Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Alien UFOs - The absolute impossibility

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ian Parker - 25 Jul 2008 15:55 GMT
Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again
all of a sudden. My posting is based on a sober scientific analysis of
known facts. No ad hominem arguments are given.

To discover the truth you have to look at one thing. ET, no not
extraterrestrial, Emergent Technology. ET (Extraterrestrial) is not
going to go around in Roswell type spacecraft. In fact if ET REALLY
DOES visit us it will be in the form of interlinked probes no larger
than insects. ET will also be able to find out all he wants to by
putting AI on the Web.
 
 The presence of Intelligent like elsewhere in the Universe is
something that has been speculated about. You are quite right to be
annoyed at all the hoaxers that are around. They do not indeed help us
to answer this question.
 
 There is however one thing that is clear to me and it is this. If ET
wanted to make contact with us he would have done so long ago. A
phased array in space at distances of 1,000 parsecs or more would
easily produce enough signal for even a simple dipole array. This
leaves us with but 2 possibilities.
 
 
 1) ET does not exist.
 
 2) ET is trying to hide.
 
 Personally I tend to "1". However if we assume "2" and suppose that
ET is lurking somewhere in the Kuiper belt, he is hardly likely to
produce Roswell type sightings.
 
 The resolution of the Fermi paradox and intelligent life will come
though better observational techniques DIRECTED AT THE HOME PLANET.
One thing though has been established by observation. There are NO
Dyson civilizations. All IR stars are super giants, not Dysons.
 
 What is the source of all the rumours?

There were indeed VTOL flying disc aircraft produced by the Nazis at
the end of WW2. A compendium is given in the reference

http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/
One you get beyond the glam pusses and Nazi propaganda there are some
very interesting articles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piecraft/Jenseitsflugmaschine From
Wikipaedia

http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/The%20Vril%20Discs.htm Aldebaron
(khayyid?)

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ufo_aleman/esp_ufoaleman_6.htm
2000+km/h endurance 5½ hr was absolutely absurd.

Immediately after WW2 the CIA started "Operation Paperclip" where Nazi
scientists were recruited to work in Area 51 and other places. There
were a number of "flying saucers" - Nothing mind that worked terribly
well but these craft were tested.

Little Green Men were used as a cover story.

http://www.slate.com/id/2072733/
http://www.padrak.com/agn/
http://www.janes.com/aerospace/civil/news/jdw/jdw020729_1_n.shtml

Antigravity research is STILL going on. What they are doing after all
these years of failure I really don't know. The individuals concerned
are obviously anxious that their "research" is never exposed to the
light of day.

 - Ian Parker
kT - 25 Jul 2008 16:32 GMT
> Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again

Who you gonna believe, a guy who denies everything and admits nothing,
or a guy who admits everything, and denies nothing.

> light of day.
dumpster4@hotmail.com - 25 Jul 2008 17:09 GMT
Alien contact covered up, says Apollo veteran Edgar Mitchell

See:

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,,24069817-5001021,00.html

More grist for the UFO-conspiracy -theory mill.
Ian Parker - 25 Jul 2008 17:44 GMT
> > Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again
>
> Who you gonna believe, a guy who denies everything and admits nothing,
> or a guy who admits everything, and denies nothing.

I am not asking you to believe in ad homiem arguments from any home.
What I am asking you to to is to think the thing through in a logical
way. Do gendanken experiments and try to work out how real aliens
would behave.

Mitchell claims aliens have visited Earth. He saw nothing on his trip
to the Moon. He is no more qualified to say this really than anyone
else.

I have said many times that there is a cover up, but what is being
covered up is not aliens. It is fraud, poor experiments and
misinterperation of results. Operation "paperclip" produced Roswell
and the need for cover up. In point of fact Ed Mitchell is PART off
the cover up. He is an astronaut and people think (erroneously) that
he has cred. In fact he is speaking FOR the Establishment.

