The chief defect of Ayn Rand
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Andrew Usher - 29 Nov 2008 02:37 GMT ... was her sex, of course. I am not being facetious - I mean that it is an easily seen fact that no woman has ever written anything of interest philosophically, and that includes her. The hypocrisy of her movement is well known; that it did not tolerate any dissent despite being ostensibly devoted to reason, which, all should agree, requires open debate.
Her megalomania convinced her that what she came up with was The Truth and that all disagreement with it was somehow evil. Yes, that describes all manner of cult leaders (though I believe that many are just faking it - certainly not in her case), but not many have explicitly invoked reason as their one and only support. Of course, this effectively holds reason as a form of revelation, which is basically a contradiction in terms and so silly that only a woman was likely to come up with it.
Objectivism, and libertarianism in general, are ideologies for losers in the money/power/status game that wish to fantasise about being winners; and the easiest way to sucker them is to convince them that they'd be winners if not for the damned government! This appeals to the vanity in all of us that tells us that 'Though not all people can be winners, _I_ am a 'natural winner' that ought to end up successful'. If there is any such thing as 'natural winners', independently of any particular social arrangement, it would be those of highest intelligence. While social success is always correlated with intelligence, for several different reasons, it is never as much as they would have one believe. This is because general intelligence is not the trait most highly valued by those that control the power.
Government is not the problem in this respect, but I do not hold government to be good in itself. It has the capacity for evil as much as for good, and in reality it can only be a function of who effectively controls it. This is why I am a socialist, albeit an anti- authoritarian one - and yes, for the first time I am not afraid to use the word 'socialist', it is exactly the word that describes it - and I would like to communicate to ordinary men that the only way that outcomes can be improved for people like them is by controlling the ruling classes' co-option of our society.
Andrew Usher
Bill Taylor - 29 Nov 2008 04:53 GMT SUrely not!
The chief defect of Ayn Rand was that she had both a very silly surname and a very silly given name.
-- w.f. Chatterton Taylor
Anastasia Beaverhausen - 29 Nov 2008 07:31 GMT >SUrely not! > >The chief defect of Ayn Rand was that she had both >a very silly surname and a very silly given name. > >-- w.f. Chatterton Taylor While I enjoy a good off-topic ramble as much as the next idiot, I fail to see what any of this has to do with sci.math.
(No doubt galathaea will soon be along to explain ...)
 Signature Angus Rodgers
jmfbahciv - 29 Nov 2008 11:58 GMT >> SUrely not! >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > While I enjoy a good off-topic ramble as much as the next idiot, > I fail to see what any of this has to do with sci.math. No math nor science knowledge was one of her defects. She also had limited knowledge in how real work got done; IMO this was the major flaw in her philosophy. The OP should really read her biography before spouting about something he doesn't know about and then track the lifetimes of her students.
<snip>
/BAH
Phil Carmody - 29 Nov 2008 11:52 GMT > ... was her sex, of course. She was a pretty feisty writer, I'm sure her sex was quite vigorous and exciting.
Do you instead have a problem with her gender?
Phil
 Signature I tried the Vista speech recognition by running the tutorial. I was amazed, it was awesome, recognised every word I said. Then I said the wrong word ... and it typed the right one. It was actually just detecting a sound and printing the expected word! -- pbhj on /.
Andrew Usher - 29 Nov 2008 20:36 GMT On Nov 29, 5:52 am, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demun...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > ... was her sex, of course. > > She was a pretty feisty writer, I'm sure her sex was > quite vigorous and exciting. Probably not so much as that in her books ...
> Do you instead have a problem with her gender? I think that was the obvious meaning.
Andrew Usher
Society - 30 Nov 2008 07:26 GMT > [The chief defect of Ayn Rand] ... was her sex, > of course. I am not being facetious - I mean that > it is an easily seen fact that no woman has ever > written anything of interest philosophically, > and that includes her. This claim you call a "fact" is not so easy for me to see.
Also, you're implying that if "no woman has ever written anything of interest philosophically" then no woman can ever write anything of interest philosophically.
Worse still, by tacking on the conjunction "and that includes her" at the end of your remarks there, you're assuming what you're trying to prove -- a move that marks you as not "of interest philosophically."
> The hypocrisy of her movement is well known; > that it did not tolerate any dissent despite > being ostensibly devoted to reason, which, > all should agree, requires open debate. Hmm. You say "all should agree," implying that you will "not tolerate any dissent" to your remarks.
 Signature Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.
from "Even More Rules"
*
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Sean_MacCloud@yahoo.com - 01 Dec 2008 14:02 GMT > ... was her sex, of course. I am not being facetious - I mean that it > is an easily seen fact that no woman has ever written anything of [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > Andrew Usher ============ "ayn rand" is one modern manifestation of "capitalism's" bullshit and it is why high IQ men (the non- milquetoast ones) are in the mess they're in.
Capitalism is accurate economic analysis --"[modern society is the comfortable, ultimately liberal, machine it is because of entrepenurial focus replacing --for lack of term-- barbarian war as the method of status aquiring]" -- but it is horrible political party platform (especially in a 'two party' system).
