Alien UFOs - The absolute impossibility
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Ian Parker - 25 Jul 2008 15:55 GMT Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again all of a sudden. My posting is based on a sober scientific analysis of known facts. No ad hominem arguments are given.
To discover the truth you have to look at one thing. ET, no not extraterrestrial, Emergent Technology. ET (Extraterrestrial) is not going to go around in Roswell type spacecraft. In fact if ET REALLY DOES visit us it will be in the form of interlinked probes no larger than insects. ET will also be able to find out all he wants to by putting AI on the Web. The presence of Intelligent like elsewhere in the Universe is something that has been speculated about. You are quite right to be annoyed at all the hoaxers that are around. They do not indeed help us to answer this question. There is however one thing that is clear to me and it is this. If ET wanted to make contact with us he would have done so long ago. A phased array in space at distances of 1,000 parsecs or more would easily produce enough signal for even a simple dipole array. This leaves us with but 2 possibilities. 1) ET does not exist. 2) ET is trying to hide. Personally I tend to "1". However if we assume "2" and suppose that ET is lurking somewhere in the Kuiper belt, he is hardly likely to produce Roswell type sightings. The resolution of the Fermi paradox and intelligent life will come though better observational techniques DIRECTED AT THE HOME PLANET. One thing though has been established by observation. There are NO Dyson civilizations. All IR stars are super giants, not Dysons. What is the source of all the rumours?
There were indeed VTOL flying disc aircraft produced by the Nazis at the end of WW2. A compendium is given in the reference
http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/ One you get beyond the glam pusses and Nazi propaganda there are some very interesting articles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piecraft/Jenseitsflugmaschine From Wikipaedia
http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/The%20Vril%20Discs.htm Aldebaron (khayyid?)
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ufo_aleman/esp_ufoaleman_6.htm 2000+km/h endurance 5½ hr was absolutely absurd.
Immediately after WW2 the CIA started "Operation Paperclip" where Nazi scientists were recruited to work in Area 51 and other places. There were a number of "flying saucers" - Nothing mind that worked terribly well but these craft were tested.
Little Green Men were used as a cover story.
http://www.slate.com/id/2072733/ http://www.padrak.com/agn/ http://www.janes.com/aerospace/civil/news/jdw/jdw020729_1_n.shtml
Antigravity research is STILL going on. What they are doing after all these years of failure I really don't know. The individuals concerned are obviously anxious that their "research" is never exposed to the light of day.
- Ian Parker
kT - 25 Jul 2008 16:32 GMT > Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again Who you gonna believe, a guy who denies everything and admits nothing, or a guy who admits everything, and denies nothing.
> light of day. dumpster4@hotmail.com - 25 Jul 2008 17:09 GMT Alien contact covered up, says Apollo veteran Edgar Mitchell
See:
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,,24069817-5001021,00.html
More grist for the UFO-conspiracy -theory mill.
Ian Parker - 25 Jul 2008 17:44 GMT > > Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again > > Who you gonna believe, a guy who denies everything and admits nothing, > or a guy who admits everything, and denies nothing. I am not asking you to believe in ad homiem arguments from any home. What I am asking you to to is to think the thing through in a logical way. Do gendanken experiments and try to work out how real aliens would behave.
Mitchell claims aliens have visited Earth. He saw nothing on his trip to the Moon. He is no more qualified to say this really than anyone else.
I have said many times that there is a cover up, but what is being covered up is not aliens. It is fraud, poor experiments and misinterperation of results. Operation "paperclip" produced Roswell and the need for cover up. In point of fact Ed Mitchell is PART off the cover up. He is an astronaut and people think (erroneously) that he has cred. In fact he is speaking FOR the Establishment.