 - Ian Parker
Rob Arndt - 25 Jul 2008 18:18 GMT
> > > Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> � - Ian Parker

Roswell is filled with so many mistakes, it is laughable:

- the craft was not even a flying saucer design, but a delta shape
with upturned wingtips
- it had a cockpit and crew compartment (3 men in a row) that was
struck by lightning in a storm and burned the crew alive in the oxygen
rich environment
- the nose section (aircraft) broke off during the crash and seperated
- if it was a weather balloon, how come the US Army sealed the entire
area and brought in a massive transport to remove a huge section of
what had to be the fuselage?
- if it was a weather balloon, then why was a huge component put on a
B-29 under heavy guard and flown out to a secure military
installation?
- all the statements about aliens and flying saucers come from second
and third hand sources rather than the initial newspaper report of
what was interpreted as an alien craft (if the farmer had seen a
Horten Parabola mod, or Ho-X delta it would have seemed alien in
1947).
- the real description of the delta is exactluy like the Ho-X final
design even with the anti-radar grooves cut into the lower fuselage
- the material that was light and would not burn could have been
Luftschwamm (Aerosponge) that could resist 1000 degrees F- a porous
material to eliminate the need for jet intakes on future Luftwaffe a/c
and discs
- the strange writing may be nothing more than Japanese if the crew
was mixed due to the craft's FUGO-type atmospheric balloon designed to
be launched at sea to carry it to heights above the USSR for spying

I firmly believe that fact is the only part of the story that is
right- the balloon was carrier for the spycraft delta that was
designed to loiter over the USSR at high altitude and then ditch the
balloon and glide back to the Pacific ocean where it would be picked
up by a US carrier group and the photos processed on the ship.

Unconventional, but definately not alien.

It was supposed to have a small rocket motor to boost-glide and that
mixed with the oxygen in the crew compartment probably burned all
night and reduced the human remains to charred 4 foot corpses.

No grays.

Rob

p.s. This story died in 1947 but the hype began in the 70s when an
author published the so-called alien connection.
kT - 25 Jul 2008 18:34 GMT
>>>> Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again
>>> Who you gonna believe, a guy who denies everything and admits nothing,
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
> p.s. This story died in 1947 but the hype began in the 70s when an
> author published the so-called alien connection.

He did quite well with that book and story, as I recall.

All kinds of weird sh.t happens out there, they haven't even found
what's his name, that balloon guy. Small planes would crash all the time
and burn to a crisp, with small children as passengers as well.

That was the beginning era of private cross country, if you will recall.
Benj - 27 Jul 2008 15:00 GMT
> I firmly believe that fact is the only part of the story that is
> right- the balloon was carrier for the spycraft delta that was
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Rob

Hey truly great cover story, Rob. You guys are starting to get GOOD
after all these years!
I really like this one!  Best disinformation I've seen about Roswell
in ages!  I guess you've got to get better as the public gets better
informed and won't buy the old "plausible" stories anymore.
hhc314@yahoo.com - 27 Jul 2008 17:13 GMT
> > I firmly believe that fact is the only part of the story that is
> > right- the balloon was carrier for the spycraft delta that was
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> in ages!  I guess you've got to get better as the public gets better
> informed and won't buy the old "plausible" stories anymore.

Benj, like your posts.  You are one of the few posters here that seems
to have his head screwed on in the right direction.

Rob, on the other hand writes fantastic strories, still doesn't seem
to realize that science requires substance in order to do research.
Consequently no scientist wastes his time researching fantastic tales,
and interesting as they may seem. So you can safely disconnect science
from UFOs, ETs, Ghosts, and other Psychic stuff. Not that the stories
are not interesting.

Now Roswell is an interesting situation.  When you combine the fact
that the residents of the Roswell Area in those years were relatively
unsophiticated with the fact that White Sand Missile Range (WSMR) is
directly downsteam of prevailing wind directions, it is not suprising
that the residents of Roswell found remains that they were incapable
of explaining. Add the security of the ongoing experiments at WSMR,
the combined results are nearly the materials of humor.

Today, it is no secret that the Mogul balloons were not precisely
created to do weather research.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Mogul

To add to the story, the project following Mogul did, among other
things, inestigate the effect of high altitude flight on living
creatures (although the government has yet to admit to this). I
believe that was during the course of a project named "Skyhook".  This
involved the use of human corpses and apes, and was designed to
research the effects of high altitude exposure of human or human-like
tissue (including radiation exposure).  Thus, the need for small
caskets for remains found in the Roswell surroundings.  I believe that
most of these stories are true, but that the remains found were
definitely not those of an ET.

The bottom line is that there is no great mystery, nor any ETs.  This
is simply how scientific research works, when government security
measures are present. As far as goverment security is concerned, I
believe that they intentially helped to encourage the ET myth, but I
don't know that as a fact this was done intentionally.

