Re: Liberals See 'Roe v Wade' Going *BYE-BYE* ~`

Re: Liberals See 'Roe v Wade' Going BYE-BYE ~`

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Anonymous - 26 Feb 2006 21:41 GMT

On Sun 26 Feb 2006, "Shawn Hirn" wrote:

>In article <BDWJGYQ438773.574375@reece.net.au>,
> Daniel Joseph Min <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>> Speaking to Atheists both individually & collectively...
>> I understand your denial and anger at permanently and
>> decisively losing control over all three branches of
>> our beloved United States Federal Government. That's
>> gotta hurt real bad, what with watching your sacred
>> cow 'Roe v Wade' about to be shot down in flames, and
>> 'Intelligent Design' about to be superimposed over the
>> top of your sacred gospel 'According to Charles Darwin'.
>
>I read an interesting article in a local newspaper this morning. Of
>course, there are no guarantees on how the SCOTUS will rule on future
>abortion cases, but even if Roberts and Alito vote on the side of
>anti-abortionists, they would still not garner enough votes to undo Roe
>v. Wade if all the other justices vote the same way they have on this
>issue the last THIRTY times they have ruled on abortion issues.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I understand that Liberals & Atheists have long-since
adopted the godless "no guarantees" view of life, the
universe and everything, etc.; seeing that they have
no clear vision--no clairvoyance--of the future, nor
the past, neither comprehending wholly in the present.

So it's also perfectly understandable that the aforesaid
Liberals & Atheists -- the Rebellious, the Vulnerable --
are desperately grasping at straws, clinging hopelessly
to the dead-and-gone past. Let the dead bury the dead...

>The history of the Supreme Court shows that they are very reluctant to
>undo legal rules on cases they have previously ruled on. Several lawyers
>I know explained to me that the reason for this is, its very important
>to have stability in our legal system and it would be highly unusual for
>the Supreme Court to take away privileges from adults that they have
>previously had for decades without an extremely good case to make for
>doing so, and thus far, the anti-abortionists have always made a bad
>case to support their beliefs.
>

Uh-huh, that's right; you Liberal/Atheist "super-geniuses"
just keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile we'll gut your
rabidly Anti-Christian A.C.L.U. like a fish! Watch & See...

>
>So, you anti-abortionists truly do have your work cut out for you.

Translation: anti-abortionists exactly equals pro-lifers,
and pro-abortionists exactly equals anti-lifers. You and
your anti-life/pro-murder A.C.L.U. are in _grave_ danger
of the Judgment: From heaven, one grand *K*ing of terror...

I learned early in life that one's labor of love (pun, in
context) makes work exceedingly fun and quite profitable!
Ripping the Anti-Christ agenda apart at its bloody seams
is PRECISELY the kind of work we God-fearing Republicans
do because we must, and also because we love God and His
Immutable Law. Destroying antichrists is a labor of love. :-D

>History and the current makeup of the SCOTUS still weigh heavily against
>you in your attempt to plunder our rights. Oh! And what would you do if
>Alito actually votes in favor of the Constitution? Anyway you slice it,
>the Constitution does not support your anti-abortion beliefs.

You're terrified. You ought to be. The Scythe approaches...

My Condolences,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7

*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/

*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster

Reply to this Message

Day Brown - 27 Feb 2006 00:53 GMT

Be careful of what you wish for. I expect reversal of Roe v. Wade, and
last year began the propagation of several herbs that provide birth
control and abortion.
I have enough Blessed Thistle left from last year to provide some
services now. (why do you spoze it was called "blessed"? or why is
"Bachelor Button" so named? and why do herbal sources warn pregnant
women to avoid so many herbs???)

Simply pay for postage. No clinic, no appointment, no adoption lecture,
no protestor line, no parental consent, no doctor, no bill. I'm sure
many witches will catch on, and thereby rapidly expand their services,
not only providing the 'Family planning' the Bishops began burning
witches for, but many other personal counseling and health services.

The more draconian the Fundies and GOP gets, the faster their covens
will grow, and the more money witches will make. Thanx in part to
archaeologists going into the museums of Eastern Europe with modern
forensic tools and identifying the pollens and plant resins the ancient
witches were brewing up in their potions.

Reply to this Message

platopes - 27 Feb 2006 08:04 GMT

> > Daniel Joseph Min <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:

> Translation: anti-abortionists exactly equals pro-lifers,

> Meanwhile we'll gut

> in _grave_ danger

> Ripping... apart at its bloody seams

> Destroying... is a labor of love. :-D

> You're terrified. You ought to be. The Scythe approaches...
>
> My Condolences,
> Daniel Joseph Min, Mr. "pro-life" ~:?)

Reply to this Message

Lorrill Buyens - 27 Feb 2006 23:21 GMT

>On Sun 26 Feb 2006, "Shawn Hirn" wrote:
>>In article <BDWJGYQ438773.574375@reece.net.au>,

>>So, you anti-abortionists truly do have your work cut out for you.
>
>Translation: anti-abortionists exactly equals pro-lifers,

Do you support the death penalty? Why or why not? If so, how do you reconcile
it with your "pro-life" stand?

>and pro-abortionists exactly equals anti-lifers.

Funny how I haven't killed or advocated the killing of anybody yet.

>>History and the current makeup of the SCOTUS still weigh heavily against
>>you in your attempt to plunder our rights. Oh! And what would you do if
>>Alito actually votes in favor of the Constitution? Anyway you slice it,
>>the Constitution does not support your anti-abortion beliefs.
>
>You're terrified. You ought to be. The Scythe approaches...

I'm laughing my a.s off. I ought to be. A Kook approaches...

Signature

"One does wonder why God went to the trouble of making Man
rational, since there's evidently no bloody use for reason
whatsoever."
- Alan Hope, in a religious discussion in misc.writing

Reply to this Message

Day Brown - 28 Feb 2006 18:12 GMT

<"One does wonder why God went to the trouble of making Man
rational, since there's evidently no bloody use for reason
whatsoever."
- Alan Hope, in a religious discussion in misc.writing >
One reason why I'm going out to the garden in a few more minutes.
Rather than argue with the irrational fundies, I'm preparing the beds
to grow Bachelor Button, Blessed Thistle, & Motherwort. Oh- I'll put
the wild yam in a stand of woods, and let it over run the weeds.

I should have plenty to provide abortions with by June. :-) As other
herbalists catch on to this, it'll sweep the whole abortion debate off
the table and into the trash where it belongs.

Reply to this Message

Space Forum / Astronomy / February 2006

Re: Liberals See 'Roe v Wade' Going *BYE-BYE* ~`

Re: Liberals See 'Roe v Wade' Going BYE-BYE ~`