- Ian Parker
Rob Arndt - 25 Jul 2008 18:18 GMT > > > Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > � - Ian Parker Roswell is filled with so many mistakes, it is laughable:
- the craft was not even a flying saucer design, but a delta shape with upturned wingtips - it had a cockpit and crew compartment (3 men in a row) that was struck by lightning in a storm and burned the crew alive in the oxygen rich environment - the nose section (aircraft) broke off during the crash and seperated - if it was a weather balloon, how come the US Army sealed the entire area and brought in a massive transport to remove a huge section of what had to be the fuselage? - if it was a weather balloon, then why was a huge component put on a B-29 under heavy guard and flown out to a secure military installation? - all the statements about aliens and flying saucers come from second and third hand sources rather than the initial newspaper report of what was interpreted as an alien craft (if the farmer had seen a Horten Parabola mod, or Ho-X delta it would have seemed alien in 1947). - the real description of the delta is exactluy like the Ho-X final design even with the anti-radar grooves cut into the lower fuselage - the material that was light and would not burn could have been Luftschwamm (Aerosponge) that could resist 1000 degrees F- a porous material to eliminate the need for jet intakes on future Luftwaffe a/c and discs - the strange writing may be nothing more than Japanese if the crew was mixed due to the craft's FUGO-type atmospheric balloon designed to be launched at sea to carry it to heights above the USSR for spying
I firmly believe that fact is the only part of the story that is right- the balloon was carrier for the spycraft delta that was designed to loiter over the USSR at high altitude and then ditch the balloon and glide back to the Pacific ocean where it would be picked up by a US carrier group and the photos processed on the ship.
Unconventional, but definately not alien.
It was supposed to have a small rocket motor to boost-glide and that mixed with the oxygen in the crew compartment probably burned all night and reduced the human remains to charred 4 foot corpses.
No grays.
Rob
p.s. This story died in 1947 but the hype began in the 70s when an author published the so-called alien connection.
kT - 25 Jul 2008 18:34 GMT >>>> Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again >>> Who you gonna believe, a guy who denies everything and admits nothing, [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > p.s. This story died in 1947 but the hype began in the 70s when an > author published the so-called alien connection. He did quite well with that book and story, as I recall.
All kinds of weird sh.t happens out there, they haven't even found what's his name, that balloon guy. Small planes would crash all the time and burn to a crisp, with small children as passengers as well.
That was the beginning era of private cross country, if you will recall.
Benj - 27 Jul 2008 15:00 GMT > I firmly believe that fact is the only part of the story that is > right- the balloon was carrier for the spycraft delta that was [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Rob Hey truly great cover story, Rob. You guys are starting to get GOOD after all these years! I really like this one! Best disinformation I've seen about Roswell in ages! I guess you've got to get better as the public gets better informed and won't buy the old "plausible" stories anymore.
hhc314@yahoo.com - 27 Jul 2008 17:13 GMT > > I firmly believe that fact is the only part of the story that is > > right- the balloon was carrier for the spycraft delta that was [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > in ages! I guess you've got to get better as the public gets better > informed and won't buy the old "plausible" stories anymore. Benj, like your posts. You are one of the few posters here that seems to have his head screwed on in the right direction.
Rob, on the other hand writes fantastic strories, still doesn't seem to realize that science requires substance in order to do research. Consequently no scientist wastes his time researching fantastic tales, and interesting as they may seem. So you can safely disconnect science from UFOs, ETs, Ghosts, and other Psychic stuff. Not that the stories are not interesting.
Now Roswell is an interesting situation. When you combine the fact that the residents of the Roswell Area in those years were relatively unsophiticated with the fact that White Sand Missile Range (WSMR) is directly downsteam of prevailing wind directions, it is not suprising that the residents of Roswell found remains that they were incapable of explaining. Add the security of the ongoing experiments at WSMR, the combined results are nearly the materials of humor.
Today, it is no secret that the Mogul balloons were not precisely created to do weather research.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Mogul
To add to the story, the project following Mogul did, among other things, inestigate the effect of high altitude flight on living creatures (although the government has yet to admit to this). I believe that was during the course of a project named "Skyhook". This involved the use of human corpses and apes, and was designed to research the effects of high altitude exposure of human or human-like tissue (including radiation exposure). Thus, the need for small caskets for remains found in the Roswell surroundings. I believe that most of these stories are true, but that the remains found were definitely not those of an ET.
The bottom line is that there is no great mystery, nor any ETs. This is simply how scientific research works, when government security measures are present. As far as goverment security is concerned, I believe that they intentially helped to encourage the ET myth, but I don't know that as a fact this was done intentionally.
