has been pretty much dead since relativity and quantum mechanics became the accepted norm. > Ya, I heard Computer Chips are growing fast But thats not Physics. > That is just an improvement of an old concept. I am talking about any > new strange Law Discovered in Science? I think these days Scientists > get a lot of Pay/ Perks but the Output is Zero. Come on, inventing better ways to kill larger and larger numbers of people is important! Of course computer technology is applied, but hey, inventing ways to track every detail of the lives of larger and larger numbers of people IS important! Improving the reach of Big Brother IS a very important contribution and governments show appreciation with welfare for the educated! Also this keeps them from thinking too much about the possible implications of what they are doing. Mindless obedience still has a place even amongst the highly educated! And you can expect a nice reward for it. > Science is good till it is used Just for Fun.... But if you make > Weapons it is the worst thing in the world. Worse? Are you kidding? What with all the billions of moronic humans filling the planet, the survival of the world DEPENDS upon physicists to come up with better and more efficient ways to kill more and more people! Of course the atomic bomb was a great advance, and lately other disciplines (such at virology) have been making the greatest advances (AIDS, EBOLA ETC.) but I do think that physicists have it in them to take back the lead with some super population control ideas! And sure, unless these things happen to get used on YOU, they are what makes physics FUN!!!! >> While I was in College I loved Physics. >> Has any new thing developed or any new concept??? [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > And sure, unless these things happen to get used on YOU, they are what > makes physics FUN!!!! In what i would call a tragic sense, you are very right about this, Benj. It's a well-known fact that every species has survival mechanisms, some of which do not "kick in" until they're needed (or they are *perceived* to be needed). It's also a well-known fact that there are only two ways to deal with over-population... 1) lower the amount of births, or 2) increase the amount of deaths. Number one, while seeming the more humane way to deal with this challenge, and while enjoying a certain amount of success on small local levels, has not been too very effective on a global basis. So it was only a matter of time before our survival drive kicked in and, at least unconciously, began to in a very systematic manner, lower the number of people on the planet. If we don't wise up and realize that the number one choice is the best way and must be made more and more effective, then we must face that the only other choice, number two, will kick in and ensure that we, as a species, will survive. happy new-year days and... starry starry nights! SignatureIndelibly yours, Paine P.S. Thank YOU for reading! P.P.S. (shh) Some secret sites... http://painellsworth.net http://savethechildren.org http://home.secretsgolden.com > >> While I was in College I loved Physics. > >> Has any new thing developed or any new concept??? [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > choice, number two, will kick in and ensure that we, > as a species, will survive. We've had another good 2008 years to wise up. It obviously isn't going to happen by way of whatever's in charge of our private parts and most of our hard earned loot. Science w/o those faith-based strings needs to kick butt, or else. In other words, in a very Hitler way if need be, we need to get rid of whatever's standing in the way of science before it's too late. WWIII is not exactly a good option. - Brad Guth > While I was in College I loved Physics. > > I know all Physics at College Level. Last 10 years has anything > changed Has any new invention made. Has any Einstine or Newton Born Or > all are running for Money and no development in Physics??? If you only know college physics you know next to noting and most of it is properly wrong. Do you know how to tap energy from the varcumm ? Do you know how to build an antigravity generator ? Do you know how to transmute elements ? Do you know how to convert energy to matter ? Do you know how to build a teleporter ? (not a quantum teleporter) Do you know how to travel in time ? Do you know how to travel between alternate realities in the multiverse ? If not you have still much study to do ! You might start you studies at http://www.rexresearch.com/ http://www.scribd.com/groups/view/223-extreme-physics |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.