----- "No government" schpiel is fundamentally impossible. And -- importantly-- it scares the masses into the hands of demagogue bait-and-switch liars. ...Big tent, strange bedfellows masses-- all being duped under a protectionism which has done nothing but give females, fools and ethnics ever more hypocritically applied "rights". -----
Liberals say capitalism is the reason people live in refrigerator boxes. Being idiots and children genetically, they are half right: Capitalism is the reason the nut living in the refrigerator box is still alive at all --in a nice cushy refrigerator box; this is otherwise called 'trickle down'. In pre barbarian-war, pre 'comfortable sociecties' the crazy failures would be long dead.
Well fed creatures seem to change their levels of aggression and selfishness, deterministically/systemically. Eg the end of slavery in the west coincided exactly with the success of the host culture that outlawed [acute] slavery.
Post barbarian-war (comfortable) society's 'capitalism theory/ analysis' (free market-ism, adam smith-ism, or whatever one calls this thing from the last few centuries) is side effect of Exploration Age's winfall.
For the already wealthy, this economic philosophy/analysis is simply an embraced excuse to legitimize their advantages (often dynastically inherited); ie they don't care 'bout no 'invisible hand (ending barbarian-war), trickle down' philosophy --they simply nod in agreement with economist professors ("greed is good" for it leads to more 'refrigerator boxes').
Libertarianism is simply hip youthful GOP failed silliness. The fact it failed to stop "government's" "liberal" snowball (of hypocrisy and anti high IQ [white] male bigotry) is conveniently not seen by its advocates and this says something important about this philosophy and it's devotees.
------------ Mussolini and his jewish girlfriend were communists as hip youngins. Mussolini being biodeterministically a certain type simply put teeth into this 'communism' as an ineviable side effect of the way he was laying dego dick into his artsy girlfriend. Together their innate sexual expression built fascism.
This thing --fascism-- was deemed capable of stopping democracy/ communism (democracy/communism = idiot-opia / milqetoast-opia, filled with dangerous to high IQ _men_ sanctimonious _hypocrits_ in EVERY CATAGORY). Seeing this threat, the ayn rand wing of the 'diaspora' simply hyped up "individualism" (another side effect of Exploration Age -- colonial outback) as a way of keeping the "don't trust communism" goy from forming coalition with fascism. ...No general in history who actually wanted to stop a charging force (like say "communism" /"liberalism") would advocate his side breaking up into individuals as the tactic unless he wanted to lose (or the battle was already lost).
As far as rand's works, I wouldn't waste my energy dissecting most humans' gribbit noises; I have long since shrugged.
The only important lesson in the whole situation is as stated:
" "No government" schpiel is fundamentally impossible. And -- importantly-- it scares the masses into the hands of demagogue bait-and-switch liars. ...Big tent, strange bedfellows masses-- all being duped under a protectionism which has done nothing but give females, fools and ethnics ever more hypocritically applied "rights".
Proof is in the puddin, for over a century now at least."
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax - 01 Dec 2008 16:12 GMT >> ... was her sex, of course. I am not being facetious - I mean that it >> is an easily seen fact that no woman has ever written anything of [quoted text clipped - 120 lines] > > Proof is in the puddin, for over a century now at least." http://www.cedarcomm.com/~stevelm1/usdebt.htm
 Signature Dirk
http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party http://www.onetribe.me.uk/wordpress/?cat=5 - Our podcasts on weird stuff
Sean_MacCloud@yahoo.com - 01 Dec 2008 16:54 GMT On Dec 1, 11:12 am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sean_MacCl...@yahoo.com wrote: > >> ... was her sex, of course. I am not being facetious - I mean that it [quoted text clipped - 126 lines] > -- > Dirk Charts and graphs (bout pres`o dents) --groovy. How is it germane to what I said?
Angus Rodgers - 01 Dec 2008 19:49 GMT Dear Sean_MacCloud,
Could you dumb it down a notch or three, for the sake of all us females, ethnics, liberals, capitalists, conservatives, wackos, defectives, evildoers, savages, conformists, simpletons, cowards, profiteers, milquetoasts [sorry, I've already had my /mot du jour/, I'll have to look it up tomorrow], liars, fools, idiots, children, failures, Jews, Communists, Fascists, degos [?], individualists, and libertarians? Perhaps you could try giving the much shorter list of all the kinds of human being (or perhaps aliens) that you /don't/ hate, despise and resent? Would that perhaps be "high IQ white males"? But you can't like all of /them/, either, because so many of them fall into one or other of the categories already listed. Is there, in fact, anyone on the lists besides yourself? Or don't you even like yourself very much? I can understand that.
 Signature Angus Rodgers
Sean_MacCloud@yahoo.com - 01 Dec 2008 22:41 GMT > Dear Sean_MacCloud, > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > -- > Angus Rodgers I guess you're right: I do bascially hate everyone... but honest chiefs of yor. And 1) they're probably a romantic myth; and 2) if one of them bested me(hardly) and stole my dames I wouldn't like them too (thus contributing to the snowball of dispicable civilization myself). What I said is not inaccurate though.
