Space Forum / Astronomy / July 2008

Right, "is ignored because it is politicized crap", and otherwise
within your NASA/Apollo Quran is where anything of independent science
truth is either antisemitic or politicised crap... (why of course it
is)

Was that semetic rant even necessary?  Obviously you have problems
with honest science that's based upon the regular laws of physics.
Why is that?

My goodness, and why exactly does Uncle Al hate Japs so much? (isn't
that being anti-semitic of yourself?)

Good question, but it's not the least bit related to this topic

Another good but unrelated question for this topic, though I never did
like that Mars face because it looked too much like another semitic
bigoted Yid.

Thus far you're not doing so good, with striking zero out of three or
more contributions that are clearly anti-semantic as well as highly
bigoted and arrogant to boot.  Have you nothing constructive of
positive to admirer or contribute about the SELENE mission?
- Brad Guth -

Where's all the usual gauntlet of those brown-nosed semitic clowns
claiming their NASA/Apollo Quran is but all there is to say about our
salty old moon?
- Brad Guth -

Who cares?  Hint:  Nobody and nobody else, i.e., only you.

For such a major scientific development, I was really surprised that
this had not recieved any coverage. It was only by some really out of
the way surfing that I found mention of this. I do not understand why.

Where's all of that Usenet love and affection when you need it, along
with those supposed better ideas and honest interpretations from all
of the new and improved data about our moon that's coming in?

In other words, do tell why is our moon still so officially NASA taboo/
nondisclosure rated, and/or getting faith-based banished along with
ignoring the active geothermal planetology truths about Venus, as
being kept so unusually off-limits?

Why are the pretend atheists that are in charge of most everything
still acting as though so unusually Old Testament sequestered within
their borg like collective or killer bee swarm like mindset, in that
the mere honest thoughts or considerations of other intelligent life
as having existed off-world but also so nearby is so gosh darn faith-
based insurmountable?

China, Japan and eventually India are no longer sitting back or having
to take another NASA no for an answer, and perhaps our Barack Obama
doesn't have to keep taking no for an answer for creating a fleet of
new and improved shuttles with fully reusable LRBs that can deliver
100+ tonnes of payload into LEO/ISS space instead of having to utilize
those polluting and only semi-reusable SRBs that can't accomplish 50
tonnes, seems like the right sort of thing to be doing as a 50/50 kind
of public/private alternative to the spendy NASA way of doing things.

This following link (still under construction or perhaps getting
moderated to death by our NASA) will soon enough become the start of
good things to come out of the KAGUYA(SELENE) mission.
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/index_e.html

Just wait until their lunar exploration mission of mapping everything
in sight eventually works it's way down to orbiting at just 10 km
above that physically dark lunar surface, and subsequently gets those
one meter or better resolution images, plus that mission hosting loads
of nifty other gamma spectrum obtained data as to what the secondary/
recoil detecting of all those sorts of accessible raw elements which
our unusually massive and nearby moon has for us.

For some unexplained reasons, our NASA/Apollo wizards along with their
rad-hard Kodak film and unfiltered camera optics never had this
following UV-a induced violet/purple/bluish hue saturation problem.

However, notice that even with JAXA/Selene's most advanced camera CCDs
having quality coated optics including some specific bandpass lens
filtering, as to how purple/blush or even somewhat violet hue
saturated those initial full color images turned out.  It's exactly
what happens without using a very good set of optically sharp spectrum
cut-off and/or narrow bandpass filters in order to exclude those
strong primary and unavoidable secondary/recoil worth of what those
raw UV-a photons create, as otherwise for those images having been so
color/hue saturation skewed as though being illuminated by way of the
raw solar energy was entirely unavoidable, though can be somewhat
PhotoShop corrected after the fact. (they obviously should have
incorporated an optical layer coating of Y-48 deep yellow or as great
as Y-52 amber for the sharp cutting off of most all that's below 500
nm, along with an HA-50 layer or element for blocking IR, or simply by
having applied a custom NBPF [ECI-1020] multi-layer coated element)
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/en/communication/com_information_e.htm#NEW_20071116A

That other ongoing mission by China may not ever accomplish as good of
images, but of their next and the ones after that should not be the
least bit disappointing, because most of anything Japan can do, China
should be fully capable of accomplishing one better and at not 10% the
cost per deployed kg.
- Brad Guth

Whenever I'm tired I make lots of extra context and typing errors.
However, since my Google/NOVA Usenet account has not been allowing for
subsequent edits by way of entirely removing postigs with such errors,
I'll just have to keep adding to the stack as best I can.  Sorry about
that.

