Space Forum / Amateur Astronomy / June 2005

> The figures I gave are for the full-size (1024 x 1024) images:
> http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime/realtime-c2-1024.html
> http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime/realtime-c3-1024.html
> For the 512 x 512 images, it's even worse.
> Tony
>
> "tony hoffman" tonyhoffman@earthlink.net wrote in message
> news:oxwwe.820$aY6.514@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...-
> The resolution of the coronagraphs is too poor to show such an effect
> For
> C2, it's about 11 arc-seconds per pixel and for C3, it's close to an
> arc-minute per pixel.
> Tony
>
> "nytecam" nytecam.1rdvlm@spacebanter.com wrote in message
> news:nytecam.1rdvlm@spacebanter.com...-
>
> Do the SOHO LASCO C2  and LASCO C3 images show dispacement of
> surrounding stars due to solar gravity as predicted by Einstein?
>
> http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime/c3/512/
> http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime/c2/512/
>
> show sample images.
>
> Nytecam
>
> --
> nytecam-