As far as dumbing it down...
My grammar is usually correct (barring accidents), though often unwieldy, so as to save me time and carples (+*). But in the post you're responding too (and in the last years) my grammar isn't even that unwieldy.
What's happened is most are all so far away from accurate that simply organizing info properly is like a major paradigm shift for most.
Humans have snowballed into big sh.t[tm] here and it takes big minds to untangle it all.
----- (+*) Interesting to note that I have the same large clause and phrase 'style' as Machiavelli and Nietze (without trying to). It saves us having to open every necessary digression and idea with a prep; and we have the intellect to handle the heavy grammar (verb 'tense'/ possess,plurals/affixes etc) of large sentence mechanics. It's economical though tougher on the reader. (You have to breath with me.) The interesting part is they too are known for observing reality for what it is(stating it using the epistemology /science lexicon of their times) and are then denounced as misanthropes who are causing it to be that way. But both Nietze and Machivelli were actually saps: animal fags etc the whole nine -- like me. It's a gene [combo thereof actually] floating around the Euro-sphere (since shaman days in the caves, I'd wager). I wonder if they had childhood portrait art skills? Seriously.
======== 'milquetoast' generally means weak or weak willed.
I did make a confusing grammar error in a post above:
""...(while denouncing anyone who is not inherently a defective wackjob, evildo-er or historically 'savage').""
I should have splurged the carples there and said "'as' evildo-er or historically savage" instead of using the debatable comma (which makes it look as though I'm listing 'evildoer' and 'savage' with 'defective wackjobs').
se la guerre... ;-) c'est la vie
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax - 03 Dec 2008 19:49 GMT > On Dec 1, 11:12 am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru...@gmail.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 112 lines] > Charts and graphs (bout pres`o dents) --groovy. How is it germane to > what I said? That Big Government in the US tends to be mainly Republican.
 Signature Dirk
http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party http://www.onetribe.me.uk/wordpress/?cat=5 - Our podcasts on weird stuff
Richard Herring - 03 Dec 2008 17:43 GMT In message <588dda68-73e1-4d34-a186-fba171577de2@v38g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, Andrew Usher <k_over_hbarc@yahoo.com> writes
...was her propensity to provoke off-topic posting. Followups set.
 Signature Richard Herring
OwlHoot - 03 Dec 2008 20:19 GMT > ... was her sex, of course. I am not being facetious - I mean that it > is an easily seen fact that no woman has ever written anything of > interest philosophically, and that includes her. > > [..] I assumed this would be a cautionary tale, adapted from Hillaire Belloc's poem [ http://sniff.numachi.com/pages/tiHENRYKNG.html ]
The Chief Defect of Henry King Was chewing little bits of string. At last he swallowed some that tied Itself in ugly Knots inside. Physicians of the utmost fame Were called at once; but when they came They answered, as they took their Fees, `There is no Cure for this Disease. Henry will very soon be dead.' His Parents stood about his bed Lamenting his Untimely Death, When Henry with his Latest Breath, Cried - `Oh, my Friends, be warned by me, That Breakfast, Dinner, Lunch, and Tea Are all the Human Frame requires . . .' With that, the Wretched Child expires.
Charles - 03 Dec 2008 20:54 GMT Seems to me being dead would be a significant defect.
Bill Taylor - 04 Dec 2008 06:43 GMT > Seems to me being dead would be a significant defect. "Clevinger was dead. That was the basic flaw in his philosophy."
-- Catch-22
spudnik - 05 Dec 2008 04:53 GMT Alan Greenspan wasn't dead; he was just being used as a somewhat deserving scapegoat on C-SPAN -- makes you almost want to watch TV.
just wait'l the February singularity, kids!
thus: so, you are nearly ready to give us examples of arithmetical operations with this, so that we can see that you're not just pretending to have a New Math, that is not just a slight dressing-up of Hensel's lemma -- where, AP, oh, Where is your lemma?
saying that math is a subest of physics may be just fine, or it may be a nonsequiter & slightly absurd, but let's be charitable: ideas are good to have, intentions can also be good, but invention is 99.3% perspiration, and typing is just far too easy for you to do -- "no sweat," ten fingers are dancing-up a seeming brainstorm.
I have just found, at UCLA on the sidewalk, "An Info Booklet for the Universitywide Analytical Writing Placement Examination;" what I guess is that, when you were in the system, they did not have these placement exams, beyond the SAT or ACT or what ever. I had these exams, before going to UCLA, but, unfortunately, that was not enough to prepare me for the load of courses that I took, "because I could."
but, at least, I *knew* that I was failing, if not really why, more or less.
> likewise, 0000...0001. has 9999...9998 places, and > the very 9999...9999th place is reserved for pi or 2pi, > whence the other digits are ignored, or what? --Cheeny, 4 mo'years: the nukey footbol was passed to Joe The Plumb-bob Biden; "We must have USA military intervention into Sudan -- yahoo! (tm)"
|
|
|