So what if our moon is getting recorded as such a nifty blue?

What hurts most of all is our getting duped by the likes of Walter
Cronkite in addition to our being snookered by all of those as
supposedly having "the right stuff".  Perhaps our investigative Dan
Rather can eventually help kick Walter Cronkite's butt on our behalf.

Honestly folks, with all of the new and improved science about our
moon coming in, there's yet another something of so many other issues
that just isn't sitting right with what our NASA/Apollo wizards had
been telling us, and fully supported by their army of such brown-nosed
minions that reside right here within Usenet naysay land of hosting
their government bad deed denials upon denials.

It seems their physics and subsequent published science just doesn't
add up, pretty much exactly as it never really did, nor do they even
have what it takes in the way of any human pilot fly-by-rocket flown
lander as of 40 years after the fact.

If you don't happen to know anything first hand about photography and
the well established science of optical/lens filtering, so that such
recorded spectrums of our naked moon isn't getting pushed so terribly
off-hue saturated for looking so unusually blue, that's OK because
there is more than sufficient expertise with replicated proof of
exactly what's going on.

Just because our own government has so often lied to us on a fairly
regular basis, as such doesn't represent that everything about our
faith-based puppeteered government is in the nearest space-toilet,
just most of everything associated with those Apollo missions is at
full risk of being exposed for what it really is.

Of course, all such exposed tips of these sorts of infowar icebergs
are clear indications of lots more truth to come.
- Brad Guth

If it wasn't for my limited Usenet efforts, it looks as though there
wouldn't have been hardly one constructive mention of anything on
behalf of either Japan or China accomplishing such terrific science
about our moon.  Of course China needs to know certain things before
their robust and rad-hard robotics get deployed upon that physically
dark and dusty surface, or even before setting up anything as station-
keeping within the moon's L1.
- Brad Guth

Just because the secondary/recoil worth of those bluish photons as
coming off our moon are so unavoidable, is of itself no good reason
for being ignored and/or having banished such new and improved science
that's now arriving from those lunar missions of the China/Chang'e and
Japan/JAXA's Selene.

Isn't there a little something about telling the truth that's good
enough for a 5th grader?

To tell the truth, with China and Japan each sharing other truths
about our unusually surface massive moon, of its physically dark
surface and cosmic accumulations of nifty substances that's in many
places worth tens of such crystal dry and downright dusty meters deep,
as well as looking so unusually but unavoidably secondary/recoil
photon bluish to those insufficiently filtered cameras, whereas it's
no wonder these Usenet rusemaster spooks and moles of what's mostly
Google/NOVA are doing all they can muster in order to banish our
contributions and otherwise trash my poor old PC.

Because Usenet is such a public accessible medium is obviously why it
has been an all out infowar, of those insider folks doing all they can
to traumatize or otherwise terminate those of us suggesting we haven't
always been told the truth, especially by way of our NASA/Apollo
wizards as supposedly having "the right stuff".

You'd think that because that unusually surface massive and nearby
moon has not always been with us, and there is some kind of other
intelligent life existing/coexisting on Venus, in that reading a few
published articles that are entirely outside of our NASA O-Ring cult
of those Old Testament scriptures might be a darn good idea.
- Brad Guth

We're being lied to again and again.  In other words, it seems their
MI5/CIA boss or MIB agent that's likely standing directly behind each
operator of their spendy supercomputer work stations (with a loaded
gun pointed at each of their empty heads) is not about to allow any
public Usenet chat about our unusually blue moon, or much less about
how their NASA and of those rad-hard Apollo wizards, along with all
that Semitic Third Reich kind of right stuff as having so nicely
managed to hide Venus.

JAXA / SELENE (KAGUYA)
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/en/communication/com_information_e.htm#NEW_20071214A

Notice their intentional color removal of the moon, and of those very
same images as otherwise depicting mother Earth in full color.