The bottom line is that many people in the Roswell area profited as a result of these events, even today, and that's probably a good thing.
Harry C.
Ian Parker - 27 Jul 2008 21:12 GMT On 27 Jul, 17:13, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > I firmly believe that fact is the only part of the story that is > > > right- the balloon was carrier for the spycraft delta that was [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] > The bottom line is that many people in the Roswell area profited as a > result of these events, even today, and that's probably a good thing. Well just before I finally retired my wife and I ran a restraurant near the Lizard in Cornwall. It was a 14th Cebtury building and we never ceased to amuse our guests by telling them ghost stories. Yes I suppose the people of Roswell deserved to get something out of it.
A Spanish sailor of the time of the Armada and a coachman kicked to death by a horse are a little bit different from Roswell though.
There were a lot of other things that went on in Area 51 like the German discs that were tested. One of my main concerns, and this is why I originally posted to sci.physics.relativity is the attacks, most of then ill informed made on the theory of Relativity. The fact of the matter is that the CIA were taken in by the Nazi myth. The fact that they were sold a pup is the real cover up.
- Ian Parker - Ian Parker
American - 27 Jul 2008 21:42 GMT > On 27 Jul, 17:13, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 82 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I have stated elsewhere w.r.t. some well researched literature, that by believing in what one cannot see, and by exceeding the speed of light one can travel into a parallel, 1:1 worldline universe, one must also "disappear" from this worldline.
This may explain the reason for an almost "psychic" quality of experiences with extraterrestrials. However, to submit to some quality of "psychic", there is the danger that some or all of the scientific explanation as such a side-effect of hypertranslation may be lost to things like emotion, hyperbole, and pure rhetoric.
This is why, IMO, one must stick to the science in regarding why FTL propulsion devices "must disappear".
These disappearing, transmigrating nucleons must also have the ability to "cross over" into the representative eigenvalues of anti-self-adjoint imaginary matrices - matrices representing imaginary, phase-conjugated, and scalar magnetic/electromagnetic DELTRONIC fields at the moment of "conception" of the person or persons DOING THE HYPERTRANSLATING.
More of the explanation for this phenomenon can be viewed at:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.policy/msg/904937db40e22f6c?hl=en
Apparently, the propulsive device for FTL vehicles also affects consciousness to the degree that it can erase memories over the long term, but these memories can IMO, also be reclaimed.
American
Uncle Al - 25 Jul 2008 17:27 GMT > Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again > all of a sudden. My posting is based on a sober scientific analysis of > known facts. No ad hominem arguments are given. Them's not hominems, them's space aliens.
> To discover the truth you have to look at one thing. ET, no not > extraterrestrial, Emergent Technology. ET (Extraterrestrial) is not > going to go around in Roswell type spacecraft. In fact if ET REALLY > DOES visit us it will be in the form of interlinked probes no larger > than insects. ET will also be able to find out all he wants to by > putting AI on the Web. [snip]
Sciolist. You cannot imagine alien technology. Their gods might be heavily into argyle. Japanese "natto" is proof of space alien cuisine, ditto Swedish "surströmming", "nam pla", "trasi", and "bagoong". No human would eat any of that.
> There is however one thing that is clear to me and it is this. If ET > wanted to make contact with us he would have done so long ago. If you were a speed reader you would have already finished reading this.
[snip]
 Signature Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Rob Arndt - 25 Jul 2008 17:38 GMT > Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again > all of a sudden. My posting is based on a sober scientific analysis of [quoted text clipped - 65 lines] > > � - Ian Parker Thanks, Ian... all the Nazi disc refs are mine (including the Wiki entry on JFM and the last URL mirror site of my old IFO Picture Library Vril Page)!!!
As for EBEs, I 'll let someone else debate them or interpret what they really are Biblically.
Rob
Rand Simberg - 25 Jul 2008 20:10 GMT On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:55:30 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away, Ian Parker <ianparker2@gmail.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again >all of a sudden. Since when? Just because loons like you do it doesn't make it "fasionable." In fact, just the opposite.
kT - 25 Jul 2008 20:42 GMT > On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:55:30 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away, > Ian Parker <ianparker2@gmail.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Since when? Since you fascist began getting fashion violations.
