Space Forum / Astronomy / July 2008

Zero Origin Universe, update (2).
Update (1) can be found here
http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon/zerorign.html

   The building blocks of matter.

Evidence shows that electrons and positrons are point sized, they
have no physical dimension.

When an electron and positron fall into orbit around each other,
the charge dipole of their separation would remain very apparent
in the outside world until the entire energy of their separation
is removed. The dipole oscillation rate must increase to
instantaneous (relative to the existence rate) when the two
finally come together in the same point, at which time the charge
dipole length is zero. The only possible indicator that would
reveal their hiding place is the very minute distortion of space
caused by their presence.

Momentum increases as orbit radius decreases. The momentum gained
by the time they both come together in the same point should add
up to be the equivalent of their combined masses. The energy of
their separation had previously existed as potential energy and
has now been converted to E/M energy. Put the E/M energy back and
the pair are again separated, as is observed. All energy has been
accounted for in each action, so why should they also be
completely removed from existence and then resurrected again?

Consider a section of deep space that is uniformly filled with
these combined pairs. Not much is going to happen unless their
is some anisotropy in their uniform distribution. But once that
balance breaks down, the pairs would begin to collect into
groups. Because the size limit for the compression of any number
of pairs is zero, long before this limit is reached, there will
be some interaction outside the immediate association between
the components of each pair. As a group concentration further
increases, so too will the interaction energy.

As the components of the pairs are increasingly separated in the
condensing environment, and interaction energy is expelled as E/M
radiation, the interaction distance again shortens. The radius
of the group would then shrink until it either, reduces to zero
size, or the remaining energy is restrained to permanently
recycling within the group.

The positive and negative components that are the basis of all
that exists are drawing into the realms of each other in a quest
to annul their differences, while remaining the origin of their
own dimensions. Where they had each existed in the _stationary_
past is expanding spherically away (inward or outward depending
on which dimension) at the speed of their progress into the
opposing dimensions (the speed of light).

From the viewpoint in the positive dimension, what appears to be
the moving past from one point is expanding outward through every
other point origin of dimension surrounding it and is thus held
back as it moves through those points. An origin of dimension is
set exactly where each e- or e+ component resides.

http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon/drag.gif

As the group quantity increases, a stage will be reached where
all radial directions are turned to point laterally around the
perimeter of the group. A light wave moving outward within the
body of the group, through the outer limits of the group, would
be moving outward at the same rate as the past is drawn inward,
and would consequently be stationary relative to the body, while
still expanding at light speed in all lateral directions. The
outside universe would completely disappear. The forces acting
between the contained components would form a very solid and very
difficult to compress shell.

The proton would be formed when a _specific_ number of components
have assembled together to finally enclose dimension, and this
number should remain constant for any stage of evolution.
Everything would always be exactly proportional to the rate of
existence.

According to the theory, electrons and positrons are the basis
of all that exists. There is nothing else. Evidence supporting
this is the fact that the positive charge of a proton is exactly
equal and opposite to that of an electron, _NEVER_ a fraction of
it. The only logical reason for this is that the exact e+ charge
excess is generated by the only thing that is capable of
generating such a charge, and that is a positron. Very simply,
the number of positrons within the proton is 1 more than the
number of electrons.

If a proton happens to carry a negative charge, the charge on
that proton will be exactly the same as an electron charge.

When the positron excess is ejected from within a proton, the
interaction distances between the remaining charges can shrink
to point size because the instability generated by the positive
charge excess which was endlessly cycling throughout the group
has been removed. Every charged particle now has a counterpart
with which it can interact in the same point. But the interaction
energy remains trapped within the enclosed boundary and will
continue to cycle throughout the group, maintaining some
separation between the components of each pair. The neutron
radius may not be zero, but it will be vastly less than that of
a proton.

-----------

The event horizon of a proton or neutron black hole is
necessarily generated on the outermost edge of what is to be the
enclosed matter. Beyond the matter, there is nothing to further
influence dimension. E/M radiation alone cannot bend space-time
because it's nothing more than a recorded message of past events
left in the stationary past that can be played back only when
matter in the present moves through the recording, or parts
thereof.

If all of the matter components inside a proton are distributed
throughout the narrow shell width only, the gravity force between
two protons will very rapidly increase approaching shell to shell
contact. Strong nuclear forces could then be gravitational forces
which increase disproportionately to the proton radius.

Which of course has nothing to do with the strong nuclear force
at all. But the contained matter within a proton-neutron, or any
black hole, would most likely reside close to the event horizon.
Anything in motion near the center follows a reasonably straight
trajectory which is pointing toward the horizon, where it's
turned to point parallel with the horizon. All motion will
eventually be likewise oriented.

A light beam traveling at a tangent to a massive object follows
the curved path exactly, while an electron or anything that has
mass shifts toward the massive object by only half the amount,
if it could travel at light speed that is. An electron traveling
at .5c or .707c (I'm not sure which) would follow the same
geodesic as the light beam, but the shift rate is still halved.

Clearly, matter does not freely shift course to follow curved
geodesics. A force is required to shift it off what is a straight
line trajectory according to the frame of the universe, and that
should apply even in a black hole, or at least in its general
internal frame. The consequences of space-time distortion are no
different in a black hole. So the turning rate, and force,
increases approaching the event horizon and reduces on the way
in. The force advantage is geared very much toward turning every
trajectory to point parallel with the event horizon.

In a fusion environment the event horizons of a proton and
neutron could be forced together so that the contents of each
begin to interact via E/M radiation transfer across the horizons.
But that doesn't seem to be enough to account for the strong
nuclear force. The neutron could in fact be forced into the event
horizon of a proton while still remaining entirely within its own
enclosed dimension and be invisible to the proton contents. And
if a neutron could be forced into the event horizons of two
protons with each proton horizon entangled into the other around
the common neutron, the force required to pull that connection
apart would increase until the bond is broken.

That's more akin to the strong nuclear force.
And there seems to be no other valid explanation.

The web pages have now been set up in more standard format.
http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon

-----

Max Keon