Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / February 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Rocks Came Before  Fusion of medium stars

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 25 Feb 2007 14:05 GMT
Good science makes that a fact. Very good theory is nebula clouds to be
compressed by gravity need areas of heavy elements.  These heavy
elements come out of super nova explosions and are traveling through
space as I'm typing(another source of dark matter(gravity)     Best to
keep in mind where there is to much iron stars will not form(no fusion)
I could come up with a theory that supernova explosion that were 99%
more prevalent 19 billion years ago,and created dark matter(heavy
elements) that are detected only by the gravity they add to the universe
gravity. We observe this when we measure the angular force(spinning)
strong enough for spiral galaxies to fall apart,and don't.    Bert
Phineas T Puddleduck - 25 Feb 2007 14:21 GMT
> Good science makes that a fact. Very good theory is nebula clouds to be
> compressed by gravity need areas of heavy elements.  These heavy
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> gravity. We observe this when we measure the angular force(spinning)
> strong enough for spiral galaxies to fall apart,and don't.    Bert

Nonsense

Signature

"Yes, you're right of course, NB.  And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best  to ignore them, as you wish." Painius

G=EMC^2 Glazier - 25 Feb 2007 17:35 GMT
Ducky Wit   since my thinking is so negative to your thinking This begs
the question Why don't you kill file me?  best you do for I will always
keep posting my own ideas.  I know my science,,and I taught myself to
add to books or discredit them as I like. and not what you like   Go
figure  Bert    PS I don't kill file but will only from now on answer
your posts that are thoughtful   Bert
Phineas T Puddleduck - 25 Feb 2007 18:58 GMT
> Ducky Wit   since my thinking is so negative to your thinking This begs
> the question Why don't you kill file me?  best you do for I will always
> keep posting my own ideas.  I know my science,,and I taught myself to
> add to books or discredit them as I like. and not what you like   Go
> figure  Bert    PS I don't kill file but will only from now on answer
> your posts that are thoughtful   Bert

You post bad science. I hate seeing idiots think they can get away with it.
Your thinking is muddled.

Signature

"Yes, you're right of course, NB.  And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best  to ignore them, as you wish." Painius

Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th - 26 Feb 2007 00:11 GMT
herbertglazier@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote in news:9169-45E197BD-811
@storefull-3333.bay.webtv.net:

> Good science makes that a fact. Very good theory is nebula clouds to be
> compressed by gravity need areas of heavy elements.  These heavy
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> gravity. We observe this when we measure the angular force(spinning)
> strong enough for spiral galaxies to fall apart,and don't.    Bert

No heavy elements are needed for gravitational collapse although the
presence of molecules does allow a nebula to cool more efficiently as they
compress. This is thought to allow the collapse of smaller regions of the
nebula. The very first stars to form were most likely all high mass ones
until the intersteller medium was seeded with sufficient "metals" to
facilitate efficient radiative cooling. Dark matter BTW has nothing to do
with heavy elements.

Klazmon
Phineas T Puddleduck - 27 Feb 2007 17:02 GMT
> herbertglazier@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote in news:9169-45E197BD-811
> @storefull-3333.bay.webtv.net:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> facilitate efficient radiative cooling. Dark matter BTW has nothing to do
> with heavy elements.

Interesting is the calculations that put a lower limit on the mass of stars
formed during the populations. The earlier ones were probably at least 8 solar
masses (compared to a lower limit of 0.08 now) and were much higher.

(OLD MAN VOICE)

In my day you had proper supernovae, not the ones you get these days !!

Signature

"Yes, you're right of course, NB.  And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best  to ignore them, as you wish." Painius

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.