A long time ago already.
> Just because loons like you do it doesn't make it > "fasionable." In fact, just the opposite. Trust me, science is fashionable, fascism is not.
kronecker@yahoo.co.uk - 25 Jul 2008 21:39 GMT > Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again > all of a sudden. My posting is based on a sober scientific analysis of [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > > - Ian Parker Yes maybe but how to explain such things in the 1950s and 1960s and even earlier. What is more likely (or just as un-likely) is that we share this world with another race of people unknown to us. Maybe they are inter-dimensional in some way.
K.
kT - 25 Jul 2008 21:49 GMT >> Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again >> all of a sudden. My posting is based on a sober scientific analysis of [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] > What is more likely (or just as un-likely) is that we share this world > with another race of people unknown to us. Bigfoot.
> Maybe they are inter-dimensional in some way.' No, but ancestors of Bigfoot have evolved over millions of years, and are now the defacto space traveling overlord cousins of the monkeyboys.
So you got these guys that look like overgrown androgynous white guys (the so called elders) in white flowing robes, and big hairy smelly human like bigfoots running around in the wilderness. The elders surely must supply them with occasional transportation methinks, the dumb apes.
From my understanding is they clone and grow the little grey guys from fetuses (properly modified) and transplant the big double infrared brain eyes from another extraterrestrial species (from a red dwarf star maybe) and then use those guys as coequal labor and as reconnaissance forces.
So you guys are screwed. And they are most definitely pissed at you.
frank - 25 Jul 2008 23:43 GMT Nice comedy.
Area 51 or Groom Lake was set up to flight test the U-2 and the SR-71. NO UFOs, though they did have an F-117 and a lot of Russian equipment that we either stole, bought or 'found'. They were doing it at Edwards but that wasn't far enough away from people.
Circular UFOs don't fly well. If at all.
Operation Paperclip was to snag all the technology before the Russians got it, rockets, aircraft, engineering drawings. No UFOs.
kT - 26 Jul 2008 00:20 GMT > Nice comedy. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Circular UFOs don't fly well. If at all. If you were a cloned biobot working slave labor for a clan of hippies, you would probably crack up a few of them too, but they don't always have to abduct you physically, they can just hoodoo you with telepathy or fake out rubes with holography, that greatly simplifies operations.
The physical stuff involves high gee fluid stabilized accelerations for some extended periods of time, presumably to some large asteroid base.
And then there apparently are other more elaborate forms of transportation to 'higher places' for ceremonial purposes.
Remember, not only are the coevolutionary with humanity, with vastly superior technology of their own, they also have access to vastly more sophisticated forms of extraterrestrial and indeed possibly spiritual or other interdimensional technology.
> Operation Paperclip was to snag all the technology before the Russians > got it, rockets, aircraft, engineering drawings. No UFOs. Sure, uh-huh. No human UFOs, that's all you can say.
Rob Arndt - 26 Jul 2008 01:59 GMT > > Nice comedy. > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Sure, uh-huh. No human UFOs, that's all you can say. The Allies already captured German advanced small arms, rocket weapons, the V-1s and V-2s, super-subs, Tiger tanks, etc... they were NOT looking for those items. They were looking for a German atomic bomb, radiologicals, beam weaponry, disc aircraft, rail guns, nerve gases, and almost everything else the SS Technical Branch was working on including advanced medicine, metallurgy, pre-fabrication methods, chemical and bio research, synthetic fuels, and more.
Special intel teams were set up for the more exotic technologies and subsequently we have Allied classifications of German weapons for 75-100 years. You gotta ask yourself WHAT in 1945 could possibly be classified until 2045. When you consider magnetic wave weapons, aircraft that flew with no visable means of propulsion, beam weapons, force fields, and a superbomb meant for Manhatten in one form or another (via Amerika Bomber 1945, Prufstand XII, A-9/A-10 or cluster rocket, or by space)... then it makes sense.
BTW, the USAF denied German disc aircraft until 1995 then admitted them through FOIA documents obtained by Jim Wilson. In the last decade information has been released on postwar discs: Avro Canada, Boeing, Northrop, Lockheed, and NASA.