The bottom line is that many people in the Roswell area profited as a
result of these events, even today, and that's probably a good thing.

Harry C.
Ian Parker - 27 Jul 2008 21:12 GMT
On 27 Jul, 17:13, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > I firmly believe that fact is the only part of the story that is
> > > right- the balloon was carrier for the spycraft delta that was
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
> The bottom line is that many people in the Roswell area profited as a
> result of these events, even today, and that's probably a good thing.

Well just before I finally retired my wife and I ran a restraurant
near the Lizard in Cornwall. It was a 14th Cebtury building and we
never ceased to amuse our guests by telling them ghost stories. Yes I
suppose the people of Roswell deserved to get something out of it.

A Spanish sailor of the time of the Armada and a coachman kicked to
death by a horse are a little bit different from Roswell though.

There were a lot of other things that went on in Area 51 like the
German discs that were tested. One of my main concerns, and this is
why I originally posted to sci.physics.relativity is the attacks, most
of then ill informed made on the theory of Relativity. The fact of the
matter is that the CIA were taken in by the Nazi myth. The fact that
they were sold a pup is the real cover up.

 - Ian Parker
 - Ian Parker
American - 27 Jul 2008 21:42 GMT
> On 27 Jul, 17:13, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

I have stated elsewhere w.r.t. some well researched
literature, that by believing in what one cannot see,
and by exceeding the speed of light one can travel into
a parallel, 1:1 worldline universe, one must also
"disappear" from this worldline.

This may explain the reason for an almost "psychic"
quality of experiences with extraterrestrials. However,
to submit to some quality of "psychic", there is the
danger that some or all of the scientific explanation
as such a side-effect of hypertranslation may be lost
to things like emotion, hyperbole, and pure rhetoric.

This is why, IMO, one must stick to the science in
regarding why FTL propulsion devices "must disappear".

These disappearing, transmigrating nucleons must also
have the ability to "cross over" into the representative
eigenvalues of anti-self-adjoint imaginary matrices -
matrices representing imaginary, phase-conjugated, and
scalar magnetic/electromagnetic DELTRONIC fields
at the moment of "conception" of the person or persons
DOING THE HYPERTRANSLATING.

More of the explanation for this phenomenon can be
viewed at:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.policy/msg/904937db40e22f6c?hl=en

Apparently, the propulsive device for FTL vehicles also
affects consciousness to the degree that it can erase
memories over the long term, but these memories can
IMO, also be reclaimed.

American
Uncle Al - 25 Jul 2008 17:27 GMT
> Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again
> all of a sudden. My posting is based on a sober scientific analysis of
> known facts. No ad hominem arguments are given.

Them's not hominems, them's space aliens.

> To discover the truth you have to look at one thing. ET, no not
> extraterrestrial, Emergent Technology. ET (Extraterrestrial) is not
> going to go around in Roswell type spacecraft. In fact if ET REALLY
> DOES visit us it will be in the form of interlinked probes no larger
> than insects. ET will also be able to find out all he wants to by
> putting AI on the Web.
[snip]

Sciolist.  You cannot imagine alien technology.  Their gods might be
heavily into argyle.  Japanese "natto" is proof of space alien
cuisine, ditto Swedish "surströmming", "nam pla", "trasi", and
"bagoong".  No human would eat any of that.

>  There is however one thing that is clear to me and it is this. If ET
> wanted to make contact with us he would have done so long ago.

If you were a speed reader you would have already finished reading
this.

[snip]

Signature

Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Rob Arndt - 25 Jul 2008 17:38 GMT
> Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again
> all of a sudden. My posting is based on a sober scientific analysis of
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
>
> � - Ian Parker

Thanks, Ian... all the Nazi disc refs are mine (including the Wiki
entry on JFM and the last URL mirror site of my old IFO Picture
Library Vril Page)!!!

As for EBEs, I 'll let someone else debate them or interpret what they
really are Biblically.

Rob
Rand Simberg - 25 Jul 2008 20:10 GMT
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:55:30 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away,
Ian Parker <ianparker2@gmail.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow
in such a way as to indicate that:

>Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again
>all of a sudden.

Since when?  Just because loons like you do it doesn't make it
"fasionable."  In fact, just the opposite.
kT - 25 Jul 2008 20:42 GMT
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:55:30 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away,
> Ian Parker <ianparker2@gmail.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Since when?

Since you fascist began getting fashion violations.

