Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / September 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

No-cloning theorem a Red Herring?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jack Sarfatti - 30 Sep 2005 03:32 GMT
The no-cloning theorem is misleading. I mean, yes you cannot clone
arbitrary quantum states perfectly, but you can clone arbitrary quantum
states approximately with good enough overlap fidelity among the clones.
This opens the door to presponse signal nonlocality. Gaussian continuous
variable states in particular can be effectively cloned. It may mean an
error in the Susskind-Hawking ideas about information recovery from
evaporating black holes that depends upon naive use of the no-cloning
theorem.
hanson - 30 Sep 2005 03:50 GMT
> The no-cloning theorem is misleading. I mean, yes you cannot clone arbitrary
> quantum states perfectly, but you can clone arbitrary quantum states
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Susskind-Hawking ideas about information recovery from evaporating black holes
> that depends upon naive use of the no-cloning theorem.

Jack, why do you have to make everything, even this one,
more complicated than it already is?... ahahaha... ahahanson
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.