Surely prototypes and possible some operational disc craft as well as the black triangles have accounted for a percentage of sightings not just around Area 51 and Roswell, but all over the world.
The previous poster left out that the German secret aerial weapons went from Wright Field to New Mexico to Edwards then up to Area 51. DIscs from Wright were stored at MacDill AFB until two USAF journalists were accidently given access to a storage facility where they witnessed both German and US jet disc types in disrepair. Their piece was supposed to be on experimental a/c and they took photos and were shown reels of flight tapes. When the accident was caught all their film was confiscated and they were kicked out. That next issue of the USAF in-house magazine was skipped and the German discs were reportedly sent back to Wright Patterson for storage. Robert J. Lee of US Army Intel also wrote a book in which he claims that his men came upon one of the giant Andromeda-Gerat machines in 1945 that was over 300 ft long. It had all sensitive systems and propulsion removed. That is the world's first true starship with what was believed to be an ion plasma drive. Two were under construction. One was found and the other escaped. A similar flying cigar was seen over the US in the 1950s as well as the Kenneth Arnold flying wings and Roswell delta (both suspected of being Horten designs built in the US in strict secrecy).
You ask for documents and testimonies and I give you the BIOS/CIOS/ FIAT Reports, testimony of the 415th NFS and 20 & 21st BGs, patent numbers pre-war and German-applied dic patents postwar, as well as photographic proof of certain disc programs, and proof of US cover-ups regarding German technology... and people like you dismiss them. that's denial.
There are no alien reverse-engineered discs, just German ones :)
Why don't they supercede conventional combat a/c or spacecraft? Because the Germans could barely operate them and weaponry was a problem. So was transport due to stability problems and primitive celestial guidance units. powerplants were revolutionary but unpredictable.
The British MoD denied the HALO golden triangle FFX craft for years even though British Airlines almost ran into them on several occasions and reported the silent machine covered in gold about 30 ft span that could stop in mid-air and then speed off at tremendous Mach numbers in silence. Then, after years of inquiries the MoD announced HALO existed- that's it- they never provided any photos nor any details of the craft nor its capabilities.
Halo uses an intense electrical field to bend gravity waves and thus pull the craft through the air. Since it is traveling within that field it can violate many physical laws, switching direction instantaneously and reaching hypersonic speeds only to stop in mid-air in silence. Any manned machine would kill the pilot with 80G turns or instant stop from Mach 10. The craft seems unmanned at this point.
So please spare me the discs, cylindricals, and triangles cannot fly using both FFX and EMG propulsion- they got that from the Germans. It is WW2 technology that lies hidden from view. Area 51 has had plenty of German scientists there and it would not be surprising at all to learn that the technology took 30 years to perfect. getting it into space, maybe longer. Or do you subscribe to the simplistic belief that NASA is the ONLY US space program? If so, you are sadly mistaken. The military space programs go all the way back to WW2. Germany probably went into space during the war- the Draeger spacesuit was designed by 1942 and the Soviets used it for their early cosmonaut development. I am not talking about Ziller's Draeger pressure suit, but an articulated space suit.
Rob
kT - 26 Jul 2008 02:20 GMT > So please spare me the discs, cylindricals, and triangles cannot fly Sure they can. Anything can fly given the proper mass, momentum, impulse and control authority. Anywhere, anytime. It's just fundamental physics.
Ian Parker - 26 Jul 2008 11:28 GMT > > > Nice comedy. > [quoted text clipped - 93 lines] > existed- that's it- they never provided any photos nor any details of > the craft nor its capabilities. Why were no reputable scientists consulted? Why did the Nazis pick a red giant. All the planets that once supported life would have been roasted long ago. The name "aldebaran" means "the follower". A smattering of Arabic gives good puns. Oppenheimer was "mis khayyid" not a good follower.
There is a link to a more recent war. No Arabist was consulted over Iraq. If you know what "mis kyayyid means" you are
> Halo uses an intense electrical field to bend gravity waves and thus > pull the craft through the air. Since it is traveling within that > field it can violate many physical laws, switching direction > instantaneously and reaching hypersonic speeds only to stop in mid-air > in silence. Any manned machine would kill the pilot with 80G turns or > instant stop from Mach 10. The craft seems unmanned at this point. I believe in GTR. Space/time is curved, that is why things fall. To influence gravity you need black hole type forces, even if you could do it (which I doubt).