A long time ago already.

> Just because loons like you do it doesn't make it
> "fasionable."  In fact, just the opposite.

Trust me, science is fashionable, fascism is not.
kronecker@yahoo.co.uk - 25 Jul 2008 21:39 GMT
> Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again
> all of a sudden. My posting is based on a sober scientific analysis of
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
>   - Ian Parker

Yes maybe but how to explain such things in the 1950s and 1960s and
even earlier.
What is more likely (or just as un-likely) is that we share this world
with another race of people unknown to us.
Maybe they are inter-dimensional in some way.

K.
kT - 25 Jul 2008 21:49 GMT
>> Postings on extraterrestrials seem to have become fashionable again
>> all of a sudden. My posting is based on a sober scientific analysis of
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
> What is more likely (or just as un-likely) is that we share this world
> with another race of people unknown to us.

Bigfoot.

> Maybe they are inter-dimensional in some way.'

No, but ancestors of Bigfoot have evolved over millions of years, and
are now the defacto space traveling overlord cousins of the monkeyboys.

So you got these guys that look like overgrown androgynous white guys
(the so called elders) in white flowing robes, and big hairy smelly
human like bigfoots running around in the wilderness. The elders surely
must supply them with occasional transportation methinks, the dumb apes.

From my understanding is they clone and grow the little grey guys from
fetuses (properly modified) and transplant the big double infrared brain
eyes from another extraterrestrial species (from a red dwarf star maybe)
and then use those guys as coequal labor and as reconnaissance forces.

So you guys are screwed. And they are most definitely pissed at you.
frank - 25 Jul 2008 23:43 GMT
Nice comedy.

Area 51 or Groom Lake was set up to flight test the U-2 and the SR-71.
NO UFOs, though they did have an F-117 and a lot of Russian equipment
that we either stole, bought or 'found'. They were doing it at Edwards
but that wasn't far enough away from people.

Circular UFOs don't fly well. If at all.

Operation Paperclip was to snag all the technology before the Russians
got it, rockets, aircraft, engineering drawings. No UFOs.
kT - 26 Jul 2008 00:20 GMT
> Nice comedy.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Circular UFOs don't fly well. If at all.

If you were a cloned biobot working slave labor for a clan of hippies,
you would probably crack up a few of them too, but they don't always
have to abduct you physically, they can just hoodoo you with telepathy
or fake out rubes with holography, that greatly simplifies operations.

The physical stuff involves high gee fluid stabilized accelerations for
some extended periods of time, presumably to some large asteroid base.

And then there apparently are other more elaborate forms of
transportation to 'higher places' for ceremonial purposes.

Remember, not only are the coevolutionary with humanity, with vastly
superior technology of their own, they also have access to vastly more
sophisticated forms of extraterrestrial and indeed possibly spiritual or
other interdimensional technology.

> Operation Paperclip was to snag all the technology before the Russians
> got it, rockets, aircraft, engineering drawings. No UFOs.

Sure, uh-huh. No human UFOs, that's all you can say.
Rob Arndt - 26 Jul 2008 01:59 GMT
> > Nice comedy.
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Sure, uh-huh. No human UFOs, that's all you can say.

The Allies already captured German advanced small arms, rocket
weapons, the V-1s and V-2s, super-subs, Tiger tanks, etc... they were
NOT looking for those items. They were looking for a German atomic
bomb, radiologicals, beam weaponry, disc aircraft, rail guns, nerve
gases, and almost everything else the SS Technical Branch was working
on including advanced medicine, metallurgy, pre-fabrication methods,
chemical and bio research, synthetic fuels, and more.

Special intel teams were set up for the more exotic technologies and
subsequently we have Allied classifications of German weapons for
75-100 years. You gotta ask yourself WHAT in 1945 could possibly be
classified until 2045. When you consider magnetic wave weapons,
aircraft that flew with no visable means of propulsion, beam weapons,
force fields,  and a superbomb meant for Manhatten in one form or
another (via Amerika Bomber 1945, Prufstand XII, A-9/A-10 or cluster
rocket, or by space)... then it makes sense.

BTW, the USAF denied German disc aircraft until 1995 then admitted
them through FOIA documents obtained by Jim Wilson. In the last decade
information has been released on postwar discs: Avro Canada, Boeing,
Northrop, Lockheed, and NASA.