Notice down the page of those other full color images of just the moon
itself along with parts of the their spacecraft as depicted in such a
nifty bluish saturation hue.  Remember that Selene's quality optics
had been bandpass coated in order to cut out the vast bulk of UV and
IR to start with.

The rather impressive blue saturated hue is clearly an expected color
shift or tint, that's due to all of the raw secondary/recoil of what
most reactive items getting UV saturated should look like to such a
bandpass filtered CCD or especially to that of an unfiltered Kodak
film recorded image.

Unfortunately, their "KAGUYA Image Gallery" that's apparently forever
stuck with using the "Adobe(R) Flash Player(R)" is what seriously
sucks, as sharing far less than full resolution and otherwise running
extremely poorly on most computers w/o a super fast internet
connection and lots of extra PC memory.

The science from their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray
Spectrometer(GRS)" being equally saturated at much greater levels than
expected, as such may also have to become excluded from the public,
because of such data being so unexpectedly intense or off-scale that
an entirely new effort at obtaining such intended science about the
complex surface of our physically dark moon may have to wait for the
next available mission.  Perhaps the lunar exploration efforts by
India will have adapted the necessary narrow bandpass of sufficient
optical filtering, as well as for having greater XRS/GRS scope in
order to properly deal with the unusual gamma and X-ray intensity of
what that naked and very anticathode moon actually represents.
- Brad Guth -

Is there any good reason(s) as to why the JAXA/SELENE(KAGUYA) science
via their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray Spectrometer(GRS)"
is being kept secret?

The Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.  A good
orange/amber worth of an optical spectrum filter (as added onto their
otherwise bandpass coated lens) would have permitted a somewhat more
natural color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth by using a
quality telescope that's getting extensively filtered by our polluted
atmosphere and secondly by the rather extensive 8r(8X radius) worth of
sodium atmosphere associated with that moon.

However, it looks as though we're still being lied to again and again
by NASA's rusemasters in charge of snookering humanity for all it's
worth.  In other words, it seems their MI5/CIA boss or MIB agent in
charge of damage control that's likely standing directly behind each
operator of all those spendy supercomputer work stations (with a
loaded gun pointed at each of their empty heads) is not about to allow
any public Usenet chat about our physically dark and such an unusually
blue moon, or much less about how their NASA and of those rad-hard
Apollo wizards, along with all that Semitic Third Reich kind of right
stuff as having so nicely managed to always avoid those blue saturated
hues as well as their having always hidden Venus at the same time.

JAXA / SELENE (KAGUYA)
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/en/communication/com_information_e.htm#NEW_20071214A

Notice their intentional color removal of the moon itself, and of
those very same images as otherwise depicting mother Earth in full
color. (it's quite easy to prove this being the case)

Down on the same page are those other original full color images of
mostly the moon itself along with parts of the their spacecraft as
depicted within such a nifty bluish saturation hue.  Remember that
Selene's quality optics had been custom bandpass coated in order to
cut out the vast bulk of UV and IR to start with.

The rather impressive blue saturated hue or color skewed amount of
color tint is clearly that of an expected color shift or blue
saturated image result, that's unavoidably their CCD obtained result
of the raw secondary/recoil worth of what most such reactive items as
getting UV saturated should always look like to such a bandpass
filtered CCD w/o having the necessary color correction filter, as
otherwise especially blue saturated as to that of what any unfiltered
Kodak film recorded image (via NASA/Apollo) should have depicted.

Unfortunately, the JAXA "KAGUYA Image Gallery" that's apparently
forever stuck with using the "Adobe(R) Flash Player(R)" is what
seriously sucks, as sharing far less than full resolution and
otherwise running extremely poorly on most computers w/o a super fast
internet connection and lots of extra PC memory.

The science from their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray
Spectrometer(GRS)" as likely being equally saturated at much greater
levels than expected, as such may also have to become excluded from
the general public, because of such data being so unexpectedly intense
or off-scale, in that an entirely new effort at obtaining such
intended science about the complex surface of our physically dark moon
may have to wait for the next available mission.  Perhaps the lunar
exploration efforts by India will have adapted the necessary narrow
bandpass of sufficient optical spectrum filtering with sufficient
color correction, as well as for their science instruments having
either greater XRS/GRS scope or much tighter resolution in order to
properly deal with the unusual gamma and X-ray intensity of what that
naked and very anticathode moon actually represents.

KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV/CCD imaging getting its first full solar dosage
or skewed saturation of those pesky raw secondary photons, as for
looking rather deep blue.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/index_e.htm
http://www.kaguya.jaxa.jp/en/
Notice as to all of the unavoidable UV secondary/recoil worth of
bluish and/or extra purple/violet saturation that KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV
is having to deal with, even though their having incorporated a
sufficient UV spectrum cut-off filter and currently using not more
than a few percent worth of their HDTV dynamic range(DR), even so
having no problems with recording the physically dark moon along with
Earth that's not even half the albedo worth of Venus which has greater
than 2.6 kw/m2 to work with.  Far better images are soon enough going
to be accomplished, especially with those other onboard CCD
instruments that'll far exceed what most of our previous science about
our extremely unusual moon had to say.
- Brad Guth -

Is anything JAXA that pertains to our physically dark blue moon still
sequestered as taboo/nondisclosure rated? (apparently so)

Is the blue moon as imaged by China not actually out moon, at least
according to all that's NASA/Apollo would like to think? (apparently
so)

How about the lunar orbital mission as planned by India.  Is that one
also going to get officially uplink.space.com and otherwise Usenet
banished because of their science being similar to that of Japan and
China? (apparently)

- Brad Guth

Perhaps everything of Japan and China that's getting such new and
improved science data about our unusually massive and nearby moon is
having to be mainstream taboo/nondisclosure rated, all because it's
too freaking honest and clearly not sufficiently Semitic to suit those
in charge of our private parts.

As having said this so often before;  Our blue moon as having been
recently color CCD imaged with quality bandpass coated optics is in
fact looking rather secondary/recoil photon bluish, pretty much as it
should appear to those insufficiently filtered cameras.

BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically dark
as an open pit coal mine.  Go figure upon which other nearly white
guano island sort of moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum
illuminated that our rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of
the physically dark and unavoidably reactive basalt naked surface of
such iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium worth of our crystal dry and
extremely dusty moon that's upon average so physically darker than
basalt, and as such representing that unavoidably gamma and X-ray
anticathode nasty environment in addition to all of its naked basalt
surface as being so unavoidably electrostatic charged.

- Brad Guth

For what reason(s) is the JAXA Selene mission so unusually taboo/
nondisclosure rated?

Is the JAXA Selene mission broken, or just getting nailed by something
unofficially NASA?

Apparently whatever I happen think doesn't matter, because what I
think is that we've been rather terribly snookered and dumbfounded to
death by those of our very own kind, as by those supposedly having
"the right stuff", whereas what you silly folks of Usenet fuckology
think as representing the official infomercial spewing clowns and
rusemasters of your Old Testament thumping Third Reich, is apparently
all that matters.

You'd think before our going off into the wild black yonder, that
perhaps it would be a good idea as to accomplish our extremely massive
and nearby moon, or at least park a little something of a fuel cache
or Boeing like oasis of fuel(s) within the moon's L1.

BTW, where's that JAXA Selene pixel truth and nothing but the truth to
behold? (hiding like Muslim WMD or like Venus always having kept
itself out of sight?)

Even if it's looking a touch worthy of all that nifty hue saturated as
a secondary/recoil blue (exactly as it should), and otherwise for
seeing our "right stuff" that's supposedly upon that physically dark
as an open pit coal mine of a dusty surface, whereas those highly
reflective and fairly large items of our NASA Apollo moon landings
should have been rather easily spotted against that physically dark
surface, not to mention the acre or more of their terribly disrupted
lunar surface standing out as an artificial sore thumb, and that's
even though the 10 meter resolution can't offer specific item or
terrain detail simply isn't the problem.

BTW No.2, I can't but help see the usual gauntlet of Usenet spermware/
fuckware arriving, as though the mostly Jewish troops of NASA's borg
army of brown-nosed clowns and minions are doing their job of tossing
flak, covering thy infowar spewing butts and otherwise mustering up as
much other damage control as possible, pretty much the same as they
provided on behalf of and as to what their old puppet warlord Hitler
used to do (of course these days it's all about doing whatever GW Bush
wants).

- Brad Guth