> So please spare me the discs, cylindricals, and triangles cannot fly > using both FFX and EMG propulsion- they got that from the Germans. It [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > am not talking about Ziller's Draeger pressure suit, but an > articulated space suit. A disc lifts up be extremely simple classical (first term of the Lorenz expansion) Physics. If air rotates there is an acceleration of v^2/r. This creates a partial vacuum and if air spins on an upper surface the aircraft lifts.
Does it work well? Is there anything in vortex aircraft? Yes and no. I believe it would be possible with modern technology to construct a vortex aircraft that would have advantages over existing aircraft. BUT I think that anyone starting out would be well advised to disregard the literature and start from scratch. A 3GB RAM 2GHz computer costs < $1,000. This can do quite a reasonable mesh for you. You would be well advised to do this, test controllability at speed, transition to conventional fixed wing BEFORE you start to bend metal.
A disc does not indeed fly well. However you don't in fact need a disc for vortex lift, any blended fusilage will do.
- Ian Parker
Gan - 26 Jul 2008 11:59 GMT @Ian parker You say ET don't exist. So you think earth is special? I thought it was just another mass speck in the universe not worthy enough to get nature's special attention showering it with the so-called intelligent lives..
Ian Parker - 26 Jul 2008 17:04 GMT > @Ian parker > You say ET don't exist. So you think earth is special? I thought it > was just another mass speck in the universe not worthy enough to get > nature's special attention showering it with the so-called intelligent > lives.. I don't say that. To say here is intelligent life elesewhere is perfectly reasonable, a priori at any rate. Part of what makes me so cross about paperclip, ODESSA and Area 51 is the fact that the CIA for the purpose of providing cover is deliberately falsifing the evidence.
The evidence against intelligent life, at any rate in our immediate neighbourhood is stacking up. The simple fact of the matter is that a real ET whatever his intentions would not behave in a Roswell sort of way. ET (if ET exists) does not want to make his presence felt. He MAY be watching over us, but Occam's razor leads us to reject this.
Certainly we can conclude that there is NO govt cover up. If ET were to be real and hiding the govt would have no more evidence than we have.
No there is a cover up, but the cover up is due to lies about Nazis going to Nurenberg rather than getting plum jobs. Everything else stems from this.
- Ian Parker
Gan - 27 Jul 2008 13:43 GMT @Ian Parker "This leaves us with but 2 possibilities.
1) ET does not exist.
2) ET is trying to hide. " You have missed the third possibility 3)We both are not able to contact each other. If you have the natural urge to find out a friend who resides somewhere out there, so will the other. Read Claude Hopper's post.
Ian Parker - 27 Jul 2008 14:04 GMT > @Ian Parker > "This [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > other. > Read Claude Hopper's post. I don't think so. See my postings on Space Solar Power
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.space.policy/browse_frm/thread/30623c801fcc a07a/c98ff7424df8eb82?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#c98ff7424df8eb82
I view ET as havving a radio telescope (effective siize) 1 AU on a phase locked principle. I also view ET as having fragmented optical telescopes thousands of kilometers across. ET could actually see us down here.
All this comes under the category of Emergent Technology. LISA with its spacecraft 5 million km apart is the start of that aspect of ET.
Extraterrestrials could therefore produce a signal strong enough for a simple dipole attenna.
- Ian Parker
tankfixer - 26 Jul 2008 05:19 GMT In article <7feb3738-10a4-46c5-a09a- aa0d2e1b24bc@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, dhssresearcher@netscape.net says...
> Nice comedy. > > Area 51 or Groom Lake was set up to flight test the U-2 and the SR-71. Groom Lake was in service as a test site long before either of those aircraft were dreamed of.
> NO UFOs, though they did have an F-117 and a lot of Russian equipment > that we either stole, bought or 'found'. They were doing it at Edwards [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Operation Paperclip was to snag all the technology before the Russians > got it, rockets, aircraft, engineering drawings. No UFOs.
 Signature War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.
The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made so and kept so by the exertions of much better men than himself.