Surely prototypes and possible some operational disc craft as well as
the black triangles have accounted for a percentage of sightings not
just around Area 51 and Roswell, but all over the world.

The previous poster left out that the German secret aerial weapons
went from Wright Field to New Mexico to Edwards then up to Area 51.
DIscs from Wright were stored at MacDill AFB until two USAF
journalists were accidently given access to a storage facility where
they witnessed both German and US jet disc types in disrepair. Their
piece was supposed to be on experimental a/c and they took photos and
were shown reels of flight tapes. When the accident was caught all
their film was confiscated and they were kicked out. That next issue
of the USAF in-house magazine was skipped and the German discs were
reportedly sent back to Wright Patterson for storage. Robert J. Lee of
US Army Intel also wrote a book in which he claims that his men came
upon one of the giant Andromeda-Gerat machines in 1945 that was over
300 ft long. It had all sensitive systems and propulsion removed. That
is the world's first true starship with what was believed to be an ion
plasma drive. Two were under construction. One was found and the other
escaped. A similar flying cigar  was seen over the US in the 1950s as
well as the Kenneth Arnold flying wings and Roswell delta (both
suspected of being Horten designs built in the US in strict secrecy).

You ask for documents and testimonies and I give you the BIOS/CIOS/
FIAT Reports, testimony of the 415th NFS and 20 & 21st BGs, patent
numbers pre-war and German-applied dic patents postwar, as well as
photographic proof of certain disc programs, and proof of US cover-ups
regarding German technology... and people like you dismiss them.
that's denial.

There are no alien reverse-engineered discs, just German ones :)

Why don't they supercede conventional combat a/c or spacecraft?
Because the Germans could barely operate them and weaponry was a
problem. So was transport due to stability problems and primitive
celestial guidance units. powerplants were revolutionary but
unpredictable.

The British MoD denied the HALO golden triangle FFX craft for years
even though British Airlines almost ran into them on several occasions
and reported the silent machine covered in gold about 30 ft span that
could stop in mid-air and then speed off at tremendous Mach numbers in
silence. Then, after years of inquiries the MoD announced HALO
existed- that's it- they never provided any photos nor any details of
the craft nor its capabilities.

Halo uses an intense electrical field to bend gravity waves and thus
pull the craft through the air. Since it is traveling within that
field it can violate many physical laws, switching direction
instantaneously and reaching hypersonic speeds only to stop in mid-air
in silence. Any manned machine would kill the pilot with 80G turns or
instant stop from Mach 10. The craft seems unmanned at this point.

So please spare me the discs, cylindricals, and triangles cannot fly
using both FFX and EMG propulsion- they got that from the Germans. It
is WW2 technology that lies hidden from view. Area 51 has had plenty
of German scientists there and it would not be surprising at all to
learn that the technology took 30 years to perfect. getting it into
space, maybe longer. Or do you subscribe to the simplistic belief that
NASA is the ONLY US space program? If so, you are sadly mistaken. The
military space programs go all the way back to WW2. Germany probably
went into space during the war- the Draeger spacesuit was designed by
1942 and the Soviets used it for their early cosmonaut development. I
am not talking about Ziller's Draeger  pressure suit, but an
articulated space suit.

Rob
kT - 26 Jul 2008 02:20 GMT
> So please spare me the discs, cylindricals, and triangles cannot fly

Sure they can. Anything can fly given the proper mass, momentum, impulse
and control authority. Anywhere, anytime. It's just fundamental physics.
Ian Parker - 26 Jul 2008 11:28 GMT
> > > Nice comedy.
>
[quoted text clipped - 93 lines]
> existed- that's it- they never provided any photos nor any details of
> the craft nor its capabilities.

Why were no reputable scientists consulted? Why did the Nazis pick a
red giant. All the planets that once supported life would have been
roasted long ago. The name "aldebaran" means "the follower". A
smattering of Arabic gives good puns. Oppenheimer was "mis khayyid"
not a good follower.

There is a link to a more recent war. No Arabist was consulted over
Iraq. If you know what "mis kyayyid means" you are

> Halo uses an intense electrical field to bend gravity waves and thus
> pull the craft through the air. Since it is traveling within that
> field it can violate many physical laws, switching direction
> instantaneously and reaching hypersonic speeds only to stop in mid-air
> in silence. Any manned machine would kill the pilot with 80G turns or
> instant stop from Mach 10. The craft seems unmanned at this point.