John Stuart Mill (1806 - 1873) English economist and philosopher.
Ian Parker - 26 Jul 2008 11:15 GMT > Nice comedy. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Operation Paperclip was to snag all the technology before the Russians > got it, rockets, aircraft, engineering drawings. No UFOs. Paperclip was basically to get German scientist to the US. You are right there.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Paperclip
Before 1933 Germany was the leading scientific nation. In 1045 there was only one field liquid fuelled rocketry in which they held a lead. Jet aviation was level peggging the 262 and the Meteor were quite closely matched. In everything else they were years behind.
Lie 1 on which perhaps Roswell and everything else depends was that all criminals went to Nurenberg. They did not. The CIA supported the ODESSA pipeline.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Paperclip
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/reichblacksun/contents.htm
Chapter 16 is on Roswell.
One of the most serious aspects of this is the lack of respect the CIA gave trained intelligence. They did not consult a single scientist of repute.
http://www.rense.com/general13/djsk.htm
This aricle is from Janes.
- Ian Parker
jonathan - 26 Jul 2008 11:25 GMT >Postings on extraterrestrial seem to have become fashionable again >all of a sudden. It must be a conspiracy!
>There is however one thing that is clear to me and it is this. If ET >wanted to make contact with us he would have done so long ago. A >phased array in space at distances of 1,000 parsecs or more would >easily produce enough signal for even a simple dipole array. This >leaves us with but 2 possibilities.
>1) ET does not exist.
>2) ET is trying to hide. I'm not so sure, from what I've read about dark energy and matter, the universe became friendly to life everywhere around the same time.
3) Life evolves everywhere at a similar time and pace.
4) Faster than light is a pipe-dream
So the universe can be full of life, yet little if any contact is ever made.
A Quintessential Introduction to Dark Energy Paul J. Steinhardt Department of Physics, Princeton University,
"We live at a special time in the history of the universe. The Copernican revolution taught us that there is nothing special about our location in the universe. If space is uniform, then should not the same be true for time? Hubble's discovery that the universe is expanding taught us that the universe is evolving, but the notion had been that the evolution has been steady over the last 15 billion years with no remarkable changes. We now know that time is anti-Copernican. We live at a special moment in cosmic history, the transition between a decelerating, matter-dominated universe and an accelerating, dark energy dominated universe.
"The future (and perhaps the past) is determined by dark energy. Clearly, the immediate future of the universe will be governed by dark energy which, depending on its nature, will determine the rate of dilution and cooling of the matter and energy. But, perhaps dark energy plays a more profound role in the history of the universe We have a dynamical explanation for why the dark energy did not overtake the universe for the first 10,000 years. But, then, something truly remarkable happens to k-essence models when the universe becomes matter dominated. The radiation-like attractor solution becomes unstable, and the energy density in the k-essence field begins to drop several orders of magnitude until a new matter-dominated attractor solution is found.
"In this scenario, the coincidence problem is beautifully addressed. Why did the universe begin to accelerate just as humans evolve? Cosmic acceleration and human evolution are both linked to the onset of matter-domination." http://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/steinhardt.pdf
>What is the source of all the rumours? Belief in God and belief in ET's are closely linked I believe. Many people cannot fathom that the earth holds all it needs to produce the wonders and complexity of life. So the assumption becomes life must've had some 'outside' help. Whether that comes from a God, or ET, is rather irrelevant. In either case some mysterious intelligence yet to be discovered must be responsible for creation for people that have yet to understand how simple components can generate complex wholes.
But the discovery of life on Mars would change that view. And show that Earth and Mars have all they need to create life without anything 'jump-starting' it from above, or afar.
s
Claude Hopper - 26 Jul 2008 16:24 GMT What you don't get is that the universe is so vast that the likelihood of running into other life is remote. When you think about it the earth has very little life, maybe 1% in a thin layer of crust, the majority of earth's mass is lifeless. Even an advanced space faring race in the universe would be like an intelligent molecule in all the oceans of the earth looking for another intelligent molecule and there only being 100 intelligent molecules in all the earth. Don't worry, if an alien visits here YOU WILL KNOW ABOUT IT.
 Signature Claude Hopper ? 3 :) 7/8
|
|
|