I believe in GTR. Space/time is curved, that is why things fall. To
influence gravity you need black hole type forces, even if you could
do it (which I doubt).

> So please spare me the discs, cylindricals, and triangles cannot fly
> using both FFX and EMG propulsion- they got that from the Germans. It
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> am not talking about Ziller's Draeger  pressure suit, but an
> articulated space suit.

A disc lifts up be extremely simple classical (first term of the
Lorenz expansion) Physics. If air rotates there is an acceleration of
v^2/r. This creates a partial vacuum and if air spins on an upper
surface the aircraft lifts.

Does it work well? Is there anything in vortex aircraft? Yes and no. I
believe it would be possible with modern technology to construct a
vortex aircraft that would have advantages over existing aircraft. BUT
I think that anyone starting out would be well advised to disregard
the literature and start from scratch. A 3GB RAM 2GHz computer costs <
$1,000. This can do quite a reasonable mesh for you. You would be well
advised to do this, test controllability at speed, transition to
conventional fixed wing BEFORE you start to bend metal.

A disc does not indeed fly well. However you don't in fact need a disc
for vortex lift, any blended fusilage will do.

 - Ian Parker
Gan - 26 Jul 2008 11:59 GMT
@Ian parker
You say ET don't exist. So you think earth is special? I thought it
was just another mass speck in the universe not worthy enough to get
nature's special attention showering it with the so-called intelligent
lives..
Ian Parker - 26 Jul 2008 17:04 GMT
> @Ian parker
> You say ET don't exist. So you think earth is special? I thought it
> was just another mass speck in the universe not worthy enough to get
> nature's special attention showering it with the so-called intelligent
> lives..

I don't say that. To say here is intelligent life elesewhere is
perfectly reasonable, a priori at any rate. Part of what makes me so
cross about paperclip, ODESSA and Area 51 is the fact that the CIA for
the purpose of providing cover is deliberately falsifing the evidence.

The evidence against intelligent life, at any rate in our immediate
neighbourhood is stacking up. The simple fact of the matter is that a
real ET whatever his intentions would not behave in a Roswell sort of
way. ET (if ET exists) does not want to make his presence felt. He MAY
be watching over us, but Occam's razor leads us to reject this.

Certainly we can conclude that there is NO govt cover up. If ET were
to be real and hiding the govt would have no more evidence than we
have.

No there is a cover up, but the cover up is due to lies about Nazis
going to Nurenberg rather than getting plum jobs. Everything else
stems from this.

 - Ian Parker
Gan - 27 Jul 2008 13:43 GMT
@Ian Parker
"This
leaves us with but 2 possibilities.

1) ET does not exist.

2) ET is trying to hide. "
You have missed the third possibility
3)We both are not able to contact each other. If you have the natural
urge to find out a friend who resides somewhere out there, so will the
other.
Read Claude Hopper's post.
Ian Parker - 27 Jul 2008 14:04 GMT
> @Ian Parker
>  "This
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> other.
> Read Claude Hopper's post.

I don't think so. See my postings on Space Solar Power

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.space.policy/browse_frm/thread/30623c801fcc
a07a/c98ff7424df8eb82?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#c98ff7424df8eb82


I view ET as havving a radio telescope (effective siize) 1 AU on a
phase locked principle. I also view ET as having fragmented optical
telescopes thousands of kilometers across. ET could actually see us
down here.

All this comes under the category of Emergent Technology. LISA with
its spacecraft 5 million km apart is the start of that aspect of ET.

Extraterrestrials could therefore produce a signal strong enough for a
simple dipole attenna.

 - Ian Parker
tankfixer - 26 Jul 2008 05:19 GMT
In article <7feb3738-10a4-46c5-a09a-
aa0d2e1b24bc@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, dhssresearcher@netscape.net
says...
> Nice comedy.
>
> Area 51 or Groom Lake was set up to flight test the U-2 and the SR-71.

Groom Lake was in service as a test site long before either of those
aircraft were dreamed of.

> NO UFOs, though they did have an F-117 and a lot of Russian equipment
> that we either stole, bought or 'found'. They were doing it at Edwards
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Operation Paperclip was to snag all the technology before the Russians
> got it, rockets, aircraft, engineering drawings. No UFOs.

Signature

War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things.  
The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic
feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.

The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight,
nothing which is more important than his own personal safety,
is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless
made so and kept so by the exertions of much better men than himself.

John Stuart Mill (1806 - 1873) English economist and philosopher.

Ian Parker - 26 Jul 2008 11:15 GMT
> Nice comedy.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Operation Paperclip was to snag all the technology before the Russians
> got it, rockets, aircraft, engineering drawings. No UFOs.

Paperclip was basically to get German scientist to the US. You are
right there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Paperclip

Before 1933 Germany was the leading scientific nation. In 1045 there
was only one field liquid fuelled rocketry in which they held a lead.
Jet aviation was level peggging the 262 and the Meteor were quite
closely matched. In everything else they were years behind.

Lie 1 on which perhaps Roswell and everything else depends was that
all criminals went to Nurenberg. They did not. The CIA supported the
ODESSA pipeline.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Paperclip

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/reichblacksun/contents.htm

Chapter 16 is on Roswell.

One of the most serious aspects of this is the lack of respect the CIA
gave trained intelligence. They did not consult a single scientist of
repute.

http://www.rense.com/general13/djsk.htm

This aricle is from Janes.

 - Ian Parker
jonathan - 26 Jul 2008 11:25 GMT
>Postings on extraterrestrial seem to have become fashionable again
>all of a sudden.

It must be a conspiracy!

>There is however one thing that is clear to me and it is this. If ET
>wanted to make contact with us he would have done so long ago. A
>phased array in space at distances of 1,000 parsecs or more would
>easily produce enough signal for even a simple dipole array. This
>leaves us with but 2 possibilities.

>1) ET does not exist.

>2) ET is trying to hide.

I'm not so sure, from what I've read about dark energy and matter, the
universe became friendly to life everywhere around the same time.

3) Life evolves everywhere at a similar time and pace.

4) Faster than light is a pipe-dream

So the universe can be full of life, yet little if any contact
is ever made.

A Quintessential Introduction to Dark Energy
Paul J. Steinhardt
Department of Physics, Princeton University,

"We live at a special time in the history of the universe. The Copernican
revolution taught us that there is nothing special about our location in
the universe. If space is uniform, then should not the same be true for time?
Hubble's discovery that the universe is expanding taught us that the universe
is evolving, but the notion had been that the evolution has been steady
over the last 15 billion years with no remarkable  changes. We now
know that time is anti-Copernican. We live at a special moment in cosmic
history, the transition between a decelerating, matter-dominated universe
and an accelerating, dark energy dominated universe.

"The future (and perhaps the past) is determined by dark energy.
Clearly, the  immediate future of the universe will be governed by
dark energy which, depending on its nature, will determine the rate
of dilution and cooling of the matter and energy. But, perhaps dark
energy plays a more profound role in the history of the universe
We have a dynamical explanation for why the dark energy did not
overtake the universe for the first 10,000 years. But, then, something
truly remarkable happens to k-essence models when the universe becomes
matter dominated. The radiation-like attractor solution becomes unstable,
and the energy density in the k-essence field begins to drop several orders
of magnitude until a new matter-dominated attractor solution is found.

"In this scenario, the coincidence problem is beautifully addressed.
Why did the universe begin to accelerate just as humans evolve?
Cosmic acceleration and human evolution are both linked to the
onset of matter-domination."
http://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/steinhardt.pdf

>What is the source of all the rumours?

Belief in God and belief in ET's are closely linked I believe.
Many people cannot fathom that the earth holds all it needs
to produce the wonders and complexity of life. So the
assumption becomes life must've had some 'outside' help.
Whether that comes from a God, or ET, is rather irrelevant.
In either case some mysterious intelligence yet to be discovered
must be responsible for creation for people that have yet
to understand how simple components can generate
complex wholes.

But the discovery of life on Mars would change that view.
And show that Earth and Mars have all they need to create life
without anything 'jump-starting' it from above, or afar.

s
Claude Hopper - 26 Jul 2008 16:24 GMT
What you don't get is that the universe is so vast that the likelihood
of running into other life is remote. When you think about it the earth
has very little life, maybe 1% in a thin layer of crust, the majority of
earth's mass is lifeless. Even an advanced space faring race in the
universe would be like an intelligent molecule in all the oceans of the
earth looking for another intelligent molecule and there only being 100
intelligent molecules in all the earth. Don't worry, if an alien visits
here YOU WILL KNOW ABOUT IT.

Signature

Claude Hopper  ? 3     :)  7/8

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.